235
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Topometric and Tomographic Evaluation of Subclinical Keratoconus

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & show all
Pages 289-297 | Received 12 Dec 2018, Accepted 06 Mar 2020, Published online: 16 Mar 2020

References

  • Gomes JA, Tan D, Rapuano CJ, et al. Global consensus on keratoconus and ectatic diseases. Cornea. 2015;34:359–369. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000000408.
  • Randelman JB, Russel B, Ward MA, et al. Risk factors and prognosis for corneal ectasia after LASIK. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:267–275. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(02)01727-X.
  • Raiskup F, Theuring A, Pillunat LE, Spoerl E. Corneal collagen crosslinking with riboflavin and ultraviolet-A light in progressive keratoconus: ten-year results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41:41–46. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.09.033.
  • Piňero DP, Alió JL, Alesón A, Escaf Vergara M, Miranda M. Corneal volume, pachymetry, and correlation of anterior and posterior corneal shape in subclinical and different stages of clinical keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;35:814–825. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.11.012.
  • Reinstein DZ, Gobbe M, Archer TJ, Silverman RH, Coleman DJ. Epithelial, stromal, and total corneal thickness in keratoconus: three-dimensional display with artemis very-high frequency digital ultrasound. J Refract Surg. 2010;26:259–271. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20100218-01.
  • Kanellopoulos AJ, Asimellis G. Revisiting keratoconus diagnosis and progression classification based on evaluation of corneal asymmetry indices, derived from Scheimpflug imaging in keratoconic and suspect cases. Clin Ophthalmol. 2013;7:1539–1548. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S44741.
  • Ambrósio R Jr, Caiado AL, Guerra FP, et al. Novel pachymetric parameters based on corneal tomography for diagnosing keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 2011;27:753–758. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20110721-01.
  • Belin MW, Villavicencio OF, Ambrósio R. Tomographic parameters for the detection of keratoconus: suggestions for screening and treatment parameters. Eye Contact Lens. 2014;40:326–330. doi:10.1097/ICL.0000000000000077.
  • Jafarinasab MR, Feizi S, Karimian F, Hasanpour H. Evaluation of corneal elevation in eyes with subclinical keratoconus and keratoconus using Galilei double Scheimpflug analyzer. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2013;23:377–384. doi:10.5301/ejo.5000226.
  • Ruiseñor Vázequez PR, Galetti JD, Minguez N, et al. Pentacam Scheimpflug tomography findings in topographically normal patients and subclinical keratoconus cases. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;158:32–40. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2014.03.018.
  • Muftuoglu O, Ayar O, Hurmeric V, Orucoglu F, Kılıc I. Comparison of multimetric D index with keratometric, pachymetric, and posterior elevation parameters in diagnosing subclinical keratoconus in fellow eyes of asymmetric keratoconus patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41:557–565. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.05.052.
  • Huseynli S, Salgado-Borges J, Alio JL. Comparative evaluation of Scheimpflug tomography parameters between thin non-keratoconic, subclinical keratoconic, and mild keratoconic corneas. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2018;28:521–534. doi:10.1177/1120672118760146.
  • Eng J. Sample size estimation: how many individuals should be studied? Radiology. 2003;227:309–313. doi:10.1148/radiol.2272012051.
  • Vellara HR, Patel DV. Biomechanical properties of the keratoconic cornea: a review. Clin Exp Optom. 2015;98:31–38. doi:10.1111/cxo.12211.
  • Bae GH, Kim JR, Kim CH, Lim DH, Chung ES, Chung TY. Corneal topographic and tomographic analysis of fellow eyes in unilateral keratoconus patients using Pentacam. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;157:103–109. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2013.08.014.
  • Hashemi H, Beiranvand A, Yekta A, Maleki A, Yazdani N, Khabazkhoob M. Pentacam top indices for diagnosing subclinical and definite keratoconus. J Curr Ophthalmol. 2016;28:21–26. doi:10.1016/j.joco.2016.01.009.
  • Shajari M, Jaffary I, Herrmann K, et al. Early tomographic changes in the eyes of patients with keratoconus. J Refract Surg. 2108;34:254–259. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20180124-01.
  • Muftuoglu O, Ayar O, Ozulken K, Ozyol E, Akıncı A. Posterior corneal elevation and back difference corneal elevation in diagnosing forme fruste keratoconus in the fellow eyes of unilateral keratoconus patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013;39:1348–1357. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.03.023.
  • de Sanctis U, Loiacono C, Richiardi L, Turco D, Mutani B, Grignolo FM. Sensitivity and specificity of posterior corneal elevation measured by Pentacam in discriminating keratoconus/subclinical keratoconus. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:1534–1539. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2008.02.020.
  • Uçakhan ÖÖ, Cetinkor V, Özkan M, Kanpolat A. Evaluation of Scheimpflug imaging parameters in subclinical keratoconus, keratoconus, and normal eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37:1116–1124. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.12.049.
  • de Sanctis U, Aragno V, Dalmasso P, Brusasco L, Grignolo F. Diagnosis of subclinical keratoconus using posterior elevation measured with 2 different methods. Cornea. 2013;32:911–915. doi:10.1097/ICO.0b013e3182854774.
  • Kamiya K, Ishii R, Shimizu K, Igarashi A. Evaluation of corneal elevation, pachymetry and keratometry in keratoconic eyes with respect to the stage of Amsler-Krumeich classification. Br J Ophthalmol. 2014;98:459–463. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304132.
  • Villavicencio OF, Gilani F, Henriquez MA, et al. Independent population validation of the Belin/Ambrósio Enhanced Ectasia display: implications for keratoconus studies and screening. Int J Keratoconus Ectatic Corneal Dis. 2014;3:1–8. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10025-1069.
  • Awad EA, Abou Samra WA, El-Kannishy AM. Objective and subjective diagnostic parameters in the fellow eye of unilateral keratoconus. BMC Ophthalmol. 2017;17:186. doi:10.1186/s12886-017-0584-2.
  • Binder PS, Trattler WB. Evaluation of a risk factor scoring system for corneal ectasia after LASIK in eyes with normal topography. J Refract Surg. 2010;26:241–250. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20100212-02.
  • Koc M, Tekin K, Tekin MI, et al. An early finding of keratoconus: increase in corneal densitometry. Cornea. 2018;37(5):580–586. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000001537.
  • Ambrósio R Jr, Lopes BT, Faria-Correia F, et al. Integration of Scheimpflug-based corneal tomography and biomechanical assessments for enhancing ectasia detection. J Refract Surg. 2017;33(7):434–443. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20170426-02.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.