Diagnostic Accuracy of Van Herick Technique to Detect Pre-Disease States of Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma in a Resource Constraint Region

References

• Jonas JB, Aung T, Bourne RR, Bron AM, Ritch R, Panda-Jonas S. Glaucoma. Lancet. 2017 Nov 11;390(10108):2183–2193. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31469-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vijaya L, George R, Arvind H, et al. Prevalence of primary angle-closure disease in an urban south Indian population and comparison with a rural population. The Chennai glaucoma study. Ophthalmology. 2008 Apr;115(4):655–660. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2007.05.034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garudadri C, Senthil S, Khanna RC, Sannapaneni K, Rao HB. Prevalence and risk factors for primary glaucomas in adult urban and rural populations in the Andhra Pradesh eye disease study. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:1352–1359. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.11.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis AW, Gyasi ME, Adjuik M, et al. Comparison of primary open angle glaucoma patients in rural and urban Ghana. Afr Health Sci. 2014 Sep;14(3):729–735. doi:10.4314/ahs.v14i3.32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. Data on annual percentage of population at mid-year residing in urban areas. United Nations web site. http://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/dataquery/. Published 2018. Accessed July 14, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Barkana Y, Dorairaj SK, Gerber Y, Liebmann JM, Ritch R. Agreement between gonioscopy and ultrasound biomicroscopy in detecting iridotrabecular apposition. Arch Ophthalmol. 2007 Oct;125(10):1331–1335. doi:10.1001/archopht.125.10.1331.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nolan WP, See JL, Chew PT, et al. Detection of primary angle closure using anterior segment optical coherence tomography in Asian eyes. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:33–39. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.05.073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekmezci M, Porco TC, Lin SC. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography as a screening tool for the assessment of the anterior segment angle. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2009;40:389–398.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Narayanaswamy A, Sakata LM, He MG, et al. Diagnostic performance of anterior chamber angle measurements for detecting eyes with narrow angles: an anterior segment OCT study. Arch Ophthalmol. 2010;128:1321–1327. doi:10.1001/archophthalmol.2010.231.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kurita N, Mayama C, Tomidokoro A, Aihara M, Araie M. Potential of the pentacam in screening for primary angle closure and primary angle closure suspect. J Glaucoma. 2009;18:506–512. doi:10.1097/IJG.0b013e318193c141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong S, Yi JH, Kang SY, Seong GJ, Kim CY. Detection of occludable angles with the Pentacam and the anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Yonsei Med J. 2009;50:525–528. doi:10.3349/ymj.2009.50.4.525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baskaran M, Oen FT, Chan YH, et al. Comparison of the scanning peripheral anterior chamber depth analyzer and the modified van Herick grading system in the assessment of angle closure. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:501–506. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.08.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Li SZ, Li L, Thomas R, Wang NL. The Handan eye study: comparison of screening methods for primary angle closure suspects in a rural Chinese population. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2014;21:268–275. doi:10.3109/09286586.2014.929707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith SD, Singh K, Lin SC. Evaluation of the anterior chamber angle in glaucoma: a report by the American academy of ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2013;120:1985–1997. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2013.05.034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Herick W, Shaffer RN, Schwartz A. Estimation of width of angle of anterior chamber. Incidence and significance of the narrow angle. Am J Ophthalmol. 1969;68:626–629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Congdon NG, Quigley HA, Hung PT, Wang TH, Ho TC. Screening techniques for angle-closure glaucoma in rural Taiwan. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1996;74:113–119.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vargas E, Drance SM. Anterior chamber depth in angle-closure glaucoma. Clinical methods of depth determination in people with and without the disease. Arch Ophthalmol. 1973;90:438–439.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thomas R, George T, Braganza A, Muliyil J. The flashlight test and van Herick’s test are poor predictors for occludable angles. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1996;24:251–256.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Foster PJ, Devereux JG, Alsbirk PH, et al. Detection of gonioscopically occludable angles and primary angle closure glaucoma by estimation of limbal chamber depth in Asians: modified grading scheme. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000;84:186–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirbelauer C, Karandish A, Häberle H, Pham DT. Noncontact goniometry with optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:179–185. doi:10.1001/archopht.123.2.179.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nolan WP, Aung T, Machin D, et al. Detection of narrow angles and established angle closure in Chinese residents of Singapore: potential screening tests. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141:896–901. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2005.12.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell P, Redmond T, Agarwal R, Marshall LR, Evans BJ. Repeatability and comparison of clinical techniques for anterior chamber angle assessment. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2015;35:170–178. doi:10.1111/opo.12200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dabasia PL, Edgar DF, Murdoch IE, Lawrenson JG. Noncontact screening methods for the detection of narrow anterior chamber angles. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56:3929–3935. doi:10.1167/iovs.15-16727.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen JF, Korevaar DA, Altman DG, et al. STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration. BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 14;6(11):e012799. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao GN, Rao GN, Khanna RC, Athota SM, Rajshekar V, Rani PK. Integrated model of primary and secondary eye care for underserved rural areas: the L V Prasad Eye Institute experience. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2012;60:396–400. doi:10.4103/0301-4738.100533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster PJ, Buhrmann R, Quigley HA, Johnson GJ. The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002 Feb;86(2):238–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flahault A, Cadilhac M, Thomas G. Sample size calculation should be performed for design accuracy in diagnostic test studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Aug;58(8):859–862. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.12.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988 Sep;44(3):837–845.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung CK, Cheung CY, Li H, et al. Dynamic analysis of dark-light changes of the anterior chamber angle with anterior segment OCT. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007 Sep;48(9):4116–4122. doi:10.1167/iovs.07-0010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He M, Lu Y, Liu X, Ye T, Foster PJ. Histologic changes of the iris in the development of angle closure in Chinese eyes. J Glaucoma. 2008 Aug;17(5):386–392. doi:10.1097/IJG.0b013e31815c5f69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chua J, Seet LF, Jiang Y, et al. Increased SPARC expression in primary angle closure glaucoma iris. Mol Vis. 2008;14:1886–1892.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okeh UM, Okoro CN. Evaluating measures of indicators of diagnostic test performance: fundamental meanings and formulars. J Biomet Biostat. 2012;3:132.
   Google Scholar
• Parikh R, Mathai A, Parikh S, Chandra Sekhar G, Thomas R. Understanding and using sensitivity, specificity and predictive values. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2008;56:45–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vision Care for All. The LVPEI pyramid of eye care. L. V. Prasad Eye Institute’s web site. http://www.lvpei.org/services/icare/eye-health-pyramid. Accessed August 18, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Chen N, Hsieh HP, Tsai RK, Sheu MM. Eye care services for the populations of remote districts in eastern Taiwan: a practical framework using a mobile vision van unit. Rural Remote Health. 2015 Oct–Dec;15:3442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nayana mobile diabetic retinopathy treatment project. World diabetes foundation web site. https://www.worlddiabetesfoundation.org/projects/india-wdf05-110. Accessed August 3, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson TV, Ramulu PY, Quigley HA, Singman EL. Low sensitivity of the van Herick technique for detecting gonioscopic angle closure independent of observer expertise. Am J Ophthalmol. 2018 Nov;195:63–71. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2018.07.026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar