A Zipfian Approach to Words in Contexts: The Cases of Modern English and Chinese

References

• Adamic, L. (2011). Complex systems: Unzipping Zipf’s law. Nature, 474(7350), 164–165. https://doi.org/10.1038/474164a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aitchison, J. (1996). The seeds of speech: Language origin and evolution. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Altmann, G. (2002). Zipfian linguistics. Glottometrics, 3, 19–26. https://www.ram-verlag.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/g3zeit.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, H. (2001). Word frequency distributions. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Baixeries, J., Elvevåg, B., & Ferrer-i-Cancho, R. (2013). The evolution of the exponent of Zipf’s law in language ontogeny. PLoS One, 8(3), e53227. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baroni, M. (2009). Distributions in text. In A. Lüdeling & M. Kytö (Eds.), Corpus linguistics: An international handbook (pp. 803–821). Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Behrens, H. (2009). Usage-based and emergentist approaches to language acquisition. Linguistics, 47(2), 383–411. https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2009.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentz, C., Kiela, D., Hill, F., & Buttery, P. (2014). Zipf’s law and the grammar of languages: A quantitative study of Old and Modern English parallel texts. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 10(2), 175–211. https://doi.org/10.1515/dlt-2014-0009
   Google Scholar
• Bérubé, N., Sainte-Marie, M., Mongeon, P., & Larivière, V. (2018). Words by the tail: Assessing lexical diversity in scholarly titles using frequency-rank distribution tail fits. PLoS One, 13(7), e0197775. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197775
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bybee, J. (2010). Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Čech, R., Garabík, R., & Altmann, G. (2015). Testing the thematic concentration of text. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 22(3), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/09296174.2015.1037157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H., & Xu, H. (2019). Quantitative linguistics approach to interlanguage development: A study based on the Guangwai-Lancaster Chinese Learner Corpus. Lingua, 230, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2019.102736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correia Saavedra, D. (2019). Measurements of grammaticalization: Developing a quantitative index for the study of grammatical change. University of Neuchâtel dissertation.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, N. C. (2012). Formulaic language and second language acquisition: Zipf and the phrasal Teddy bear. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 17–44. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190512000025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrer-i-Cancho, R., & Solé, R. (2003). Least effort and the origins of scaling in human language. PNAS, 100(3), 788–791. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0335980100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ha, L. Q., Sicilia-Garcia, E. I., Ming, J., & Smith, F. J. (2003). Extension of Zipf’s law to word and character n-grams for English and Chinese. Computational Linguistics and Chinese Language Processing, 8(1), 77–102. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/O03-4004.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hopper, P., & Traugott, E. (2003). Grammaticalization (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hundt, M., Sand, A., & Siemund, R. (1998). Manual of information to accompany the Freiburg-LOB Corpus of British English (“FLOB”). University of Freiburg. http://khnt.hit.uib.no/icame/manuals/flob/INDEX.HTM
   Google Scholar
• Kurumada, C., Meylan, S., & Frank, M. (2013). Zipfian frequency distributions facilitate word segmentation in context. Cognition, 127(3), 439–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labelle, M. (2005). The acquisition of grammatical categories: A state of the art. In H. Cohen & C. Lefebvre (Eds.), Handbook of categorization in cognitive science (pp. 433–457). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• McEnery, A., Xiao, R., & Mo, L. (2003). Aspect marking in English and Chinese: Using the Lancaster Corpus of Mandarin Chinese for contrastive language study. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 18(4), 361–378. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/18.4.361
   Google Scholar
• Neophytou, K., Van Egmond, M., & Avrutin, S. (2017). Zipf’s law in aphasia across languages: A comparison of English, Hungarian and Greek. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 24(2–3), 178–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/09296174.2016.1263786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, T. (2011). Understanding English grammar: A linguistic introduction. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piantadosi, S. (2014). Zipf’s word frequency law in natural language: A critical review and future directions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(5), 1112–1130. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0585-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popescu,I. I., & Altmann, G. (2008). Hapax legomena and language typology. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 15(4), 370–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/09296170802326699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popescu, I. I., Altmann, G., Grzybek, P., Jayaram, B., Köhler, R., Krupa, V., Mačutek, J., Pustet, R., Uhlířová, L., & Vidya, M. (2009). Word frequency studies. Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Saussure, F. D. (1959). Course in general linguistics (W. Baskin, Trans.). Philosophical Library.
   Google Scholar
• Shibatani, M., & Bynon, T. (1999). Approaches to language typology: A conspectus. In M. Shibatani & T. Bynon (Eds.), Approaches to language typology (pp. 1–26). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siddiqi, D. (2014). The morphology-syntax interface. In A. Carnie, Y. Sato, & D. Siddiqi (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of syntax (pp. 345–364). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sun, C. (2006). Chinese: A linguistic introduction. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Traugott, E., & Trousdale, G. (2013). Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Velupillai, V. (2012). An introduction to linguistic typology. John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Xiao, R., & McEnery, A. (2004). Aspect in Mandarin Chinese: A corpus-based study. John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Zipf, G. K. (1936). The psycho-biology of language: An introduction to dynamic philology. Houghton Mifflin Company.
   Google Scholar
• Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human behavior and the principle of least effort. Addison-Wesley Press.
   Google Scholar