‘Should We Kill the Grey Squirrels?’ A Study Exploring Students’ Justifications and Decision-Making

References

• Abd-El-Khalick , F. 2003 . “ Socioscientific issues in pre-college science classrooms ” . In The role of moral reasoning and discourse on socioscientific issues in science education , Edited by: Zeidler , D. 41 – 62 . Dordrecht : Kluwer Academic Publishers .
   Google Scholar
• Aikenhead , G. S. 2006 . Science education for everyday life: Evidence-based practice , New York : Teachers College Press .
   Google Scholar
• Albe , V. 2008 . Students’ positions and considerations of scientific evidence about a controversial socioscientific issue . Science and Education , 17 : 805 – 827 .
   Google Scholar
• Albe, V. (2009). Students' positions and considerations of scientific evidence about a controversial socioscientific issue. Science and Education, 17, 805–827.
   Google Scholar
• American Association of Advancement of Science [AAAS] . 1993 . Benchmarks for science literacy: A Project 2061 report , New York : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Applebaum, S., Barker, B., & Pinzino, D. (2006, April). Socioscientific issues as context for conceptual understanding of content. Paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Ash , D. 2003 . Dialogic inquiry in life science conversations of family groups in a museum . Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 40 ( 2 ) : 138 – 162 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barron, B. (2000). Achieving coordination in collaborative problem-solving groups. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 403–436.
   Google Scholar
• Bell , P. 2004 . “ Promoting students’ argument construction and collaborative debate in the science classroom ” . In Internet environments for science education , Edited by: Linn , M. , Davis , E. and Bell , P. 115 – 143 . New Jersey : Lawrence Erlbaum .
   Google Scholar
• Chiapetta , E. , Koballa , T. and Collette , A. 1998 . Science instruction in the middle and secondary schools , Upper Saddle River , NJ : Merill .
   Google Scholar
• Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2010). Students' questions and discursive interaction: Their impact on argumentation during collaborative group discussions in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 883–908.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, D., & Sampson, V. (2006). Characteristics of students’ argumentation practices when supported by online personally seeded discussions. San Francisco, USA: National Association of Research in Science Teaching San Francisco.
   Google Scholar
• Driver , R. , Leach , J. , Millar , R. and Scott , P. 1996 . Young people's images of science , Bristol , PA : Open University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Duschl , R. 2008 . “ Quality argumentation and epistemic criteria ” . In Argumentation in science education , Edited by: Erduran , S. and Jiménez-Aleixandre , M. P. 159 – 178 . Springer .
   Google Scholar
• Edwards , A. and Westgate , D. 1994 . Investigating classroom talk , London : The Falmer Press .
   Google Scholar
• Erduran , S. 2008 . “ Methodological foundations in the study of argumentation in science classrooms ” . In Argumentation in science education , Edited by: Erduran , S. and Jiménez-Aleixandre , M. P. 47 – 70 . Springer .
   Google Scholar
• Erduran , S. , Simon , S. and Osborne , J. 2004 . TAPing into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's Argument Pattern for studying science discourse . Science Education , 88 ( 6 ) : 915 – 933 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evagorou, M., & Osborne, J. (2007). Argue-WISE: Using technology to support argumentation in science. School Science Review, 89, 103–110.
   Google Scholar
• Evagorou, M., & Avraamidou, L. (2008). The role of technology in supporting the process of argument construction in science learning. Educational Media International, 45(1), 33–45.
   Google Scholar
• Evagorou, M. (2009). Argue-WISE: Exploring young students' features of collaborative argumentation (PhD thesis). King's College, London.
   Google Scholar
• Evagorou, M., & Dillon, J. (2011). Argumentation in the teaching of science. In D. Corrigan, J. Dillon, & R. Gunstone (Eds.), The professional knowledge base of science teaching (pp. 189–204). London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Evagorou, M. (2011). Discussing a socioscientific issue in a primary school classroom: The case of using a technology-supported environment in formal and nonformal settings. In T. Sadler (Ed.), Socio-scientific issues in the classroom (pp. 133–160). London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Herriott , R. E. and Firestone , W. A. 1983 . Multiple qualitative policy research: Optimizing description and generalizability . Educational Researcher , 12 : 14 – 19 .
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Aleixandre, M.P., Bugallo Rodríguez, A., & Duschl, R. (2000). ‘Doing the lesson’ or ‘doing science’: Argument in high school genetics. Science Education, 84(6), 757–792.
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez-Aleixandre, M.P., & Pereiro-Munoz, C. (2002). Knowledge producers or knowledge consumers? Argumentation and decision making about environmental management. International Journal of Science Education, 24(11), 1171–1190.
   Google Scholar
• Jorde , D. and Mork , S. 2007 . “ The contribution of information technology for inclusion of socio-scientific issues in science: The case of wolves in Norway ” . In The re-emergence of values in science , Edited by: Corrigan , D. , Dillon , J. and Gunstone , R. 179 – 196 . Rotterdam : Sense .
   Google Scholar
• Khishfe , R. and Lederman , N. 2006 . Teaching nature of science within a controversial topic: Integrated versus nonintegrated . Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 43 ( 4 ) : 395 – 418 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolsto , S. 2001 . To trust or not to trust pupils’ ways of judging information encountered in a socio-scientific issue . International Journal of Science Education , 23 ( 9 ) : 877 – 901 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolsto , S. 2006 . Patterns in students’ argumentation confronted with a risk-focused socioscientific issue . International Journal of Science Education , 28 ( 14 ) : 1689 – 1716 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn , D. 1991 . The skills of argument , Melbourne: Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn , D. 1993 . Science as argument: Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking . Science Education , 77 ( 3 ) : 319 – 337 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn , D. 2005 . Education for thinking , Cambridge , MA : Harvard University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., Wang, Y., & Li, H. (2001). Why argue? Developing understanding of the purposes and values of argumentive discourse. Discourse Processes, 48(1), 26–49.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke . 2001 . Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education . Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 38 : 296 – 316 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson , R. 2008 . Promoting the role of the personal narrative in teaching controversial socio-scientific issues . Science and Education , 17 : 855 – 871 .
   Google Scholar
• Linn , M. , Bell , P. and Davis , E. 2004 . “ Specific design principles: Elaborating the scaffolded knowledge integration framework ” . In Internet environments for science education , Edited by: Linn , M. , Davis , E. and Bell , P. 315 – 339 . New Jersey : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates .
   Google Scholar
• López-Facal, R., & Jiménez-Aleixandre, M.P. (2008). Identities, social representations and critical thinking. Cultural Studies in Science Education, 4(3), 689–695.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill , K. and Krajcik , J. 2008 . Scientific explanations: Characterizing and evaluating the effects of teachers’ instructional practices on student learning . Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 45 ( 1 ) : 53 – 78 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill , K. and Pimentel , D. S. 2010 . Scientific discourse in three urban classrooms: The role of the teacher in engaging high school students in argumentation . Science Education , 94 ( 2 ) : 203 – 229 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam , S. 1998 . Qualitative research and case study applications in education , San Francisco : Jossey-Bass .
   Google Scholar
• Norris , S. and Philips , L. 2003 . How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy . Science Education , 87 ( 2 ) : 224 – 240 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oulton , C. , Dillon , J. and Grace , M. 2004 . Reconceptualizing the teaching of controversial issues . International Journal of Science Education , 26 ( 4 ) : 411 – 423 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J.F. (1997). Practical alternatives. School Science Review, 78, 61–66.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994–1020.
   Google Scholar
• Pedretti , E. 2003 . “ Teaching science, technology, society and environment (STSE) education ” . In The role of moral reasoning and discourse on socioscientific issues in science education , Edited by: Zeidler , D. 219 – 240 . Dordrecht : Kluwer Academic Publishers .
   Google Scholar
• Ratcliffe , M. 1996 . Pupil decision-making about socio-scientific issues, within the science curriculum . International Journal of Science Education , 19 ( 2 ) : 167 – 182 .
   Google Scholar
• Sadler , T. D. 2009 . Socioscientific issues in science education: Labels, reasoning and transfer . Cultural Studies in Science Education , 4 ( 3 ) : 705 – 711 .
   Google Scholar
• Sadler , T. , Barab , S. and Scott , B. 2007 . What do students gain by engaging in socioscientific inquiry? . Research in Science Education , 37 : 371 – 391 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler , T. and Zeidler , D. 2005 . The significance of content knowledge for informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: Applying genetics knowledge to genetic engineering issues . Science Education , 89 ( 1 ) : 71 – 93 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson , V. and Clark , D. 2008 . Assessment of the ways students generate arguments in science education: Current perspectives and recommendations for future directions . Science Education , 92 ( 3 ) : 447 – 472 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandoval , W. A. 2003 . Conceptual and epistemic aspects of students’ scientific explanations . The Journal of the Learning Sciences , 12 ( 1 ) : 5 – 51 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonneaux , L. 2008 . “ Argumentation in socio-scientific contexts ” . In Argumentation in science education , Edited by: Erduran , S. and Jiménez-Aleixandre , M. P. 179 – 200 . Springer .
   Google Scholar
• Simonneaux , L. and Simonneaux , J. 2009 . Socio-scientific reasoning influenced by identities . Cultural Studies in Science Education , 4 ( 3 ) : 705 – 711 .
   Google Scholar
• Stradling , B. 1985 . Controversial issues in the curriculum . Bulletin of Environmental Education , 170 : 9 – 13 .
   Google Scholar
• Toulmin , S. 1958 . The uses of argument , Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky , L. S. 1978 . Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes , Cambridge , MA : Harvard University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Webb, N.M., & Palinscar, A.S. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In D.C. Berliner & R.C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 841–873). New York: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Yin , R. K. 2003 . Case study research: Design and methods , 3 , London: SAGE Publications .
   Google Scholar
• Zeidler , D. 1997 . The central role of fallacious thinking in science education . Science Education , 81 ( 4 ) : 483 – 496 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeidler , D. and Keefer , M. 2003 . “ The role of moral reasoning and the status of socioscientific issues in science education ” . In The role of moral reasoning and discourse on socioscientific issues in science education , Edited by: Zeidler , D. 7 – 40 . Dordrecht : Kluwer Academic Publishers .
   Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D.L., Osborne, J., Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Monk, M. (2003). The role of argument during discourse about socioscientific issues. In D. Zeidler (Ed.), The role of moral reasoning and discourse on socioscientific issues in science education (pp. 97–116). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Zeidler , D. and Sadler , T. 2008 . “ The role of moral reasoning in argumentation: Conscience, character, and care ” . In Argumentation in science education , Edited by: Erduran , S. and Jiménez-Aleixandre , M. P. 201 – 216 . Springer .
   Google Scholar
• Zeidler , D. , Sadler , T. , Applebaum , S. and Callahan , B. 2009 . Advancing reflective judgment through socioscientific issues . Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 46 ( 1 ) : 74 – 101 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeidler , D. , Sadler , T. , Simmons , M. and Howes , E. 2005 . Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education . Science Education , 89 ( 3 ) : 357 – 377 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zohar , A. and Nemet , F. 2002 . Fostering students’ knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics . Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 30 ( 1 ) : 35 – 62 .
   Google Scholar