A general model for 6 switch voltage source inverter

References

• Dey A, Mathew K, Gopakumar K, et al. Nearly constant switching frequency hysteresis current controller with fast online computation of boundary for a 2-level induction motor drive. EPE J. 2013;23(3):13–21.10.1080/09398368.2013.11463856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao D, Rahman M. A novel hysteresis direct torque control for matrix converter drives. EPE J. 2011;21(2):40–48.10.1080/09398368.2011.11463794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz-Gonzalez F, Sumper A, Gomis-Bellmunt O, et al. Modeling, control and experimental validation of a flywheel-based energy storage device. EPE J. 2013;23(2):41–51.10.1080/09398368.2013.11463852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Restrepo J, Aller J, Bueno A, et al. Generalized algorithm for pulse width modulation using a two-vectors based technique. EPE J. 2011;21(2):30–39.10.1080/09398368.2011.11463793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bist V, Singh B. A PFC based BLDCM drive for low power household appliances. EPE J. 2014;24(2):21–30.10.1080/09398368.2014.11463881
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puukko J, Suntio T. Dynamic properties of a voltage source inverter-based three-phase inverter in photovoltaic application. IET Renewable Power Gener. 2012;6(6):381–391.10.1049/iet-rpg.2011.0302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohiero PO, Cossar C, Melone J. A fast simulation model for a permanent magnet synchronous generator (PMSG) drive system. Power Electron Appl. 2014:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Dasgupta S, Kukherjee K, Sengupta M. A simplified averaged dynamic model of a permanent magnet synchronous motor driven by a two- level, three-phase, self- controlled transistorized voltage source inverter under 120 conduction mode. In: Power electronics, machines and drives; 2008. p. 727–731.
   Google Scholar
• Li-Chun L, Ching-Tsai P, Jong T-L. Switching flow-graph modeling technique for three-phase inverters. IEEE Trans Indus Electron. 2008;55(4):1603–1613.10.1109/TIE.2008.918618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Tommaso AO, Genduso F, Miceli R, et al. A general mathematical model for the simulation of common faults in three phasevoltage source inverters. Int J Autom Power Eng. 2013;2(1):1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Byoung-Kuk L, Mehrdad E. A simplified functional simulation model for three-phase voltage-source inverter using switching function concept. IEEE Trans Indus Electron. 2001;48(2):309–321.10.1109/41.915410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champa P, Somsiri P, Wipasuramonton P, et al. Initial rotor position estimation for sensorless brushless DC drives. IEEE Trans Indus Appl. 2009;45(4):1318–1324.10.1109/TIA.2009.2023355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar P, Bauer P. Analytical model for determination of steady state performance of permanent magnet brushless DC motor drive. EPE J. 2010;20(2):25–35.10.1080/09398368.2010.11463756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masrur MA. Assumption or fact ? Line-to-neutral voltage expression in an unbalanced 3-phase circuit during inverter switching. IEEE Trans Edu. 2009;52(2):222–227.10.1109/TE.2008.925762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kikuchi J, Wolf C, Degner M. Comparison of latch-based and switch-based, sampled-data, three-phase, PWM, voltage-source inverter models for dynamic analysis. IEEE Energy Conver Cong Expos ECCE. 2012;2012(1):4619–4626.
   Google Scholar
• Mohan N, Undeland TM, Robbins WP. Power electronics convertors, applictions, and design. Hoboken: Wiley; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Iqbal A, Lamine A, Ashraf I, et al. Matlab/Simulink model of space vector PWM for three-phase voltage source inverter. Proceedings of the 41st International Universities Power Engineering Conference; 2013; Newcastle, IEEE: Vol. 3, No. 1. p. 2–6.
   Google Scholar
• Ciobotaru M, Kerekes T, Teodorescu R, et al. PV inverter simulation using MATLAB/Simulink graphical environment and PLECS blockset. IECON Proc Indus Electron Conf. 2006(1):5313–5318.
   Google Scholar
• Deuflhard P, Hairer E, Zugck J. One-step and extrapolation methods for differential-algebraic systems. Numerische Mathematik. 1987;51(5):501–516.10.1007/BF01400352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matlab. Making optimal solver choices for physical simulation [ Online]. Available from: http://nl.mathworks.com/help/physmod/simscape/ug/makingoptimal-solver-choices-for-physical-simulation.html#bsmdfl9
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Israel A, Greville TNE. Generalized inverses: theory and applications. Vol. 44. New York (NY): Springer-Verlag; 1976, No. 2.
   Google Scholar
• On Semiconductor. Datasheet STK984-091A-E [ Online]. Available from: http://www.onsemi.com/pub link/Collateral/ENA2117-D.PDF
   Google Scholar
• Bourns. CRA2512 – high power current sense chip resistor. Tech Rep. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Prasad G, Ramya NS, Prasad PVN, et al. Modelling and simulation analysis of the brushless DC motor by using MATLAB. Int J Innov Technol Explor Eng. 2012;1(5):27–31.
   Google Scholar
• Tashakori A, Iaeng M, Ektesabi M, et al. Modeling of BLDC motor with ideal back – EMF for automotive applications. Proc World Cong Eng. 2011;II:4–8.
   Google Scholar
• Darba A, De Belie F, Melkebeek J. Sensorless commutation and speed control of brushless DC-machine drives based on the back-EMF symmetric threshold-tracking. Electric Machines Drives Conf. 2013:492–497.
   Google Scholar
• Shao J, Nolan D. Further improvement of direct back EMF detection for sensorless brushless DC (BLDC) motor drives. Appl Power Electron. 2005: II:933–937.
   Google Scholar
• Damodharan P, Vasudevan K. Sensorless brushless DC motor drive based on the zero-crossing detection of back electromotive force (EMF) From the line voltage difference. IEEE Trans Energy Conver. 2010;25(3):661–668.10.1109/TEC.2010.2041781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar