Understanding the Greenhouse Effect by Embodiment – Analysing and Using Students' and Scientists' Conceptual Resources

References

• Andersson, B., & Wallin, A. (2000). Students’ understanding of the greenhouse effect, the social consequences of reducing CO2 emissions and the problem of ozone layer depletion. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(10), 1096–1111. doi: 10.1002/1098-2736(200012)37:10<1096::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, B., & Wallin, A. (2006). On developing content-oriented theories taking biological evolution as an example. International Journal of Science Education, 28(6), 673–695. doi: 10.1080/09500690500498385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrhenius, S. (1896). On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground. Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 41(5), 237–276. doi: 10.1080/14786449608620846
   Google Scholar
• Aubusson, P. J., & Fogwill, S. (2006). Role play as analogical modelling in science. In P. J. Aubusson, A. G. Harrison, & S. M. Ritchie (Eds.), Metaphor and analogy in science education (pp. 93–104). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bord, R. J., Fisher, A., & O'Connor, R. E. (1998). Public perceptions of global warming: United States and internationational perspectives. Climate Research, 11, 75–84. doi: 10.3354/cr011075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bostrom, A., Morgan, M. G., Fischhoff, B., & Read, D. (1994). What do people know about global climate change? 1. Metal models. Risk Analysis, 14(6), 959–970. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00065.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyes, E., & Stanisstreet, M. (1993). The greenhouse-effect—childrens perceptions of causes, consequences and cures. International Journal of Science Education, 15(5), 531–552. doi: 10.1080/0950069930150507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronin, M., Gonzalez, C., & Sterman, J. (2009). Why don't well-educated adults understand accumulation? A challenge to researchers, educators, and citizens. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(1), 116–130. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutsche Meteorologische Gesellschaft (German Society for Meteorology [DMG]). (1999). Grundlagen des Treibhauseffektes [Principles of the greenhouse effect], Report of the German Association for Meteorology, Berlin, pp. 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Dove, J. (1996). Student teacher understanding of the greenhouse effect, ozone layer depletion and acid rain. Environmental Education Research, 2(1), 89–100. doi: 10.1080/1350462960020108
   Google Scholar
• Duit, R., Gropengiesser, H., & Kattmann, U. (2005). Towards science education research that is relevant for improving practice: The model of educational reconstruction. In H. Fischer (Ed.), Developing standards in research on science education, the ESERA Summer School 2004 (pp. 1–9). London: Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Duit, R., Gropengießer, H., Kattmann, U., & Komorek, M. (2012). The model of educational reconstruction—a framework for improving teaching and learning science. In D. Jorde & J. Dillon (Eds.), Science education research and practice in Europe (pp. 13–38). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Duit, R., & Treagust, D. (1998). Learning in science—from behaviourism towards social constructivism and beyond. In B. Fraser & K. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (Vol. 1, Part 1, pp. 3–25). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Duschl, R., Maeng, S., & Sezen, A. (2011). Learning progressions and teaching sequences: A review and analysis. Studies in Science Education, 47(2), 123–182. doi: 10.1080/03057267.2011.604476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekborg, M., & Areskoug, M. (2006). How student teacher's understanding of the greenhouse effect develops during a teacher education programme. NorDiNa, 1(5), 17–29.
   Google Scholar
• Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G. (2005). The brain's concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21, 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Gropengießer, H. (2007). Theorie des erfahrungsbasierten Verstehens [Experientialism]. In D. Krüger & H. Vogt (Eds.), Theorien in der biologiedidaktischen Forschung (pp. 105–116). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, P. J.K. (2010). Knowledge about the greenhouse effect and the effects of the ozone layer among Norwegian pupils finishing compulsory education in 1989, 1993, and 2005—what now?. International Journal of Science Education, 32(3), 397–419. doi: 10.1080/09500690802600787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houghton, J. (2002). Physics of the atmospheres. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2007). Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffries, H., Boyes, E., & Stanisstreet, M. (2001). Knowledge about the greenhouse effect: Have college students improved?. Research in Science & Technological Education, 19(2), 205–221. doi: 10.1080/02635140120087731
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind—the bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Khalid, T. (2003). Pre-service high school teachers’ perceptions of three environmental phenomena. Environmental Education Research, 9(1), 35–50. doi: 10.1080/13504620303466
   Google Scholar
• Koulaidis, V., & Christidou, V. (1999). Models of students’ thinking concerning the greenhouse effect and teaching implications. Science Education, 83(5), 559–576. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199909)83:5<559::AID-SCE4>3.0.CO;2-E
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G. (1990). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.64
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.56
   Google Scholar
• Longino, H. (1990). Science as social knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, L., & Santi, M. (1998). Discussing the greenhouse effect: Children's collaborative discourse reasoning and conceptual change. Environmental Education Research, 4(1), 67–85. doi: 10.1080/1350462980040105
   Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. (2002). Qualitative content analysis—research instrument or mode of interpretation?. In M. Kiegelmann (Ed.), The role of the researcher in qualitative psychology (pp. 139–148). Tuebingen: UTB.
   Google Scholar
• Niebert, K. (2010). Den Klimawandel verstehen. Eine Didaktische Rekonstruktion der globalen Erwärmung [Understanding climate change. An educational reconstruction of global warming]. Oldenburg: Didaktisches Zentrum Oldenburg (diz).
   Google Scholar
• Niebert, K., Marsch, S., & Treagust, D. (2012). Understanding needs embodiment: A theory-guided reanalysis of the role of metaphors and analogies in understanding science. Science Education, 96(5), 849–877. doi: 10.1002/sce.21026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niebert, K., Riemeier, T., & Gropengiesser, H. (2013). The hidden hand that shapes conceptual understanding: Choosing effective representations for teaching cell division and climate change. In C.Y. Tsui & D. Treagust (Eds.), Multiple representations in biological education, Models and Modeling in Science Education (Vol. 7, pp. 210–229). New York: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-4192-8_16.
   Google Scholar
• Núñez, R. E., Edwards, L. D., & Matos, F. J. (1999). Embodied cognition as grounding for situatedness and context in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 39(1), 45–65. doi: 10.1023/A:1003759711966
   Google Scholar
• Papadimitriou, V. (2004). Prospective primary teachers’ understanding of climate change, greenhouse effect, and ozone layer depletion. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13(2), 299–307. doi: 10.1023/B:JOST.0000031268.72848.6d
   Google Scholar
• Pruneau, D., Liboiron, L., Vrain, E., Biosphère, L., Gravel, H., Bourque, W., & Langis, J. (2001). People's ideas about climate change: A source of inspiration for the creation of educational programs. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education (CJEE), 6(1), 121–138.
   Google Scholar
• Read, D., Bostrom, A., Morgan, M. G., Fischhoff, B., & Smuts, T. (1994). What do people know about global climate change? 2. Survey studies of educated laypeople. Risk Analysis, 14(6), 971–982. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00066.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riemeier, T., & Gropengiesser, H. (2008). On the roots of difficulties in learning about cell division: Process-based analysis of students’ conceptual development in teaching experiments. International Journal of Science Education, 30(7), 923–939. doi: 10.1080/09500690701294716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohrer, T. (2001, July). Understanding through the body: fMRI and ERP investigations into the neurophysiology of cognitive semantics. Paper presented at the 7th International Cognitive Linguistics Association, University of Carlifornia at Santa Barbara, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Rohrer, T. (2005). Image schemata in the brain. In B. Hampe & J. Grady (Eds.), From perception to meaning: Images schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 165–196). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Rye, J. A., Rubba, P. A., & Wiesenmayer, R. L. (1997). An investigation of middle school students’ alternative conceptions of global warming. International Journal of Science Education, 19(5), 527–551. doi: 10.1080/0950069970190503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, R. (2005). Systematic metaphor analysis as a method of qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 10(2), 358–394.
   Google Scholar
• Shepardson, D., Choi, S., Niyogi, D., & Charusombat, U. (2011). Seventh grade students’ mental models of the greenhouse effect. Environmental Education Research, 17(1), 1–17. doi: 10.1080/13504620903564549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon, M. (2008). Social epistemology of science. In R. A. Duschl & R. E. Grandy (Eds.), Establishing a consensus agenda for K-12 science inquiry (pp. 86–94). Rotterdam, NL: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Steffe, L., Thompson, P., & von Glaserfeld, E. (2000). Teaching experiment methodology: Underlying principles and essential elements. In A. Kelly & R. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 277–309). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Steinke, I. (2004). Quality criteria in qualitative research. In U. Flick, E. Kardorff, & I. Steinke (Eds.), A companion to qualitative research (pp. 184–191). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sterman, J., & Sweeney, L. B. (2007). Understanding public complacency about climate change: Adults’ mental models of climate change violate conservation of matter. Climatic Change, 80(3), 213–238. doi: 10.1007/s10584-006-9107-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweeney, L. B., & Sterman, J. D. (2007). Thinking about systems: Student and teacher conceptions of natural and social systems. System Dynamics Review, 23(2–3), 285–311. doi: 10.1002/sdr.366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vollmer, G. (1984). Mesocosm and objective knowledge. In F. Wuketits (Ed.), Concepts and approaches in evolutionary epistemology (pp. 69–121). Dordrecht: Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S., & Ioannides, C. (1998). From conceptual development to science education: A psychological point of view. International Journal of Science Education, 20(10), 1213–1230. doi: 10.1080/0950069980201004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar