A Corpus-Based Study of the Distributions of Adnominals Across Registers and Disciplines

References

• Andreev, S. (2020). Nominal and adjectival adnominals in Russian fiction: Relationship and distribution. Glottometrics, 49, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.53482/2021_51_391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreev, S., Fan, F., & Altmann, G. (2018). Adnominal aggregation. Glottometrics, 40, 63–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreev, S., Místecký, M., & Altmann, G. (2018). Sonnets: Quantitative inquiries. RAM-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Andreev, S., Popescu, I. -I., & Altmann, G. (2016). On Russian adnominals. Glottometrics, 35, 64–84.
   Google Scholar
• Andreev, S., Popescu, I. -I., & Altmann, G. (2017). Some properties of adnominals in Russian texts. Glottometrics, 38, 77–106.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, T., & Tilton, L. (2022). CoreNLP: Wrappers around Stanford CoreNLP tools. R. package version 0.4-3. https://rdocumentation.org/packages/coreNLP/versions/0.4-2
   Google Scholar
• Benelhadj, F. (2019). Discipline and genre in academic discourse: Prepositional phrases as a focus. Journal of Pragmatics, 139, 190–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2011). Grammatical change in the noun phrase: The influence of written language use. English Language and Linguistics, 15(2), 223–250. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674311000025
   Google Scholar
• Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2016). Grammatical complexity in academic English: Linguistic change in writing. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2019). Register, genre, and style (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biber, D., Gray, B., & Poonpon, K. (2011). Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development? TESOL Quarterly, 45(1), 5–35. https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2011.244483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Biglan, A. (1973). The characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, E. K., & Miller, J. E. (2013). The Cambridge dictionary of linguistics. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Busemann, A. (1925). Die Sprache der Jugend als Ausdruck der Entwicklungsrhythmik. Fischer.
   Google Scholar
• Copeck, T., Barker, K., Delisle, S., Szpakowicz, S., & Delannoy, J. (1997). What is technical text? Language Sciences, 19(4), 381–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0388-0001(97)00003-X
   Google Scholar
• Dutra, D. P., Queiroz, J. M. S., Macedo, L. D., Costa, D. D., & Mattos, E. (2020). Adjectives as nominal pre-modifiers in chemistry and applied linguistics research articles. In U. Römer, V. Cortes, & E. Friginal (Eds.), Advances in corpus-based research on academic writing: Effects of discipline, register and writer expertise (pp. 205–226). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.95.09dut
   Google Scholar
• Egbert, J. (2015). Publication type and discipline variation in published academic writing: Investigating statistical interaction in corpus data. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 20(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.20.1.01egb
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, Z., Gresser, V., Cao, P., & Zheng, J. (2021). Nominal complexities in school children’s informational writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 50, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.100958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Games, P. A., & Howell, J. F. (1976). Pairwise multiple comparison procedures with unequal Ns and/or variances: A Monte Carlo study. Journal of Educational Statistics, 1(2), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986001002113
   Google Scholar
• Gray, B. (2013). More than discipline: Uncovering multi-dimensional patterns of variation in academic research articles. Corpora, 8(2), 153–181. https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2013.0039
   Google Scholar
• Gray, B. (2015a). Linguistic variation in research articles: When discipline tells only part of the story. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.71
   Google Scholar
• Gray, B. (2015b). On the complexity of academic writing: Disciplinary variation and structural complexity. In V. Cortes & E. Csomay (Eds.), Corpus-based research in applied linguistics: Studies in honor of Doug Biber (pp. 49–78). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.66.03gra
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. Edward Arnold Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1989). Spoken and written language. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (2010). Grammar, society and the noun (1966). In M. A. K. Halliday & J. Webster (Eds.), On language and linguistics (pp. 50–73). Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• He, Q., & Guo, M. (2021). A corpus-based study of adjectivizations in English. Lingua, 260, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2021.103100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, Q., & Yang, B. (2018). A corpus-based study of the correlation between text technicality and ideational metaphor in English. Lingua, 203, 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2017.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. The University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K. (2006). English for academic purposes: An advanced resource book. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lan, G., Zhang, Q., Lucas, K., Sun, Y., & Gao, J. (2022). A corpus-based investigation on noun phrase complexity in L1 and L2 English writing. English for Specific Purposes, 67, 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2022.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei, L., & Liu, D. (2018). The academic English collocation list: A corpus-driven study. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 23(2), 216–243. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.16135.lei
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, C. D., Surdeanu, M., Bauer, J., Finkel, J., Bethard, S. J., & McClosky, D. (2014). The Stanford CoreNLP natural language processing toolkit. Available at https://stanfordnlp.github.io/CoreNLP/ (last Retrieved October , 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Marneffe, M. C., Dozat, T., Silveira, N., Haverinen, K., Ginter, F., Nivre, J., & Manning, C. D. (2014). Universal Stanford Dependencies: A cross-linguistic typology. In Proceedings of the 9Th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), Reykjavik, Iceland (pp. 4585–4592). European Language Resources Association.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R. (1991). Nominalization in science and humanities: Distilling knowledge and scaffolding text. In E. Ventola (Ed.), Functional and systemic linguistics (pp. 307–338). Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. R., Doran, Y. J., & Zhang, D. (2021). Nominal group grammar: System and structure. Word, 67(3), 248–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.2021.1957545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikros, G. K., & Mačutek, J. (2015). Foreword. In G. K. Mikros, J. Mačutek (Eds.), Sequences in language and text (pp. V). Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Pan, X., & Liu, H. (2014). Adnominal Constructions in Modern Chinese and their distribution properties. Glottometrics, 29, 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson, J., & Musgrave, J. (2014). Development of noun phrase complexity in the writing of English for Academic Purposes students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 14, 48–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2013.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popescu, I. -I., Altmann, G., & Köhler, R. (2010). Zipf’s law—another view. Quality & Quantity, 40(4), 713–731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-009-9234-y
   Google Scholar
• Shao, Z., Zhang, H., Zhang, J., Zhong, Y., & Xu, X. (2022). Phrasal complexity in English argumentative writing: Variations across Chinese STEM versus English major’s production and EFL textbook essays. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 55, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.101070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2009). Abstracts and the writing of abstracts. The University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Welch, B. L. (1951). On the comparison of several mean values: An alternative approach. Biometrika, 38(3–4), 330–336. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/38.3-4.330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, J., & Liang, M. (2013). A tale of two C’s: Comparing English varieties with Crown and CLOB (The 2009 Brown family corpora). ICAME Journal, 37, 175–183. http://icame.uib.no/ij37/Pages_175-184.pdf
   Google Scholar