An Empirically Derived Measure of Melodic Similarity

References

• Allan, H., Müllensiefen, D., & Wiggins, G.A. (2007). Methodological consideration in studies of musical similarity. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR) (6pp). Vienna: Austrian Computer Society (OCG).
   Google Scholar
• Aloupis, G., Fevens, T., Langerman, S., Matsui, T., Mesa, A., Nuñez, Y., Rappaport, D., & Toussaint, G. (2006). Algorithms for computing geometric measures of melodic similarity. Computer Music Journal, 30, 67–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J.R., & Schooler, L.J. (2000). The adaptive nature of memory. In E. Tulving & F.I.M. Craik (Eds.), Handbook of memory (pp. 557–570). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Balzano, G.J. (1982). The pitch set as a level of description for studying musical pitch perception. In M. Clynes (Ed.), Music, mind and brain: The neuropsychology of music (pp. 321–351). New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clausen, M., & Kurth, F. (2002). A Unified approach to content-based and fault-tolerant music identification. In Second International Conference On Web Delivering of Music, WEDELMUSIC 2002, Darmstadt, Germany (pp. 56–65). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, B.H., & Lea, R.B. (2004). Essentials of statistics for the social and behavioral sciences (Vol. 3). New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Dowling, W.J. (1972). Recognition of melodic transformations: Inversion, retrograde, and retrograde inversion. Perception and Psychophysics, 12, 417–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowling, W.J. (1978). Scale and contour: Two components of a theory of memory for melodies. Psychological Review, 85, 341–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowling, W.J., & Fujitani, D.S. (1971). Contour, interval, and pitch recognition in memory for melodies. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 49, 524–531.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eerola, T., & Bregman, M.R. (2007). Melodic and contextual similarity of folk song phrases. Musicae Scientiae, Discussion Forum, 4A–2007, 211–233.
   Google Scholar
• Eerola, T., Järvinen, T., Louhivuori, J., & Toiviainen, P. (2001). Statistical features and perceived similarity of folk melodies. Music Perception, 18, 275–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K.A. (2003). Exceptional memorizers: Made, not born. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 233–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferraro, P., Hanna, P., Allali, J., & Robine, M. (2006, October). MIREX query-by-humming/singing. Paper presented at the Annual Music Information Retrieval Evaluation exchange (MIREX) as part of the 7th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR), Victoria, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Foxton, J.M., Dean, J.L., Gee, R., Peretz, I., & Griffiths, T.D. (2004). Characterization of deficits in pitch perception underlying ‘tone deafness’. Brain, 127, 801–810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frances, R. (1958). La perception de la musique. Paris: Vrin.
   Google Scholar
• Frieler, K., & Müllensiefen, D. (2006). MIREX: Three algorithms for symbolic similarity computation. In Proceedings of the Annual Music Information Retrieval Evaluation exchange (MIREX) (2pp). Victoria, BC: University of Victoria.
   Google Scholar
• Grachten, M., & Arcos, J.L. (2004). Using the Implication/Realization model for measuring melodic similarity. In Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, ECAI04. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez, C., Abad-Mota, S., & Ruckhaus, E. (2007). An analysis of the Mongeau-Sankoff algorithm for music information retrieval. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (pp. 109–110). Vienna: Vienna University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K., Lee, D., Yoon, T., & Lee, J. (2008). A music recommendation system based on personal preference analysis. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on the Applications of Digital Information and Web Technologies (pp. 102–106). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Krumhansl, C.L. (2000). Rhythm and pitch in music cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 159–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krumhansl, C.L. (2004). The cognition of tonality - as we know it today. Journal of New Music Research, 33, 253–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krumhansl, C.L., & Kessler, E.J. (1982). Tracing the dynamic changes in perceived tonal organization in a spatial representation of musical keys. Psychological Review, 89, 334–368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemström, K., Mikkilä, N., Mäkinen, V., & Ukkonen, E. (2005, September). String matching and geometric algorithm for melodic similarity. Paper presented at the Annual Music Information Retrieval Evaluation exchange (MIREX) as part of the 6th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR), London.
   Google Scholar
• London, J. (2012). Hearing in time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marsden, A. (2012). Interrogating melodic similarity: A definitive phenomenon or the product of interpretation? Journal of New Music Research, 41, 323–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott, J.H., & Oxenham, A.J. (2008). Music, perception, pitch, and the auditory system. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 18, 452–463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNab, R.J., Smith, L.A., Witten, I.H., Henderson, C.L., & Cunningham, S.J. (1996). Towards the digital music library: Tune retrieval from acoustic input. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Conference on Digital Libraries (pp. 11–18). Bethesda, MD: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mongeau, M., & Sankoff, D. (1990). Comparison of musical sequences. Computers and the Humanities, 24, 161–175.
   Google Scholar
• M{\"u}llensiefen, D., & Frieler, K. (2004a). Measuring melodic similarity: Human vs. algorithmic judgments. In Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Interdisciplinary Musicology (CIM04) (pp. 15–18). Graz, Austria: University of Graz.
   Google Scholar
• Müllensiefen, D., & Frieler, K. (2004b). Cognitive adequacy in the measurement of melodic similarity: Algorithmic vs. human judgments. Computing in Musicology, 13, 147–176.
   Google Scholar
• Müllensiefen, D., & Frieler, K. (2007). Modelling experts’ notions of melodic similarity. Musicae Scientiae, Discussion Forum, 4A, 183–210.
   Google Scholar
• Murdock, B.B., Jr (1962). The serial position effect of free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 482–488.
   Google Scholar
• Narmour, E. (1990). The analysis and cognition of basic melodic structures: The Implication-Realization model. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Novello, A., McKinney, M.F., & Kohlrausch, A. (2006). Perceptual evaluation of music similarity. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (pp. 246–249). Victoria, BC: University of Victoria.
   Google Scholar
• Novello, A., McKinney, M.F., & Kohlrausch, A. (2011). Perceptual evaluation of inter-song similarity in western popular music. Journal of New Music Research, 40, 1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orio, N. (2005, September). Combining multilevel and multi-feature representation to compute melodic similarity. Paper presented at the Annual Music Information Retrieval Evaluation exchange (MIREX) as part of the 6th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR), London.
   Google Scholar
• Pauws, S. (2002). CubyHum: A fully operational query-by-humming system. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (pp. 187–196). Paris: IRCAM - Centre Pompidou.
   Google Scholar
• Peretz, I., Ayotte, J., Zatorre, R.J., Mehler, J., Ahad, P., Penhune, V.B., & Jutras, B. (2002). Congenital amusia: A disorder of fine-grained pitch discrimination. Neuron, 33, 185–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plantinga, J., & Trainor, L.J. (2005). Memory for melody: Infants use a relative pitch code. Cognition, 98, 1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prechelt, L., & Typke, R. (2001). An interface for melody input. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 8, 133–149.
   Google Scholar
• Prince, J.B., Schmuckler, M.A., & Thompson, W.F. (2009). Pitch and time, tonality and meter: How do musical dimensions combine. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1598–1617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmuckler, M.A. (2010). Melodic contour similarity using folk melodies. Music Perception, 28, 169–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubert, E., & Stevens, C. (2006). The effect of implied harmony, contour and musical expertise on judgments of similarity of familiar melodies. Journal of New Music Research, 35, 161–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, K.C., & Cuddy, L.L. (1989). Effects of metric and harmonic rhythm on the detection of pitch alterations in melodic sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 457–471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suyoto, I.S., & Uitdenbogerd, A.L. (2005, September). Simple efficient n-gram indexing for effective melody retrieval. Paper presented at the Annual Music Information Retrieval Evaluation exchange (MIREX) as part of the 6th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR), London.
   Google Scholar
• Suyoto, I.S., & Uitdenbogerd, A.L. (2010, August). Simple orthogonal pitch with IOI symbolic music matching. Paper presented at the Annual Music Information Retrieval Evaluation exchange (MIREX) as part of the 11th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR), Utrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Trehub, S.E., Schellenberg, E.G., & Kamenetsky, S.B. (1999). Infants’ and adults’ perception of scale structure. Journal of experimental psychology: Human perception and performance, 25, 965–975.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Typke, R., den Hoed, M., de Nooijer, J., Wiering, F., & Veltkamp, R.C. (2005). A ground truth for half a million musical incipits. Journal of Digital Information Management, 3, 34–38.
   Google Scholar
• Typke, R., Wiering, F., & Veltkamp, R.C. (2005). A survey of music information retrieval systems. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (pp. 153–160). London: Queen Mary, University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Typke, R., Veltkamp, R.C., & Wiering, F. (2006). Mirex symbolic melodic similarity and query by singing/humming. International Music Information Retrieval Systems Evaluation Laboratory (IMIRSEL).
   Google Scholar
• Typke, R., Wiering, F., & Veltkamp, R.C. (2007). Transportation distances and human perception of melodic similarity. Musicae Scientiae, 11, 153–181.
   Google Scholar
• Urbano, J., Lloréns, J., Morato, J., & Cuadrado, S. (2010). Using the shape of music to compute the similarity between symbolic musical pieces. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Computer Music Modeling and Retrieval (CMMR) (pp. 385–396, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 6684). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Uitdenbogerd, A.L. (2007, September). N-gram pattern matching and dynamic programming for symbolic melody search. Paper presented at the Annual Music Information Retrieval Evaluation exchange (MIREX) as part of the 8th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR), Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• Van Egmond, R., Povel, D.J., & Maris, E. (1996). The influence of height and key on the perceptual similarity of transposed melodies. Perception and Psychophysics, 58, 1252–1259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vempala, N.N., & Russo, F.A. (2012). A melodic similarity measure based on human similarity judgments. In E. Cambouropoulos, C. Tsougras, P. Mavromatis & K. Pastisdis. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition (ICMPC) 8th Triennial Conference of the European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music (pp. 1074–1080, online). Jyväskylä, Finland: European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music (ESCOM).
   Google Scholar
• Wo{\l}kowicz, J., & Ke\v{s}elj, V. (2013). Evaluation of n-gram-based classification approaches on classical music corpora. In Mathematics and computation in music (pp. 213–225). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, R., & Fischer, M. (1974). The string-to-string correction problem. Journal of the ACM, 21, 168–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar