199
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Loss to Follow up among Glaucoma Patients at a Tertiary Eye Center over 10 Years: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Clinical Outcomes

ORCID Icon, , & ORCID Icon
Pages 383-391 | Received 06 Jan 2022, Accepted 19 Sep 2022, Published online: 25 Sep 2022

References

  • Gedde SJ, Vinod K, Wright MM, et al. Primary open-angle glaucoma preferred practice pattern®. Ophthalmology. 2021;128(1): P71–150. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.10.022.
  • Kosoko O, Quigley HA, Vitale S, Enger C, Kerrigan L, Tielsch JM. Risk factors for noncompliance with glaucoma follow-up visits in a residents’ eye clinic. Ophthalmology. 1998;105(11):2105–2111. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(98)91134-4.
  • Ngan R, Lam DL, Mudumbai RC, Chen PP. Risk factors for noncompliance with follow-up among normal-tension glaucoma suspects. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007;144(2):310–311. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2007.04.005.
  • Murakami Y, Lee BW, Duncan M, et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in adherence to glaucoma follow-up visits in a county hospital population. Arch Ophthalmol. 2011;129(7):872–878. doi:10.1001/archophthalmol.2011.163.
  • Ashaye AO, Adeoye AO. Characteristics of patients who dropout from a glaucoma clinic. J Glaucoma. 2008;17(3):227–232. doi:10.1097/IJG.0b013e31815768b3.
  • Kim YK, Jeoung JW, Park KH. Understanding the reasons for loss to follow-up in patients with glaucoma at a tertiary referral teaching hospital in Korea. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017;101(8):1059–1065. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-309103.
  • Funk IT, Strelow BA, Klifto MR, et al. The relationship of travel distance to postoperative follow-up care on glaucoma surgery outcomes. J Glaucoma. 2020;29(11):1056–1064. doi:10.1097/IJG.0000000000001609.
  • Momoh RO, Bunce C, Oko-Oboh GA, Gilbert CE. Advanced glaucoma at presentation is associated with poor follow-up among glaucoma patients attending a tertiary eye facility in Southern Nigeria. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2018;25(3):266–272. doi:10.1080/09286586.2018.1424345.
  • Pleet A, Sulewski M, Salowe RJ, et al. Risk factors associated with progression to blindness from primary open-angle glaucoma in an African-American population. Ophthal Epidemiol. 2016;23(4):248–256. doi:10.1080/09286586.2016.1193207.
  • Ung C, Murakami Y, Zhang E, et al. The association between compliance with recommended follow-up and glaucomatous disease severity in a county hospital population. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;156(2):362–369. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2013.03.005.
  • Fudemberg SJ, Lee B, Waisbourd M, et al. Factors contributing to nonadherence to follow-up appointments in a resident glaucoma clinic versus primary eye care clinic. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016;10:19–25. doi:10.2147/PPA.S89336.
  • Stone JS, Muir KW, Stinnett SS, Rosdahl JA. Glaucoma blindness at a tertiary eye care center. NC Med J. 2015;76:211–218.
  • Williams AM, Kalra G, Commiskey PW, et al. Ophthalmology practice during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: the University of Pittsburgh experience in promoting clinic safety and embracing video visits. Ophthalmol Ther. 2020;9(3):1–9. doi:10.1007/s40123-020-00255-9.
  • US Social Security Administration. Disability evaluation under Social Security. 2.02 Loss of central visual acuity. https://www.ssa.gov/disability/professionals/bluebook/2.00-SpecialSensesandSpeech-Adult.htm#2_02. Accessed November 14, 2021.
  • North Carolina department of transportation, division of motor vehicles. https://one.nhtsa.gov/people/injury/olddrive/olderdriversbook/pages/NCarolina.html. Accessed November 14, 2021.
  • Gupta V, Chandra A, Yogi R, Sihota R, Singh D. Prevalence and causes of patient dropout after glaucoma surgery. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2013;20(1):40–44. doi:10.3109/09286586.2012.741278.
  • Hark LA, Radakrishnan A, Madhava M, et al. Awareness of ocular diagnosis, transportation means, and barriers to ophthalmology follow-up in the Philadelphia telemedicine glaucoma detection and follow-up study. Soc Work Health Care. 2019;58(7):651–664. doi:10.1080/00981389.2019.1614711.
  • Kolli A, Mozaffarian RS, Kenney EL. Food insecurity and vision impairment among adults age 50 and older in the United States. Am J Ophthalmol. 2022;236:69–78. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2021.10.002.
  • Nwanyanwu K, Andoh J. Social Determinants of Health in Diabetic Retinopathy in the United States: Evidence from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2005-2008). PO360. New Orleans: American Academy of Ophthalmology Annual Meeting; 2021 November 13.
  • Halawa OA, Kolli A, Oh G, et al. Racial and socioeconomic differences in eye care utilization among Medicare beneficiaries with glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2022;129(4) 397–405. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.09.022.
  • Leiby BE, Hegarty SE, Zhan T, et al. A randomized trial to improve adherence to follow-up eye examinations among people with glaucoma. Prev Chronic Dis. May 20 2021;18:E52. doi:10.5888/pcd18.200567.
  • Williams AM, Liu PJ, Muir KW, Waxman EL. Behavioral economics and diabetic eye exams. Prev Med. 2018;112:76–87. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.04.006.
  • Parke DW, Lum F, Rich WL. Das IRIS®-Register. Der Ophthalmologe. 2017;114(S1):1–6. doi:10.1007/s00347-016-0265-1.
  • Khurana R, Li C, Myrick A, Lum F. Loss to follow-up in Patients with Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Treated with Anti- VEGF Therapy and/or PRP in the United States. PO050. New Orleans: American Academy of Ophthalmology Annual Meeting; 2021 November 13.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.