Co-opting Science: A preliminary study of how students invoke science in value-laden discussions

References

• Albe , V. 2008 . Students' positions and considerations of scientific evidence about a controversial socioscientific issue . Science & Education , 17 ( 8–9 ) : 805 – 827 .
   Google Scholar
• Andrews , R. 2005 . Models of argumentation in educational discourse . Text: Transactions of the Society for Textual Scholarship , 25 ( 1 ) : 107 – 127 .
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong , D. M. 1997 . A world of states of affairs , Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Aufschnaiter , C. v. , Erduran , S. , Osborne , J. and Simon , S. 2008 . Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Case studies of how students' argumentation relates to their scientific knowledge . Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 45 ( 1 ) : 101 – 131 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett , S. E. and Nieswandt , M. 2010 . Teaching about ethics through socioscientific issues in physics and chemistry: Teacher candidates' beliefs . Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 47 ( 4 ) : 380 – 401 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandom , R. B. 1994 . Making it explicit: Reasoning, representing, and discursive commitment , Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Castaneda , H. 1960 . On a proposed revolution in logic . Philosophy of Science , 27 ( 3 ) : 279 – 292 .
   Google Scholar
• Clark , D. B. and Sampson , V. 2007 . Personally-seeded discussions to scaffold online argumentation . International Journal of Science Education , 29 ( 3 ) : 253 – 277 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooley , J. 1959 . On Mr. Toulmin's revolution in logic . The Journal of Philosophy , 56 ( 7 ) : 297 – 319 .
   Google Scholar
• Cowan , J. 1964 . The uses of argument—an apology for logic . Mind: A Quarterly Review of Philosophy , 73 ( 289 ) : 27 – 45 .
   Google Scholar
• Craig , R. and Tracy , K. 2005 . “ ‘The issue’ in argumentation practice and theory ” . In Argumentation in practice , Edited by: van Eemeren , F. H. and Houtlosser , P. 11 – 28 . Amsterdam : John Benjamins .
   Google Scholar
• Davies , D. S. 2006 . “ Genetic dilemmas and the child's right to an open future ” . In Bioethics: An anthology , Edited by: Helga , Kuhse and Peter , Singer . 246 – 256 . Oxford : Blackwell Publishing Ltd .
   Google Scholar
• Dawson , C. 2000 . “ Selling snake oil: Must science educators continue to promise what they can't deliver ” . In Science and the citizen for educators and the public , Edited by: Cross , R. T. and Fensham , P. 121 – 132 . Melbourne : Arena Publications .
   Google Scholar
• Denzin , N. K. and Lincoln , Y. 1994 . Handbook of qualitative research , Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Dewey , J. 1981 . The later works, 1925–1953 , Carbondale, IL : Southern Illinois University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Driver , R. , Newton , P. and Osborne , J. 2000 . Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms . Science Education , 84 ( 3 ) : 287 – 312 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duschl , R. A. 2007 . “ Quality argumentation and epistemic criteria ” . In Argumentation in science education , Edited by: Erduran , Sibel and Jiménez-Aleixandre , María Pilar . 159 – 175 . Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands .
   Google Scholar
• Erduran , S. , Simon , S. and Osborne , J. 2004 . TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's argument pattern for studying science discourse . Science Education , 88 ( 6 ) : 915 – 933 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EU-Commission . 2004 . Europe needs more scientists Report by the high level group on Increasing Human Resources for Science and Technology in Europe, Brussels (pp. 1–215)
   Google Scholar
• Feinberg , J. 1980 . “ The child's right to an open future ” . In Whose child? Children's rights, parental authority and state power , Edited by: Aiken , William and LaFollette , Hugh . 124 – 153 . Totowa, NJ : Littlefield, Adams & Co .
   Google Scholar
• Fowler , S. R. , Zeidler , D. L. and Sadler , T. D. 2009 . Moral sensitivity in the context of socioscientific issues in high school science students . International Journal of Science Education , 31 ( 2 ) : 279 – 296 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvão , C. , Reis , P. , Freire , S. and Almeida , P. 2010 . “ Enhancing the popularity and the relevance of science teaching in Portuguese science classes ” . In Research in Science Education (Advance online publication). DOI: 10.1007/s11165-010-9184-3
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert , M. A. 1997 . Prolegomenon to a pragmatics of emotion Paper presented at the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation, Brock University, St. Catherine's, ON. Retrieved from http://www.yorku.ca/gilbert/argthry/argthry/arg-papers/mag1997-prol-emo.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin , J. 2000 . Comments on ‘rhetoric and dialectic from the standpoint of normative pragmatics’ . Argumentation , 14 ( 3 ) : 287 – 292 .
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin , J. 2001 . “ One question, two answers ” . In Argumentation and its implications , Edited by: Hansen , H. V. , Tindale , C. W. , Blair , J. A. , Johnson , R. H. and Pinto , R. C. 1 – 17 . Windsor, ON : Ontario Society for the Study of Argument, CD-ROM . ISBN:0-9683461-2-X. Retrieved from http://www.public.iastate.edu/~goodwin/pubs/goodwinone.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin , J. 2002 . “ Designing issues ” . In Dialectic and rhetoric: The warp and woof of argumentation analysis , Edited by: van Eemeren , F.H. and Houtlosser , P. 81 – 96 . Amsterdam : Kluwer .
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, J. (2005). Designing premises. In F.H. van Eemeren & P. Houtlosser (Eds.), Argumentation in practice (pp. 99–114). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin , J. and Honeycutt , L. 2009 . When science goes public: From technical arguments to appeals to authority . Studies in Communication Sciences , 9 ( 2 ) : 19 – 30 .
   Google Scholar
• Govier , T. 2010 . A practical study of argument , Belmont, CA : Wadsworth Cengage Learning .
   Google Scholar
• Habermas , J. 1984 . The theory of communicative action: Reason and the rationalization of society , Boston, MA : Beacon Press . (T. McCarthy, Trans.)
   Google Scholar
• Hample , D. 1977 . The Toulmin model and the syllogism . Journal of the American Forensic Association , 14 : 1 – 9 .
   Google Scholar
• Hare , R. M. 1952 . The language of morals , Oxford : Clarendon Press .
   Google Scholar
• Harris , J. 1993 . Is gene therapy a form of eugenics? . Bioethics , 7 ( 2–3 ) : 178 – 187 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hofstein , A. , Kipnis , M. and Kind , P. 2008 . “ Learning in and from science laboratories: Enhancing students' meta-cognition and argumentation skills ” . In Science education issues and developments , Edited by: Petroselli , C. L. 59 – 94 . New York, NY : Nova Science Publishers .
   Google Scholar
• Holland , S. 2003 . Bioethics. A philosophical introduction , Cambridge : Polity .
   Google Scholar
• Innocenti , B. 2006 . A normative pragmatic perspective on appealing to emotions in argumentation . Argumentation , 20 ( 3 ) : 327 – 343 .
   Google Scholar
• Irwin , A. and Wynne , G. 1996 . Misunderstanding science , Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Jackson , S. and Jacobs , S. 1980 . Structure of conversational argument: Pragmatic bases for the enthymeme . Quarterly Journal of Speech , 66 ( 3 ) : 251 – 265 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs , S. 2000 . Rhetoric and dialectic from the standpoint of normative pragmatics . Argumentation , 14 ( 3 ) : 261 – 286 .
   Google Scholar
• Jimenez-Aleixandre , M. , Rodriguez , A. and Duschl , R. 2000 . Doing the lesson or doing science: Argument in high school genetics . Science Education , 84 ( 6 ) : 757 – 792 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson , R. H. 2002 . Manifest rationality reconsidered: Reply to my fellow symposiasts . Argumentation , 16 ( 3 ) : 311 – 331 .
   Google Scholar
• Kauffeld , F. J. 1998 . Presumptions and the distribution of argumentative burdens in acts of proposing and accusing . Argumentation , 12 ( 2 ) : 245 – 266 .
   Google Scholar
• Keith , W. and Beard , D. 2008 . Toulmin's rhetorical logic: What's the warrant for warrants? . Philosophy and Rhetoric , 41 ( 1 ) : 22 – 50 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly , G. , Druker , S. and Chen , C. 1998 . Students' reasoning about electricity: Combining performance assessments with argumentation analysis . International Journal of Science Education , 20 ( 7 ) : 849 – 871 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerlin , S. , McDonald , S. and Kelly , G. 2010 . Complexity of secondary scientific data sources and students . International Journal of Science Education , 32 : 1207 – 1225 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitcher , P. 2010 . The climate change debates . Science , 328 ( 5983 ) : 1230 – 1234 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kock , C. 2008 . Dialectical obligations in political debate . Informal Logic , 27 ( 3 ) : 223 – 247 .
   Google Scholar
• Kock , C. 2009 . Choice is not true or false: The domain of rhetorical argumentation . Argumentation , 23 ( 1 ) : 61 – 80 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolstø , S. D. 2000 . Consensus projects: Teaching science for citizenship . International Journal of Science Education , 22 ( 6 ) : 645 – 664 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolstø , S. D. 2001 . ‘To trust or not to trust, …’—pupils' ways of judging information encountered in a socio-scientific issue . International Journal of Science Education , 23 ( 9 ) : 877 – 901 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolstø , S. D. 2006 . Patterns in students' argumentation confronted with a risk focused socio scientific issue . International Journal of Science Education , 28 ( 14 ) : 1689 – 1716 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour , B. and Woolgar , S. 1979 . Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts , Beverly Hills, CA : Sage Publications .
   Google Scholar
• Levinson , R. 2007 . Towards a pedagogical framework for the teaching of controversial socio-scientific issues to secondary school students in the age range 14-19 , London : University of London .
   Google Scholar
• Lewis , J. and Leach , J. 2006 . Discussion of socio-scientific issues: The role of science knowledge . International Journal of Science Education , 28 ( 11 ) : 1267 – 1287 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindahl , M. G. 2009 . Ethics or morals: Understanding students' values related to genetic tests on humans . Science & Education , 18 ( 10 ) : 1285 – 1311 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch , M. 1982 . Closure and disclosure in pre-trial argument . Human studies , 5 ( 1 ) : 285 – 318 .
   Google Scholar
• Marttunen , M. 1997 . Electronic mail as a pedagogical delivery system: An analysis of the learning of argumentation . Research in Higher Education , 38 ( 3 ) : 345 – 363 .
   Google Scholar
• Millar , R. 1997 . “ Science education for democracy ” . In Science today: Problem or crisis? , Edited by: Levinson , R. and Thomas , J. 87 – 101 . London : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Millar , R. and Osborne , J. 1998 . Beyond 2000: Science education for the future , London : King's College London .
   Google Scholar
• Nowell-Smith , P. H. 1954 . Ethics , Balitmore, MD : Penguin Books .
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperatrion and Development) . 2006 . Assessing, scientific, reading and mathematical literacy—a framework for PISA 2006 , Paris : OECD .
   Google Scholar
• Patronis , T. , Potari , D. and Spiliotopoulou , V. 1999 . Students argumentation in decision-making on a socio-scientific issue: Implications for teaching . International Journal of Science Education , 21 : 745 – 754 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pouliot , C. 2008 . Students' inventory of social actors concerned by the controversy surrounding cellular telephones: A case study . Science Education , 92 ( 3 ) : 543 – 559 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliffe , M. 1997 . Pupil decision-making about socio-scientific issues within the science curriculum . International Journal of Science Education , 19 ( 2 ) : 167 – 182 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryder , J. 2001 . Identifying science understanding for functional scientific literacy . Studies in Science Education , 36 ( 1 ) : 1 – 44 .
   Google Scholar
• Sadler , T. D. 2004 . Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research . Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 41 ( 5 ) : 513 – 536 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler , T. D. 2006 . Promoting discourse and argumentation in science teacher education . Journal of Science Teacher Education , 17 ( 4 ) : 323 – 346 .
   Google Scholar
• Sadler , T. D. and Donnelly , L. 2006 . Socioscientific argumentation: The effects of content knowledge and morality . International Journal of Science Education , 28 ( 12 ) : 1463 – 1488 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler , T. D. and Zeidler , D. L. 2003 . The morality of socioscientific issues: Construal and resolution of genetic engineering dilemmas . Science Education , 88 ( 1 ) : 4 – 27 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler , T. D. and Zeidler , D. L. 2004 . Negotiating gene therapy controversies . The American Biology Teacher , 66 ( 6 ) : 428 – 433 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler , T. D. and Zeidler , D. L. 2005a . Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making . Journal of Resarch in Science Teaching , 42 ( 1 ) : 112 – 138 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler , T. D. and Zeidler , D. L. 2005b . The significance of content knowledge for informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: Applying genetics knowledge to genetic engineering issues . Science Education , 89 ( 1 ) : 71 – 93 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler , T. D. and Zeidler , D. L. 2006 . “ Scientific errors, atrocities and blunders ” . In The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education , Edited by: Zeidler , D. L. 261 – 285 . Dordrecht : Springer .
   Google Scholar
• Sampson , V. and Clark , D. 2008 . Assessment of the ways students generate arguments in science education: Current perspectives and recommendations for future directions . Science Education , 92 ( 3 ) : 447 – 472 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searle , J. R. 1969 . Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language , New York, NY : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Simon , S. 2008 . Using Toulmin's argument pattern in the evaluation of argumentation in school science . International Journal of Research & Method in Education , 31 ( 3 ) : 277 – 289 .
   Google Scholar
• Smith , P. C. 1995 . “ Towards a discursive logic: Gadamer and Toulmin on inquiry and argument ” . In The specter of relativsm , Edited by: Schmidt , L. K. 159 – 177 . Evanston, IL : Northwestern University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Takala , T. 2005 . “ The many wrongs of human reproductive cloning ” . In Bioethics and social reality , Edited by: Häyry , M. , Takala , T. and Herissone-Kelly , P. 53 – 66 . Amsterdam : Rodolpi .
   Google Scholar
• Thomas , D. R. 2003 . “ A general inductive approach for qualitative data analysis ” . Retrieved from http://www.health.auckland.ac.nz/hrmas/Inductive2003.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Toulmin , S. E. 1958 . The uses of argument , Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Trent , J. 1968 . Toulmin's model of an argument: An examination and extension . Quarterly Journal of Speech , 54 ( 3 ) : 252 – 259 .
   Google Scholar
• Tseronis , A. 2009 . Qualifying standpoints. Stance adverbs as a presentational device for managing the burden of proof , Utrecht : Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics .
   Google Scholar
• van Eemeren , F. H. and Grootendorst , R. 1982 . The speech acts of arguing and convincing in externalized discussions . Journal of Pragmatics , 6 ( 1 ) : 1 – 24 .
   Google Scholar
• van Eemeren , F. H. and Grootendorst , R. 1989 . Speech act conditions as tools for reconstructing argumentative discourse . Argumentation , 3 ( 4 ) : 367 – 383 .
   Google Scholar
• van Eemeren , F. H. and Grootendorst , R. 2004 . A systematic theory of argumentation: The pragma-dialectical approach , Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• van Eemeren , F. H. , Grootendorst , R. and Kruiger , T. 1987 . Handbook of argumentation theory: A critical survey of classical backgrounds and modern studies , Dordrecht : Foris .
   Google Scholar
• van Eemeren , F. H. and Houtlosser , P. 2002 . “ Strategic maneuvering with the burden of proof ” . In Advances in pragma-dialectics , Edited by: van Eemeren , F.H. 13 – 28 . New Port News, VA : Vale Press .
   Google Scholar
• van Eemeren , F. H. and Houtlosser , P. 2007 . The study of argumentation as normative pragmatics . Pragmatics: Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association , 15 ( 1 ) : 161 – 177 .
   Google Scholar
• van Eemeren , F. H. , Houtlosser , P. and Henkemans , A. F.S. 2007 . Argumentative indicators in discourse: A pragma-dialectical study , Dordrecht : Springer .
   Google Scholar
• Walker , K. and Zeidler , D. L. 2007 . Promoting discourse about socioscientific issues through scaffolded inquiry . International Journal of Science Education , 29 ( 11 ) : 1387 – 1410 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson , S. 2010 . “ On the distinction between positive and negative eugenics ” . In Arguments and analysis in bioethics , Edited by: Häyry , M. , Takala , T. and Herissone-Kelly , P. 115 – 128 . Amsterdam : Rodolpi .
   Google Scholar
• Yin , R. K. 2009 . Case stuy research. Design and methods , Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage .
   Google Scholar
• Zeidler , D. L. , Osborne , J. , Erduran , S. , Simon , S. and Monk , M. 2006 . “ The role of argument during discourse about socioscientific issues ” . In The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education , Edited by: Zeidler , D. L. 97 – 116 . Dordrecht : Springer .
   Google Scholar
• Zeidler , D. L. , Sadler , T. D. , Simmons , M. L. and Howes , E. 2005 . Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education . Science Education , 89 ( 3 ) : 357 – 377 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zohar , A. and Nemet , F. 2002 . Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics . Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 39 ( 1 ) : 35 – 62 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar