Multiple Systems Estimation and Human Trafficking

Further Reading

• Bales, Kevin, Hesketh, Olivia, and Silverman, Bernard. 2015. Modern slavery in the UK: How many victims? Significance 12(3):16–21.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, Patrick, and Price, Megan. 2018. The statistics of genocide. CHANCE 31(1):38–45.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, Patrick, Scheuren, Fritz, Seltzer, William, and Spirer, Herbert F. 1999. Multiple or N-system estimates of the number of political killings in Guatemala. In Proceedings of the Section on Government Statistics and Section on Social Statistics. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association, 156–160.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, David L., and Hooten, Mevin B. 2021. Statistical challenges in agent-based modeling. The American Statistician 75(3):235–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, Lax, Silverman, Bernard W., and Vincent, Kyle. 2021. Multiple systems estimation for sparse capture data: Inferential challenges when there are nonoverlapping lists. Journal of the American Statistical Association 116(535):1297–1306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engineering National Academies of Sciences, Medicine, Committee on Population, et al. 2020. Estimating the prevalence of human trafficking in the United States: Considerations and complexities: Proceedings of a workshop. National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fellegi, Ivan P. and Sunter, Alan B. 1969. A theory for record linkage. Journal of the American Statistical Association 64(328):1183–1210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jewell, Nicholas P., Spagat, Michael, and Jewell, Britta L. 2013. MSE and casualty counts: Assumptions, interpretation, and challenges. In Counting Civilian Casualties: An Introduction to Recording and Estimating Nonmilitary Deaths in Conflict. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-997730-7. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199977307.003.0010.
   Google Scholar
• Johndrow, James E., Lum, Kristian, and Manrique-Vallier, Daniel. 2019. Low-risk population size estimates in the presence of capture heterogeneity. Biometrika 106(1):197–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lum, Kristian, Price, Megan Emily, and Banks, David L. 2013. Applications of multiple systems estimation in human rights research. The American Statistician 67(4):191–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manrique-Vallier, Daniel. 2016. Bayesian population size estimation using Dirichlet process mixtures. Biometrics 72(4-):1246–1254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manrique-Vallier, Daniel, Price, Megan E., and Gohdes, Anita. 2013. Multiple systems estimation techniques for estimating casualties in armed conflicts. Counting civilian casualties: An introduction to recording and estimating nonmilitary deaths in conflict, 165.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, C. G. J. 1896. The yearly immigration of young plaice into the Limfjord from the German Sea. Report of the Danish Biological Station for 1895, 6:1–48. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1571135650073221120.
   Google Scholar
• Plante, Nathalie, Rivest, Louis-Paul, and Gilles Tremblay. 1998. Stratified capture-recapture estimation of the size of a closed population. Biometrics 47–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, Megan E., and Ball, Patrick. 2015. Selection bias and the statistical patterns of mortality in conflict. Statistical Journal of the IAOS 31(2):263–272.
   Google Scholar
• Shelley, Louise. 2010. Human trafficking: A global perspective. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, Bernard W. 2014. Modern slavery: an application of multiple systems estimation. Government of the UK.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, Bernard W. 2020. Multiple-systems analysis for the quantification of modern slavery: classical and Bayesian approaches. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society 183(3):691–736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steorts, Rebecca C., Hall, Rob, and Fienberg, Stephen. 2014a. SMERED: A Bayesian approach to graphical record linkage and de-duplication. In Artificial Intelligence and Statistics: 922–930. PMLR.
   Google Scholar
• Steorts, Rebecca C., Ventura, Samuel L., Sadinle, Mauricio, and Fienberg, Stephen E. 2014b. A comparison of blocking methods for record linkage. In Proceedings of Privacy in Statistical Databases: UNESCO Chair in Data Privacy, International Conference, 253–268. PSD 2014, Ibiza, Spain: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Winkler, William E. 2014. Matching and record linkage. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews: Computational Statistics 6(5):313–325.
   Google Scholar