Readability Analysis of Bengali Literary Texts

References

• Aukerman, R. C. (1965). Readability of secondary school literature textbooks: A first report. The English Journal, 54(6), 533–540.
   Google Scholar
• Ayodele, M. O. (2013). A comparative study of textbook readability and students’ comprehension levels in senior secondary school biology. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 3(1).
   Google Scholar
• Baker, M. T., & Taub, H. A. (1983). Readability of informed consent forms for research in a veterans administration medical center. Jama, 250(19), 2646–2648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buse, R. P., & Weimer, W. R. (2008). A metric for software readability. Proceedings of the 2008 international symposium on software testing and analysis (pp. 121–130), Seattle, Washington DC.
   Google Scholar
• Chall, J. S., & Dale, E. (1995). Readability revisited: The new dale-chall readability formula. Brookline Books.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y.-T., Chen, Y.-H., & Cheng, Y.-C. (2013). Assessing chinese readability using term frequency and lexical chain. Computational Linguistics and Chinese Language Processing, 18(2), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Dale, E., & Chall, J. S. (1948). A formula for predicting readability: Instructions. In Educational research bulletin (pp. 37–54).
   Google Scholar
• Das, S., & Roychoudhury, R. (2000). On readability evaluation of bangla text documents by computational linguistic approach. Journal of Dravidic Studies, 10(2):201–208.
   Google Scholar
• Das, S., & Roychoudhury, R. (2004). Testing level of readability in bangla novels of bankim chandra chattopodhay wrt the density of polysyllabic words. Indian Journal of Linguistics, 22, 41–51.
   Google Scholar
• Das, S., & Roychoudhury, R. (2006). Readability modelling and comparison of one and two parametric fit: A case study in bangla*. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 13(1), 17–34.
   Google Scholar
• Durr, W. K., Hillerich, R. L., & Mifflin, H. (1986). Houghton mifflin reading program. Beijing: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Feng, L., Jansche, M., Huenerfauth, M., & Elhadad, N. (2010). A comparison of features for automatic readability assessment. Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on computational linguistics: Posters (pp. 276–284), Jeju Island, Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Flesch, R. (1948). A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology, 32(3), 221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• François, T., & Fairon, C. (2012). An ai readability formula for french as a foreign language. In Proceedings of the 2012 joint conference on empirical methods in natural language processing and computational natural language learning (pp. 466–477).
   Google Scholar
• Fry, E. (1977). Fry’s readability graph: Clarifications, validity, and extension to level 17. Journal of Reading, 21(3), 242–252.
   Google Scholar
• Glöckner, I., Hartrumpf, S., Helbig, H., Leveling, J., & Osswald, R. (2006). An architecture for rating and controlling text readability. Proceedings of KONVENS 2006 (pp. 32–35), Konstanz, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, W. S., & Leary, B. E. (1935). What makes a book readable.
   Google Scholar
• Gunning, R. (1952). The Technique of Clear Writing.
   Google Scholar
• Hancke, J., Vajjala, S., & Meurers, D. (2012). Readability classification for german using lexical, syntactic, and morphological features. Coling (pp. 1063–1080), Mumbai, India.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, G. (1975). Comment mesurer la lisibilite (how to measure readability), ERIC.
   Google Scholar
• Homan, S., Hewitt, M., & Linder, J. (1994). The development and validation of a formula for measuring single-sentence test item readability. Journal of Educational Measurement, 31(4), 349–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam, Z., Mehler, A., Rahman, R., & Texttechnology, A. 2012. Text readability classification of textbooks of a low-resource language. Proceedings of the 26th pacific asia conference on language, information, and computation. (accepted)
   Google Scholar
• Islam, Z., Rahman, M. R., & Mehler, A. (2014). Readability classification of bangla texts. In International conference on intelligent text processing and computational linguistics (pp. 507–518).
   Google Scholar
• Jeng, -C.-C. (2001). Chinese readability analysis using artificial neural networks. Northern Illinois University.
   Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W., & Van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85(5), 363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Language difficulty ranking. (n.d.). Retrieved January 1, 2014, from. http://www.effectivelanguagelearning.com/language-guide/language-diffiulty.www.effectivelanguagelearning.com.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Y.-S., Tseng, H.-C., Chen, J.-L., Peng, C.-Y., Chang, T.-H., & Sung, Y.-T. (2012). Constructing a novel chinese readability classification model using principal component analysis and genetic programming. In Advanced learning technologies (icalt), 2012 ieee 12th international conference on (pp. 164–166).
   Google Scholar
• Likert, R. (1932). A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 22(140), 1–55.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, X., Croft, W. B., Oh, P., & Hart, D. (2004). Automatic recognition of reading levels from user queries. In Proceedings of the 27th annual international acm sigir conference on research and development in information retrieval (pp. 548–549).
   Google Scholar
• Lorge, I. (1944). Predicting readability. The Teachers College Record, 45(6), 404–419.
   Google Scholar
• Loughran, T., & McDonald, B. (2010). Measuring readability in financial text. SSRN eLibrary.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, G. H. (1969). Smog grading-a new readability formula. Journal of Reading, 12(8), 639–646.
   Google Scholar
• Paasche-Orlow, M. K., Taylor, H. A., & Brancati, F. L. (2003). Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability. New England Journal of Medicine, 348(8), 721–726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang, L. T. (2006). Chinese Readability Analysis and its Applications on the Internet (Un- published doctoral dissertation). The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• Phani, S., Lahiri, S., & Biswas, A. (2014). Inter-rater agreement study on readability as- sessment in bengali. International Journal on Natural Language Computing (IJCNLP), 3, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Pikulski, J. J. (2002). Readability. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, R. E. (1975). An exploratory effort to design a readability graph for german material.
   Google Scholar
• Senter, R., & Smith, E. A. (1967). Automated readability index (Tech. Rep.). DTIC Document.
   Google Scholar
• Sinha, M., & Basu, A. (2016). A study of readability of texts in bangla through machine learning approaches. Education and Information Technologies, 21(5), 1071–1094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinha, M., Sharma, S., Dasgupta, T., & Basu, A. (2012). New readability measures for bangla and hindi texts. Mumbai, India: Colin.
   Google Scholar
• Spache, G. (1953). A new readability formula for primary-grade reading materials. The Elementary School Journal, 53(7), 410–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summary by language size. SIL International Publications Retrieved January 1, 2014, from http://www.ethnologue.com/statistics/size.
   Google Scholar
• Tinker, M. A. (1963). Legibility of print. (Tech. Rep.).
   Google Scholar
• Walters, T. W. (1966). Readability in german: Some levels of difficulty encountered in reading professional theological literature in german.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, S.-J. (1970). A readability formula for chinese language. University of Wisconsin– Madison.
   Google Scholar