Advanced search
Publication Cover
Ship Technology Research
Schiffstechnik
Volume 69, 2022 - Issue 3
Submit an article Journal homepage
4,039
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

A comprehensive approach to scenario-based risk management for Arctic waters

Martin Bergströma Department of Mechanical Engineering, Aalto University, Espoo, FinlandCorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7758-3038View further author information
ORCID Icon,
Thomas Browneb Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Canada;c National Research Council of Canada, Ocean, Coastal and River Engineering Research Centre, St. John's, CanadaORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4568-1252View further author information
ORCID Icon,
Sören Ehlersd Institute for Ship Structural Design and Analysis, Hamburg University of Technology, Hamburg, GermanyView further author information
,
Inari Hellee Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, FinlandORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9006-0899View further author information
ORCID Icon,
Hauke Herrnringd Institute for Ship Structural Design and Analysis, Hamburg University of Technology, Hamburg, GermanyORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3583-684XView further author information
ORCID Icon,
Faisal Khanb Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, CanadaORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5638-4299View further author information
ORCID Icon,
Jan Kubiczekd Institute for Ship Structural Design and Analysis, Hamburg University of Technology, Hamburg, GermanyORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-3882-9194View further author information
ORCID Icon,
Pentti Kujalaa Department of Mechanical Engineering, Aalto University, Espoo, FinlandORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2665-9957View further author information
ORCID Icon,
Mihkel Kõrgesaarf Kuressaare College, School of Engineering, Tallinn University of Technology, Kuressaare, EstoniaView further author information
,
Bernt Johan Leirag Department of Marine Technology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, NorwayView further author information
,
Tuuli Parviainene Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, FinlandView further author information
,
Arttu Polojärvia Department of Mechanical Engineering, Aalto University, Espoo, FinlandView further author information
,
Mikko Suominena Department of Mechanical Engineering, Aalto University, Espoo, FinlandORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9758-9365View further author information
ORCID Icon,
Rocky Taylorb Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, CanadaView further author information
,
Jukka Tuhkuria Department of Mechanical Engineering, Aalto University, Espoo, FinlandView further author information
,
Jarno Vanhataloe Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland;h Faculty of Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, FinlandORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6831-0211View further author information
ORCID Icon &
Brian Veitchb Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, CanadaView further author information
 show all
Pages 129-157 | Received 07 Nov 2021, Accepted 27 Feb 2022, Published online: 22 Mar 2022

References

  • AARI. 2021a. Website of the Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute. [accessed 2021 Jul 5]. http://www.aari.ru/main.php?lg=1&id=54.
  • AARI. 2021b. Website of AARI. Reference tables for International and Russian national symbology. [accessed 2021 Jul 5]. http://www.aari.ru/gdsidb/docs/wmo/code_tables_en.pdf.
  • Abramov V. 1996. Atlas of Arctic icebergs: the Greenland, Barents, Kara, Laptev, East-Siberian and Chukchi Seas and the Arctic Basin. Paramus: Backbone Publishing Company.
  • Afenyo M, Jiang C, Ng AKY. 2019. Climate change and Arctic shipping: a method for assessing the impacts of oil spills in the Arctic. Transp Res D. 77:476–490.
  • Afenyo M, Ng AKY, Jiang C. 2021. A multiperiod model for assessing the socioeconomic impacts of oil spills during Arctic shipping. Risk Anal. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13773.
  • Afenyo M, Veitch B, Khan F. 2016. A state-of-the-art review of fate and transport of oil spills in open and ice-covered water. Ocean Eng. 119:233–248.
  • AMAP. 2010. Assessment 2007: oil and gas activities in the Arctic – effects and potential effects. Vol. I. Oslo: Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP).
  • AMAP/CAFF/SDWG. 2013. Identification of Arctic marine areas of heightened ecological and cultural significance: Arctic Marine Shipping Assessment (AMSA) IIc. Oslo: AMSA.
  • Ashton GD. 1986. River lake Ice engineering. 1st ed. Highlands Ranch: Water Resources Publications LLC.
  • Benz L, Münch C, Hartmann E. 2021. Development of a search and rescue framework for maritime freight shipping in the Arctic. Trans Res Part A. 152:54–69.
  • Bergström M, Leira BJ, Kujala P. 2020. Future scenarios for Arctic shipping. ASME 2020 39th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering (OMAE 2020).
  • Bergström M, Li F, Suominen M, Kujala P. 2022. A goal-based approach for selecting a ship’s polar class. Mar Struct. 81:103123.
  • Billard R, Rahman MS, Kennedy A, Simões Ré AJ, Veitch B. 2014. Operability of lifeboats in pack ice: coxswains’ skill and design factors. Offshore Technology Conference; Houston, Texas.
  • Brandvik P, Sorheim K, Singsaas I, Reed M. 2006. Short state-of-the-art report on oil spills in ice-infested waters. Oil behaviour and response options. SINTEF Materials and Chemistry. Report No. STF80MKA06148. Trondheim: SINTEF.
  • Browne T, Taylor R, Jordaan I, Gürtner A. 2013. Small-scale ice indentation tests with variable structural compliance. Cold Reg Sci Technol. 88:2–9.
  • Browne T, Taylor R, Veitch B, Kujala P, Khan F, Smith D. 2020. A framework for integrating life-safety and environmental consequences into conventional Arctic shipping risk models. Appl Sci. 10(8):2937.
  • Browne T, Veitch B, Taylor R, Smith J, Smith D, Khan F. 2021. Consequence modelling for Arctic ship evacuations using expert knowledge. Mar Policy. 130:104582.
  • Canadian Ice Service. 2021a. Daily Iceberg analysis chart Newfoundland and Labrador Coasts. [accessed 2021 Jul 8]. https://ice-glaces.ec.gc.ca/cgi-bin/getprod.pl?prodid=WIS65&wrap=1&lang=en&q=2.
  • Canadian Ice Service. 2021b. Ice forecasts and observations. [accessed 2021 Jun 15]. https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/ice-forecasts-observations.html.
  • Carleton University. 2021a. The Nunaliit Atlas Framework. [accessed 2021 Jul 8]. http://nunaliit.org/.
  • Carleton University. 2021b. Inuit Siku Atlas. [accessed 2021 Dec 20]. https://sikuatlas.ca/index.html.
  • Chai W, Leira BJ, Høyland KV, Sinsabvarodom C, Yu Z. 2021. Statistics of thickness and strength of first-year ice along the Northern Sea route. J Mar Sci Technol. 26:331–343.
  • Chang S, Stone J, Demes K, Piscitelli M. 2014. Consequences of oil spills: a review and framework for informing planning. Ecol Soc. 19(2):26.
  • Chapman P, Riddle M. 2005. Toxic effects of contaminants in polar marine environments. Environ Sci Technol. 39(9):200A–206A.
  • Cundall PA, Strack O. 1979. A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. Géotechnique. 29(1):47–65.
  • Daley C, Daley K, Dolny J, Quinton B. 2017. Overload response of flatbar frames to ice loads. Ships Offsh Struct. 12(Issue sup1):S68–S81.
  • Daley C, Kendrick A, Appollonov E. 2001. Plating and framing design in the unified requirements for polar class ships. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering Under Arctic Conditions (POAC); Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
  • Daley CG. 1999. Energy based ice collision forces. Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Arctic Conditions (POAC); Helsinki.
  • Daley CG. 2002. Derivation of plastic framing requirements for polar ships. Mar Struct. 15(6):543–559.
  • Daley CG, Ferregut C, Brown R. 1991. Structural risk model of Arctic shipping. In: Jones S, Tillotson J, McKenna RF, Jordaan IJ editors. Ice-structure interaction. International union of theoretical and applied mechanics (International Association for Hydraulic Research). Berlin: Springer; p. 507–540.
  • Dawson J, Carter N, van Luijk N, Parker C, Weber M, Cook A, Grey K, Provencher J. 2020a. Infusing inuit and local knowledge into the low impact shipping corridors: an adaptation to increased shipping activity and climate change in Arctic Canada. Environ Sci Policy. 105:19–36.
  • Dawson J, Carter NA, van Luijk N, Weber M, Cook A. 2020b. Arctic corridors and northern voices project: methods for community-based participatory mapping for low impact shipping corridors in Arctic Canada. MethodsX. 7:101064.
  • Dillon Consulting. 2017. Area risk assessment methodology development for ship-source oil spills in Canadian waters – Guidance Document 15-1623. Ottawa: Transport Canada.
  • DMI. 2022. Webpage of the Danish Meteorological Institute. Ice charts around Greenland. [accessed 2022 Jan 15]. http://ocean.dmi.dk/arctic/icecharts.uk.php.
  • Dumanskaya IO. 2014. Ice conditions of the seas of the European part of Russia. Moscow: IG-SOTSIN.
  • Emmerson C, Lahn G. 2012. Arctic opening: opportunity and risk in the high north project report. London: Lloyd’s and Chatham House.
  • EPPR. 2021. Guideline for Arctic marine risk assessment. [accessed 2021 Jun 7]. https://eppr.dnvgl.com/.
  • Erceg B, Taylor R, Ehlers S, Leira BJ. 2014. A response comparsion of a stiffened panel subjected to rule-based and measured ice loads. Proceedings of ASME 2014 33rd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering.
  • Fahd F, Yang M, Khan F, Veitch B. 2021. A food chain-based ecological risk assessment model for oil spills in the Arctic environment. Mar Pollut Bull. 166:112164.
  • Fattal P, Maanan M, Tillier I, Rollo N, Robin M, Pottier P. 2010. Coastal vulnerability to oil spill pollution: the case of Noirmoutier Island (France). J Coast Res. 265:879–887.
  • Fedi L, Etienne L, Faury O, Rigot-Müller P, Stephenson S, Cheaitou A. 2018. Arctic navigation: stakes, benefits and limits of the POLARIS system. J Ocean Technol. 13(4):60–71.
  • Fingas M, Hollebone B. 2013. Oil behaviour in ice-infested waters, The Arctic Marine Oilspill Program (AMOP). Halifax; p. 110–135.
  • French McCay D. 2004. Oil spill impact modeling: development and validation. Environ Toxicol Chem. 23(10):2441–2456.
  • Gagnon R. 2011. A numerical model of ice crushing using a foam analogue. Cold Reg Sci Technol. 65(3):335–350.
  • Gagnon R, Andrade SL, Quinton B, Daley C, Colbourne B. 2020. Pressure distribution data from large double-pendulum ice impact tests. Cold Reg Sci Technol. 175:103033.
  • Gong H, Polojärvi A, Tuhkuri J. 2019. Discrete element simulation of the resistance of a ship in unconsolidated ridges. Cold Reg Sci Technol. 167:102855.
  • Gundlach E, Hayes M. 1978. Vulnerability of coastal environments to oil spill impacts. Mar Technol Soc J. 12:18–27.
  • Helle I, Mäkinen J, Nevalainen M, Afenyo M, Vanhatalo J. 2020. Impacts of oil spills on Arctic marine ecosystems: a quantitative and probabilistic risk assessment perspective. Environ Sci Technol. 54(4):2112–2121.
  • Herrnring H, Ehlers S. 2021. A finite element model for compressive ice loads based on a Mohr-Coulomb material and the node splitting technique. J Offshore Mech Arct Eng. 144(2):021601.
  • Herrnring H, Kubiczek JM, Ehlers S. 2020. The ice extrusion test: a novel test setup for the investigation of ice-structure interaction – results and validation. Ships Offsh Struct. 15(sup1):S1–S9.
  • Hopkins M. 1992. Numerical simulation of systems of multitudinous polygonal blocks. Tech. Rep. 92-22. Hanover, New Hampshire: Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, CRREL.
  • IACS. 2016. Requirements concerning polar class. London: International Association of Classification Societies.
  • Idrissova S, Bergström M, Hirdaris SE, Kujala P. 2019. Analysis of a collision-energy-based method for the prediction of Ice loading on ships. Appl Sci. 9(21):4546.
  • IMO. 2015. International code for ships operating in polar waters (Polar Code). MEPC 68/21/Add.1 Annex 10. London: International Maritime Organization.
  • IMO. 2016. Guidance on methodologies for assessing operational capabilities and limitations in ice. MSC.1/Circ.1519. London: International Maritime Organization.
  • IMO. 2018. Revised guidelines for formal safety assessment (FSA) for use in the IMO rule-making process. MSC-MEPC.2/Circ.12/Rev.2. London: International Maritime Organization.
  • IMO. 2019. Generic guidelines for developing IMO goal-based standards. MSC.1/Circ.1394/Rev.2. London: International Maritime Organization.
  • ISO. 2010. ISO 19906:2010. Petroleum and natural gas industries—Arctic offshore structures. Geneva: International Standard Organization (ISO).
  • IUCN. 2021. The IUCN Red list of threatened species. Version 2021-1. [accessed 2021 Jun 7]. https://www.iucnredlist.org.
  • Jordaan I, Maes M, Brown P, Herman I. 1993. Probabilistic analysis of local ice pressure. Offshore Mech Arct Eng. 115:83–89.
  • Jordaan IJ. 1987. Probabilistic analysis of environmental data for design of fixed and mobile Arctic offshore structures. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability in Soil and Structural Engineering (ICASP). Vancouver.
  • Jordaan IJ. 2001. Mechanics of ice–structure interaction. Eng Fract Mech. 68(17-18):1923–1960.
  • Kämäräinen J, Riska K. 2017. Ice class rules and international regulations. In: Carlton J, Jukes P, Choo YS, editors. Encyclopedia of Maritime and offshore engineering. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; p. 1–13.
  • Kellner L, Lu W, Ehlers S, Høyland KV. 2021. Study on the cohesive edge crack in a square plate with the cohesive element method. Int J Fract. 231:21–41.
  • Kendrick A, Daley C. 2011. Structural challenges faced by Arctic ships. SSC-461. Washington (DC): Ship Structure Committee.
  • Khan B, Khan F, Veitch B. 2020. A dynamic Bayesian network model for ship-ice collision risk in the Arctic waters. Saf Sci. 130:104858.
  • Kim H, Daley C, Colbourne B. 2015. A numerical model for ice crushing on concave surfaces. Ocean Eng. 106:289–297.
  • Kolari K, Kurkela J. 2012. Ship-ice collision analysis. VTT-R-07666-12, Espoo: VTT.
  • Kõrgesaar M, Kujala P, Romanoff J. 2018. Load carrying capacity of ice-strengthened frames under idealized ice load and boundary conditions. Mar Struct. 58:18–30.
  • Kotilainen M, Suominen M, Kujala P. 2019. Rotating ice cusps on ship's bow shoulder: full-scale study on the cusp sizes and corresponding peak loads in different ice and operational conditions. Ocean Eng. 189(1):106280.
  • Kotilainen M, Vanhatalo J, Suominen M, Kujala P. 2017. Predicting ice-induced load amplitudes on ship bow conditional on ice thickness and ship speed in the Baltic Sea. Cold Reg Sci Technol. 135:116–126.
  • Kotilainen M, Vanhatalo J, Suominen M, Kujala P. 2018. Predicting local ice loads on ship bow as a function of ice and operational conditions in the Southern Sea. Ship Technol Res. 65(2):87–101.
  • Kovacs K, Lydersen C, Overland J, Moore S. 2011. Impacts of changing sea-ice conditions on Arctic marine mammals. Mar Biodivers. 41(1):181–194.
  • Kubat I, Babaei H, Sayed M. 2012. Quantifying ice pressure conditions and predicting the risk of ship besetting. Proceedings of ICETECH12; Banff, Alberta.
  • Kujala P. 1994. On the statistics of ice loads on ship hull in the Baltic [doctoral thesis]. Espoo: Helsinki University of Technology.
  • Kujala P. 1996. Semi-empirical evaluation of long term ice loads on a ship hull. Mar Struct. 9(9):849–871.
  • Kujala P, Goerlandt F, Way B, Smith D, Yang M, Khan F, Veitch B. 2019a. Review of risk-based design for ice-class ships. Mar Struct. 63:181–195.
  • Kujala P, Kämäräinen J, Suominen M. 2019b. Validation of the new risk based design approaches (POLARIS) for Arctic and Antarctic operations. Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Arctic Conditions (POAC). Delft.
  • Li F, Suominen M, Lu L, Kujala P, Taylor R. 2021. A probabilistic method for long-term estimation of ice loads on ship hull. Struct Saf. 93:102130.
  • Liu Z, Amdahl J, Løset S. 2011. Plasticity based material modelling of ice and its application to ship–iceberg impacts. Cold Reg Sci Technol. 65(3):326–334.
  • LR. 2011. Ship right design and construction. Fatigue design assessment. Fatigue induced by ice loading. London: Lloyd’s Register.
  • Lu W, Yu Z, van den Berg M, Dennis M, Lubbad R, Hornnes V, Amdahl J, Løset S, Kim E. 2019. Loads, design and operations of floaters in the Arctic (Nord ST20). PTIL – LASTER, DESIGN OG OPERASJON AV FLYTERE I NORDOMRÅDENE (NORD ST20), Trondheim: Petroleumstilsynet.
  • Lu W, Yu Z, Lubbad R, Amdahl J, Løset S, Kim E. 2020. Glacial ice actions: executive summary of NORD ST20_2019/313 and NORD ST19, Trondheim: ArcISo AS.
  • Lubbad R, Løset S. 2011. A numerical model for real-time simulation of ship-ice interaction. Cold Reg Sci Technol. 65(2):111–127.
  • Mäkinen J, Vanhatalo J. 2018. Hierarchical Bayesian model reveals the distributional shifts of Arctic marine mammals. Divers Distrib. 24(10):1381–1394.
  • MET Norway. 2021. Website of the Norwegian Meteorological Institute. [accessed 2021 Jun 16]. https://cryo.met.no/en/home.
  • Met Office. 2021. How we measure sea ice. [accessed 2021 Jun 21]. https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/research/climate/cryosphere-oceans/sea-ice/measure.
  • Metrikin I, Løset S. 2013. Nonsmooth 3D discrete element simulation of a drillship in discontinuous ice. 22nd International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Arctic Conditions (POAC'13). Espoo.
  • Milaković A-S, Schütz P, Piehl H, Ehlers S. 2018. A method for estimation of equivalent-volume ice thickness based on WMO egg code in absence of ridging parameters. Cold Reg Sci Technol. 155:381–395.
  • Moakler E. 2018. Development of guidelines for transverse web frame design in Polar Class ships using non-linear finite element analysis [master's thesis]. St. John's: Memorial University of Newfoundland.
  • Nevalainen M, Helle I, Vanhatalo J. 2017. Preparing for the unprecedented – towards quantitative oil risk assessment in the Arctic marine areas. Mar Pollut Bull. 114(1):90–101.
  • Nevalainen M, Helle I, Vanhatalo J. 2018. Estimating the acute impacts of Arctic marine oil spills using expert elicitation. Mar Pollut Bull. 131:782–779.
  • Nevalainen M, Vanhatalo J, Helle I. 2019. Index-based approach for estimating vulnerability of Arctic biota to oil spills. Ecosphere. 10(6):e02766.
  • Nilsson AE, Carson M, Cost DS, Forbes BC, Haavisto R, Karlsdottir A, Nymand Larsen J, Paasche Ø, Sarkki S, Vammen Larsen S, et al. 2019. Towards improved participatory scenario methodologies in the Arctic. Polar Geogr. 44(2):75–89.
  • Nordam T, Dunnebier DAE, Beegle-Krause CJ, Reed M, Slagstad D. 2017. Impact of climate change and seasonal trends on the fate of Arctic oil spills. Ambio. 46(Suppl 3):442–452.
  • Nowacki H. 2010. Five decades of computer-aided ship design. Comput Aided Des. 42(11):956–969.
  • Nunavut Planning Commission. 2013. Summary of community meetings on the draft Nunavut land use plan. [accessed 2021 Jan 19]. https://www.nunavut.ca/pond-inlet.
  • Nunavut Planning Commission. 2016. Nunavut land use plan, 2016 draft. Iqaluit: Nunavut Planning Commission.
  • Olsen J, Carter N, Dawson J, Coetzee W. 2019. Community perspectives on the environmental impacts of Arctic shipping: case studies from Russia, Norway and Canada. Cogent Soc Sci. 5(1):1609189.
  • Polojärvi A, Gong H, Ranta J, Tuhkuri J. 2021a. 3D DEM simulations on ship passage through an ice floe field: Local ice loads. Manuscript under preparation.
  • Polojärvi A, Gong H, Tuhkuri J. 2021b. Comparison of full-scale and DEM simulation data on ice loads due to floe fields on a ship hull. International Conference on Port and Ocean Engineering under Arctic Conditions (POAC 2021). Moscow / Online.
  • Popov Y, Faddeyev O, Kheisin D, Yalovlev A. 1967. Strength of ships sailing in ice (English translation by U.S. army foreign science and technology centre). Leningrad: Sudostroyeniye Publishing House.
  • Quinton B, Daley C, Gagnon R. 2012. Realistic moving ice loads and ship structural response. The Twenty-second International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference.
  • Radhakrishnan G. 2018. Analysis of accidental iceberg impacts with large passenger vessels and FPSOs [master thesis]. Trondheim / Espoo: NTNU (Norway) and Aalto University.
  • Riska K. 2009. Definition of the new ice class IA Super +. Research report no 60. Helsinki: Finnish Maritime Administration & Swedish Maritime Administration.
  • Riska K. 2018. Ice edge failure process and modelling ice pressure. Philos Transact A Math Phys Eng Sci. 376(2129). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2017.0340.
  • Riska K. 2019. Ice action on ship hull. In: Carlton J, Jukes P, Choo Y, editors. Encyclopedia of maritime and offshore engineering. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons; p. 1–25.
  • Riska K, Bridges R. 2019. Limit state design and methodologies in ice class rules for ships and standards for Arctic offshore structures. Mar Struct. 63:462–479.
  • Romanov I. 1995. Atlas of ice and snow of the Arctic basin and Siberian shelf seas. Paramus: Backbone Publishing Company.
  • RS. 2019. Rules for the classification and construction of sea-going ships. Part 1 classification. Saint-Petersburg: Russian Maritime Register of Shipping.
  • Sabodash O, Zagorodnyaya S, Krikunova Y. 2019. Probabilistic modelling of icebergs in the Russian Arctic seas. IOP Conf. Ser: Earth Environ Sci. 272(12):022088.
  • Sajid Z, Khan F, Veitch B. 2020. Dynamic ecological risk modelling of hydrocarbon release scenarios in Arctic waters. Mar Pollut Bull. 153:111001.
  • Sandru A, Hyyti H, Visala A, Kujala P. 2020. A complete process for Shipborne Sea-Ice field analysis using machine vision. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 53(2):14539–14545.
  • Sandru A, Visala A, Kujala P. 2021. Shipborne Sea-Ice field mapping using a LiDAR. 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS); Prague.
  • Santos CF, Carvalho R, Andrade F. 2013. Quantitative assessment of the differential coastal vulnerability associated to oil spills. J Coast Conserv. 17(1):25–36.
  • Shamaei F, Bergström M, Li F, Taylor R, Kujala P. 2020. Local pressures for ships in ice: probabilistic analysis of full-scale line-load data. Mar Struct. 74:102822.
  • SIMAP. 2021. Integrated oil spill impact model system. [accessed 2021 Jun 21]. http://asascience.com/software/simap/.
  • Suominen M. 2018. Uncertainty and variation in measured ice-induced loads on a ship hull [doctoral dissertation]. Espoo: Aalto University.
  • Taylor R, Jordaan I, Li L, Sudom D. 2010. Local design pressure for structures in ice. Offshore Mech Arct Eng. 132(3):031502.
  • Timco G, Weeks W. 2010. A review of the engineering properties of sea ice. Cold Reg Sci Technol. 60(2):107–129.
  • Trafi. 2017. Ice class regulations and the application thereof. TRAFI/494131/03.04.01.00/2016, Helsinki: Finnish Transport Safety Agency.
  • Tuhkuri J, Polojärvi A. 2018. A review of discrete element simulation of ice-structure interaction. Philos Trans Royal Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci. 376(2129):20170335.
  • Tunik A.L. 1991. Impact ice pressure: more questions than answers. In: Jones S, Tillotson J, McKenna RF, Jordaan IJ, editors. Ice-structure interaction. Berlin: International Union of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics (International Association for Hydraulic Research); p. 693–714.
  • Turnbull I, Bourbonnais P, Taylor R. 2019. Investigation of two pack ice besetting events on the Umiak I and development of a probabilistic prediction model. Ocean Eng. 179:76–91.
  • USNIC. 2021. Webite of the U.S. National Ice Center. Products on Demand. [accessed 2021 Jun 10]. https://usicecenter.gov/Products.
  • Valtonen V. 2016. Effect of rudder force on stern shoulder region ice loads. St. John’s, Offshore Technology Conference.
  • van den Berg M, Lubbad R, Løset S. 2018. An implicit time-stepping scheme and an improved contact model for ice-structure interaction simulations. Cold Reg Sci Technol. 155:193–213.
  • van den Berg M, Lubbad R, Løset S. 2020. Repeatability of ice-tank tests with broken ice. Mar Struct. 74:102827.
  • Vanhatalo J, Huuhtanen J, Bergström M, Helle I, Mäkinen J, Kujala P. 2021. Probability of a ship becoming beset in ice along the Northern Sea Route – a Bayesian analysis of real-life data. Cold Reg Sci Technol. 184:103238.
  • Wallace BP, Brosnan T, McLamb D, Rowles T, Ruder E, Schroeder B, Schwacke L, Stacy B, Sullivan L, Takeshita R, et al. 2017. Effects of the deepwater horizon oil spill on protected marine species. Endang Species Res. 33:1–7.
  • Williams R, Mustoe G, Worgan K. 1986. Force transfer and behavior of rubble piles. Proceedings of International Association of Hydraulic Engineering and Research Symposium on Ice; Iowa city.
  • Wilson R, Perham C, French-McCay D, Balouskus R. 2018. Potential impacts of offshore oil spills on polar bears in the Chukchi Sea. Environ Pollut. 235:652–659.
  • WMO. 1970. Sea ice nomenclature. Geneva: Secretariat of the World Meteorological Organization.
  • WWF, KNAPK, ICC Greenland, ICC Canada, Dalhousie University. 2021. Pikialasorsuaq Atlas. [accessed 2021 Dec 20]. http://pikialasorsuaq.org/en/Resources/Pikialasorsuaq-Atlas.
  • Yang B, Sun Z, Zhang G, Wang Q, Zong Z, Li Z. 2021. Numerical estimation of ship resistance in broken ice and investigation on the effect of floe geometry. Mar Struct. 75:102867.
  • Yu Z, Amdahl J. 2021. A numerical solver for coupled dynamic simulation of glacial ice impacts considering hydrodynamic-ice-structure interaction. Ocean Eng. 226:108827.
  • Yu Z, Lu W, van den Berg M, Amdahl J, Løset S. 2021. Glacial ice impacts: part II: damage assessment and ice-structure interactions in accidental limit states (ALS). Mar Struct. 75:102889.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.