Publication Cover
Exceptionality
A Special Education Journal
Volume 22, 2014 - Issue 2
321
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Developmental Differences in Curriculum-Based Measurement (CBM) Reading Aloud Growth Rates Between English-Speaking Students and English Language Learners in Grade 8

&
Pages 91-110 | Received 09 Jul 2012, Accepted 08 Sep 2013, Published online: 24 Apr 2014

REFERENCES

  • Abedi, J. (2002). Standardized achievement tests and English language learners: Psychometric issues. Educational Assessment, 8, 231–257. doi: 10.1207/S15326977EA0803_02.
  • Aunola, K., Leskinen, E., Onatsu-Arvilommi, T., & Nurmi, J.-E. (2002). Three methods for studying developmental change: A case of reading skills and self-concept. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 343–364.
  • Baker, S. K., & Good, R. (1995). Curriculum-based measurement of English reading with bilingual Hispanic students: A validation study with second-grade students. School Psychology Review, 24, 561–578.
  • Baker, S., Plasencia-Peinado, J., & Lezcano-Lytle, V. (1998). The use of curriculum-based measurement with language-minority students. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement (pp. 175–213). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Bast, J., & Reitsma, P. (1997). Matthew effects in reading: A comparison of latent growth curve models and simplex models with structured means. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32, 135–167.
  • Bast, J., & Reitsma, P. (1998). Analyzing the development of individual differences in terms of Matthew effects in reading: Results from a Dutch longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 34, 1373–1399.
  • Bollen, K. A., & Curran, P. J. (2006). Latent curve models: A structural equation perspective. New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Boscardin, C. K., Muthen, B., Francis, D. J., & Baker, E. L. (2008). Early identification of reading difficulties using heterogeneous developmental trajectories. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 192–208. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.192.
  • Cabell, S. Q., Justice, L. M., Konold, T. R., & McGinty, A. S. (2011). Profiles of emergent literacy skills among preschool children who are at risk for academic difficulties. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 26, 1–14. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461.
  • Coenders, G., Saris, W. E., Batista-Foguet, J. M., & Andreenkova, A. (1999). Stability of three-wave simplex estimates of reliability. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 135–157.
  • Cooper, D., & Pikulski, J. (1999). Invitations to literacy. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Dembo, R., Wothke, W., Livingston, S., & Schmeidler, J. (2002). The impact of a family empowerment intervention on juvenile offender heavy drinking: A latent growth model analysis. Substance Use & Misuse, 37, 1359–1390.
  • Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219–232.
  • Deno, S. L. (2003). Developments in curriculum-based measurement. The Journal of Special Education, 37, 184–192.
  • Duncan, T. E., Duncan, S. C., & Strycker, L. A. (2006). An introduction to latent variable growth curve modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Espin, C. A., & Deno, S. L. (1993). Content-specific and general reading disabilities of secondary-level students: Identification and educational relevance. Journal of Special Education, 27, 321–337.
  • Espin, C. A., & Foegen, A. (1996). Curriculum-based measures at the secondary level: Validity of three general outcome measures for predicting performance on content-area tasks. Exceptional Children, 62, 497–514.
  • Espin, C. A., Shin, J., & Busch, T. W. (2005). Curriculum-based measurement in the content areas: Vocabulary matching as an indicator of progress in social studies learning. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 353–363.
  • Francis, D. J., Shaywitz, S. E., Stuebing, K. K., Shaywitz, B. A., & Fletcher, J. M. (1996). Developmental lag versus deficit models of reading disability: A longitudinal, individual growth curves analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 3–17.
  • Friend, M. P. (2005). Special education: Contemporary perspectives for school professionals. Boston, MA: Pearson Education Inc.
  • Fuchs, L. S., & Deno, S. L. (1994). Must instructionally useful performance assessment be based in the curriculum? Exceptional Children, 61, 15–24.
  • Genesee, F., Lindholm-Lieary, K., Saunders, W., & Christian, D. (2005). English language learners in U.S. schools: An overview of research findings. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 10, 363–385. doi:10.1207/s15327671espr1004_2.
  • Gilbertson, D., & Bluck, J. (2006). Improving responsiveness to intervention for English-language learner: A comparison of instructional pace on letter naming rates. Journal of Behavioral Education, 15, 131–147. doi:10.1007/s10864-006-9013-y.
  • Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Jöreskog, K. G. (1970). Estimation and testing of simplex models. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 23, 121–145.
  • Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 437–447.
  • Kim, J. (2004). Summer reading and the ethnic achievement gap. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 9, 169–188.
  • Klingner, J. K., Artiles, A. J., & Barletta, L. M. (2006). English language learners who struggle with reading: Language acquisition or LD? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 108–128.
  • Leppänen, U., Niemi, P., Aunola, K., & Nurmi, J.-E. (2004). Development of reading skills among preschool and primary school pupils. Journal of Educational Psychology, 39, 72–93.
  • Lesaux, N., & Siegel, L. (2003). The development of reading in children who speak English as a second language. Developmental Psychology, 39, 1005–1019. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.39.6.1005.
  • Marston, D. B. (1989). A curriculum-based measurement approach to assessing academic performance: What it is and why do it. In Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 18–78). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • McCardle, P., Mele-McCarthy, J., Cutting, L., Leos, K., & D'Emilio, T. (2005). Learning disabilities in English language learners: Identifying the issues. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 20, 1–5. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2005.00114x.
  • McCardle, P., Mele-McCarthy, J., & Leos, K. (2005). English language learners and learning disabilities: Research agenda and implications for practice. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 20, 68–78. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2005.00122x.
  • McCoach, D. B., O'Connell, A. A., Reis, S. M., & Levitt, H. A. (2006). Growing readers: A hierarchical linear model of children's reading growth during the first 2 years of school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 14–28. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.14.
  • McMaster, K. L., Wayman, M. M., & Cao, M. (2006). Monitoring the reading progress of secondary-level English learners: Technical features of oral reading and maze tasks. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 31, 17–31.
  • Parrila, R., Aunola, K., Leskinen, E., Nurmi, J., & Kirby, J. R. (2005). Development of individual differences in reading: Results from longitudinal studies in English and Finnish. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 299–319. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.97.3.299.
  • Ramirez, R. D., & Shapiro, E. S. (2006). Curriculum-based measurement and the evaluation of reading skills of Spanish-speaking English language learners in bilingual education classrooms. School Psychology Review, 35, 356–369.
  • Salend, S. J., Garrick Duhaney, L. M., & Montgomery, W. (2002). A comprehensive approach to identifying and addressing issues of disproportionate representation. Remedial & Special Education, 23, 289–299.
  • Scarborough, H. S., & Parker, J. D. (2003). Matthew effects in children with learning disabilities: Development of reading, IQ, and psychosocial problems from Grade 2 to Grade 8. Annals of Dyslexia, 47–71.
  • Schafer, J. L. (1997). Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. London, England: Chapman & Hall.
  • Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407.
  • Tichá, R., Espin, C. A., & Wayman, M. M. (2009). Reading progress monitoring for secondary-school students: Reliability, validity, and sensitivity to growth of reading aloud and maze selection measures. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 24, 132–142. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2009.00287.
  • U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2006). The condition of education 2006, NCES 2006-071, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  • Vang, C. T. (2005). Minority students are far from academic success and still at-risk in public schools. Multicultural Education, 12, 9–15.
  • Wayman, M. M., Wallace, T., Wiley, H. I., Ticha, R., & Espin, C. A. (2007). Literature synthesis on curriculum-based measurement in reading. Journal of Special Education, 41, 85–120.
  • Wiley, H. I., & Deno, S. L. (2005). Oral reading and maze measures as predictors of success for English learners on states standards assessment. Remedial and Special Education, 26, 207–214.
  • Willett, J. B. (1997). Measuring change: What individual growth modeling buys you. In E. Amsel and K. A. Renninger (Eds.), Change and development: Issues of theory, method, and application. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Williamson, G. L., Appelbaum, M., & Epanchin, A. (1991). Longitudinal analyses of academic achievement. Journal of Educational Measurement, 28, 61–76.
  • Yeo, S. (2010). Predicting performance on statewide achievement tests using curriculum-based measurement in reading: A multilevel meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 31, 412–422. doi:10.1177/0741932508327463.
  • Yeo, S. (2011). Reliability generalization of curriculum-based measurement reading aloud: A meta-analytic review. Exceptionality, 19, 75–93. doi:10.1080/09362835.2011.562094.
  • Yeo, S., Kim, D.-I., Branum-Martin, L., Wayman, M. M., & Espin, C. (2012). Assessing the reliability of curriculum-based measurement: An application of latent growth modeling. Journal of School Psychology, 50, 275–292. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2011.09.002.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.