Menzerath-Altmann Law in Consecutive and Simultaneous Interpreting: Insights into Varied Cognitive Processes and Load

References

• Altmann, G. (1980). Prolegomena to Menzerath’s law. In R. Grotjahn (Ed.), Glottometrika (pp. 2). Brockmeyer.
   Google Scholar
• Altmann, G. (2014). Bibliography: Menzerath’s law. Glottotheory, 5(1), 121–123. https://doi.org/10.1515/glot-2014-0008
   Google Scholar
• Baixeries, J., Hernández-Fernández, A., Forns, N., & Ferrer-i-cancho, R. (2013). The parameters of Menzerath-Altmann law in genomes. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 20(2), 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/09296174.2013.773141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, M. (1993). Corpus linguistics and translation studies: Implications and applications. In M. Baker, G. Francis, and E. Tognini-Bonelli (Eds.), Text and technology: In honour of John Sinclair. John Benjamins (pp. 233–250).
   Google Scholar
• Bernardini, S., Ferraresi, A., & Miličević, M. (2016). From EPIC to EPTIC: Exploring simplification in interpreting and translation from an intermodal perspective. Target, 28(1), 61–86. https://doi.org/10.1075/target.28.1.03ber
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buk, S., & Rovenchak, A. (2008). Menzerath-Altmann law for syntactic structures in Ukrainian. Glottotheory, 1(1), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1515/glot-2008-0002
   Google Scholar
• Coloma, G. (2015). The Menzerath-Altmann law in a cross-linguistic context. SKY Journal of Linguistics, 28, 139–159. http://www.linguistics.fi/julkaisut/SKY2015/SKYJoL28_Coloma.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(1), 87–114. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X01003922
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramer, I. (2005). The parameters of the Altmann-Menzerath law. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 12(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/09296170500055301
   Google Scholar
• De Groot, A. M. B. (2000). A complex-skill approach to translation and interpreting. In S. Tirkkonen-Condit, and R. Jääskeläinen (Eds.), Tapping and mapping the processes of translation and interpreting outlooks on empirical research. John Benjamines (pp. 37–53).
   Google Scholar
• Eroglu, S. (2014). Menzerath-Altmann law: Statistical mechanical interpretation as applied to a linguistic organization. Journal of Statistical Physics, 157(2), 392–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-014-1078-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenk-Oczlon, G., & Fenk, A. (2008). Complexity trade-offs between the subsystems of language. In M. Miestamo, K. Sinnemäk, and F. Karlsson (Eds.), Language complexity: Typology, contact, change. John Benjamins (pp. 43–65).
   Google Scholar
• Fenk, A., & Fenk-Oczlon, G. (1993). Menzerath’s law and the constant flow of linguistic information. In R. Köhler, and B. B. Rieger (Eds.), Contributions to quantitative linguistics. Kluwer Academic Publishers (pp. 11–31).
   Google Scholar
• Ferrer-i-cancho, R., Hernández-Fernández, A., Baixeries, J. D. A., & Mačutek, J. (2014). When is Menzerath-Altmann law mathematically trivial? A new approach. Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, 13(6), 633–644. https://doi.org/10.1515/sagmb-2013-0034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frawley, W. (1984). Prolegomenon to a theory of translation. In W. Frawley (Ed.), Translation: Literary, linguistic and philosophical perspectives. Associated University Presses (pp. 159–175).
   Google Scholar
• Gerlach, R. (1982). Zur Überprüfung des Menzerathschen Gesetzes im Bereich der Morphologie. In W. Lehfeld & U. Strauss (Eds.), Glottometrika (Vol. 4, pp. 95–102). Brockmeyer.
   Google Scholar
• Gile, D. (2009). Basic concepts and models for interpreter and translator training. John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Grzybek, P., & Stadlober, E. (2007). Do we have problems with Arens’ law? A new look at the sentence-word relation. In P. Grzybek, and R. Köhler (Eds.), Exact methods in the study of language and text. Mouton de Gruyter (pp. 203–215).
   Google Scholar
• Gustison, M. L., Semple, S., Ferrer-i-cancho, R., & Bergman, T. J. (2016). Gelada vocal sequences follow Menzerath’s linguistic law. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(19), E2750–E2758. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1522072113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heesen, R., Hobaiter, C., Ferrer-i-cancho, R., & Semple, S. (2019). Linguistic laws in chimpanzee gestural communication. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 286(1896), 20182900. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2018.2900
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou, R., Huang, C. R., Do, H. S., & Liu, H. (2017). A study on correlation between Chinese sentence and constituting clauses based on the Menzerath-Altmann law. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 24(4), 350–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/09296174.2017.1314411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou, R., Huang, C. R., Zhou, M., & Jiang, M. (2019). Distance between Chinese registers based on the Menzerath-Altmann law and regression analysis. Glottometrics, 45, 24–57. https://www.ram-verlag.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/g45zeit-1.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia, H., & Liang, J. (2020). Lexical category bias across interpreting types: Implications for synergy between cognitive constraints and language representations. Lingua, 239, 1028009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, X., & Jiang, Y. (2020). Effect of dependency distance of source text on disfluencies in interpreting. Lingua, 243, 102873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102873
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, Y., & Ma, R. (2020). Does Menzerath-Altmann law hold true for translational language: Evidence from translated English literary texts. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/09296174.2020.1766335
   Google Scholar
• Jin, H., & Liu, H. (2017). How will text size influence the length of its linguistic constituents? Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 53(2), 197–225. https://doi.org/10.1515/psicl-2017-0008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Köhler, R. (1982). Das Menzerathsche Gesetz auf Satzebene. In W. Lehfeldt & U. Straus (Eds.), Glottometrika (Vol. 4, pp. 103–113). Brockmeyer.
   Google Scholar
• Köhler, R. (1984). Zur Interpretation des Menzerathschen Gesetzes. In J. Boy & R. Köhler (Eds.), Glottometrika (Vol. 6, pp. 177–183). Brockmeyer.
   Google Scholar
• Köhler, R. (1989). Das Menzerathsche Gesetz als Resultat des Sprachverarbeitungsmechanismus. In G. Altmann & H. Schwibbe (Eds.), Das Menzerathsche Gesetz in informationsverarbeitenden Systemen (pp. 109–112). Georg Olms Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Köhler, R. (2005). Synergetic linguistics. In R. Köhler, G. Altmann, and R. G. Piotrowski (Eds.), Quantitative linguistics: An international handbook. Walter de Gruyter (pp. 760–774).
   Google Scholar
• Köhler, R. (2012). Quantitative syntax analysis. In Quantitative Linguistics. Walter de Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110272925
   Google Scholar
• Kułacka, A. (2010). The coefficients in the formula for the Menzerath-Altmann law. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 17(4), 257–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/09296174.2010.512160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, W. (2011). Menzerath’s law at the gene-exon level in the human genome. Complexity, 17(4), 49–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/cplx.20398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, J., Fang, Y., Lv, Q., & Liu, H. (2017). Dependency distance differences across interpreting types: Implications for cognitive demand. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2132. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, J., Lv, Q., & Liu, Y. (2018). Interpreting as a mirror for language foundations —comment on “rethinking foundations of language from a multidisciplinary perspective” by t. Gong et al. Physics of Life Review 26–27, 139–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2018.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, J., Lv, Q., & Liu, Y. (2019). Quantifying interpreting types: Language sequence mirrors cognitive load minimization in interpreting tasks. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 285. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00285
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H., & Wang, Y. (2019). A quantitative stylistic study on contemporary Chinese novels’ syntactic features: A comparison between Fanhua and other ten novels with Mao Dun literature award. Journal of Shanxi University (Philosophy & Social Science), 42(6), 65–72. https://doi.org/10.3451/j.cnki.shanxi.univ(phil.soc.).2019.06.009
   Google Scholar
• Lv, Q., & Liang, J. (2019). Is consecutive interpreting easier than simultaneous interpreting? —A corpus-based study of lexical simplification in interpretation. Perspectives: Studies in Translation Theory and Practice, 27(1), 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2018.1498531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mačutek, J., & Mikros, G. K. (2015). Menzerath-Altmann law for word length motifs. In G. K. Mikros, and J. Mačutek (Eds.), Sequences in Language and Text (pp. 125–132). De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Mauranen, A. (1999). Will ‘translationese’ ruin a contrastive study? Languages in Contrast, 2(2), 161–185. https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.2.2.03mau
   Google Scholar
• Mauranen, A. (2004). Contrasting languages and varieties with translational corpora. Languages in Contrast, 5(1), 73–92. https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.5.1.07mau
   Google Scholar
• Menzerath, P. (1954). Die Architektonik des deutschen Wortschatzes. Dümmler.
   Google Scholar
• Meuleman, C., & Van Besien, F. (2009). Coping with extreme speech conditions in simultaneous interpreting. Interpreting, 11(1), 20–34. https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.11.1.03meu
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obler, L. K. (2012). Conference interpreting as extreme language use. International Journal of Bilingualism, 16(2), 177–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006911403199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pareyon, G. (2016). Music as a carbon language: A mathematical analogy and its interpretation in biomusicology. MusMat: Brazilian Journal of Music and Mathematics, 1(1), 25–43. https://musmat.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/04-pareyon-v10.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pöchhacker, F. (2016). Introducing interpreting studies. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Polio, C. G. (2001). Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy and complexity. Journal of Second Language Acquisition, 23(3), 423–425. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263101263050
   Google Scholar
• Roukk, M.et al (2007). The Menzerath-Altmann law in translated texts as compared to the original texts. In P. Grzybek, and R. Köhler (Eds.), Exact methods in the study of language and text (pp. 605–610). Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Sanada, H. (2016). The Menzerath-Altmann law and sentence structure. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 23(3), 256–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/09296174.2016.1169850
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seeber, K. G. (2011). Cognitive load in simultaneous interpreting existing theories - new models. Interpreting, 13(2), 176–204. https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.13.2.02see
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seeber, K. G. (2015). Simultaneous interpreting. In H. Mikkelson, and R. Jourdenais (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Interpreting (pp. 79–95). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, L., & He, L. (2018). Is the Menzerath-Altmann law specific to certain languages in certain registers? Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 27(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09296174.2018.1532158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human behavior and the principle of least effort. Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar