Using Rank-Frequency and Type-Token Statistics to Compare Morphological Typology in the Celtic Languages

References

• Ager, S. (2009). A study of language death and revival with a particular focus on Manx Gaelic ( MA dissertation). Bangor University.
   Google Scholar
• Altmann, G. (1992). Das Problem der Datenhomogenität. In B. Rieger (Ed.), Glottometrika 9 (pp. 287–298). Bochum: Brockmeyer.
   Google Scholar
• Antić, G., Kelih, E., & Grzybek, P. (2006). Zero-syllable words in determining word length. In P. Grzybek (Ed.), Contributions to the science of text and language: Word length studies and related issues (pp. 117–156). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, M. J., & Fife, J. (Ed.). (1993). The Celtic languages. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Best, K.-H. (2009). Quantitative Linguistik: Einführung und “Führer” zur Sprachstatistik des Deutschen sowie Principles for Word-Length Count. Retrieved July 25, 2011, from http://wwwuser.gwdg.de/~kbest/einfueh.htm
   Google Scholar
• Broderick, G. (1999). Language death in the Isle of Man. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J. H. (1960). A quantitative approach to the morphological typology of languages. International Journal of American Linguistics, 26, 178–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmer, N. M. (1942). The Irish language in Rathlin Island, Co. Antrim. Dublin: Royal Irish Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Ihaka, R., & Gentleman, R. (1996). R: A language for data analysis and graphics. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 5, 299–314.
   Google Scholar
• Kelih, E. (2010). The type-token relationship in Slavic parallel texts. Glottometrics, 20, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Köhler, R. (1987). Systems theoretical linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics, 14, 241–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacAulay, D. (Ed.). (1992). The Celtic languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacCoinnich, A. (2008). Where and how was Gaelic written in late medieval and early modern Scotland? Orthographic practices and cultural identities. Scottish Gaelic Studies, 24, 309–356.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, J. (2010). Genocide and ethnocide: The suppression of the Cornish language. In J. Partridge (Ed.), Interfaces in language (pp. 189–206). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Parina, E. (2006). О морфологическом типе валлийского языка. In А. Б. Кошелев (Ed.), Аналитизм в языках различных типов: сорок лет спустя. К 100-летию со дня рождения В. Н. Ярцевой (pp. 236–246). Moscow: Institute of Linguistics of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Popescu, -I.-I., & Altmann, G. (2008a). Hapax legomena and language typology. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 15(4), 370–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popescu, -I.-I., & Altmann, G. (2008b). Zipf’s mean and language typology. Glottometrics, 16, 31–37.
   Google Scholar
• Popescu, -I.-I., Mačutek, J., & Altmann, G. (2009). Aspects of word frequencies. Lüdenscheid: RAM-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, P. (1995). An introduction to the Celtic languages. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Sapir, E. (1921). Language: An introduction to the study of speech. New York: Harcourt Brace and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Sebba, M. (1998). Orthography as practice and ideology: The case of Manx. Centre for Language in Social Life Working Paper 102, Lancaster University.
   Google Scholar
• Tristram, H. L. C. (2009). Wie weit sind die inselkeltischen Sprachen (und das Englische) analytisiert? In U. Hinrichs, N. Reiter, & S. Tornow (Eds.), Eurolinguistik: Entwicklung und Perspektiven (pp. 255–280). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
   Google Scholar
• Tristram, H. L. C. (2010). Probleme bei der Quantifizierung morphologischer Komplexität im Altirischen. In K. Stüber, T. Zehnder, & D. Bachmann (Eds.), Akten des 5. Deutschsprachigen Keltologensymposiums (pp. 407−426). Vienna: Praesens Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Welch, B. L. (1947). The generalization of ‘Student’s’ problem when several different population variances are involved. Biometrika, 34, 28–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar