Linguistic Properties of Emojis: A Quantitative Exploration of Emoji Frequency, Category, and Position on Twitter

References

• Altmann, G. (2016). Introduction. Glottometrics, 13(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.3917/tu.013.0032
   Google Scholar
• Bai, Q., Dan, Q., Mu, Z., & Yang, M. (2019). A systematic review of Emoji: Current research and future perspectives. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baixeries, J., Elvevåg, B., Ferrer-I-Cancho, R., & Hayasaka, S. (2013). The evolution of the exponent of Zipf’s law in language ontogeny. Public Library of Science ONE, 8(3), e53227. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053227
   Google Scholar
• Barach, E., Feldman, L. B., & Sheridan, H. (2021). Are emojis processed like words?: Eye movements reveal the time course of semantic processing for emojified text. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 28(3), 978–991. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-020-01864-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohn, N., Roijackers, T., Schaap, R., & Engelen, J. (2018). Are emoji a poor substitute for words? Sentence processing with emoji substitutions. Proceedings of the 40th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Madison, USA (pp. 1524–1529). The Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Covington, M. A., & McFall, J. D. (2010). Cutting the Gordian knot: The moving-average type–token ratio (MATTR). Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 17(2), 94–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/09296171003643098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danesi, M. (2017). The semiotics of Emoji: The rise of visual language in the age of the internet. Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• EmojifyData-EN. (2018, April 1). https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/rexhaif/emojifydata-en?resource=download&select=emojitweets-01-04-2018.txt
   Google Scholar
• Emoji Ordering, v13.0. (2021, March 8). https://unicode.org/emoji/charts-13.0/emoji-ordering.html
   Google Scholar
• Emojipedia. (2022, September 10). Emojipedia statistics. Accessed https://emojipedia.org/stats/
   Google Scholar
• Ferrer i Cancho, R. (2005). The variation of Zipf’s law in human language. The European Physical Journal B-Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, 44(2), 249–257. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2005-00121-8
   Google Scholar
• Ferrer i Cancho, R., & Solé, R. V. (2001). Two regimes in the frequency of words and the origins of complex lexicons: Zipf’s law revisited*. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 8(3), 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1076/jqul.8.3.165.4101
   Google Scholar
• Gawne, L., & McCulloch, G. (2019). Emoji as digital gestures. Language@ internet, 17. https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/li/article/view/37786
   Google Scholar
• Ge, J., & Herring, S. C. (2018). Communicative functions of emoji sequences on Sina Weibo. First Monday, 23(11). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v23i11.9413
   Google Scholar
• Grosz, P., Kaiser, E., & Pierini, F. (2021, September). Discourse anaphoricity and first-person indexicality in emoji resolution. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung (Vol. 25. pp. 340–357). https://doi.org/10.18148/sub/2021.v25i0.941
   Google Scholar
• Guntuku, S. C., Li, M., Tay, L., & Ungar, L. H. (2019). Studying cultural differences in emoji usage across the east and the west. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (Vol. 13. pp. 226–235). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1904.02671
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Herring, S. C., & Ge, J. (2020). Do emoji sequences have a preferred word order. Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Emoji Understanding and Applications in Social Media. http://workshop-proceedings.icwsm.org/abstract?id=2020_05
   Google Scholar
• Herring, S. C., & Ge-Stadnyk, J. (in press). Emoji and illutionarity: Acting on, and acting as, language. In M. Gill, A. Malmivirta, & B. Warvik (Eds.), Structures in discourse: Studies in interaction, adaptability, and pragmatic functions in honour of Tuija Virtanen. John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Kilgarriff, A. (1998). BNC database and word frequency lists. https://www.kilgarriff.co.uk/bnc-readme.html
   Google Scholar
• Koch, T. K., Romero, P., & Stachl, C. (2022). Age and gender in language, emoji, and emoticon usage in instant messages. Computers in Human Behavior, 126, 106990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köhler, R. (2012). Quantitative syntax analysis. De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110272925
   Google Scholar
• Konrad, A., Herring, S., & Choi, D. (2020). Sticker and emoji use in Facebook messenger: Implications for graphicon change. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 25(3), 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmaa003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koplenig, A. (2018). Using the parameters of the Zipf–Mandelbrot law to measure diachronic lexical, syntactical and stylistic changes–a large-scale corpus analysis. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 14(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2014-0049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulig, A., Kwapień, J., Stanisz, T., & Drożdż, S. (2017). In narrative texts punctuation marks obey the same statistics as words. Information Sciences, 375, 98–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2016.09.051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwapień, J., & Drożdż, S. (2012). Physical approach to complex systems. Physics Reports, 515(3–4), 115–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2012.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon, J., Kobayashi, N., Kamigaito, H., Takamura, H., & Okumura, M. (2021). Making your tweets more fancy: Emoji insertion to texts. Proceedings of the International Conference on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (RANLP 2021) (pp. 770–779). https://aclanthology.org/2021.ranlp-1.88
   Google Scholar
• Kwon, J., Naoki, K., Kamigaito, H., Takamura, H., & Okumura, M. (2022). Joint modeling of emoji position and its label for better understanding in social media. Journal of Natural Language Processing, 29(2), 467–492. https://doi.org/10.5715/jnlp.29.467
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. L. (1998). Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In J. R. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science (pp. 87–113). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Linders, G. M., & Louwerse, M. M. (2023). Zipf’s law revisited: Spoken dialog, linguistic units, parameters, and the principle of least effort. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 30(1), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-022-02142-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, R., Ma, Q. D., & Bian, C. (2014). Scaling laws in human speech, decreasing emergence of new words and a generalized model. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:1412.4846. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1412.4846
   Google Scholar
• Liu, C., Tan, X., Zhou, T., Zhang, W., Liu, J., & Lu, X. (2022). Emoji use in China: Popularity patterns and changes due to COVID-19. Applied Intelligence, 52(14), 16138–16148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-022-03195-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, F., Wang, H., & Xu, X. (2020). Usage behavior and cause of emoji in social media. Complex Systems and Complexity Science, 17(3), 70–77. https://doi.org/10.13306/j.1672-3813.2020.03.007
   Google Scholar
• Logi, L., & Zappavigna, M. (2023). A social semiotic perspective on emoji: How emoji and language interact to make meaning in digital messages. New Media & Society, 25(12), 3222–3246. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211032965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandelbrot, B. (1953). An informational theory of the statistical structure of language. In W. Jackson (Ed.), Communication theory (pp. 486–502). Butterworths Scientific Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Mehri, A., & Jamaati, M. (2017). Variation of Zipf’s exponent in one hundred live languages: A study of the holy bible translations. Physics Letters A, 381(31), 2470–2477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2017.05.061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mei, Q. (2019). Decoding the new world language: Analyzing the popularity, roles, and utility of emojis. In Companion Proceedings of the 2019 World Wide Web Conference (pp.417–418). New York: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3308560.3316541
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. A. (1957). Some effects of intermittent silence. The American Journal of Psychology, 70(2), 311–314. https://doi.org/10.2307/1419346
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neophytou, K., Van Egmond, M., & Avrutin, S. (2017). Zipf’s law in aphasia across languages: A comparison of English, Hungarian and Greek. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 24(2/3), 178–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/09296174.2016.1263786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novak, P. K., Smailović, J., Sluban, B., Mozetič, I., & Perc, M. (2015). Sentiment of Emojis. Public Library of Science ONE, 10(12), e0144296. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144296
   Google Scholar
• Parkwell, C. (2019). Emoji as social semiotic resources for meaning-making in discourse: Mapping the functions of the toilet emoji in Cher’s Tweets about Donald Trump. Discourse, Context & Media, 30, 100307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2019.100307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampietro, A. (2019). Emoji and rapport management in Spanish WhatsApp chats. Journal of Pragmatics, 143, 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semple, S., Ferrer-I-Cancho, R., & Gustison, M. L. (2022). Linguistic laws in biology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 37(1), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2021.08.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torre, I. G., Luque, B., Lacasa, L., Kello, C. T., & Hernández-Fernández, A. (2019). On the physical origin of linguistic laws and lognormality in speech. Royal Society Open Science, 6(8), 191023. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhlířová, L. (2007). Word frequency and position in sentence. Glottometrics, 14, 1–21. https://www.ram-verlag.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/g14zeit.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Uhlířová, L. (2009). Word frequency and position in sentence. In I.-I. Popescu, et al., (Ed.), Word frequency studies (pp. 203–230). Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• van Egmond, M., van Ewijk, L., & Avrutin, S. (2015). Zipf ’s law in non-fluent aphasia. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 22(3), 233–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/09296174.2015.1037158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weissman, B., Tanner, D., & Corcoran, C. M. (2018). A strong wink between verbal and emoji-based irony: How the brain processes ironic emojis during language comprehension. Public Library of Science ONE, 13(8), e0201727. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201727
   Google Scholar
• Wu, R., Chen, J., & Li, Y. (2021). The effect of the angry emoji position on consumers’ perception of the sender’s anger. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 53(10), 1133. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2021.01133
   Google Scholar
• Yang, X., & Liu, M. (2021). The pragmatics of text-emoji co-occurrences on Chinese social media. Pragmatics, 31(1), 144–172. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.18018.yan
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zappavigna, M. (2015). Searchable talk: The linguistic functions of hashtags. Social Semiotics, 25(3), 274–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2014.996948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zappavigna, M., & Logi, L. (2021). Emoji in social media discourse about working from home. Discourse, Context & Media, 44, 100543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2021.100543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., Wang, M., & Li, Y. (2021). More than playfulness: Emojis in the comments of a WeChat official account. Internet Pragmatics, 4(2), 247–271. https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00048.zha
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, P., Jia, J., An, Y., Liang, J., Xie, L., & Luo, J. (2018). Analyzing and predicting emoji usages in social media. Companion Proceedings of the The Web Conference 2018, 327–334. https://doi.org/10.1145/3184558.3186344
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, Y. (2021). Meaningfulness and unit of Zipf’s law: Evidence from danmu comments. In S. Li, M. Sun, Y. Liu, H. Wu, L. Kang, W. Che, S. He, & G. Rao (Eds.), Chinese computational linguistics (Vol. 12869, pp. 239–253). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84186-7_16.
   Google Scholar
• Zipf, G. K. (1932). Selected studies of the principle of relative frequency in language. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human behavior and the principle of least effort. Addison-Wesley Press.
   Google Scholar