1,471
Views
48
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Reports

Exploring Dominant Types of Explanations Built by General Chemistry Students

Pages 2393-2412 | Published online: 08 Dec 2009

References

  • Abrams , E. , Southerland , S. and Cummins , C. 2001 . The how’s and why’s of biological change: How learners neglect physical mechanisms in search for meaning . International Journal of Science Education , 23 (12) : 1271 – 1281 .
  • Andersson , B. 1986 . The experiential gestalt of causation: A common core to pupils’ preconceptions in science . European Journal of Science Education , 8 (2) : 155 – 171 .
  • Bartov , H. 1978 . Can student be taught to distinguish between teleological and causal explanations? . Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 15 (6) : 567 – 572 .
  • Bartov , H. 1981 . Teaching students to understand the advantages and disadvantages of teleological and anthropomorphic statements in biology . Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 18 (1) : 79 – 86 .
  • Berland , L. K. and Reiser , B. J. 2009 . Making sense of argumentation and explanation . Science Education , 93 (1) : 26 – 55 .
  • Brewer , W. F. , Chinn , C. A. and Samarapungavan , A. 1998 . Explanation in scientists and children . Minds and Machines , 8 : 119 – 136 .
  • Chi , M. T. H. 2005 . Commonsense conceptions of emergent processes: Why some misconceptions are robust . Journal of the Learning Sciences , 14 (2) : 161 – 199 .
  • Chi , M. T. H. , Bassok , M. , Lewis , M. W. , Reimann , P. and Glaser , P. 1989 . Self‐explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems . Cognitive science , 13 : 145 – 182 .
  • Chi , M. T. H. , de Leeuw , N. , Chiu , M. H. and Lavancher , C. 1994 . Eliciting self‐explanations improves understanding . Cognitive Science , 18 : 439 – 477 .
  • Chin , C. and Brown , D. E. 2000 . Learning in science: A comparison of deep and surface approaches . Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 37 (2) : 109 – 138 .
  • Deacon , T. W. 2003 . “ The hierarchic logic of emergence: Untangling the interdependence of evolution and self‐organization ” . In Evolution and learning: The Baldwin effect reconsidered , Edited by: Weber , B. H. and Depew , D. J. 273 – 308 . Cambridge, MA : MIT Press .
  • Driver , R. , Guesne , E. and Tiberghien , A. 1995 . Children’s ideas in science , Buckingham : Open University Press .
  • Duit , R. 2007 . Bibliography STCSE: Students’ and teachers’ conceptions and science education Retrieved October 28, 2009, from http://www.ipn.uni-kiel.de/aktuell/stcse/
  • Friedler , Y. , Amir , R. and Tamir , P. 1987 . High school students’ difficulties in understanding osmosis . International Journal of Science Education , 9 (5) : 541 – 551 .
  • Garvin‐Doxas , K. and Klymkowsky , M. W. 2008 . Understanding randomness and its impact on student learning: Lessons learned form building the biology concept inventory (BCI) . Cell Biology Education , 7 : 227 – 233 .
  • Gilbert , J. K. , Boulter , C. and Rutherford , M. 1998 . Models in explanations, Part 2: Whose voices? Whose ears? . International Journal of Science Education , 20 (2) : 187 – 203 .
  • Gilovich , T. , Griffin , D. and Kahneman , D. , eds. 2002 . Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment , Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
  • Goswami , U. 2008 . Cognitive development: The learning brain , New York : Psychology Press .
  • Griffin , R. and Baron‐Cohen , S. 2002 . “ The intentional stance: Developmental and neurocognitive perspectives ” . In Daniel Dennett , Edited by: Brook , A. and Ross , D. 83 – 116 . Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
  • Grotzer , T. A. 2003 . Learning to understand the forms of causality implicit in scientifically accepted explanations . Studies in Science Education , 39 : 1 – 74 .
  • Gutierrez , R. and Ogborn , J. 1992 . A causal framework for analyzing alternative conceptions . International Journal of Science Education , 14 (2) : 201 – 220 .
  • Hammer , D. 1996 . Misconceptions or p‐prims: How may alternative perspectives of cognitive structure influence instructional perceptions and intentions? . Journal of the Learning Sciences , 5 (2) : 97 – 127 .
  • Jacobson , M. J. and Wilensky , U. 2006 . Complex systems in education: Scientific and educational importance and implications for the learning sciences . Journal of the Learning Sciences , 15 (1) : 11 – 34 .
  • Jungwirth , E. 1979 . Do students accept anthropomorphic and teleological formulations as scientific explanations? . Journal of College Science Teaching , 8 : 152 – 155 .
  • Keil , F. C. 2006 . Explanations and understanding . Annual Review of Psychology , 57 : 227 – 254 .
  • Kelemen , D. 1999 . Functions, goals and intentions: Children’s teleological reasoning about objects . Trends in Cognitive Sciences , 3 (12) : 461 – 468 .
  • Kelemen , D. and Rosset , E. 2009 . The human function compunction: Teleological explanation in adults . Cognition , 111 : 138 – 143 .
  • Klaczynski , P. A. 2004 . “ A dual‐process model of adolescent development: Implications for decision making, reasoning, and identity ” . In Advances in child development and behavior , Edited by: Kail , R. V. 73 – 123 . San Diego, CA : Academic Press .
  • Lombrozo , T. 2006 . The structure and function of explanations . Trends in Cognitive Sciences , 10 (10) : 464 – 470 .
  • Lombrozo , T. and Carey , S. 2006 . Functional explanation and the function of explanation . Cognition , 99 : 167 – 204 .
  • Luisi , P. L. 2002 . Emergence in chemistry: Chemistry as the embodiment of emergence . Foundations of Chemistry , 4 : 183 – 200 .
  • McNeill , K. L. , Lizotte , D. J. , Krajcik , J. and Marx , R. W. 2006 . Supporting students’ construction of scientific explanations by fading scaffolds in instructional materials . Journal of the Learning Sciences , 15 (2) : 153 – 191 .
  • Metz , K. 1991 . Development of explanation: Incremental and fundamental change in children’s physics knowledge . Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 28 : 785 – 798 .
  • Miles , M. B. and Huberman , A. M. 1994 . Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook , (2nd ed.) , Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage .
  • National Research Council . 1996 . National Science Education Standards , Washington, DC : The National Academies Press .
  • Penner , D. E. 2000 . Explaining systems: Investigating middle school students’ understanding of emergent phenomena . Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 37 (8) : 784 – 806 .
  • Perkins , D. N. and Grotzer , T. A. 2005 . Dimensions of causal understanding: The role of complex causal models in students’ understanding of science . Studies in Science Education , 41 : 117 – 166 .
  • Resnick , M. 1994 . Turtles, termites, and traffic jams: Explorations in massively parallel microworlds , Cambridge, MA : MIT Press .
  • Russ , R. , Scherr , R. E. , Hammer , D. and Mikeska , J. 2008 . Recognizing mechanistic reasoning in student scientific inquiry: A framework for discourse analysis developed from philosophy of science . Science Education , 92 : 499 – 525 .
  • Sandoval , W. A. and Millwood , K. A. 2005 . The quality of students’ use of evidence in written scientific explanations . Cognition and Instruction , 23 (1) : 23 – 55 .
  • Slotta , J. D. and Chi , M. T. H. 2006 . Helping students understand the challenging topics in science through ontology training . Cognition and Instruction , 24 : 261 – 289 .
  • Solomon , J. 1986 . Children’s explanations . Oxford Review of Education , 12 : 41 – 51 .
  • Taber , K. S. 2008 . Conceptual resources for learning science: issues of transience and grain‐size in cognition and cognitive structure . International Journal of Science Education , 30 (8) : 1027 – 1053 .
  • Taber , K. S. and García‐Franco , A. 2009 . Intuitive thinking and learning chemistry . Education in Chemistry , 46 (2) : 57 – 60 .
  • Taber , K. S. and Watts , M. 2000 . Learners’ explanations for chemical phenomena . Chemistry Education: Research and Practice , 1 (3) : 329 – 353 .
  • Talanquer , V. 2006 . Common sense chemistry: A model for understanding students’ alternative conceptions . Journal of Chemical Education , 83 (5) : 811 – 816 .
  • Talanquer , V. 2007 . Explanations and teleology in chemistry education . International Journal of Science Education , 29 (7) : 853 – 870 .
  • Talanquer , V. 2008 . Students’ predictions about the sensory properties of chemical compounds: Additive versus emergent frameworks . Science Education , 92 (1) : 96 – 114 .
  • Talanquer , V. 2009 . On cognitive constraints and learning progressions: The case of structure of matter . International Journal of Science Education , 31 (15) : 2123 – 2136 .
  • Viennot , L. 2001 . Reasoning in physics: The part of common sense , Dordrecht, The Netherlands : Kluwer Academic .
  • Wellman , H. M. and Gelman , S. A. 1998 . “ Knowledge acquisition in foundational domains ” . In Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 2. Cognition, perception, and language , Edited by: Kuhn , D. and Siegler , R. S. 523 – 573 . New York : Wiley .
  • White , R. and Gunstone , R. 1992 . Probing understanding , New York : The Falmer Press .
  • Wilensky , U. and Resnick , M. 1999 . Thinking in levels: A dynamic system approach to making sense of the world . Journal of Science Education and Technology , 8 (1) : 3 – 19 .
  • Woodruff , E. and Meyer , K. 1997 . Explanations from intra‐ and inter‐group discourse: Students building knowledge in the science classroom . Research in Science Education , 27 : 25 – 39 .
  • Zuckerman , J. T. 1994 . Problem solvers’ conceptions about osmosis . American Biology Teacher , 56 (1) : 22 – 25 .

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.