133
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

COMPARISON OF SMARTPHONE-BASED AND AUTOMATED REFRACTION WITH SUBJECTIVE REFRACTION FOR SCREENING OF REFRACTIVE ERRORS

&
Pages 588-594 | Received 04 Jan 2021, Accepted 22 Sep 2021, Published online: 08 Oct 2021

References

  • Ellwein LB. Case finding for refractive errors: assessment of refractive error and visual impairment in children. Community Eye Health. 2002;15:37–38.
  • Resnikoff S, Pascolini D, Mariotti SP, Pokharel GP. Global magnitude of visual impairment caused by uncorrected refractive errors in 2004. Bull World Health Organ. 2008;86:63–70. doi:10.2471/BLT.07.041210.
  • Varma R, Vajaranant TS, Burkemper B, et al. Visual impairment and blindness in adults in the United States: demographic and geographic variations from 2015 to 2050. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016;134:802–809. doi:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.1284.
  • Morgan IG, Iribarren R, Fotouhi A, Grzybowski A. Cycloplegic refraction is the gold standard for epidemiological studies. Acta Ophthalmol. 2015;93:581–585. doi:10.1111/aos.12642.
  • Bullimore MA, Fusaro RE, Adams CW. The repeatability of automated and clinician refraction. Optom Vis Sci. 1998;75:617–622. doi:10.1097/00006324-199808000-00028.
  • Pesudovs K, Weisinger HS. A comparison of autorefractor performance. Optom Vis Sci. 2004;81:554–558. doi:10.1097/00006324-200407000-00018.
  • Choong YF, Chen AH, Goh PP. A comparison of autorefraction and subjective refraction with and without cycloplegia in primary school children. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;142:68–74. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2006.01.084.
  • Sun YY, Wei SF, Li SM, et al. Cycloplegic refraction by 1% cyclopentolate in young adults: is it the gold standard? The Anyang University Students Eye Study (Auses). Br J Ophthalmol. 2018;103:654–658. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2018-312199.
  • Sankaridurg P, He X, Naduvilath T, et al. Comparison of noncycloplegic and cycloplegic autorefraction in categorizing refractive error data in children. Acta Ophthalmol. 2017;95:e633–e40. doi:10.1111/aos.13569.
  • Eyenetra. Self-test refraction tool powered by a smartphone. https://eyenetra.com/product-netra.html. Accessed March 29, 2018.
  • Miller JM. Clinical applications of power vectors. Optom Vis Sci. 2009;86:599–602. doi:10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181a6a211.
  • Thibos LN, Wheeler W, Horner D. Power vectors: an application of Fourier analysis to the description and statistical analysis of refractive error. Optom Vis Sci. 1997;74:367–375. doi:10.1097/00006324-199706000-00019.
  • Jeganathan VSE, Valikodath N, Niziol LM, et al. Accuracy of a smartphone-based autorefractor compared with criterion-standard refraction. Optom Vis Sci. 2018;95:1135–1141. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000001308.
  • Tousignant B, Garceau MC, Bouffard-Saint-Pierre N, et al. Comparing the Netra smartphone refractor to subjective refraction. Clin Exp Optom. 2019;103:501–506. doi:10.1111/cxo.13003.
  • Agarwal A, Bloom DE, deLuise VP, et al. Comparing low-cost handheld autorefractors: a practical approach to measuring refraction in low-resource settings. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0219501. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0219501.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.