What Third-Grade Students of Differing Ability Levels Learn about Nature of Science after a Year of Instruction

References

• American Association for the Advancement of Science (1994). Benchmarks for science literacy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Akerson, V.L., & Abd-El-Khalick, F.S. (2005). How should I know what scientists do—I am just a kid: Fourth grade students' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 17, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Akerson, V.L., & Volrich, M. (2006). Teaching nature of science explicitly in a first grade internship setting. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 377–394.
   Google Scholar
• Akerson, V.L., & Hanuscin, D.L. (2007). Teaching nature of science through inquiry: The results of a three-year professional development program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 653–680.
   Google Scholar
• Akerson, V.L., & Donnelly, L.A. (2010). Teaching nature of science to K-2 students: What understandings can they attain? International Journal of Science Education, 32, 97–124.
   Google Scholar
• Akerson, V.L., Buck, G.A., Donnelly, L.A., Nargund-Joshi, V., & Weiland, I.S. (2011a). The importance of teaching and learning nature of science in the early childhood years. The Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(5), 537–549.
   Google Scholar
• Akerson, V.L., Weiland, I.S., Pongsanon, K., & Nargund-Joshi, V. (2011b). Evidence-based strategies for teaching nature of science to young children. Journal of Kırşehir Education, 11(4), 61–78.
   Google Scholar
• Board on Science Education (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts and core ideas, Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clough, M.P. (2006). Learners’ responses to the demands of conceptual change: Considerations for effective nature of science instruction. Science and Education, 15(5), 463–494. doi: 10.1007/s11191-005-4846-7
   Google Scholar
• Conley, A.M., Pintrich, P.R., Vekiri, I., & Harrison, D. (2004). Changes in epistemological beliefs in elementary science students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(2), 186–204. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• reswell, J. (1996). Qualitative inquiry and research design. New York: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Deng, F., Chen, D., Tsai, C., & Chai, C. (2011). Students’ views of the nature of science: A critical review of the research. Science Education, 95(6), 961–999. doi: 10.1002/sce.20460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dogan, N., Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2008). Turkish grade 10 students’ and science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: A national study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(10), 1083–1112. doi: 10.1002/tea.20243
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fathman, A.K., & Crowther, D.T. (2006). Science for English Language Learners: K-12 classroom strategies, Arlington, VA: NSTA.
   Google Scholar
• Felder, R., & Brent, R. (2005). Understanding student differences. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 57–72. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00829.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fensham, P.J. (1985). Science for all. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 17(4), 415–435. doi: 10.1080/0022027850170407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, S., Scharmann, L.C., & Noh, T. (2005). Examining students’ views on the nature of science: Results from Korean 6th, 8th, and 10th graders. Science Education, 89(2), 314–334. doi: 10.1002/sce.20053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khishfe, R. (2012). Transfer of nature of science understandings into similar contexts: Promises and possibilities of an explicit-reflective approach. International Journal of Science Education, 29, 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khishfe, R., Abd-El-Khalick, F.S. (2002). Influence of explicit and reflective vs. implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), 551–578. doi: 10.1002/tea.10036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khishfe, R., & Lederman, N.G. (2007). Relationship between instructional context and views of nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 29(8), 939–961. doi: 10.1080/09500690601110947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederman, J.S. (2009). Young children’s views of science. Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL. Unpublished paper.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, J.S., & Khishfe, R. (2002). Views of nature of science, form D2. Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL. Unpublished paper.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, J.S., & Lederman, N.G. (2004). Early elementary students’ and teachers understandings of nature of science and scientific inquiry: Lessons learned from Project ICAN. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST), Vancouver, British Columbia.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, N.G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In S.K. Abell & N.G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education, (pp. 831–880). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, O., & Luyx, A. (2007). Science education and student diversity: Race/ethnicity, language, culture, and socioeconomic status. In S.K. Abell & N.G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education, (pp. 171–198). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• McGinnis, J.R., & Stefanich, G.P. (2007). Special needs and talents in science learning. In S.K. Abell & N.G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education, (pp. 287–318). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S.B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Michaels, S., Shouse, A.W., & Schweingruber, H.A. (2008). Ready, set, science!: Putting research to work in K-8 classrooms, Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council (1996). National science education standards, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Science Teachers Association. (2000). NSTA position statement: The nature of science. Retrieved August 12, 2008, from http://www.nsta.org/159&psid=22
   Google Scholar
• Ozkal, K., Tekkaya, C., Sungur, S., Cakiroglu, J., & Cakiroglu, E. (2011). Elementary students’ scientific epistemological beliefs in relation to socio-economic status and gender. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(2), 115–127. doi: 10.1007/s10972-010-9197-9
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, W. (1992). The constructivist perspective: Implications and teaching strategies for science. School Science and Mathematics, 92(3), 136–141. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.1992.tb12159.x
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C.L., Maclin, D., Houghton, C., & Hennessey, M.G. (2000). Sixth grade students’ epistemologies of science: The impact of school science experiences on epistemological development. Cognition and Instruction, 18(3), 349–422. doi: 10.1207/S1532690XCI1803_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walls, L. (2012). Third grade African American students’ views of nature of science. Journal of research in Science Teaching, 49(1), 1–37. doi: 10.1002/tea.20450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis, J., & Ross, T. (1994). Earthlets: As explained by Professor Xargle, New York, NY: Andersen Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (2008). Case study research: Design and methods, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Young, E. (1997). Seven Blind Mice. New York: Scholastic.
   Google Scholar