Using Formal Embedded Formative Assessments Aligned with a Short-Term Learning Progression to Promote Conceptual Change and Achievement in Science

References

• Alonzo, A. C., & Steedle, J. T. (2009). Developing and assessing a force and motion learning progression. Science Education, 93(3), 389–421. doi: 10.1002/sce.20303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayala, C. C., Shavelson, R. J., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Brandon, P., Yin, Y., Furtak, E. M., … Tomita, M. K. (2008). From formal embedded assessments to reflective lessons: The development of formative assessment suites. Applied Measurement in Education, 21(4), 315–334.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, B., & Cowie, B. (2001). Formative assessment and science education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & William, D. (2003). Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. Maidenhead, Berkshire: Open university Press.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2004). Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(1), 8–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998a). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7–74. doi: 10.1080/0969595980050102
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998b). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Children's responses to anomalous scientific data: How is conceptual change impeded?. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 327–343. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clement, J. (1982). Students’ preconceptions in introductory mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 50(1), 66–71. doi: 10.1119/1.12989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, A., Brown, J. S., Newman, S. E. (1998). Cogntive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In ResnickL. B. (Ed.), Learning, knowing, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser, (pp. 453–494). Hilldale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Corcoran, T., Mosher, F. A., & Rogat, A. (2009). Learning progressions in science: An evidence-based approach to reform. New York, NY: Center on Continuous Instructional Improvement, Teachers College, Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Duit, R., & Treagust, D. (2003). Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 671–688. doi: 10.1080/09500690305016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, R. G., Rogat, A. D., & Yarden, A. (2009). A learning progression for deepening students’ understandings of modern genetics across the 5th-10th grades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 655–674. doi: 10.1002/tea.20312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furberg, A., & Arnseth, H. C. (2009). Reconsidering conceptual change from a socio-cultural perspective: Analyzing students’ meaning making in genetics in collaborative learning activities. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 4(1), 157–191. doi: 10.1007/s11422-008-9161-6
   Google Scholar
• Furtak, E. M. (2012). Linking a learning progression for natural selection to teachers’ enactment of formative assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(9), 1181–1210. doi: 10.1002/tea.21054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewson, M. G. (1986). The acquisition of scientific knowledge: Analysis and representation of student conceptions concerning density. Science Education, 70(2), 159–170. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730700210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, H., & Anderson, C. W. (2012). A learning progression for energy in socio-ecological systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(9), 1149–1180. doi: 10.1002/tea.21051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, P., & Tymms, P. (2011). The emergence of a learning progression in middle school chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(8), 849–877. doi: 10.1002/tea.20433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, C., & Wilson, M. (2007). Using progress variables to interpret student achievement and progress (BEAR Technical Report, 2006-12-01). Berkeley: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Kohn, A. S. (1993). Preschoolers’ reasoning about density: Will it float?. Child Development, 64(6), 1637–1650. doi: 10.2307/1131460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H.-S., & Liu, O. L. (2010). Assessing learning progression of energy concepts across middle school grades: The knowledge integration perspective. Science Education, 94(4), 665–688. doi: 10.1002/sce.20382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merritt, J. D., Krajcik, J. K., & Schwartz, Y. (2008). Development of a learning progression for the particle model of matter. Paper presented at the International Conference for the Learning Sciences, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• NRC (2001). Knowing what students know. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, National Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• NRC (2007). Taking science to school. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• NRC (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, cross-cutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R., & Boyle, R. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63(2), 167–199. doi: 10.3102/00346543063002167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plummer, J. D., & Krajcik, J. S. (2010). Building a learning progression for celestial motion: Elementary levels from an earth-based perspective. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(7), 768–787. doi: 10.1002/tea.20355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. F. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211–227. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730660207
   Google Scholar
• Pottenger, F. M. I., & Young, D. B. (1992). The local environment: FAST 1, Foundational approaches in science teaching. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Curriculum Research & Development Group.
   Google Scholar
• Ramaprasad, A. (1983). On the definition of feedback. Behavioral Science, 28(1), 4–13. doi: 10.1002/bs.3830280103
   Google Scholar
• Schnotz, W., Vosniadou, S., & Carretero, M. (1999). New perspectives in conceptual change research. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shavelson, R. J., Yin, Y., Furtak, E. M., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Ayala, C. C., Young, D. B. … Pottenger, F. (2008). On the role and impact of formative assessment on science inquiry teaching and learning. In J. Coffey, R. Douglas, & C. Sterns (Eds.), Science assessment: Research and practical approaches (pp. 21–36). Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, M. A. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(2), 114–145. doi: 10.2307/749205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, C., Snir, J., & Grosslight, L. (1992). Using conceptual models to facilitate conceptual change: The case of weight-density differentiation. Cognition and Instruction, 9(3), 221–283. doi: 10.1207/s1532690xci0903_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, C., Wiser, M., Anderson, C. W., & Krajcik, J. (2006). Implications of research on children's learning for assessment: Matter and atomic molecular theory. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 4(1&2), 1–98.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. P., diSessa, A. A., & Roschelle, J. (1993). Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(2), 115–163. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls0302_1
   Google Scholar
• Songer, N. B., & Gotwals, A. W. (2012). Guiding explanation construction by children at the entry points of learning progressions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(2), 141–165. doi: 10.1002/tea.20454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steedle, J. T., & Shavelson, R. J. (2009). Supporting valid interpretations of learning progression level diagnoses. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 699–715.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, S. Y., Shin, N., & Krajcik, J. S. (2009, June). Towards a model for the development of an empirically tested learning progression. Paper presented at the Learning Progressions in Science (LeaPS) Conference, Iowa City, IA.
   Google Scholar
• Tao, P. K., & Gunstone, R. F. (1999). The process of conceptual change in force and motion during computer-supported physics instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(7), 859–882. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199909)36:7<859::AID-TEA7>3.0.CO;2-J
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, R., & Gunstone, R. (1992). Probing understanding. London and New York: The Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D., Lee, C., Harrison, C., & Black, P. J. (2004). Teachers developing assessment for learning: Impact on student achievement. Assessment in Education, 11(1), 49–65. doi: 10.1080/0969594042000208994
   Google Scholar
• Yin, Y. (2005). The influence of formative assessments on student motivation, achievement, and conceptual change (Doctoral dissertation). Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, Y., Shavelson, R. J., Ayala, C. C., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Brandon, P. R., Furtak, E. M., Tomita, M. K., & Young, D. B. (2008). On the impact of formative assessment on students' motivation, achievement, and conceptual change. Applied Measurement in Education, 21(4), 335–359.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, Y., Tomita, K. M., & Shavelson, R. J. (2008). Diagnosing and dealing with student misconceptions about “Sinking and Floating”. Science Scope, 31, 34–39.
   Google Scholar