Normalized Dependency Distance: Proposing a New Measure

References

• Chen, X., & Gerdes, K. ( 2017). Classifying languages by dependency structure: Typologies of delexicalized universal dependency treebanks. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Dependency Linguistics (Depling 2017), September 18-20, 2017, Università di Pisa, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(1), 87–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan, N. (2010). The magical mystery four: How is working memory capacity limited, and why? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(1), 51–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croft, W. (2002). Typology and Universals. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrer-i-Cancho, R. (2004). Euclidean distance between syntactically linked words. Physical Review E, 70(5), 056135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrer-i-Cancho, R. (2013). Hubiness, length, crossings and their relationships in dependency trees. Glottometrics, 25, 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrer-i-Cancho, R., & Liu, H. (2014). The risks of mixing dependency lengths from sequences of different length. Glottotheory, 5(2), 143–155.
   Google Scholar
• Futrell, R., Mahowald, K., & Gibson, E. (2015). Large-scale evidence of dependency length minimization in 37 languages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(33), 10336–10341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healy, A. F., & Miller, G. A. (1970). Verb as main determinant of sentence meaning. Psychonomic Science, 20(6), 372.
   Google Scholar
• Hiranuma, S. (1999). Syntactic difficulty in English and Japanese: A textual study. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 11, 309–322.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, R. (2010). An introduction to word grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, J. Y., & Liu, H. T. (2015). The effects of sentence length on dependency distance, dependency direction and the implications-Based on a parallel English-Chinese dependency treebank. Language Sciences, 50, 93–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, J. Y., & Ouyang, J. H. (2017). Dependency distance: A new perspective on the syntactic development in second language acquisition. Comment on “Dependency distance: A new perspective on syntactic patterns in natural language” by Haitao Liu et al. Physics of Life Reviews, 21, 209–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, D. (1996). On the structural complexity of natural language sentences. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 16th conference on Computational linguistics, Copenhagen, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, H. T. (2007). Probability distribution of dependency distance. Glottometrics, 15, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, H. T. (2008). Dependency distance as a metric of language comprehension difficulty. Journal of Cognitive Science, 9(2), 159–191.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, H. T. (2009). Probability distribution of dependencies based on a Chinese dependency treebank. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 16(3), 256–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H. T. (2010). Dependency direction as a means of word-order typology: A method based on dependency treebanks. Lingua, 120(6), 1567–1578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H. T., & Xu, C. S. (2011). Can syntactic networks indicate morphological complexity of a language? Epl, 93(2). doi:10.1209/0295-5075/93/28005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H. T., & Xu, C. S. (2012). Quantitative typological analysis of Romance languages. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 48(4), 597–625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H. T., Xu, C. S., & Liang, J. Y. (2016). Dependency length minimization: Puzzles and promises. Glottometrics, 33, 35–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H. T., Xu, C. S., & Liang, J. Y. (2017). Dependency distance: A new perspective on syntactic patterns in natural languages. Physics of Life Reviews, 21(SupplementC), 171–193.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McDonald, R., Nivre, J., Quirmbach-Brundage, Y., Goldberg, Y., Das, D., Ganchev, K., … Lee, J. (2013). Universal dependency annotation for multilingual parsing. Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Sofia, Bulgaria, 2, 92–97. In.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. A. (2003). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.
   Google Scholar
• Miyake, A., & Shah, P. (1999). Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ouyang, J., & Jiang, J. (2017). Can the probability distribution of dependency distance measure language proficiency of second language learners? Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 1–19. doi:10.1080/09296174.2017.1373991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raeburn, V. P. (1979). The role of the verb in sentence memory. Memory & Cognition, 7(2), 133–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temperley, D. (2007). Minimization of dependency length in written English. Cognition, 105(2), 300–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temperley, D. (2008). Dependency-length minimization in natural and artificial languages. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 15(3), 256–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesnière, L. (1959). Eléments de la syntaxe structurale. Paris: Klincksieck.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L., & Liu, H. T. (2016). Syntactic differences of adverbials and attributives in Chinese-English code-switching. Language Sciences, 55, 16–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., & Liu, H. (2017). The effects of genre on dependency distance and dependency direction. Language Sciences, 59, 135–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, W., Lu, X., & Weigle, S. C. (2015). Different topics, different discourse: Relationships among writing topic, measures of syntactic complexity, and judgments of writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 28, 53–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yngve, V. H. (1960). A model and an hypothesis for language structure. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 104(5), 444–466.
   Google Scholar