2,500
Views
57
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Revisiting the Translation of Nature of Science Understandings into Instructional Practice: Teachers' nature of science pedagogical content knowledge

&

References

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F. (1998). The influence of history of science courses on students’ conceptions of the nature of science (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Oregon State University, Oregon..
  • Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2001). Embedding nature of science instruction in preservice elementary science courses: Abandoning scientism, but …. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 12, 215–233. doi: 10.1023/A:1016720417219
  • Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). Rutherford's enlarged: A content-embedded activity to teach about nature of science. Physics Education, 37(1), 64–68. doi: 10.1088/0031-9120/37/1/309
  • Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2005). Developing deeper understandings of nature of science: The impact of a philosophy of science course on preservice science teachers’ views and instructional planning. International Journal of Science Education, 27(1), 15–42. doi: 10.1080/09500690410001673810
  • Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2012). Examining the sources for our understandings about science: Enduring conflations and critical issues in research on nature of science in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 34(3), 353–374. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2011.629013
  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Akerson, V. L. (2004). Learning about nature of science as conceptual change: Factors that mediate the development of preservice elementary teachers’ views of nature of science. Science Education, 88(5), 785–610. doi: 10.1002/sce.10143
  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Akerson, V. L. (2009). The influence of metacognitive training on preservice elementary teachers’ conceptions of nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 31(16), 2161–2184. doi: 10.1080/09500690802563324
  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82, 417–437. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199807)82:4<417::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-E
  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., & BouJaoude, S. (2003). Lebanese middle school students’ views of nature of science. Mediterranean Journal of Educational Studies, 8(1), 61–79.
  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000a). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 665–701. doi: 10.1080/09500690050044044
  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000b). The influence of history of science courses on students’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(10), 1057–1095. doi: 10.1002/1098-2736(200012)37:10<1057::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-C
  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., Waters, M., & Le, A. (2008). Representations of nature of science in high school chemistry textbooks over the past four decades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(7), 835–855. doi: 10.1002/tea.20226
  • Aguirre, J. M., Haggerty, S. M., & Linder, C. J. (1990). Student-teachers’ conceptions of science, teaching and learning: A case study in preservice science education. International Journal of Science Education, 12, 381–390. doi: 10.1080/0950069900120405
  • Akerson, V. L., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2003). Teaching elements of nature of science: A yearlong case study of a fourth grade teacher. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(10), 1025–1049. doi: 10.1002/tea.10119
  • Akerson, V. L., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a reflective explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(4), 295–317. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200004)37:4<295::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-2
  • Akerson, V. L., Buzzelli, C. A., & Donnelly, L. A. (2010). On the nature of teaching nature of science: Preservice early childhood teachers’ instruction in preschool and elementary settings. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(2), 213–233.
  • Akerson, V. L., Morrison, J., & McDuffie, A. R. (2005). One course is not enough: Preservice elementary teachers’ retention of improved views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(2), 194–213. doi: 10.1002/tea.20099
  • Akerson, V. L., & Volrich, M. L. (2006). Teaching nature of science explicitly in a first-grade internship setting. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(4), 377–394. doi: 10.1002/tea.20132
  • Akindehin, F. (1988). Effect of an instructional package on preservice science teachers’ understanding of the nature of science and acquisition of science-related attitudes. Science Education, 72(1), 73–82. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730720107
  • Alvarez, W., & Azaro, F.An extraterrestrial impact. Scientific American1990, October263, 78–84. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican1090-78
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (1990). Science for all AmericansNew York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (1993). Benchmarks for science literacyNew York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Bell, R. L., Blair, L. M., Crawford, B. A., & Lederman, N. G. (2003). Just do it? Impact of a science apprenticeship program on high school students’ understandings of the nature of science and scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(5), 487–509. doi: 10.1002/tea.10086
  • Billeh, V. Y., & Hasan, O. E. (1975). Factors influencing teachers’ gain in understanding the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 12, 209–219. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660120303
  • Brickhouse, N. W. (1990). Teachers’ beliefs about the nature of science and their relationship to classroom practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 41, 53–62. doi: 10.1177/002248719004100307
  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 17, 32–42. doi: 10.3102/0013189X018001032
  • Butler, W., & Southerland, S. A. (2010, March). Influence of the nature of science instruction on the learning of evolution: A qualitative study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Philadelphia, PA..
  • Carey, R. L., & Stauss, N. G. (1968). An analysis of the understanding of the nature of science by prospective secondary science teachers. Science Education, 52(2), 358–363. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730520410
  • Chen, S. (2006). Development of an instrument to assess views of nature of science and attitudes toward teaching science. Science Education, 90, 803–919. doi: 10.1002/sce.20147
  • Council of Ministers of Education Canada Pan-Canadian Science Project. (1997). Common framework of science learning outcomes K to 12. Retrieved from http://www.cmec.ca/science/framework/Pages/english/CMEC%20Eng.html.
  • Courtillot, V. E. (1990). A volcanic eruption. Scientific American, 263(October), 85–92. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican1090-85
  • Curriculum Council (1998). Curriculum framework for Kindergarten to Year 12 education in Western AustraliaOsborne Park, WA: Author.
  • Dogan, N., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2008). Turkish grade 10 students’ and science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: A national study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(10), 1083–1112. doi: 10.1002/tea.20243
  • Gabel, D. L., Rubba, P. A., & Franz, J. R. (1977). The effect of early teaching and training experiences on physics achievement, attitude toward science and science teaching, and process skill proficiency. Science Education, 61, 503–511. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730610406
  • Hashweh, M. (1996). Effects of science teachers’ epistemological beliefs in teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(1), 47–63. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199601)33:1<47::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-P
  • Hashweh, M.Z. (1985). An exploratory study of teacher knowledge and teaching: The effects of science teachers' knowledge of subject-matter and their conceptions of learning on their teaching (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Stanford University, California.
  • Haukoos, G. D., & Penick, J. E. (1983). The influence of classroom climate on science process and content achievement of community college students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 629–637. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660200704
  • Haukoos, G. D., & Penick, J. E. (1985). The effects of classroom climate on college science students: A replication study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22, 163–168. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660220207
  • Hewson, P. W., Beeth, M. E., & Thorley, N. R. (1998). Teaching for conceptual change. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 199–218). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  • Irwin, A. R. (2000). Historical case studies: Teaching the nature of science in context. Science Education, 84(1), 5–26. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200001)84:1<5::AID-SCE2>3.0.CO;2-0
  • Kang, S., Scharmann, L. C., & Noh, T. (2005). Examining students’ views on the nature of science: Results from Korean 6th, 8th, and 10th graders. Science Education, 89(2), 314–334. doi: 10.1002/sce.20053
  • Khaldi, M., Harris, P., & McCarthy, S. (2008). Teachers’ views of the nature of science: A Palestinian perspective. Paper presented as part of the ‘explorations in the nature of science: Challenges and opportunities in developing teacher learning’ symposium at BERA, Edinburgh, Scotland..
  • Kimball, M. E.Understanding the nature of science: A comparison of scientists and science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching1967–19685, 110–120. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660050204
  • King, B. B. (1991). Beginning teachers’ knowledge of and attitudes toward history and philosophy of science. Science Education, 75(1), 135–141. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730750112
  • Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutionsChicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Latour, B. (1987). Science in actionCambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Lavach, J. F. (1969). Organization and evaluation of an inservice program in the history of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 6, 166–170. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660060211
  • Lawson, A. E. (1982). The nature of advanced reasoning and science instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 19, 743–760. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660190904
  • Lederman, N. G. (1999). Teachers’ understanding of the nature of science and classroom practice: Factors that facilitate or impede the relationship. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 916–929. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199910)36:8<916::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-A
  • Lederman, N. G., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (1998). Avoiding de-natured science: Activities that promote understandings of the nature of science. In W. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies (pp. 83–126). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  • Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire (VNOS): Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 497–521. doi: 10.1002/tea.10034
  • Lederman, N. G., Schwartz, R. S., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Bell, R. L. (2001). Preservice teachers’ understanding and teaching of the nature of science: An intervention study. The CaSawsann Journal of Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education, 1(2), 135–160. doi: 10.1080/14926150109556458
  • Lin, H. S., & Chen, C. C. (2002). Promoting preservice chemistry teachers’ understanding about the nature of science through history. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 773–792. doi: 10.1002/tea.10045
  • Mackay, L. D. (1971). Development of understanding about the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 8(1), 57–66. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660080110
  • Mathews, M. R. (1994). Science teaching: The role of history and philosophy of scienceNew York, NY: Routledge.
  • McDonald, C. V. (2010). The influence of explicit nature of science and argumentation instruction on preservice primary teachers’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(9), 1137–1164. doi: 10.1002/tea.20377
  • Merill, R., & Butts, D. (1969). Vitalizing the role of the teacher. In D. Butts (Ed.), Designs for progress in science education (pp. 35–42). Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association.
  • Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (1998). In R. Millar & J. Osborne (Eds.), Beyond 2000: Science education for the futureLondon: King's College.
  • Miller, P. E. (1963). A comparison of the abilities of secondary teachers and students of biology to understand science. Iowa Academy of Science, 70, 510–513.
  • Ministry of Education and Higher Education (MoEHE). (1998). General outline for science curriculum (in Arabic). Ramallah: Curriculum Development Center..
  • National Research Council (NRC) (1996). National science education standardsWashington, DC: National Academic Press.
  • Nye, M. J. (1980). N-rays: An episode in the history and psychology of science. Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences, 11, 125–156. doi: 10.2307/27757473
  • Peters, E., & Kitsantas, A. (2010). The effect of nature of science metacognitive prompts on science students’ content and nature of science knowledge, metacognition, and self-regulatory efficacy. School Science and Mathematics, 110(8), 382–396. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2010.00050.x
  • Reiser, B. J., Tabak, I., Sandoval, W. A., Smith, B. K., Steinmuller, F., & Leone, A. J. (2001). BGuILE: Strategic and conceptual scaffolds for scientific inquiry in biology classrooms. In S. M. Carver & D. Klahr (Eds.), Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress (pp. 263–305). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Rowe, M. B. (1974). A humanistic intent: The program of preservice elementary education at the University of Florida. Science Education, 58, 369–376. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730580311
  • Rubba, P. A., & Anderson, H. (1978). Development of an instrument to assess secondary school students’ understanding of the nature of scientific knowledge. Science Education, 62(4), 449–458. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730620404
  • Ryan, A. G., & Aikenhead, G. S. (1992). Students’ preconceptions about the epistemology of science. Science Education, 76(6), 559–580. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730760602
  • Schmidt, D. J. (1967). Test on understanding science: A comparison among school groups. Journal of research in Science Teaching, 5(4), 365–366. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660050411
  • Schwartz, R. S., & Lederman, N. G. (2002). It's the nature of the beast’: The influence of knowledge and intentions on learning and teaching nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(3), 205–236. doi: 10.1002/tea.10021
  • Shapiro, B. L. (1996). A case study of change in elementary student teacher thinking during an independent investigation in science: Learning about the ‘face of science that does not yet know’. Science Education, 80, 535–560. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199609)80:5<535::AID-SCE3>3.0.CO;2-C
  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4–14. doi: 10.3102/0013189X015002004
  • Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–22.
  • Soderberg, P. (1992). Marshmallow meiosis. The Science Teacher, 59(8), 28–31.
  • Tamir, P., & Zohar, A. (1991). Anthropomorphism and teleology in reasoning about biological phenomena. Science Education, 75(1), 57–68. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730750106
  • Wahbeh, N. (2003). Teaching and learning science in Palestine: Dealing with the new Palestinian science curriculum. Mediterranean Journal of Educational Studies, 8(1), 135–159.
  • Wolpert, L. (1993). The unnatural nature of scienceCambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.