Analysis and Mathematical Modelling of the Pattern of Occurrence of Various Devanāgari Letter Symbols according to the Phonological Inventory of Indic Script in Hindi Language

References

• Bell, T. C., & Witten, I. H. (1988). Source models for natural language. http://hdl.handle.net/1880/46172
   Google Scholar
• Bharati, A., Rao, K, P., Sangal, R., & Bendre, S. M. (2002). Basic statistical analysis of corpus and cross comparison among corpora. Proceedings of 2002 the International Conference on Natural Language Processing, Mumbai, India. Available at: http://ltrc.iiit.ac.in/MachineTrans/publications/technicalReports/tr022/camera-187.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bolshakov, I. A., & Gelbukh, A. (2004). Computational linguistics models, resources, applications, ciencia de la computación. Mexico. Available at: http://www.gelbukh.com/clbook/Computational-Linguistics.htm
   Google Scholar
• Dhore, M. L., Dixit, S. K., & Dhore, R. M. (2012). Optimizing transliteration for Hindi/Marathi to English using only two weights. Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Optimization Techniques for Human Language Technology, COLING 2012, Mumbai (pp. 31–48).
   Google Scholar
• Eftekhari, A. (2006). Fractal geometry of texts: An initial application to the works of Shakespeare. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 13, 177–193.10.1080/09296170600850106
   Google Scholar
• Good, I. J. (1969). Statistics of language. Encyclopaedia of information, linguistics and control. In A. R. Meetham & R. A. Hudson (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of linguistics, information and control (pp. 567–581). Oxford: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Goyal, L. (2011). Comparative analysis of printed Hindi and Punjabi text based on statistical parameters. In Ch. Sing, G. Sing Lehal, J. Sengupta, D. V. Sharma & V. Goyal (Eds.), Information systems for Indian languages, communications in computer and information science, Volume 139, Part 2 (pp. 209–213). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-19403-0
   Google Scholar
• Goyal, V., & Lehal, G. S. (2008). Comparative study of Hindi and Punjabi language scripts. Nepalese Linguistics, 23, 67–82.
   Google Scholar
• Grzybek, P., & Kelih, E. (2005). Towards a general model of grapheme frequencies in slavic languages. In: R. Garabík (Ed), Computer treatment of slavic and East European languages (pp. 73–87). Bratislava: Veda.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, R. (2008). Initial literacy in Devanagari: What matters to learners. South Asia Language Pedagogy and Technology, Vol 1.
   Google Scholar
• Jayaram, B. D., & Vidya, M. N. (2006). Word length distribution in Indian Languages. Glottometrics, 12, 16–38.
   Google Scholar
• Jayaram, B. D., & Vidya, M. N. (2008). Zipf’s law for Indian languages. Journal of quantitative linguistics, 15, 293–317.10.1080/09296170802326640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, A., Ganu, A., Chand, A., Parmar, V., & Mathur, G. (2004). Keylekh: A keyboard for text entry in indic scripts. Proceedings of the CHI ‘04 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY. (pp. 928–942).
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, V. (2006). A statistical approach towards the recognition of Hindi language words. inria-00114544, version 1, pp. 1–5. Available at < http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/11/45/44/PDF/Hindi_Language_Recognition.pdf> Retrived on 15/03/2014.
   Google Scholar
• Li, W., & Miramontes, P. (2011). Fitting ranked English and Spanish letter frequency distribution in US and Mexican presidential speeches. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 18, 359–380.10.1080/09296174.2011.608606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, W., Miramontes, P., & Cocho, G. (2010). Fitting ranked linguistic data with two-parameter functions. Entropy, 12, 1743–1764.10.3390/e12071743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murthy, K. N., & Kumar, G. B. (2006). Language identification from small text samples. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 13, 57–80.10.1080/09296170500500694
   Google Scholar
• Pande, H., & Dhami, H. S. (2010). Mathematical modelling of occurrence of letters and word’s initials in texts of hindi language. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics, 7, 19–38.
   Google Scholar
• Pande, H., & Dhami, H. S. (2013). Mathematical modeling of the pattern of occurrence of words in different corpora of Hindi language. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 20(1), 1–12.10.1080/09296174.2012.754596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanderson, R. (2007). COMP527: Data Mining. Retrieved December 25, 2007, from www.csc.liv.ac.uk/*azaroth/courses/current/comp527/lectures/comp527–28.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Singh, A. K. (2006). A computational phonetic model for Indian language scripts. Constraints on Spelling Changes: Fifth International Workshop on Writing Systems, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Available at <ltrc.iiit.ac.in/anil/papers/cpms-long-iwlc-06.pdf> Retrived on 15/03/2014.
   Google Scholar
• Solso, R. L., & King, J. F. (1976). Frequency and versatility of letters in the English language. Bahavior research methods and instrumentation, 8, 283–286.10.3758/BF03201714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human behaviour and the principle of least effort. Addison-Wesley Press.
   Google Scholar