2,411
Views
159
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
RESEARCH REPORT

Promoting Discourse about Socioscientific Issues through Scaffolded Inquiry

&
Pages 1387-1410 | Published online: 01 Aug 2007

References

  • Aikenhead , G. S. and Ryan , A. G. 1992 . The development of a new instrument: “Views on science–technology–society” (VOSTS) . Science Education , 76 (5) : 477 – 491 .
  • Akerson , V. L. , Abd‐El‐Khalick , F. and Lederman , N. G. 2000 . Influence of a reflective explicit activity‐based approach on elementary teachers’ conceptions of nature of science . Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 37 (4) : 295 – 317 .
  • Bell , P. Debating about deformed frogs: Design principles for bringing a current scientific controversy into the classroom . Paper presented at the annual meeting for the National Association of Research in Science Teaching .
  • Bell , P. 2004 . “ Promoting students’ argument construction and collaborative debate in the science classroom ” . In Internet environments for science education , Edited by: Linn , M.C. , Davis , E. A. and Bell , P. Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum .
  • Bell , P. and Linn , M. 2000 . Scientific arguments as learning artefacts: Designing for learning from the web with KIE . International Journal of Science Education , 22 (8) : 797 – 817 .
  • Bell , R. L. and Lederman , N. G. 2003 . Understandings of the nature of science and decision making on science and technology based issues . Science Education , 87 (3) : 352 – 377 .
  • Brucklacher , B. and Gimbert , B. 1999 . Role‐playing software and webquests—What’s possible with cooperative learning and computers . Computers in the Schools , 15 (2) : 37 – 48 .
  • Craven , J. A. I. , Hand , B. and Prain , V. 2002 . Assessing explicit and tacit conceptions of the nature of science among preservice elementary teachers . International Journal of Science Education , 24 (8) : 785 – 802 .
  • Driver , R. , Leach , J. , Milar , R. and Scott , P. 1996 . Young people’s images of science , Bristol, PA : Open University Press .
  • Driver , R. , Newton , P. and Osborne , J. 2000 . Establishing the norms of scientific argument in the classroom . Science Education , 84 (3) : 287 – 312 .
  • Erduran , S. , Simon , S. and Osborne , J. 2004 . TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin’s argument pattern for studying science discourse . Science Education , 88 (2) : 915 – 933 .
  • Feldman , A. The nature of science as an academic discipline and school subject . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association .
  • Fleming , R. 1986a . Adolescent reasoning in socio‐scientific issues, Part I: Social cognition . Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 23 (8) : 677 – 687 .
  • Fleming , R. 1986b . Adolescent reasoning in socio‐scientific issues, Part II: Nonsocial cognition . Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 23 (8) : 689 – 698 .
  • Glaser , B. G. and Strauss , A. L. 1967 . The discovery of grounded theory , Chicago : Aldine .
  • Jimenez‐Aleixandre , M. P. , Rodriguez , A. B. and Duschl , R. A. 2000 . “Doing the lesson” or “doing science”: Argument in high school genetics . Science Education , 84 (6) : 757 – 792 .
  • Kollar , I. , Fischer , F. and Slotta , J.D. Internal and external collaboration scripts in web‐based science learning at schools . Paper presented at the Proceedings of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) . Taipei, Taiwan. June 1–4 .
  • Kolstø , S. D. 2001 . Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues . Science Education , 85 (3) : 291 – 310 .
  • Kuhn , D. 1991 . The skills of argument , Cambridge, England : Cambridge University Press .
  • Lederman , N. G. , Abd‐El‐Khalick , F. , Bell , R. L. , Schwartz , R. S. and Ackerson , V. L. Assessing the un‐assessable: Views of nature of science questionnaire . Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching .
  • Leitão , S. 2000 . The potential of argument in knowledge building . Human Development , 43 : 332 – 360 .
  • Lincoln , Y. S. and Guba , E. G. 1985 . Naturalistic inquiry , Newbury Park, CA : Sage Publications .
  • Linn , M. C. 2000 . Designing the knowledge integration environment . International Journal of Science Education , 22 (8) : 781 – 796 .
  • Linn , M. C. , Clark , D. and Slotta , J. D. 2003 . WISE design for knowledge integration . Science Education , 87 (4) : 517 – 538 .
  • Osborne , J. , Erduran , S. , Simon , S. and Monk , M. Enhancing the quality of argument in science lessons . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the North American Association for Research in Science Teaching .
  • Patton , M. Q. 1990 . Qualitative evaluation and research methods , Newbury Park, CA : Sage Publications .
  • Pedretti , E. 1999 . Decision making and STS education: Exploring scientific knowledge and social responsibility in schools and science centers through an issues‐based approach . Journal of School Science and Mathematics , 99 (4) : 174 – 181 .
  • Rest , J. , Narvaez , Bebeau , M. J. and Thoma , S. J. 1999 . Postconventional moral thinking: A neo‐Kohlbergian approach , Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates .
  • Rubba , P. A. 1977 . Nature of scientific knowledge scale: Test and users’ manual (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 146 225)
  • Sadler , T. D. 2004 . Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of the research . Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 41 (5) : 513 – 536 .
  • Sadler , T. D. , Chambers , F. W. and Zeidler , D. L. Investigating the crossroads of socioscientific issues, the nature of science, and critical thinking . Paper presented at the 75th Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching .
  • Sadler , T. D. , Chambers , F. W. and Zeidler , D. L. 2004 . Student conceptualisations of the nature of science in response to a socioscientific issue . International Journal of Science Education , 26 : 387 – 409 .
  • Sadler , T. D. and Zeidler , D. L. 2004 . The morality of socioscientific issues: Construal and resolution of genetic engineering dilemmas . Science Education , 88 (1) : 4 – 27 .
  • Sadler , T. D. and Zeidler , D. L. 2005a . The significance of content knowledge for informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: Applying genetics knowledge to genetic engineering issues . Science Education , 89 (1) : 71 – 93 .
  • Sadler , T. D. and Zeidler , D. L. 2005b . Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision‐making . Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 42 (1) : 112 – 138 .
  • Seethaler , S. and Linn , M. 2004 . Genetically modified food in perspective: an inquiry‐based curriculum to help middle school students make sense of tradeoffs . International Journal of Science Education , 26 (14) : 1765 – 1785 .
  • Slotta , J.D. 2004 . “ The Web‐based Inquiry Science Environment (WISE): Scaffolding KNOWLEDGE INTEGRATION IN THE SCIENCE CLASSROOM ” . In Internet environments for science education , Edited by: Linn , M.C. , Bell , P. and Davis , E. Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum .
  • Toulmin , S. E. 1958 . The uses of argument , Cambridge, , England : Cambridge University Press .
  • Willis , J. 2000 . The maturing of constructivist instructional design: Some basic principles that can guide practice . Educational Technology , 40 (1) : 5 – 16 .
  • Zeidler , D. L. 1997 . The central role of fallacious thinking in science education . Science Educator , 7 (1) : 38 – 46 .
  • Zeidler , D. L. 2003 . The role of moral reasoning and discourse on socioscientific issues in science education , Dordrecht, , The Netherlands: : Kluwer Academic Publishers .
  • Zeidler , D. L. and Keefer , M. 2003 . “ The role of moral reasoning and the status of socioscientific issues in science education: Philosophical, psychological and pedagogical considerations ” . In The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education , Edited by: Zeidler , D. L. The Netherlands : Kluwer Academic Press .
  • Zeidler , D. L. , Lederman , N. G. and Taylor , S. C. 1992 . Fallacies and student discourse: Conceptualizing the role of critical thinking in science education . Science Education , 76 (4) : 437 – 450 .
  • Zeidler , D. L. , Osborne , J. , Erduran , S. , Simon , S. and Monk , M. 2003 . “ The role of argument and fallacies during discourse about socioscientific issues ” . In The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education , Edited by: Zeidler , D. L. 97 – 116 . The Netherlands : Kluwer Academic Press .
  • Zeidler , D. L. , Sadler , T. D. , Simons , M. L. and Howes , E. V. 2005 . Beyond STS: A research‐based framework for socioscientific issues education . Science Education , 89 (3) : 357 – 377 .
  • Zeidler , D. L. and Schafer , L. E. 1984 . Identifying mediating factors of moral reasoning in science education . Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 21 (1) : 1 – 15 .
  • Zeidler , D. L. , Walker , K. A. , Ackett , W. A. and Simmons , M. L. 2002 . Tangled up in views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas . Science Education , 3 (86) : 343 – 367 .
  • Zohar , A. and Nemet , F. 2001 . Fostering students’ knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics . Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 39 (1) : 35 – 62 .

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.