Gender and Education: Their Role in the Zipfian Distribution of Speech Acts

References

• Allen, J., & Core, M. (1997). Draft of DAMSL: Dialog Act Markup in Several Layers. Retrieved August 6, 2020, from. http://www.fb10.uni-bremen.de/anglistik/ling/ss07/discourse-materials/DAMSL97.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Al-Shboul, Y., & Abumahfouz, A. (2018). Gender differences in advice-giving among Jordanian undergraduate students at BAU. Arab World English Journal, 9(4), 177–185. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol9no4.12
   Google Scholar
• Alston, W. P. (2000). Illocutionary acts and sentence meaning. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Altham, P. M. (1984). Improving the precision of estimation by fitting a model. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 46(1), 118–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1984.tb01283.x
   Google Scholar
• Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bach, K., & Harnish, R. M. (1979). Linguistic communication and speech acts. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baider, F. (2019). Double speech act: Negotiating inter-cultural beliefs and intra-cultural hate speech. Journal of Pragmatics, 151, 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baixeries, J., Elvevåg, B., Ferrer-I-Cancho, R., & Hayasaka, S. (2013). The evolution of the exponent of Zipf’s law in language ontogeny. Public Library of Science ONE, 8(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053227
   Google Scholar
• Ballmer, T. T., & Brennenstuhl, W. (1981). Speech act classification: A study of thelexical analysis of English speech activity verbs. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee, J., & Carrell, P. L. (1988). Tuck in your shirt, you squid: Suggestions in ESL. Language Learning, 38(3), 313–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1988.tb00416.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bataineh, R. F., & Bataineh, R. F. (2008). A cross-cultural comparison of apologies by native speakers of American English and Jordanian Arabic. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(4), 792–821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carletta, J. (1996). Assessing agreement on classification tasks: The kappa statistic. Computational Linguistics, 22(2), 249–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, C. T., Schrock, D. B., & Dauterman, P. (2012). Speech acts within facebook status messages. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 31(2), 176–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X12438535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandler, J. D., Salvador, R., & Kim, Y. (2018). Language, brand and speech acts on Twitter. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 27(4), 375–384. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-06-2017-1493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Croft, W. (1994). Speech act classification, language typology and cognition. In S. Tsohatzidis (Ed.), Foundations of speech act theory: Philosophical and linguistic perspectives (pp. 460–477). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Doty, K. L., & Hiltunen, R. (2009). Formulaic discourse and speech acts in the witchcraft trial records of Salem, 1692. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(3), 458–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duran, N. (2020). Processing the Switchboard Dialogue Act Corpus. Retrieved August 8, 2020, from. https://github.com/NathanDuran/Switchboard-Corpus
   Google Scholar
• Ferrer-I-Cancho, R. (2005). The variation of Zipf’s law in human language. The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, 44(2), 249–257. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2005-00121-8
   Google Scholar
• Ferrer-I-Cancho, R. (2018). Optimization models of natural communication. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 25(3), 207–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/09296174.2017.1366095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flöck, I., & Geluykens, R. (2015). Speech acts in corpus pragmatics: A quantitative contrastive study of directives in spontaneous and elicited discourse. In J. Romero-Trillo (Ed.), Yearbook of corpus linguistics and pragmatics 2015 (pp. 7–37). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17948-3_2
   Google Scholar
• Friedrich, S., Konietschke, F., Pauly, M., & Friedrich, M. S. (2017). Package ‘MANOVA. RM’. Retrieved December 2, 2021, from. https://cran.biotools.fr/web/packages/MANOVA.RM/MANOVA.RM.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guga-Cotea, A., & Murgu, E. (2014). Speech acts in British and Romanian advertisements). (pp. 412–416). Arhipelag XXI Press, The proceedings of the international conference literature, discourse and multicultural dialogue. Section: Language and discourse). Mureş. https://doi.org/10.17684/issn.2393-1140. In I. Boldea (Ed.).
   Google Scholar
• Hashim, S. S. M., & Safwat, S. (2015). Speech acts in political speeches. Journal of Modern Education Review, 5(7), 699–706. https://doi.org/10.15341/jmer(2155-7993)/07.05.2015/008
   Google Scholar
• Ha, L. Q., Sicilia-Garcia, E. I., Ming, J., & Smith, F. J. (2002). Extension of Zipf’s law to words and phrases. COLING 2002: Proceedings of the 19th international conference on computational linguistics. https://doi.org/10.3115/1072228.1072345
   Google Scholar
• Heinrichsmeier, R. (2021). Who gets to speak: The role of reported speech for identity work in complaint stories. Journal of Pragmatics, 174, 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.12.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, J. (1989). Sex differences and apologies: One aspect of communicative competence. Applied Linguistics, 10(2), 194–213. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/10.2.194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, J. F., & Adrefiza, A. (2017). Comparing apologies in Australian English and Bahasa Indonesia: Cultural and gender perspectives. Journal of Politeness Research, 13(1), 89–119. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2016-0033
   Google Scholar
• Jurafsky, D., Shriberg, E., & Biasca, D. (1997). Switchboard SWBD-DAMSL Shallow-Discourse-Function Annotation Coders Manual, Draft 13. Retrieved August 5, 2020, from. https://web.stanford.edu/~jurafsky/ws97/manual.august1.html
   Google Scholar
• Khani, R., & Darabi, R. (2014). Flouting the netiquette rules in the academic correspondence in Iran. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 898–907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.498
   Google Scholar
• Khany, R., Gheitasi, M., & Afshar, T. (2020). Investigating thanking speech act in Ilami Kurdish. Journal of Western Iranian Languages and Dialects, 8(3), 13–29. https://doi.org/10.22126/JLW.2020.4843.1389
   Google Scholar
• Kirk, J. M. (2016). The pragmatic annotation scheme of the SPICE-Ireland corpus. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 21(3), 299–322. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.21.3.01kir
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köhler, R. (1993). Synergetic linguistics. In R. Köhler & B. B. Rieger (Eds.), Contributions to quantitative linguistics (pp. 41–51). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1769-2_4
   Google Scholar
• Köhler, R. (2015). Linguistic motifs. In G. K. Mikros & J. Mačutek (Eds.), Sequences in language and text (pp. 89–108). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110362879-007
   Google Scholar
• Köhler, R., & Altmann, G. (2009). Problems in quantitative linguistics 2. Ram-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Köhler, R., & Altmann, G. (2014). Problems in quantitative linguistics 4. Ram-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Konietschke, F., Bathke, A. C., Harrar, S. W., & Pauly, M. (2015). Parametric and nonparametric bootstrap methods for general MANOVA. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 140, 291–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmva.2015.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koussouhon, L. A., & Dadjo, S. D. (2016). Pragmatic analyses of President Goodluck Jonathan’s concession speech and General Muhammadu Buhari’s acceptance speech: A comparative appraisal. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 5(4), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.5n.4p.12
   Google Scholar
• Leaper, C. (1991). Influence and involvement in children’s discourse: Age, gender, and partner effects. Child Development, 62(4), 797–811. https://doi.org/10.2307/1131178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linders, G. M., & Louwerse, M. M. (2023). Zipf’s law revisited: Spoken dialog, linguistic units, parameters, and the principle of least effort. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 30(1), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-022-02142-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H. (2017). An introduction to quantitative linguistics. The Commercial Press. In Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, H., & Qian, M. (2018). A study on gender differences in speech act of refusal of Chinese college students. Proceedings of the 2017 7th international conference on education and management (ICEM 2017) (pp. 289–298). Atlantis Press, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.2991/icem-17.2018.61
   Google Scholar
• Meena, S. (2016). Simplified Switchboard Dialog Act Corpus. Retrieved August 6, 2020, from. http://sanjaymeena.io/tech/nlp/Simplified-Switchboard-Corpus/
   Google Scholar
• Mehri, A., & Jamaati, M. (2017). Variation of Zipf’s exponent in one hundred live languages: A study of the holy bible translations. Physics Letters A, 381(31), 2470–2477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2017.05.061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno-Sánchez, I., Font-Clos, F., Corral, Á., & Chialvo, D. R. (2016). Large-scale analysis of Zipf’s law in English texts. Public Library of Science ONE, 11(1), e0147073. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147073
   Google Scholar
• Németh, G., & Zainkó, C. (2002). Multilingual statistical text analysis, Zipf’s law and Hungarian speech generation. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 49(3), 385–405. https://doi.org/10.1556/ALing.49.2002.3-4.8
   Google Scholar
• Ouyang, J., & Jiang, J. (2021). What makes a good quantitative linguistics textbook? Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 28(1), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/09296174.2019.1631118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piantadosi, S. T. (2014). Zipf’s word frequency law in natural language: A critical review and future directions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(5), 1112–1130. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0585-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potts, C., & Pillai, S. (2020). Switchboard dialog act corpus with Penn treebank links. Retrieved August 4, 2020, from. https://github.com/cgpotts/swda
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Rothe, U., Altmann, G., & Wagner, K. R. (1992). Verteilung der Länge von Sprechakten in der Kindersprache. InK. R. Wagner (Ed.), Kindersprachstatistik (pp. 47–56). Die Blaue Eule.
   Google Scholar
• Rühlemann, C. (2011). Corpus-based pragmatics II: Quantitative studies. In W. Bublitz & N. R. Norrick (Eds.), Foundations of Pragmatics (pp. 629–656). de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214260
   Google Scholar
• Rumaria, C. (2015). An analysis of speech acts in the dead poets society [ PhD thesis]. https://eprints.uny.ac.id/23857/1/Skripsi%20-%20Choerunnisa%20Rumaria.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sadock, J. M. (1994). Toward a grammatically realistic typology of speech acts. In S. Tsohatzidis (Ed.), Foundations of speech act theory: Philosophical and linguistic perspectives (pp. 393–406). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Salmani Nodoushan, M. A. (2016). Persian speakers’ use of refusal strategies across politeness systems. PhiN: Philologie Netz, 76 (1) , 61–77.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. A. (1996). Issues of relevance for discourse analysis: Contingency in action, interaction and co-participant context. InE. H. Hovy & D. R. Scott (Eds.), Computational and conversational discourse: Burning issues — an interdisciplinary account (pp. 3–35). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03293-0_1
   Google Scholar
• Searle, J. R. (1965). What is a speech act? InM. Black (Ed.), Philosophy in America (pp. 221–239). Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438
   Google Scholar
• Searle, J. R. (1976). A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society, 5(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500006837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Semple, S., Ferrer-I-Cancho, R., & Gustison, M. L. (2022). Linguistic laws in biology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 37(1), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2021.08.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shams, R., & Afghari, A. (2011). Effects of culture and gender in comprehension of speech acts of indirect request. English Language Teaching, 4(4), 279–287. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v4n4p279
   Google Scholar
• Simon, S., & Dejica-Cartis, D. (2015). Speech acts in written advertisements: Identification, classification and analysis. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192, 234–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.033
   Google Scholar
• Srikandi, C. N. (2020). An analysis of the illocutionary acts on Donald Trump’s presidential candidacy speech. Globish: An English-Indonesian Journal for English, Education, and Culture, 9(1), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.31000/globish.v9i1
   Google Scholar
• Steinsträter, C. (1988). Zur kindlichen Sprachhandlungsfähigkeit: Analyse eines Korpus spontaner Sprechsprache einer Fünfjährigen. Diss.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, C. (2021). Gratitude communication in academic written acknowledgement: Gender variation. Pragmatics and Society, 12(4), 515–536. https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.16018.tan
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tannen, D. (1994). Talking from 9 to 5: Women and men in the workplace: Language, sex and power. Avon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Valizadeh, P., Gowhary, H., & Azizifar, A. (2015). A contrastive study of realization patterns of request strategies of Ilami-Kurdish and Persian speakers based on age and education. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 4(5), 255–261. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.4n.5p.255
   Google Scholar
• Watkins, C. D., Bovet, J., Fernandez, A. M., Leongómez, J. D., Żelaźniewicz, A., Corrêa Varella, M. A., & Wagstaff, D. (2022). Men say “I love you” before women do: Robust across several countries. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 39(7), 2134–2153. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075221075264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisser, M. (2015). Speech act annotation. InK. Aijmer & C. Rühlemann (Eds.), Corpus pragmatics: A handbook (pp. 84–113). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139057493
   Google Scholar
• Widiatmoko, P. (2017). Analysis of presidential inaugural addresses using Searle’s taxonomy of speech acts. English Review: Journal of English Education, 5(2), 275–282. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v5i2.542
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J., & Powell, E. (2009). Biases in interpersonal communication: How engineering students perceive gender typical speech acts in teamwork. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01001.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y. (2013). Gender differences in pragmatic strategies of disagreement in Chinese. Proceedings of the 2013 international academic workshop on social science (pp. 929–934). Atlantis Press, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.2991/iaw-sc.2013.211. In: X. Shao (Ed.).
   Google Scholar
• Zaefferer, D. (2001). Deconstructing a classical classification: A typological look at Searle’s concept of illocution type. Revue Internationale de Philosophie, n° 216(2), 209–225. https://doi.org/10.3917/rip.216.0209
   Google Scholar
• Zipf, G. K. (1935). The psycho-biology of language: An introduction to dynamic philology. Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human behavior and the principle of least effort: An introduction to human ecology. Addison-Wesley Press.
   Google Scholar