Examining the Effects of SRSD in Combination with Video Self-Modeling on Writing by Third Grade Students with Learning Disabilities

References

• Ayres, K. M., & Gast, D. L. (2010). Dependent measures and measurement procedures. In D. L. Gast (Ed.), Single subject research methodology in behavioral sciences (pp. 129–165). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, R. L., Angell, M. E., & Stoner, J. B. (2011). Improving literacy skills in students with complex communication needs who use augmentative/alternative communication systems. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 46(3), 352–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bangert-Drowns, R. L. (1993). The word processor as an instructional tool: A meta-analysis of word processing in writing instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63, 69–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boisvert, P., & Rao, K. (2015). Video self-modeling for English language learners. TESOL Journal, 6(1), 36–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bromley, K. (2007). Best practices in teaching writing. In L. M. Morrow, L. B. Gambrell, & N. K. Duke (Eds.), Best practices in literacy instruction (pp. 243–263). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buggey, T., Toombs, K., Gardener, P., & Cervetti, M. (1999). Using videotaped self-modeling to train response behaviors in students with autism. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 1(4), 255–270.
   Google Scholar
• Calkins, L. M. (1994). The art of teaching writing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Calfee, R. C., & Miller, R. G. (2007). Best practices for writing assessment. In S. Graham, C. A. MacArthur, & J. Fitzgerald. (Eds.), Best practices in writing instruction (pp. 265–288). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, C., & Moshenko, B. (1996). Elicitations of knowledge transformational reports while children write narratives. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 28, 271–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creer, T. L., & Miklich, D. R. (1970). The application of a self-modeling procedure to modify inappropriate behavior: A preliminary report. Behavior Research and Therapy, 8, 91–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler, L., & Graham, S. (2008). Primary grade writing instruction: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 907–919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delano, M. E. (2007). Improving written language performance of adolescents with Asperger syndrome. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40(2), 345–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De la Paz, S. (2007). Best practices in teaching writing to students with special needs. In S. Graham, C. A. MacArthur, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Best practices in writing instruction (pp. 308–329). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dowrick, P. W. (1999). A review of self modeling and related information. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 8, 23–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, R., & Portaluppi, J. (2001). Writing workshop: The essential guide. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Florida Department of Education, Office of Assessment. (2013b). FCAT 2.0 Writing. Frequently asked questions. Retrieved from http://fcat.fldoe.org/fcat2/pdf/13fcat2writing.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gast, D. L. (2010). Single subject research methodology in behavioral sciences. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gast, D. L., & Ledford, J. (2010). Multiple baseline and multiple probe designs. In D. L. Gast (Ed.), Single subject research methodology in behavioral sciences (pp. 276–328). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gast, D. L., & Spriggs, A. (2010). Visual analysis of graphic data. In D. L. Gast (Ed.), Single subject research methodology in behavioral sciences (pp. 199–233). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, A., Russell, M., & Cook, A. (2003). The effect of computers on student writing: A meta-analysis of studies from 1992 to 2002. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 2(1), 3–49.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S. (2006b). Writing. In P. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 457–478). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1989). Improving learning disabled students’ skills at composing essays: Self-instructional strategy training. Exceptional Children, 56(3), 201–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2000). The role of self-regulation and transcription skills in writing and writing development, Educational Psychologist, 35, 3–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2003). Students with learning disabilities and the process of writing: A meta-analysis of SRSD studies. In L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning disabilities (pp. 383–402). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2005). Improving the writing performance of young struggling writers: Theoretical and programmatic research from the center on accelerated student learning, The Journal of Special Education, 39(1), 19–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (2009). Almost 30 years of writing research: Making sense of it all with the Wrath of Khan. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 24(2), 58–68.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Sexton, M. (1998). Self-regulated strategy development and the writing process: Effects on essay writing and attributions. Exceptional Children, 64(3), 295–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Hebert, M. (2010). Writing to read: Evidence for how writing can improve reading: A report from Carnegie Corporation of New York. New York: Carnegie Corporation of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., McKeown, D., Kiuhara, S., & Harris, K. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for students in the elementary grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 879–896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007b). Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high school—A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellence in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Graves, D. (1983). Writing: Teachers and children at work. Exeter, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1985). Improving learning disabled students’ composition skills: Self-control strategy training. Learning Disability Quarterly, 8, 27–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1996). Making the writing process work: Strategies for composition and self-regulation. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, K.R., Graham, S., & Mason, L. (2006). Improving the writing, knowledge, and motivation of struggling writers: Effects of self-regulated strategy development with and without peer support. American Educational Research Journal, 43(2), 295–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, K. R., Graham, S., Mason, L., & Friedlander, B. (2008). Powerful writing strategies for all students. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Hitchcock, C., Dowrick, P.W., & Prater, M. A. (2003). Video self modeling intervention in school-based settings: A review. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 36–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitchcock, C., Prater, M. A., & Dowrick, P. W. (2004). Reading comprehension and fluency: Examining the effects of video self-modeling on first grade students’ reading difficulties. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 27, 89–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horner, R. D., & Baer, D. M. (1978). Multiple-probe technique: A variation on the multiple baseline. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11(1), 189–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horner, R. H., Carr, E. G., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S. L., & Wolery, M. (2005). The use of single-subject research design to identify evidence-based practices in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellogg, R.T. (1987). Writing performance: Effects of cognitive strategies. Written Communication, 4(3), 269–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kratochwill, T. R., Hitchcock, J. H., Horner, R. H., Levin, J. R., Odom, S. L., Rindskopf, D. M., & Shadish, W. R. (2013). Single-case intervention research design standards. Remedial and Special Education, 34, 26–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lienemann, T. O., & Reid, R. (2008). Using self-regulated strategy development to improve expository writing with students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Exceptional Children, 74(4), 471–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, M. A., Lynne Lane, K., Harris, K. R., Graham, S., Story, M., & Sandmel, K. (2010). Self-regulated strategies development for persuasive writing in tandem with schoolwide positive behavioral support: Effects for second-grade students with behavioral and writing difficulties. Behavioral Disorders, 35(2), 157–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacArthur, C., & Graham, S. (1987). Learning disabled students’ composing under three methods of text production: Handwriting, word processing, and dictation. Journal of Special Education, 21, 22–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, L. H., Kubina, R., & Taft, R. J. (2011). Developing quick writing skills of middle school students with disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 44(4), 205–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, L. H., & Shriner, J. G. (2008). Self-regulated strategy development instruction for writing an opinion essay: Effects for six students with emotional/behavior disorders. Reading and Writing, 21(1), 71–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mechling, L. (2005). The effect of instructor-created video programs to teach students with disabilities: A literature review. Journal of Special Education Technology, 20(2), 25–36.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson-Karlan, G. R., & Parette, H. P. (2007). Evidence-based practice and the consideration of assistive technology. Assistive Technology Outcomes and Benefits, 4(1), 130–139.
   Google Scholar
• Prater, M. A., Carter, N., Hitchcock, C., & Dowrick, P. (2012). Video self-modeling to improve academic performance: A literature review. Psychology in the Schools, 49(1), 71–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santangelo, T., Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (2008). Using self-regulated strategy development to support students who have “trubol giting thangs into werds.” Remedial & Special Education, 29(2), 78–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson-Jacobson, L., & Reid, R. (2010). Improving the persuasive essay writing of high school students with ADHD. Exceptional Children, 76(2), 157–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Troia, G. A. (2006). Writing instruction for students with learning disabilities. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 324–336). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, M. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar