The Effects of a Summary Writing Strategy on the Literacy Skills of Adolescents with Disabilities

References

• Achieve, Inc. (2005). Rising to the challenge: Are high school graduates prepared for college and work? Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Applebee, A. N., & Langer, J. A. (2011). A snapshot of writing instruction in middle schools and high schools. English Journal, 100, 14–27.
   Google Scholar
• Bangert-Drowns, R., Hurley, M. M., Wilkinson, B. (2004). The effects of school-based writing-to-learn interventions on academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 74, 29–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bean, T. W., & Steenwyk, F. L. (1984). The effect of three forms of summarization instruction on sixth graders‘ summary writing and comprehension. Journal of Reading Behavior, 15, 297–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büyüknarci, O., Hennes, A., Rietz, C., & Grünke, M. (2015). Teaching children with learning disabilities how to write concise summaries of stories. Insights into Learning Disabilities, 12, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, J. (2012). Summarize to get the gist. Educational Leadership, 69, 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, K. B., & Bennet, K. E. (2014). Writing interventions for high school students with disabilities: A review of single-case design studies. Remedial and Special Education, 35, 344–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De La Paz, S., & Wissinger, D. R. (2015). Effects of genre and content knowledge on historical thinking with academically diverse high school students. The Journal of Experimental Education, 83, 110–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, N., Fisher, D., & Hernandez, T. (2003). “What’s the Gist?” Summary writing for struggling adolescent writers. Voices from the Middle, 11, 43–49.
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, A., Graham, S., Kiuhara, S., & Hebert, M. (2014). High school teachers use of writing to support students’ learning: A national survey. Reading and Writing, 27, 1043–1072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham. S., & Harris, K. R. (2003). Students with learning disabilities and the process of writing: A meta-analysis of SRSD studies. In L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning disabilities (pp. 383–402). New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Harris, K. (2005). Writing better. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Hebert, M. (2011). It is more than just the message: Presentation effects in scoring writing. Focus on Exceptional Children, 44, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Santangelo, T. (2015). Research-based writing practices and the Common Core: Meta-analysis and meta-synthesis. The Elementary School Journal, 115, 498–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Hebert, M. A. (2010). Writing to read: Evidence for how writing can improve reading. A Carnegie Corporation Time to Act Report. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). Writing next: Effective strategies to improve writing of adolescents in middle and high schools—A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (in press). Self-regulated strategy development: Theoretical bases, critical instructional elements, and future research. In R. Fidalgo, K. R. Harris, & M. Braaksma (Eds.), Design principles for teaching effective writing: Theoretical and empirical principles. Hershey, PA: Brill Editions.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, K. R., Graham, S., Mason, L. H., & Friedlander, B. (2008). Powerful writing strategies for all students. Baltimore: Brookes Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, L. M., & Konrad, M. (2009). Teaching students with intellectual or developmental disabilities to write: A review of the literature. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 30, 1–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiuhara, S., Graham, S., & Hawken, L. (2009). Teaching writing to high school students: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 136–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohnen, A. M. (2013). Informational writing in high school science: The importance of genre, apprenticeship, and publication. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 57, 233–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, L. H., Kubina, R. M., Valasa, L. L., & Cramer, A. M. (2010). Evaluating effective writing instruction for adolescent students in an emotional and behavior support setting. Behavioral Disorders, 35, 140–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mateos, M., Martın, E., Villalon, R., Luna, M. (2008). Reading and writing to learn in secondary education: Online processing activity and written products in summarizing and synthesizing tasks. Reading and Writing, 21, 675–697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meltzer, L. (2007). Executive function in education: From theory to practice. New York: Guildford.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2012). The Nation’s Report Card: Writing 2011 (NCES 2012–470). Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education, Washington, DC
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics (2013). 2013 Mathematics and Reading: Grade 12 Assessments. Retrieved from http://www.nationsreportcard.gov/reading_math_g12_2013/#/reaching-proficient
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics (2015). 2013 Mathematics and Reading Assessments. Retrieved from http://www.nationsreportcard.gov/reading_math_2015/#reading?grade=4
   Google Scholar
• National Commission on Writing. (2006). Writing and school reform. Retrieved from http://www.host-collegeboard.com/advocacy/writing/publications.html
   Google Scholar
• National Commission on Writing. (2008). Writing, technology, and teens. Retrieved from http://www.nwp.org/cs/public/print/resource/2900
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices. (2010). Common Core State Standards: English Language Arts. Washington DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, R., Mason, L., & Asaro-Saddler, K. (2013). Self-regulation strategies for students with Autism Spectrum Disorder. In S. Goldstein & J. Naglieri (Eds.), Interventions for autism spectrum disorders (pp. 257–282) New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rinehart, S. D., Stahl, S. A., and Erickson, L. G. (1986). Some effects of summarization training on reading and studying. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 422–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saddler, B. (2003). But teacher I added a period! Middle schoolers learn to revise. Voices from the Middle, 11, 20–26.
   Google Scholar
• Saddler, B. (2015). WINDOW summarization strategy. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Educational and Counseling Psychology, University at Albany, Albany, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Saddler, B., Asaro-Saddler, K., Moeyaert, M., & Ellis-Robinson, T. (2016). The effects of a summarizing strategy on the written summaries of children with emotional and behavioral disorders. Remedial and Special Education. doi:10.1177/0741932516669051
   Google Scholar
• Schumaker, J. B., & Deshler, D. D. (2009). Adolescents with learning disabilities as writers: Are we selling them short? Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 24, 81–92.
   Google Scholar
• Troia, G. (2014). Evidence-based practices for writing instruction (Document No. IC-5). Retrieved from University of Florida, Collaboration for Effective Educator, Development, Accountability, and Reform Center website: http://ceedar.education.ufl.edu/tools/innovation-configuration/
   Google Scholar
• Westby, C., Culatta, B., Lawrence, B., & Hall-Kenyon, K. (2010). Summarizing expository texts. Topics in Language Disorders, 30, 275–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, E., Winne, P., & Carney, P. (1995). Evaluating the effects of training high school students to use summarization when training includes analogically similar information. Journal of Reading Behavior, 27, 605–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar