The Handy Metaphor: Bimanual, touchless interaction for the internet of musical things

References

• Aliel L. (2017). Essays on comprovisation in sonic ecologies: Practical and theoretical perspectives. Master in music, University of São Paulo.
   Google Scholar
• Aliel L., Costa R. L. M., & Keller D. (2015). Comprovisation: Aesthetic heuristics in ecocomposition comprovisação; abordagens desde a heurística estética em ecocomposição. Brazilian Symposium on Computer Music.
   Google Scholar
• Aliel, L., Keller, D., & Costa, R. (2018). The Maxwell Demon: Comprovisation in ecologically grounded creative practice. Musica Hodie, 18(1), 103–116. doi:10.5216/mh.v18i1.53575.
   Google Scholar
• Beghetto R. A., & Kaufman J. C. (2007). Toward a broader conception of creativity: A case for ‘mini-c’ creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1(2), 73–79. doi: 10.1037/1931-3896.1.2.73
   Google Scholar
• Berdahl, E., Salazar, S., & Borins, M. (2013). Embedded networking and hardware-accelerated graphics with satellite CCRMA. Proceedings of the International Conference on New Instruments for Musical Expression (NIME2013) (pp. 325–330). Daejeon: KAIST. doi:10.5281/zenodo.1178476
   Google Scholar
• Berndt, A., Waloschek, S., & Hadjakos, A. (2016). Hand gestures in music production. Proceedings of the international computer music conference (ICMC 2016). (pp. 448--453), Utretch, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Bischoff J., Gold R., & Horton J. (1978). Music for an interactive network of microcomputers. Computer Music Journal, 2, 24–29. doi: 10.2307/3679453
   Google Scholar
• Bown O., Eldridge A., & McCormack J. (2009). Understanding interaction in contemporary digital music: From instruments to behavioural objects. Organised Sound, 14, 188–196. doi: 10.1017/S1355771809000296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cartwright, M. B., & Pardo, B. (2013). Social-eq: Crowdsourcing an equalization descriptor map. Proceedings of the InternationalSociety for Music Information Retrieval (ISMIR 2013) (pp. 395--400). Curitiba: ISMIR.
   Google Scholar
• Connors T. M. (2015). Audiovisual installation as ecological performativity. Proceedings of the 21st international symposium on electronic art (ISEA2015). Vancouver, Canada: ISEA.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey J. (1934/2005). Art as experience. New York, NY: Perigee Books.
   Google Scholar
• Fan X., & Essl G. (2013). Air violin: A body-centric style musical instrument. Proceedings of the international conference on new interfaces for musical expression (NIME 2013) (pp. 122–123). Daejeon, Korea: KAIST.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira E., Keller D., & Lima M. H. (2016). Sonic sketches in ubiquitous music: Educational perspectives (esboços sonoros em música ubíqua: Perspectivas educacionais). Sonic Ideas, 8(15), 12. ISSN 2317-9694. Electronic paper number: 12.
   Google Scholar
• Fillwalk, J. (2015). ChromaChord: A virtual musical instrument. Proceedings of the IEEE symposium on 3D user interfaces(3DUI2015) (pp. 201–202). Arles: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Gomes J., Pinho N., Lopes F., Costa G., Dias R., Tudela D., & Barbosa A. (2014). Capture and transformation of urban soundscape data for artistic creation. Journal of Science and Technology of the Arts, 6(1), 97–109. doi: 10.7559/citarj.v6i1.132
   Google Scholar
• Grant, K. A. (2007). Tacit knowledge revisited: We can still learn from polanyi. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(2), 173–180.
   Google Scholar
• Heidegger M. (1966). Discourse on thinking (Gelassenheit). New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman J. C., & Beghetto R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The four c model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1–12. doi: 10.1037/a0013688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller D. (2000). Compositional processes from an ecological perspective. Leonardo Music Journal, 10, 55–60. doi: 10.1162/096112100570459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller D. (2018). Challenges for a second decade of ubimus research: Knowledge transfer in ubimus activities. Música Hodie, 18(1), 148–165. ISSN 1676-3939. doi:10.5216/mh.v18i1.53578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, D., Barreiro, D. L., Queiroz, M., & Pimenta, M. S. (2010). Anchoring in ubiquitous musical activities. Proceedings of the international computer music conference (ICMC 2010) (pp. 319–326). Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Publishing, University of Michigan Library.
   Google Scholar
• Keller D., Flores L. V., Pimenta M. S., Capasso A., & Tinajero P. (2011). Convergent trends toward ubiquitous music. Journal of New Music Research, 40(3), 265–276. doi: 10.1080/09298215.2011.594514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller D., & Lazzarini V. (2017a). Theoretical approaches to musical creativity: The ubimus perspective. Musica Theorica, 2(1), 1–53. ISSN 2525–5541.
   Google Scholar
• Keller D., & Lazzarini V. (2017b). Ecologically grounded creative practices in ubiquitous music. Organised Sound, 22(1), 61–72. doi: 10.1017/S1355771816000340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller D., Lazzarini V., & Pimenta M. S. (2014a). Ubiquitous music, volume XXVIII of Computation music series. Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, D., Lazzarini, V., & Pimenta, M. S. (2014b). Ubimus through the lens of creativity theories. In D. Keller, V. Lazzarini, & M. S. Pimenta (Eds.), Ubiquitous music (pp. 3–23). Berlin: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, D., & Lima, M. H. (2016). Supporting everyday creativity in ubiquitous music making. In P. Kostagiolas, K. Martzoukou, & C. Lavranos (Eds.), Trends in music information seeking, behavior, and retrieval for creativity (pp. 78–99). Vancouver, BC: IGI Global Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keller D., Pinheiro da Silva F., Ferreira da Silva E., Lazzarini V., & M. S. Pimenta (2013). Opportunistic design of ubiquitous music systems: The impact of anchoring on creativity (design oportunista de sistemas musicais ubíquos: O impacto do fator de ancoragem no suporte à criatividade). In E. Ferneda, G. Cabral, & D. Keller (Eds.), Proceedings of the XIV Brazilian symposium on computer music (SBCM 2013). Brasília, DF: SBC.
   Google Scholar
• Kozbelt, A., Beghetto, R. A., & Runco, M. A. (2010). Theories of creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 20–47). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Machover T., & Chung J. (1989). Hyperinstruments: Musically intelligent and interactive performance and creativity systems. Proceedings of the international computer music conference (ICMC 1989) (pp. 186–190). Ann Arbor, MI: MPublishing, University of Michigan Library.
   Google Scholar
• Mandanici, M., Roda, A., & Canazza, S. (2015). A conceptual framework for motion based music applications. IEEE 2nd VR workshop on sonic interactions for virtual environments (SIVE 2015) (pp. 1–5). Arles: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Nance R. W. (2007). Compositional explorations of plastic sound (Doctoral thesis in music). De Montfort University.
   Google Scholar
• Opie T., & Brown A. (2006). An introduction to eco-structuralism. Proceedings of the international computer music conference (ICMC 2006) (pp. 9–12). New Orleans, LO. Ann Arbor, MI: MPublishing, University of Michigan Library.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira V. S., Silva S. L., Bessa W. R. B., Alcântara-Silva T. R., & Keller D. (2018). Soundsphere: Participatory design as a strategy to develop sustainable tecnologies in ubiquitous music (soundsphere: O design participativo como estratégia para o desenvolvimento de tecnologias sustentáveis em música ubíqua). Sonic Ideas, 10(19), 7–44. ISSN 2317-9694. Electronic paper number 7.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi M. (1958). Harper torchbooks: Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Puckette M. (1997). Pure data. Proceedings of the international computer music conference (pp. 2224–227). San Francisco, CA: International Computer Music Association.
   Google Scholar
• Pullin G. (2007). Social mobiles and speaking chairs: Applying critical design to disruption, discourse and disability. Proceedings of the conference of the European academy of design (EAD 2007). Izmir, Turkey: EAD.
   Google Scholar
• Richards R., Kinney D. K., Benet M., & Merzel A. P. (1988). Assessing everyday creativity: Characteristics of the lifetime creativity scales and validation with three large samples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 476–485. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.3.476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, S. L., Keller, D., Pereira, V. S., & Bessa, W. R. B. (2016). Creativity assessment strategies with children: Using emoticons in time tagging activities. Proceedings of the Amazon international symposium on music (SIMA 2016). Belém, PA: EMUFPA.
   Google Scholar
• Simonton D. K. (1990). History, chemistry, psychology, and genius: An intellectual autobiography of historiometry. In M. A. Runco & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp. 92–115). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka, A. (2009). Sensor-based musical instruments and interactive music. In R. T. Dean (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of computer music (pp. 233–257). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turchet L., Fischione C., Essl G., Keller D., & Barthet M. (2018). Internet of musical things: Vision and challenges. IEEE Access, 6, 61994–62017. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2872625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vohs K. D., Redden J. P., & Rahinel R. (2013). Physical order produces healthy choices, generosity, and conventionality, whereas disorder produces creativity. Psychological Science, 24(9), 1860–1867. doi: 10.1177/0956797613480186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiser, M. (1995). The computer for the 21st century. In R. M. Baecker, J. Grudin, W. A. S. Buxton, & S. Greenberg (Eds.), Human-computer interaction (pp. 933–940). Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Weiser M., & Brown J. S. (1996). Designing calm technology. Powergrid Journal, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Wessel D., & Wright M. (2002, September). Problems and prospects for intimate musical control of computers. Computer Music Journal, 26(3), 11–22. doi: 10.1162/014892602320582945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Z. (2012). Microsoft kinect sensor and its effect. IEEE Multimedia, 19(2), 4–10. doi: 10.1109/MMUL.2012.24
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar