Geometries in sound: an investigation of embodied cognition in contemporary art music

References

• Alain, C., Arnott, S. R., Hevenor, S., Graham, S., & Grady, C. L. (2001). “What” and “where” in the human auditory system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(21), 12301–12306. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.211209098
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 577–660. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99002149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergson, H. (1998). Durée et Simultainéité a Propos de la Théorie D’Einstein. Presses Universitaires de France. (Original work published 1922)
   Google Scholar
• Bonnet, F. J. (2012). Les mots et les sons: Un archipel sonore. Éditions de l’éclat.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1979). La distinction. Critique sociale du jugement. Les Éditions de Minuit.
   Google Scholar
• Brattico, E., & Pearce, M. (2013). Neuroaesthetic of Music. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts , 7(1), 48–61. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031624
   Google Scholar
• Bregman, A. S. (1990). Auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization of sound. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cage, J. (1961). Silence. Wesleyan University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caramiaux, B., Bevilacqua, F., Bianco, T., Schnell, N., Houix, O., & Susini, P. (2014). The role of sound source perception in gestural sound description. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 11(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1145/2536811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chemero, A. (2003). An outline of a theory of affordances. Ecological Psychology, 15(2), 181–195. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326969ECO1502_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chion, M. (2009). Guide to sound objects. Pierre Schaeffer and musical research. (J. Dack & C. North, Trans.) [Guide des Objects Sonores]. Buchet Chastel. (Original work published 1983)
   Google Scholar
• Churchland, P. M. (2013). Matter and consciousness. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, E. (2005). Ways of listening: An ecological approach to the perception of musical meaning. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, A. (2016). Music and embodied cognition. Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, C. (2011). Beyond representation and signification: Toward a sonic materialism. Journal of Visual Culture, 10(2), 145–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470412911402880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, C. (2018). Sonic flux. Sound art, and metaphysics. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, C. & Warner D. (Eds.), (2017). Audio culture. Readings in modern music. Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Damasio, A. (2010). Self comes to mind: Constructing the conscious brain. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Deil, J., Markert, N., Normand, P., Kammen, P., Küssner, M. B., & Taruffi, L. (2022). Mind-wandering during contemporary live music: An exploratory study. Musicae Scientiae, 27, 616–636. https://doi.org/10.1177/10298649221103210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLanda, M. (2022). Materialist phenomenology. Philosophy of Perception. Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Demers, J. (2010). Listening through noise: The aesthetics of experimental electronic music. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dennett, D. C. (2017). Consciousness explained. Hachette UK.
   Google Scholar
• Di Salle, F., Esposito, F., Scarabino, T., Formisano, E., Marciano, E., Saulino, C., Cirillo, S., Elefante, R., Scheffler, K., & Seifritz, E. (2003). FMRI of the auditory system: Understanding the neural basis of auditory gestalt. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 21(10), 1213–1224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2003.08.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolscheid, S., Shayan, S., Majid, A., & Casasanto, D. (2013). The Thickness of Musical Pitch: Psychophysical Evidence for Linguistic Relativity. Psychological Science, 24(5), 613–621. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612457374
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunbar, J. C. (2011). Women, music, culture: An introduction. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dyson, F. (2009). Sounding new media. Immersion and embodyment in the arts and culture. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eitan, Z. (2013). How pitch and loudness shape musical space and motion. In S.-L. Tan, A. J. Cohen, S. D. Lipscomb, & R. A. Kendall (Eds.), The psychology of music in multimedia (pp. 165–191). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199608157.003.0008
   Google Scholar
• Eitan, Z., & Granot, R. Y. (2006). How music moves: Musical parameters and listeners’ images of motion. Music Perception, 23(3), 221–248. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2006.23.3.221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eitan, Z., Ornoy, E., & Granot, R. Y. (2012). Listening in the dark: Congenital and early blindness and cross-domain mappings in music. Psychomusicology: Music, Mind, and Brain, 22(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028939
   Google Scholar
• Emmerson, S., & Landy, L. (Eds.). (2016). Expanding the horizon of electroacoustic music analysis. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fingelkurts, A. A., Fingelkurts, A. A., & Neves, C. F. H. (2010). Natural world physical, brain operational, and mind phenomenal space-time. Physics of Life Reviews, 7(2), 195–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2010.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, A., Daquet, A., Poitrenaud, S., Tijus, C., Fremiot, M., Formosa, M., Prod’homme, L., Mandelbrojt, J., Timsit-Berthier, M., Bootz, P., Hautbois, X., & Besson, M. (2009). Pertinence cognitive des unités sémiotiques temporelles. Musicae Scientiae, 13(2), 415–440. https://doi.org/10.1177/102986490901300209
   Google Scholar
• Gallistel, C. R. (1990). The organization of learning. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gärdenfors, P. (2000). Conceptual spaces. The geometry of thought. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gaver, W. W. (1993). What in the world do we hear?: An ecological approach to auditory event perception. Ecological Psychology, 5(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326969eco0501_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Ginzburg, J., & Purgas, P. (2017). Emptyset – borders: Vol. thrill 429 [CD]. Thrill Jockey.
   Google Scholar
• Glover, R., Gottschalk, J., & Harrison, B. (2018). Being time. Case studies in musical temporality. Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Godøy, R. I. (1997). Knowledge in music theory by shapes of musical objects and sound-producing actions. In M. Leman (Ed.), Music, gestalt, and computing. Studies in cognitive and systematic musicology (pp. 89–102). Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Godøy, R. I. (2010). Images of sonic objects. Organised Sound, 15(1), 54–62. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355771809990264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godøy, R. I., & Jørgensen, H. (Eds.). (2001). Musical imagery. Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Grebosz-Haring, K., & Weichbold, M. (2020). Contemporary art music and its audiences: Age, gender, and social class profile. Musicae Scientiae, 24(1), 60–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/1029864918774082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths, T. D., & Warren, J. D. (2004). What is an auditory object? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(11), 887–892. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1538
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimshaw, M., & Garner, T. (2015). Sonic virtuality. Sound as emergent perception. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grisey, G. (1987). Tempus ex machina: A composer’s reflections on musical time. Contemporary Music Review, 2(1), 239–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/07494468708567060
   Google Scholar
• Haas, G. F. (1998). Streichquartette 2. On Haas—Kairos Quartett - Streichquartette 1 und 2. (Vol. ez-19017-CD) [CD]. Edition Zeitklang.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, G. F. (2000). In vain. On Haas—Klangforum Wien, S. Cambreling - in vain (Vol. 0012332KAI-CD) [CD]. Kairos.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, A. (2009). The sound of music. In M. Nudds & C. O’Callaghan (Eds.), Sounds and perception: New philosophical essays (pp. 146–182). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hjortkjær, J. (2016). Sound objects – Auditory objects – Musical objects. Danish Musicology Online. Special Edition, 47–56.
   Google Scholar
• Huron, D. B. (2006). Sweet anticipation: Music and the psychology of expectation. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Imberty, M. (2005). La musique creuse le temps. De Wagner à Boulez: Musique, psychologie, psychanalyse. L’Harmattan.
   Google Scholar
• Jakubowski, K. (2020). Musical imagery. In A. Abraham (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the imagination (pp. 187–206). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. (2008). The meaning of the body: Aesthetics of human understanding. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M., & Larson, S. (2003). Something in the way she moves”-metaphors of musical motion. Metaphor and Symbol, 18(2), 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327868MS1802_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, S., Kumar, S., Husain, M., & Griffiths, T. D. (2015). Auditory working memory for objects vs. features. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 9, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2015.00013
   Google Scholar
• Juslin, P. N., & Sloboda, J. A. (2013). Music and emotion. In D. Deutsch (Ed.), The psychology of music (3rd ed., pp. 583–645). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knight-Hill, A. (Ed.). (2020). Sound and image: Aesthetics and practices. Focal Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429295102
   Google Scholar
• Koelsch, S., & Siebel, W. A. (2005). Towards a neural basis of music perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(12), 578–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köhler, W. (1929). Gestalt psychology. H. Liveright.
   Google Scholar
• Kozak, M. (2020). Enacting musical time. The bodily experience of New music. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, J. D. (1988). The time of music: New meanings, new temporalities, new listening strategies. New York: Schirmer Books.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, J. (2014). Affordances and the musically extended mind. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1003. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.01003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubovy, M., & Van Valkenburg, D. (2001). Auditory and visual objects. Cognition, 80(1-2), 97–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00155-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Küssner, M. B. (2017). Shape, drawing and gesture: Empirical studies of cross-modality. In D. Leech-Wilkinson, & H. M. Prior (Eds.), Music and shape (pp. 33–56). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Küssner, M. B., Tidhar, D., Prior, H. M., & Leech-Wilkinson, D. (2014). Musicians are more consistent: Gestural cross-modal mappings of pitch, loudness and tempo in real-time. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 789. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00789
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live By. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Landy, L. (2007). Understanding the Art of sound organization. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leech-Wilkinson, D., & Prior, H. M. (Eds.). (2017). Music and shape. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leman, M. (2007). Embodied music cognition and mediation technology. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leman, M., & Maes, P.-J. (2015). The role of embodiment in the perception of music. Empirical Musicology Review, 9(3-4), 236–246. https://doi.org/10.18061/emr.v9i3-4.4498
   Google Scholar
• Lerdahl, F., & Jackendoff, R. (1983). A generative theory of tonal music. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lesaffre, M., Leman, M., & Maes, P. J. (Eds.). (2017). The Routledge companion to embodied music interaction. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Löbbers, S., & Fazekas, G. (2021). Representation of musical timbre through visual sketching [International Conference for Music Perception and Cognition (ICMPC)]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LyRyrbBVDOU
   Google Scholar
• Mencke, I., Omigie, D., Wald-Fuhrmann, M., & Brattico, E. (2019). Atonal music: Can uncertainty lead to pleasure? Frontiers in Neuroscience, 12, 979. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00979
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menger, P.-M. (2001). Il pubblico della musica contemporanea. In J.-J. Nattiez (Ed.), Enciclopedia della Musica. Il Novecento (Einaudi Vol. 1, pp. 987–1004).
   Google Scholar
• Menin, D., & Schiavio, A. (2012). Rethinking musical affordances. AVANT, III(2), 202–215.
   Google Scholar
• Momi, M. (2019). Umami. Ricordi.
   Google Scholar
• Momi, M. (2020). Umami, for ensemble and electronics (2019). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b4OBAcvoOIg (private content)
   Google Scholar
• Noë, A. (2004). Action in perception. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Callaghan, C., & Nudds, M. (Eds.). (2009). Sounds and perception: New philosophical essays. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ockelford, A., & Sergeant, D. (2012). Musical expectancy in atonal contexts: Musicians’ perception of “antistructure”. Psychology of Music, 41(2), 139–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735612442582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petitot, J. (1985). Morphogenèse du Sens I. Presses Universitaires de France.
   Google Scholar
• Petitot, J. (2011). Cognitive morphodynamics. Dynamical morphological models of constituency in perception and syntax. Peter Lang AG.
   Google Scholar
• Ramachandran, V. S., & Hubbard, E. (2001). Synaesthesia? A window into perception, thought and language. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8(12), 3–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reybrouck, M. (1997). Gestalt concepts and music: Limitations and possibilities. In M. Leman (Ed.), Music, gestalt, and computing. Studies in cognitive and systematic musicology (pp. 57–69). Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Reybrouck, M. (2012). Musical sense-making and the concept of affordance: An ecosemiotic and experiential approach. Biosemiotics, 5(3), 391–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-012-9144-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reybrouck, M. (2013). Musical universals and the axiom of psychobiological equivalence. In J.-L. Leroy (Ed.), Topicality of Musical Universals/Actualité des Universaux musicaux (pp. 31–44). Editions des Archives Contemporaines.
   Google Scholar
• Rocchesso D., & Fontana, F. (Eds.). (2003). The sounding object. GNU Free Documentation License.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, A. (2010). The Darkness Audible. The spectral sounds of Georg Friedrich Haas. The New Yorker. November 29. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2010/11/29/darkness-audible, (accessed October 28, 2023)
   Google Scholar
• Santarcangelo, V., & Wanke, R. (2020). The early stage of perception of contemporary art music: A matter of time. Organised Sound, 25(2), 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355771820000047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaeffer, P. (1966). Traité des objets musicaux. Editions du Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Scruton, R. (1997). The aesthetics of music. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scruton, R. (2009). Sounds as secondary objects and pure events. In M. Nudds, & C. O’Callaghan (Eds.), Sounds and perception: New philosophical essays (pp. 50–68). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seth, A. (2021). Being you: A new science of consciousness. Faber & Faber.
   Google Scholar
• Shamma, S. (2001). On the role of space and time in auditory processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(8), 340–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01704-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheets-Johnstone, M. (1999). The primacy of movement. John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Smalley, D. (1997). Spectromorphology: Explaining sound-shapes. Organised Sound, 2(2), 107–126. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355771897009059
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, B. (2001). Music and memory. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Solomos, M. (2019). From music to sound: The emergence of sound in 20th- and 21st-century music. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Spence, C. (2011). Crossmodal correspondences: A tutorial review. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73(4), 971–995. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-010-0073-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tenney, J. (1988). Meta+Hodos: A phenomenology of 20th-century musical materials and an approach to the study of form; and, META Meta+Hodos. Frog Peak Music.
   Google Scholar
• Tenney, J., & Polansky, L. (1980). Temporal gestalt perception in music. Journal of Music Theory, 24(2), 205–241. https://doi.org/10.2307/843503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thom, R. (1983). Paraboles et catastrophes. Flammarion.
   Google Scholar
• Vainio, M., & Väisänen, I. (2004). Pan Sonic—Kesto 234.48:4: Vol. BFFP 180BX-CD [CD]. Blast First.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Cruys, S., & Wagemans, J. (2011). Gestalts as predictions—Some reflections and an application to art. Gestalt Theory, 33(3–4), 325–344.
   Google Scholar
• Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Verrando, G. (2012). La nuova liuteria. Orchestrazione, grammatica, estetica. Suvini Zerboni.
   Google Scholar
• Voegelin, S. (2010). Listening to noise and silence: Towards A philosophy Of sound Art. Continuum Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, K., & Dobkins, K. R. (2011). Synaesthetic associations decrease during infancy. Psychological Science, 22(8), 1067–1072. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611416250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanke, R. (2015). A cross-genre study of the (Ec)Static perspective of today’s music. Organised Sound, 20(3), 331–339. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355771815000266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanke, R. (2019). A unified approach to perceiving sound in current experimental music genres. Filigrane. Musique, Esthétique, Sciences, Société, 23. http://revues.mshparisnord.org/filigrane/index.php?id=879
   Google Scholar
• Wanke, R. (2021). Sound in the ecstatic-materialist perspective on experimental music. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wanke, R. (2022). Listening Survey – figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21590658.v3
   Google Scholar
• Wanke, R., & Santarcangelo, V. (2021). Memory as the a-spatial domain for the perception of certain genres of contemporary art music. Music & Science, 4, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/2059204321997658
   Google Scholar
• Windsor, L. W. (2000). Through and around the acousmatic: The interpretation of electroacoustic sounds. In S. Emmerson (Ed.), Music, electronic media and culture (pp. 7–35). Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Windsor, L. W. & de Bézenac, C. (2012). Music and affordances. Musicae Scientiae, 16(1), 102–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/1029864911435734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zbikowski, L. M. (2002). Conceptualizing music: Cognitive structure, theory, and analysis. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zbikowski, L. M. (2008). Metaphor and music. In R. W. Gibbs Jr. (Ed.). The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 502–524). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802
   Google Scholar
• Zbikowski, L. M. (2010). Foundations of musical grammar. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zbikowski, L. M. (2017). Music, analogy and metaphor. In R. Ashley & R. Timmers (Eds.). The Routledge companion to music cognition, (pp. 501–512). Routledge.
   Google Scholar