Development and Reliability of an Appropriateness and Prioritization Instrument for Eye Care Practice: A Modified Delphi Process

References

• Klein BE, Klein R, Lee KE. Incidence of age-related cataract over a 10-year interval: the Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2002;109(11):2052–2057. doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(02)01249-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatch WV, Cernat G, Singer S, Bell CM. A 10-year population-based cohort analysis of cataract surgery rates in Ontario. Can J Ophthalmol. 2007;42(4):552–556. doi:10.3129/canjophthalmol.i07-090.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochtchina E, Mukesh BN, Wang JJ, McCarty CA, Taylor HR, Mitchell P. Projected prevalence of age‐related cataract and cataract surgery in Australia for the years 2001 and 2021: pooled data from two population‐based surveys. J Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2003 Jun 1;31(3):233–236. doi:10.1046/j.1442-9071.2003.00635.x.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Denmark. StatBank Denmark. http://www.statistikbanken.dk. Published in 2009. Accessed November 20, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Hodge W, Horsley T, Albiani D, et al. The consequences of waiting for cataract surgery: a systematic review. CMAJ. 2007;176(9):1285–1290. doi:10.1503/cmaj.060962.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conner-Spady B, Sanmartin C, Sanmugasunderam S, et al. A systematic literature review of the evidence on benchmarks for cataract surgery waiting time. Can J Ophthalmol. 2007;42(4):543–551. doi:10.3129/canjophthalmol.i07-094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canadian Institute for Health Information. Benchmarks for treatment and wait time in Canada. http://waittimes.cihi.ca/All/cataract. Accessed onAugust 30 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Choi YJ, Park EC. Analysis of rating appropriateness and patient outcomes in cataract surgery. Yonsei Med J. 2009;50(3):368–374. doi:10.3349/ymj.2009.50.3.368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romanchuk KG, Sanmugasunderam S, Hadorn DC. Developing cataract surgery priority criteria: results from the Western Canada Waiting List Project. Can J Ophthalmol. 2002;37:145–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• British Medical Association. Waiting List Prioritisation Scoring System: a Discussion Paper. British Medical Association, Health Policy and Economic Research Unit. 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Gutierrez SG, Quintana JM, Bilbao A, et al. Validation of priority criteria for cataract extraction. J Eval Clin Pract. 2009;15(4):675–684. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01083.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundström M, Stenevi U, Thorburn W. Assessment of waiting time and priority setting by means of a national register. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1996 Jan;12(1):136–140. doi:10.1017/s0266462300009454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundström M, Albrecht S, Håkansson I, et al. NIKE: a new clinical tool for establishing levels of indications for cataract surgery. Acta Ophthalmol. 2006 Aug 1;84(4):495–501. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0420.2006.00707.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadorn DC, Holmes AC. The New Zealand priority criteria project. Part 1: overview. BMJ. 1997;314:135–138. doi:10.1136/bmj.314.7074.135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quintana JM, Espallargues M, Las Hayas C, et al. Comparison of 3 systems for assigning priority to patients on waiting lists for cataract extraction. Can J Ophthalmol. 2010;45(2):125–131. doi:10.3129/i09-245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Las Hayas C, Gonzalez N, Aguirre U, et al. Can an appropriateness evaluation tool be used to prioritize patients on a waiting list for cataract extraction? Health Policy. 2010;95(2–3):194–203. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.11.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quintana JM, Escobar A, Arostegui I. Development of appropriateness explicit criteria for cataract extraction by phacoemulsification. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006;6:23. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-6-23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canadian Institute of Health Information. Wait Times for Priority Procedures in Canada, 2017. Accessed August 15, 2018. https://www.cihi.ca/sites/default/files/document/wait-times-report-2017_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez SG, Bilbao A, Beguiristain JM, et al. Variability in the prioritization of patients for cataract extraction. Int J Qual Health Care. 2010;22(2):107–114. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzq002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. Quality-Based Procedures Clinical Handbook for Cataract Day Surgery. Accessed August 15, 2018. http://www.health.gov.on.ca/en/pro/programs/ecfa/docs/qbp_cataract.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Health Quality Ontario. Wait Times for Surgeries and Procedures – Health Quality Ontario. Accessed August 15, 2018. http://www.hqontario.ca/System-Performance/Wait-Times-for-Surgeries-and-Procedures/Wait-Times-for-Eye-Surgeries-including-Cataract-Surgery/Time-from-Decision-to-Having-Eye-Surgery.
   Google Scholar
• Shaffer VA, Zikmund-Fisher BJ. All stories are not alike: a purpose-, content-, and valence-based taxonomy of patient narratives in decision aids. Med Decis Making. 2013 Jan;33(1):4–13. doi:10.1177/0272989X12463266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. 5th. USA:Oxford University Press;2015.
   Google Scholar
• Jette AM, Haley SM, Coster WJ, et al. Late life function and disability instrument: I. Development and evaluation of the disability component. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2002;57(4):M209–M16. doi:10.1093/gerona/57.4.m209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemingway H, Crook AM, Rex Dawson J, et al. Rating the appropriateness of coronary angiography, coronary angioplasty and coronary artery bypass grafting: the ACRE study. J Public Health Med. Dec 1, 1999;21(4):421–429.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Diamond IR, Grant RC, Feldman BM, et al. Defining consensus: a systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(4):401–409. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.12.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linstone HA, Turoff M. The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. Reading, MA:Addison-Wesley;1975.
   Google Scholar
• Boulkedid R, Abdoul H, Loustau M, Sibony O, Alberti C. Using and reporting the Delphi method for selecting healthcare quality indicators: a systematic review. PloS One. 2011 Jun 9;6(6):e20476. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0020476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider P, Evaniew N, Rendon JS, et al. Moving forward through consensus: protocol for a modified Delphi approach to determine the top research priorities in the field of orthopaedic oncology. BMJ Open. 2016 May 1;6(5):e011780. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canadian Medical Association. Driver’s Guide: Determining Medical Fitness to Operate Motor Vehicles 8th Edition. Joule Inc. 2012 Toronto, ON, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Adams M, Robert G, Maben J. Exploring the legacies of filmed patient narratives: the interpretation and appropriation of patient films by health care staff. Qual Health Res. 2015 Sep;25(9):1241–1250. doi:10.1177/1049732314566329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ash JS, Cottrell E, Saxton L, Newman L, Gebhardt E, Helfand M. Patient narratives representing patient voices to inform research: a pilot qualitative study. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;208:55.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hsu CC, Sandford BA. The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. PARE. Aug 2007;12(10):1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Akins RB, Tolson H, Cole BR. Stability of response characteristics of a Delphi panel: application of bootstrap data expansion. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005 Dec;5(1):37. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-5-27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar