To Move or Not to Move: An Entropy-based Approach to the Informativeness of Research Article Abstracts across Disciplines

References

• Alotaibi, H. (2015). Metadiscourse in Arabic and English research article abstracts. World Journal of English Language, 5(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v5n2p1
   Google Scholar
• Ansarifara, A., Shahriari, H., & Pishghadam, R. (2018). Phrasal complexity in academic writing: A comparison of abstracts written by graduate students and expert writers in applied linguistics. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 31, 58–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2017.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of experimental article in science. University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Becher, T. (1989). The disciplinary shaping of the profession. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Becher, T., & Trowler, P. (2001). Academic tribes and territories. SRHE/ Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bentz, C., Alikaniotis, D., Cysouw, M., & Ferrer-i-cancho, R. (2017). The entropy of words—learnability and expressivity across more than 1000 languages. Entropy, 19(6), 275. https://doi.org/10.3390/e19060275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Bondi, M., & Cavalieri, S. (2012). The evolution of the abstract as a genre: 1988–2008. The case of applied linguistics. In G. E, C. Degano, and P. Catenaccio (Eds.), Genre change in the contemporary world: Short-term diachronic perspectives. Peter Lang, 43–54.
   Google Scholar
• Cao, X., Lei, L., & Wen, J. (2020). Promoting science with linguistic devices: A large-scale study of positive and negative words in academic writing. Learned Publishing, 32(34), 82–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1322
   Google Scholar
• Chen, R., Liu, H., & Altmann, G. (2016). Entropy in different text types. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 32(3), 528–542. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqw008
   Google Scholar
• Cross, C., & Oppenheim, C. (2006). A genre analysis of scientific abstracts. Journal of Documentation, 62(4), 428–446. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410610700953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darabad, A. M. (2016). Move analysis of research article abstracts: A cross-disciplinary study. International Journal of Linguistics, 8(2), 125–140. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v8i2.9379
   Google Scholar
• Ding, H. (2007). Genre analysis of personal statements: Analysis of moves in application essays to medical and dental schools. English for Specific Purposes, 26(3), 368–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2006.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doro, K. (2013). The rhetoric structure of research article abstracts in English studies journals. Prague Journal of English Studies, 2(1), 119–139. https://doi.org/10.2478/pjes-2014-0013
   Google Scholar
• Gillaerts, P., & Van de Velde, F. (2010). Interactional metadiscourse in research article abstracts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(2), 128–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Givon, T. (1985). Iconicity, isomorphism and non-arbitrary coding in syntax. John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Golebiowski, Z. (2009). Prominent messages in education and applied linguistic abstracts: How do authors appeal to their prospective readers? Journal of Pragmatics, 41(4), 753–769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausser, J., & Strimmer, K. (2009). Entropy inference and the James-Stein estimator, with application to nonlinear gene association networks. Journal of Machine Learning, 10(7), 1469–1484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, R. (1997). Genre analysis, and the social sciences: An investigation of the structure of research article discussion sections in three disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 16(4), 321–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(96)00038-5
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourse: Social interactions in academic writing. Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2008). As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes, 27(1), 4–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2007.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2015). Genre, discipline and identity. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 19, 32–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2005). Hooking the reader: A corpus study of evaluative that in abstracts. English for Specific Purposes, 24(2), 123–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2004.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, F. K., & Hyland, K. (2017). Metadiscursive nouns: Interaction and cohesion in abstract moves. English for Specific Purposes, 46, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2016.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, X., Jiang, Y., & Hoi, C. K. W. (2020). Is Queen’s English drifting towards common people’s English? —Quantifying diachronic changes of Queen’s Christmas Messages (1952–2018) with reference to BNC. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 29(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/09296174.2020.1737483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juola, P. (2008). Assessing linguistic complexity. John Benjamins Press.
   Google Scholar
• Juola, P. (2013). Using the Google N-Gram corpus to measure cultural complexity. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 28(4), 668–675. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqt017
   Google Scholar
• Kuteeva, M., & Airey, J. (2014). Disciplinary differences in the use of English in higher education: Reflections on recent language policy developments. Higher Education, 67(5), 533–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9660-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, M., & Vitányi, P. (2019). An Introduction to Kolmogorov Complexity and Its Applications. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Z. (2016). A diachronic study on British and Chinese cultural complexity with Google Books Ngrams. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 23(4), 361–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/09296174.2016.1226431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, P., & Huang, X. (2017). A study of interactional metadiscourse in English abstracts of Chinese economics research articles. Higher Education Studies, 7(3), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v7n3p25
   Google Scholar
• Martin, M. P. (2003). A genre analysis of English and Spanish research paper abstracts in experimental social sciences. English for Specific Purposes, 22(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(01)00033-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNab, S. M. (1990). Writing an abstract: The supreme test, particularly for scientists to whom English is a foreign language. European Science Editing, 39, 7–9.
   Google Scholar
• Melander, B., Swales, J., & Fredrickson, K. (1997). Journal abstracts from three academic fields in the United States and Sweden: National or disciplinary proclivities? Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Menezes, C. A. (2013). A comparative study of textual and rhetorical features of abstracts written by expert and novice writers. A Palavrada, 3, 10–18.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, P., Lafitte, F., & Bontempi, G. (2008). Minet: A R/Bioconductor Package for Inferring Large Transcriptional Networks Using Mutual Information. BMC Bioinformatics, 9(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-9-461
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller, G. A. (1955). Note on the bias of information estimates. In H. Quastler (Ed.), Information Theory in Psychology II-B. Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• North, S. (2005). Disciplinary variation in the use of theme in undergraduate essays. Applied Linguistics, 26(3), 431–452. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omidian, T., Shahriari, H., & Siyanova-Chanturia, A. (2018). A cross-disciplinary investigation of multi-word expressions in the moves of research article abstracts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 36, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paninski, L. (2003). Estimation of entropy and mutual information. Neural Computation, 15(6), 1191–1253. https://doi.org/10.1162/089976603321780272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pho, P. D. (2010). Linguistic realizations of rhetorical structure: A corpus-based study of research article abstracts and introductions in applied linguistics and educational technology. Language & Computers, 71, 135–152. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCIAIG.2009.2032416
   Google Scholar
• Ren, H., & Li, Y. (2011). A comparison study on the rhetorical moves of abstracts in published research articles and Master’s foreign-language theses. English Language Teaching, 4(1), 162–166. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v4n1p162
   Google Scholar
• Ruan, Z. (2018). Structural compression in academic writing: An English-Chinese comparison study of complex noun phrases in research article abstracts. English for Specific Purposes, 36, 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.09.001
   Google Scholar
• Saboori, F., & Hashemi, M. R. (2013). A cross-disciplinary move analysis of research article abstracts. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 4(4), 483–496.
   Google Scholar
• Saeeaw, S., & Tangkiengsirisin, S. (2014). Rhetorical variation across research article abstracts in environmental science and applied linguistics. English Language Teaching, 7(8), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n8p81
   Google Scholar
• Salager-Meyer, F. (1990). Discoursal flaws in medical English abstracts: A genre analysis per research- and text-type. Text, 10(4), 365–384. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1990.10.4.365
   Google Scholar
• Santos, M. B. (1996). The textual organization of research paper abstracts in applied linguistics. Text, 16(4), 481–499. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1996.16.4.481
   Google Scholar
• Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27(3), 379–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x
   Google Scholar
• Shi, Y., & Lei, L. (2020). Lexical richness and text length: An entropy-based perspective. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 29(1), 62–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/09296174.2020.1766346
   Google Scholar
• Suntara, W., & Usaha, S. (2013). Research article abstracts in two related disciplines: Rhetorical variation between linguistics and applied linguistics. English Language Teaching, 6(2), 84–99. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n2p84
   Google Scholar
• Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres. Exploration and applications. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tanko, G. (2017). Literary research article abstracts: An analysis of rhetorical moves and their linguistic realizations. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 56(27), 42–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2017.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tas, E. E. I. (2008). A corpus-based analysis of genre-specific discourse of research: The PhD thesis and the research article in ELT. Technical University.
   Google Scholar
• Vathanalaoha, K. (2018). Genre analysis of experiment-based dental research article abstracts: Thai and international journals. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 24(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2018-2403-01
   Google Scholar
• Xiao, W., Liu, J. & Li, L. (2022). How is information content distributed in RA introductions across disciplines? An entropy-based approach. Research in Corpus Linguistics, 10(1): 63–83. https://doi.org/10.32714/ricl.10.01.04
   Google Scholar
• Xiao, W., & Sun, S. (2020). Dynamic lexical features of PhD theses across disciplines: A text mining approach. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 27(2), 114–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/09296174.2018.1531618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, H., & Lei, L. (2018). British cultural complexity: An entropy-based approach. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 25(2), 190–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/09296174.2017.1348014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar