A multi-refraction-based 3D reconstruction method for underwater measurement with rotating scanning

References

• Peng W, Cheng C, Yongqiang J, et al. High-resolution deconvolved beamforming for three-dimensional imaging sonars. Chin J Acoust. 2021;40(1):95–110.
   Google Scholar
• Yubo Y, Chenglin Y, Zhongjun D, et al., editors. Application of sonar detection technology in water conservancy project. The 8th Academic Conference of Geology Resource Management and Sustainable Development; 2020 Dec 19; Beijing, China.
   Google Scholar
• Hallset JO. A vision system for an autonomous underwater vehicle. In: Sanz JLC, editor. Image technology. Berlin: Springer; 1992. p. 285–306.
   Google Scholar
• Huang C, Fu Y, Zhong K, et al. A fast stitching method based on verticality calibration using three marker points. J Mod Opt. 2019;66(18):1850–1858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou H, Chen M, Zhang L, et al. Measuring shape and motion of a high-speed object with designed features from motion blurred images. Measurement. 2019;145:559–567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei Y, Ding Z, Huang H, et al. A non-contact measurement method of ship block using image-based 3D reconstruction technology. Ocean Eng. 2019;178:463–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeongjun L, Yoongeon L, Taek CH, et al. Underwater 3D dense mapping using unmanned underwater vehicle with laser scanner: first experiment in engineering basin. J Electr EngTechnol. 2019;56(10):3199–3208.
   Google Scholar
• Magnus B, Trine K, Walter C, et al. ROV navigation in a fish cage with laser-camera triangulation. J Mar Sci Eng. 2021;9(1):79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson-Roberson M, Bryson M, Friedman A, et al. High-resolution underwater robotic vision-based mapping and three-dimensional reconstruction for archaeology. J Field Robot. 2017;34(4):625–643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu L, Cao Y, He D, et al. Real-time tricolor phase measuring profilometry based on CCD sensitivity calibration. J Mod Opt. 2016;64(4):379–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schjølberg I, Gjersvik TB, Transeth AA, et al. Next generation subsea inspection, maintenance and repair operations. IFAC PapersOnLine. 2016;49(23):434–439.
   Google Scholar
• Yang C, Weller SD, Wang Y-X, et al. Experimental and numerical investigation on coupled motion characteristics of a tunnel element suspended from a twin-barge. Ocean Eng. 2018;153:201–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao W, An H, Draper S, et al. Experimental investigation of local scour around submerged piles in steady current. Coast Eng. 2018;142:27–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takagi M, Mori H, Yimit A, et al. Development of a small size underwater robot for observing fisheries resources-underwater robot for assisting abalone fishing. J Robot Mechatron. 2016;28(3):0397.
   Google Scholar
• Xingyu H, Ningning T, Xiaowei H. High-resolution imaging and 3-D reconstruction of precession targets by exploiting sparse apertures. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst. 2017;53(3):1212–1220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lodi Rizzini D, Kallasi F, Aleotti J, et al. Integration of a stereo vision system into an autonomous underwater vehicle for pipe manipulation tasks. Comput Electr Eng. 2017;58:560–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Gao H, Zhang Z, et al. Underwater salient object detection by combining 2D and 3D visual features. Neurocomputing. 2020;391:249–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guanying H, Ziyin W, Jiabiao L, et al. Underwater target detection and 3D reconstruction system based on binocular vision. Sensors. 2018;18(10):3570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yifan F, Yu H, Qican Z. Two 3D spatial phase unwrapping algorithms for dynamic 3D shape measurement. J Mod Opt. 2020;67(19):1479–1491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du H, Li M-G, Meng J. Study on the reconstruction method of stereo vision in glass flume. Adv Eng Softw. 2016;94:14–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiao X, Yamashita A, Asama H. Underwater structure from motion for cameras under refractive surfaces. J Robot Mechatron. 2019;31(4):603–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhaoxu W, Yanjun F, Kejun Z, et al. Fast 3D laser scanning of highly reflective surfaces based on a dual-camera system. J Mod Opt. 2021;68(21):1229–1239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadebecq F, Vasconcelos F, Lacher R, et al. Refractive two-view reconstruction for underwater 3D vision. Int J Comput Vis. 2020;128(5):1101–1117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann GW, Eckels SJ. Focal plane model for flat refractive geometry. J Eur Opt Soc-Rapid Publ. 2017;13(1):1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Kang L, Wu L, Yang YH. Experimental study of the influence of refraction on underwater three-dimensional reconstruction using the SVP camera model. Appl Optics. 2012;51(31):7591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon YH, Casebolt JB. Effects of light refraction on the accuracy of camera calibration and reconstruction in underwater motion analysis. Sports Biomech. 2006;5(2):315–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas H-G. New developments in multimedia photogrammetry. Optical 3D measurement techniques Karlsruhe. 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Maas H-G. A modular geometric model for underwater photogrammetry. ISPRS Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci. 2015;40:139–141.
   Google Scholar
• Shortis M, Harvey E. Design and calibration of an underwater stereo-video system for the monitoring of marine fauna populations. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sensing. 1998;32:792–799.
   Google Scholar
• Jordt-Sedlazeck A, Jung D, Koch R. Refractive plane sweep for underwater images. Berlin: Springer; 2013. p. 8142.
   Google Scholar
• Jordt-Sedlazeck A, Koch R. Refractive structure-from-motion on underwater images. 2013 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Sydney (Australia). 2013. p. 57–64.
   Google Scholar
• Jordt-Sedlazeck A, Köser K, Koch R. Refractive 3D reconstruction on underwater images. Methods Oceanogr. 2016;15:90–113.
   Google Scholar
• Sun H, Du H, Li M, et al. Underwater image matching with efficient refractive-geometry estimation for measurement in glass-flume experiments. Measurement. 2020;152:107391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Telem G, Filin S. Photogrammetric modeling of underwater environments. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens. 2010;65(5):433–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe JS. Development of a laser line scan LIDAR imaging system for AUV use. ARGIS [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2021 Dec 8]; Research:[about LIDAR Imaging]. Available from: https://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=AV2012084496.
   Google Scholar
• Bianco G, Gallo A, Bruno F, et al. A comparative analysis between active and passive techniques for underwater 3D reconstruction of close-range objects. Sensors. 2013;13:11007–11031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amini N, Hassan YA. An investigation of matched index of refraction technique and its application in optical measurements of fluid flow. Exp Fluids. 2012;53(6):2011–2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira R, Costeira JP, Santos JA, editors. Stereo reconstruction of a submerged scene. 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Chang YC, Chang YH, Lee YH, et al. The development of a cost-effective and optimized DP-SPIV system for fluid turbulence researches. J Mar Sci Technol. 2014;22:362–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bräuer-Burchardt C, Heinze M, Schmidt I, et al. Underwater 3D surface measurement using fringe projection based scanning devices. Sensors. 2015;16:13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang S. Recent progresses on real-time 3D shape measurement using digital fringe projection techniques. Opt Lasers Eng. 2010;48(2):149–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue Q, Sun Q, Wang F, et al. Underwater high-precision 3D reconstruction system based on rotating scanning. Sensors. 2021;21(4):1402–1402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhengyou Z. Camera calibration with one-dimensional objects. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2004;26(7):892–899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penna MA. Camera calibration: a quick and easy way to determine the scale factor. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 1991;13(12):1240–1245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang SB, Weiss R. Characterization of errors in compositing panoramic images. Comput Vis Image Underst. 1999;73(2):269–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens M, editor. A combined corner and edge detector. The 4th Alvey Vision Conference; 1988; Manchester.
   Google Scholar
• He T, Xie Y, Zhu C, et al. Research on calibration method of linear structured light vision measurement system. Appl Mech Mater. 2014;644–650:1234–1239.
   Google Scholar