Severity of Visual Field Loss at First Presentation to Glaucoma Clinics in England and Tanzania

References

• Flaxman SR, Bourne RRA, Resnikoff S, et al. Global causes of blindness and distance vision impairment 1990–2020: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2017;5(12):e1221–e1234. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30393-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tham Y-C, Li X, Wong TY, Quigley HA, Aung T, Cheng C-Y. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(11):2081–2090. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boodhna T, Crabb DP. Disease severity in newly diagnosed glaucoma patients with visual field loss: trends from more than a decade of data. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2015;35(2):225–230. doi:10.1111/opo.12187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crabb DP, Saunders LJ, Edwards LA. Cases of advanced visual field loss at referral to glaucoma clinics–more men than women? Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2017;37(1):82–87. doi:10.1111/opo.12328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser S, Bunce C, Wormald R, Brunner E. Deprivation and late presentation of glaucoma: case-control study. Bmj. 2001;322(7287):639–643. doi:10.1136/bmj.322.7287.639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buys YM, Gaspo R, Kwok K, Group CGRFS, others. Referral source, symptoms, and severity at diagnosis of ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma in various practices. Can J Ophthalmol Can d’Ophtalmologie. 2012;47(3):217–222. doi:10.1016/j.jcjo.2012.03.031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landers J, Goldberg I, Graham S. Does a family history of glaucoma affect disease severity at the time of diagnosis? J Glaucoma. 2003;12:31–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyari F, Entekume G, Rabiu M, et al. A population-based survey of the prevalence and types of glaucoma in Nigeria: results from the Nigeria national blindness and visual impairment survey. BMC Ophthalmol. 2015;15(1):176. doi:10.1186/s12886-015-0160-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jackson DJ, Razai MS, Falama R, et al. The clinical characteristics of patients with glaucoma presenting to Botswana healthcare facilities: an observational study. BMJ Open. 2014;4(12):e005965. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005965.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook C. Glaucoma in Africa: size of the problem and possible solutions. J Glaucoma. 2009;18(2):124–128. doi:10.1097/IJG.0b013e318189158c.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdull MM, Gilbert CC, Evans J. Primary open angle glaucoma in northern Nigeria: stage at presentation and acceptance of treatment. BMC Ophthalmol. 2015;15(1):111. doi:10.1186/s12886-015-0097-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders LJ, Russell RA, Crabb DP. Measurement precision in a series of visual fields acquired by the standard and fast versions of the Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm: analysis of large-scale data from clinics. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015;133(1):74–80. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.4237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills RP, Budenz DL, Lee PP, et al. Categorizing the stage of glaucoma from pre-diagnosis to end-stage disease. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141(1):24–30. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2005.07.044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brusini P, Filacorda S. Enhanced glaucoma staging system (GSS 2) for classifying functional damage in glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2006;15:40–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varma R, Lee PP, Goldberg I, Kotak S. An assessment of the health and economic burdens of glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2011;152(4):515–522. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2011.06.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traverso CE, Walt JG, Kelly SP, et al. Direct costs of glaucoma and severity of the disease: a multinational long term study of resource utilisation in Europe. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89(10):1245–1249. doi:10.1136/bjo.2005.067355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotchford AP, Johnson GJ. Glaucoma in Zulus: a population-based cross-sectional survey in a rural district in South Africa. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120(4):471–478. doi:10.1001/archopht.120.4.471.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Budenz DL, Barton K, Whiteside-de Vos J, et al. Prevalence of glaucoma in an urban West African population: the tema eye survey. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013;131(5):651–658. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.1686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buhrmann RR, Quigley HA, Barron Y, West SK, Oliva MS, Mmbaga BBO. Prevalence of glaucoma in a rural East African population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:40–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotchford AP, Kirwan JF, Muller MA, Johnson GJ, Roux P. Temba glaucoma study: a population-based cross-sectional survey in urban South Africa. Ophthalmology. 2003;110(2):376–382. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(02)01568-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wormald R, Foster A. Clinical and pathological features of chronic glaucoma in north-east Ghana. Eye. 1990;4(1):107–114. doi:10.1038/eye.1990.13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Verrey J-D, Foster A, Wormald R, Akuamoa C. Chronic glaucoma in northern Ghana - a retrospective study of 397 patients. Eye. 1990;4(1):115–120. doi:10.1038/eye.1990.14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ellong A, Mvogo CE, Bella-Hiag AL, Mouney EN, Ngosso A, Litumbe CN. Prevalence of glaucomas in a black Cameroonian population. Sante. 2006;16:83–88.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Omoti AE, Osahon AI, Waziri-Erameh MJM. Pattern of presentation of primary open-angle glaucoma in Benin City, Nigeria. Trop Doct. 2006;36(2):97–100. doi:10.1258/004947506776593323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mafwiri M, Bowman RJC, Wood M, Kabiru J. Primary open-angle glaucoma presentation at a tertiary unit in Africa: intraocular pressure levels and visual status. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2005;12(5):299–302. doi:10.1080/09286580500180572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyari F, Abdull MM, Bastawrous A, Gilbert CE, Faal H. Epidemiology of glaucoma in sub-saharan Africa: prevalence, incidence and risk factors. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2013;20(2):111–125. doi:10.4103/0974-9233.110605.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Motlagh BF, Pirbazari TJ. Risk factors for late presentation of chronic glaucoma in an Iranian population. Oman J Ophthalmol. 2016;9(2):97–100. doi:10.4103/0974-620X.184527.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yousaf O, Grunfeld EA, Hunter MS. A systematic review of the factors associated with delays in medical and psychological help-seeking among men. Health Psychol Rev. 2015;9(2):264–276. doi:10.1080/17437199.2013.840954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapetanakis VV, Chan MPY, Foster PJ, Cook DG, Owen CG, Rudnicka AR. Global variations and time trends in the prevalence of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Ophthalmol. 2016;100(1):86–93. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vajaranant TS, Nayak S, Wilensky JT, Joslin CE. Gender and glaucoma: what we know and what we need to know. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2010;21(2):91–99. doi:10.1097/ICU.0b013e3283360b7e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buor D. Determinants of utilisation of health services by women in rural and urban areas in Ghana. GeoJournal. 2004;61(1):89–102. doi:10.1007/s10708-005-1929-6.
   Google Scholar
• Heijl A, Bengtsson B. The effect of perimetric experience in patients with glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996;114(1):19–22. doi:10.1001/archopht.1996.01100130017003.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tattersall CL, Vernon SA, Menon GJ. Mean deviation fluctuation in eyes with stable Humphrey 24–2 visual fields. Eye. 2007;21(3):362–366. doi:10.1038/sj.eye.6702206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser S, Bunce C, Wormald R. Risk factors for late presentation in chronic glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40:2251–2257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prior M, Francis JJ, Azuara-blanco A, Anand N, Burr JM. Why do people present late with advanced glaucoma? A qualitative interview study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2013;97(12):1574–1578. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-303813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saw SM, Gazzard G, Friedman D, et al. Awareness of glaucoma, and health beliefs of patients suffering primary acute angle closure. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003;87(4):446–449. doi:10.1136/bjo.87.4.446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronsard A, Geneau R, Shirima S, Courtright P, Mwende J. Why are children brought late for cataract surgery? Qualitative findings from Tanzania. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2008;15(6):383–388. doi:10.1080/09286580802488624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickley RJ, Mkocha H, Munoz B, West S. Identifying patient perceived barriers to trichiasis surgery In Kongwa District, Tanzania. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017;11(1):e0005211. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0005211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimes CE, Bowman KG, Dodgion CM, Lavy CBD. Systematic review of barriers to surgical care in low-income and middle-income countries. World J Surg. 2011;35(5):941–950. doi:10.1007/s00268-011-1010-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davey CJ, Green C, Elliott DB. Assessment of referrals to the hospital eye service by optometrists and GPs in Bradford and Airedale. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2011;31(1):23–28. doi:10.1111/j.1475-1313.2010.00797.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowling B, Chen SDM, Salmon JF. Outcomes of referrals by community optometrists to a hospital glaucoma service. Br J Ophthalmol. 2005;89(9):1102–1104. doi:10.1136/bjo.2004.064378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewallen S, Courtright P. Blindness in Africa: present situation and future needs. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001;85(8):897–903. doi:10.1136/bjo.85.8.897.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flessa S. Where efficiency saves lives: A linear programme for the optimal allocation of health care resources in developing countries. Health Care Manag Sci. 2000;3:249–267.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wandwalo E, Robberstad B, Morkve O. Cost and cost-effectiveness of community based and health facility based directly observed treatment of tuberculosis in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2005;3(1):1–9. doi:10.1186/1478-7547-3-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shah R, Evans BJW, Edgar D. A survey of the availability of state-funded primary eye care in the UK for the very young and very old. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2007;27(5):473–481. doi:10.1111/j.1475-1313.2007.00506.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javitt JC. Preventing blindness in americans: the need for eyehealth education. Surv Ophthalmol. 1995;40:41–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander RL, Miller NA, Cotch MF, Janiszewski R. Factors that influence the receipt of eye care. Am J Health Behav. 2008;32(5):547–556. doi:10.5555/ajhb.2008.32.5.547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gasch AT, Wang P, Pasquale LR. Determinants of glaucoma awareness in a general eye clinic1. Ophthalmology. 2000;107(2):303–308. doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(99)00076-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attebo K, Mitchell P, Cumming R, BMath WS. Knowledge and beliefs about common eye diseases. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1997;25:283–287.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tenkir A, Solomon B, Deribew A. Glaucoma awareness among people attending ophthalmic outreach services in Southwestern Ethiopia. BMC Ophthalmol. 2010;10(17):1–6. doi:10.1186/1471-2415-10-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dandona R, Dandona L, John RK, McCarty CA, Rao GN. Awareness of eye diseases in an urban population in southern India. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79:96–102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adegbehingbe BO, Bisiriyu LA. Knowledge, attitudes, and self care practices associated with glaucoma among hispital workers in Ile-Ife, Osun State, Nigeria. Tanzan J Health Res. 2008;10(4):240–245.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shickle D, Griffin M. Why don’t older adults in England go to have their eyes examined? Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2014;34(1):38–45. doi:10.1111/opo.12100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biddyr S, Jones A. Preventing sight loss in older people. A qualitative study exploring barriers to the uptake of regular sight tests of older people living in socially deprived communities in South Wales. Public Health. 2015;129(2):110–116. doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2014.10.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shickle D, Griffin M, Evans R, et al. why don’t younger adults in England go to have their eyes examined? Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2014;34(1):30–37. doi:10.1111/opo.12099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burr JM, Mowatt G, Hernández R, et al. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening for open angle glaucoma: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2007;11(41):1–190. doi:10.3310/hta11410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuck MW, Crick RP. The cost-effectiveness of various modes of screening for primary open angle glaucoma. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 1997;4:3–17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vaahtoranta-Lehtonen H, Tuulonen A, Aronen P, et al. Cost effectiveness and cost utility of an organized screening programme for glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007;85(5):508–518. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0420.2007.00947.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hernández R, Rabindranath K, Fraser C, et al. Screening for open angle glaucoma: systematic review of cost-effectiveness studies. J Glaucoma. 2008;17(3):159–168. doi:10.1097/IJG.0b013e31814b9693.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tielsch JM, Katz J, Singh K, et al. A population-based evaluation of glaucoma screening: the Baltimore Eye Survey. Am J Epidemiol. 1991;134(10):1102–1110. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim S, Crose M, Eldridge WJ, Cox B, Brown WJ, Wax A. Design and implementation of a low-cost, portable OCT system. Biomed Opt Express. 2018;9(3):1232–1243. doi:10.1364/BOE.9.001232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu CD, Kraus MF, Potsaid B, et al. Handheld ultrahigh speed swept source optical coherence tomography instrument using a MEMS scanning mirror. Biomed Opt Express. 2014;5(1):293–311. doi:10.1364/BOE.5.000293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keane PA, Sadda SR. Retinal imaging in the twenty-first century: state of the art and future directions. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(12):2489–2500. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.07.054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuyen B, Mansouri K. Fundamentals and advances in tonometry. Asia-Pacific J Ophthalmol. 2015;4(2):66–75. doi:10.1097/APO.0000000000000118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Castillo A, Garcia-Sanchez J. Reproducibility and clinical evaluation of rebound tonometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46(12):4578–4580. doi:10.1167/iovs.05-0586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russo A, Mapham W, Turano R, et al. Comparison of smartphone ophthalmoscopy with slit-lamp biomicroscopy for grading vertical cup-to-disc ratio. J Glaucoma. 2016;25(9):e777–e781. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000000499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastawrous A, Giardini ME, Bolster NM, et al. Clinical validation of a smartphone-based adapter for optic disc imaging in Kenya. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016;134(2):151–158. doi:10.1001/jamaophthal.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz AM, Graham EC, You Y, Klistorner A, Graham SL. Performance of iPad based threshold perimetry in glaucoma and controls. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017;64(4):346–355. doi:10.1111/ceo.13082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong YXG, He M, Crowston JG, Vingrys AJ. A comparison of perimetric results from a tablet perimeter and Humphrey field analyzer in glaucoma patients. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2016;5(6):2. doi:10.1167/tvst.5.6.4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vingrys AJ, Healey JK, Liew S, et al. Validation of a tablet as a tangent perimeter. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2016;5(4):3. doi:10.1167/tvst.5.6.4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prea SM, Kong YXG, Mehta A, et al. Six-month longitudinal comparison of a portable tablet perimeter with the Humphrey field analyzer. Am J Ophthalmol. 2018;190:9–16. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2018.03.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson CA, Thapa S, Kong YXG, Robin AL. Performance of an iPad application to detect moderate and advanced visual field loss in Nepal. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;182:147–154. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2017.08.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastawrous A, Rono HK, Livingstone IAT, et al. Development and validation of a smartphone-based visual acuity test (peek acuity) for clinical practice and community-based fieldwork. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015;133(8):930–937. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.1468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aslam TM, Parry NRA, Murray IJ, et al. Development and testing of an automated computer tablet-based method for self-testing of high and low contrast near visual acuity in ophthalmic patients. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016;254(5):891–899. doi:10.1007/s00417-016-3293-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorr M, Lesmes LA, Lu Z-L, Bex PJ. Rapid and reliable assessment of the contrast sensitivity function on an iPad. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(12):7266–7273. doi:10.1167/iovs.13-11743.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winther C, Frisén L. Self-testing of vision in age-related macula degeneration: a longitudinal pilot study using a smartphone-based rarebit test. J Ophthalmol. 2015;2015:1–7. doi:10.1155/2015/285463.
   Google Scholar
• Jones PR, Smith ND, Bi W, Crabb DP. Portable perimetry using eye-tracking on a tablet computer – a feasibility assessment. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2019;8(1):17. doi:10.1167/tvst.8.1.17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar