Stylistic Fingerprints, POS-tags, and Inflected Languages: A Case Study in Polish

References

• Acedański, S. (2010). A morphosyntactic Brill tagger for inflectional languages. In Loftsson, H., Rögnvaldsson, E., Helgadóttir, S. (eds) Advances in natural language processing (Vol. 6233), Springer, Berlin, Heidelber. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14770-8_3
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, H., Van Halteren, H., & Tweedie, F. (1996). Outside the cave of shadows: Using syntactic annotation to enhance authorship attribution. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 11(3), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/11.3.121
   Google Scholar
• Burrows, J. (1996). Tiptoeing into the infinite: Testing for evidence of national differences in the language of English narrative. In S. Hockey & N. Ide (Eds.), Research in humanities computing (Vol. 4, pp. 1–33). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burrows, J. (2002). “Delta”: A measure of stylistic difference and a guide to likely authorship. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 17(3), 267–287. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/17.3.267
   Google Scholar
• Eder, M. (2011). Style-markers in authorship attribution: A cross-language study of the authorial fingerprint. Studies in Polish Linguistics, 6(1), 99–114. http://www.ejournals.eu/SPL/2011/SPL-vol-6-2011/art/1171/
   Google Scholar
• Eder, M. (2013). Mind your corpus: Systematic errors in authorship attribution. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 28(4), 603–614. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqt039
   Google Scholar
• Eder, M., Rybicki, J., & Kestemont, M. (2016). Stylometry with R: A package for computational text analysis. R Journal, 8(1), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2016-007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evert, S., Proisl, T., Jannidis, F., Reger, I., Pielström, S., Schöch, C., & Vitt, T. (2017). Understanding and explaining Delta measures for authorship attribution. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 32(Suppl. 2), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqx023
   Google Scholar
• Hirst, G., & Feiguina, O. (2007). Bigrams of syntactic labels for authorship discrimination of short texts. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 22(4), 405–417. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqm023
   Google Scholar
• Jockers, M. L., & Witten, D. M. (2010). A comparative study of machine learning methods for authorship attribution. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 25(2), 215–223. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqq001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juola, P. (2009). Cross-linguistic transferrence of authorship attribution, or why English-only prototypes are acceptable. Digital humanities 2009: Conference abstracts (pp. 162–163). College Park, MD: University of Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• Kenny, A. (1982). The computation of style: An introduction to statistics for students of literature and humanities. Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kestemont, M. (2014). Function words in authorship attribution: From black magic to theory? In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Literature (CLFL) (pp. 59–66). Gothenburg, Sweden: Association for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Koppel, M., Schler, J., & Argamon, S. (2009). Computational methods in authorship attribution. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(1), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luyckx, K., & Daelemans, W. (2011). The effect of author set size and data size in authorship attribution. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 26(1), 35–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqq013
   Google Scholar
• McKenna, W., Burrows, J., & Antonia, A. (1999). Beckett’s trilogy: Computational stylistics and the nature of translation. Revue Informatique et Statistique dans les Sciences Humaines, 35(1–4), 151–171. https://www.rissh.uliege.be/upload/docs/application/pdf/2022-05/wmckennaetc_beckett.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Przepiórkowski, A., Bańko, M., Górski, R. L., & Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, B. (Eds.). (2012). Narodowy Korpus Języka Polskiego. PWN.
   Google Scholar
• Rybicki, J. (2015a). Success rates in most-frequent-word-based authorship attribution: A case study of 1000 polish novels from Ignacy Krasicki to Jerzy Pilch. Studies in Polish Linguistics, 10(2), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.4467/23005920SPL.15.004.3561
   Google Scholar
• Rybicki, J. (2015b). Vive la différence: Tracing the (authorial) gender signal by multivariate analysis of word frequencies. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 31(4), 746–761. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqv023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rybicki, J., & Eder, M. (2011). Deeper Delta across genres and languages: Do we really need the most frequent words? Literary and Linguistic Computing, 26(3), 315–321. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqr031
   Google Scholar
• Sokolova, M., & Lapalme, G. (2009). A systematic analysis of performance measures for classification tasks. Information Processing and Management, 45(4), 427–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2009.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stamatatos, E. (2009). A survey of modern authorship attribution methods. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(3), 538–556. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiersma, W., Nerbonne, J., & Lauttamus, T. (2011). Automatically extracting typical syntactic differences from corpora. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 26(1), 107–124. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqq017
   Google Scholar