8,810
Views
48
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

‘Am I Like a Scientist?’: Primary children's images of doing science in school

, &

References

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., BouJaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N. G., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., & Tuan, H.-I. (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88(3), 397–419. doi: 10.1002/sce.10118
  • Akerson, V., & Donnelly, L. A. (2009). Teaching nature of science to K-2 students: What understandings can they attain?. International Journal of Science Education, 32(1), 97–124. doi: 10.1080/09500690902717283
  • Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1–12. doi: 10.1023/A:1015171124982
  • Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2010). ‘Doing’ science versus ‘being’ a scientist: Examining 10/11-year-old schoolchildren's constructions of science through the lens of identity. Science Education, 94(4), 617–639. doi: 10.1002/sce.20399
  • Braund, M., & Reiss, M. (2006). Towards a more authentic science curriculum: The contribution of out-of-school learning. International Journal of Science Education, 28(12), 1373–1388. doi: 10.1080/09500690500498419
  • Brickhouse, N. W., Lowery, P., & Schultz, K. (2000). What kind of a girl does science? The construction of school science identities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(5), 441–458. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200005)37:5<441::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-3
  • Brooks, M. (2005). Drawing as a unique mental development tool for young children: Interpersonal and intrapersonal dialogues. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 6(1), 80–91. doi: 10.2304/ciec.2005.6.1.11
  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42. doi: 10.3102/0013189X018001032
  • Buldu, M. (2006). Young children's perceptions of scientists: A preliminary study. Educational Research, 48(1), 121–132. doi: 10.1080/00131880500498602
  • Calabrese Barton, A. (1998). Teaching science with homeless children: Pedagogy, representation, and identity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(4), 379–394. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199804)35:4<379::AID-TEA8>3.0.CO;2-N
  • Chambers, D. W. (1983). Stereotypic images of the scientist: The draw-a-scientist test. Science Education, 67(2), 255–265. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730670213
  • Chiappetta, E. L. (1997). Inquiry-based science: Strategies and techniques for encouraging inquiry in the classroom. The Science Teacher, 64(1), 22–26.
  • Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2008). Students’ questions: A potential resource for teaching and learning science. Studies in Science Education, 44(1), 1–39. doi: 10.1080/03057260701828101
  • Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86(2), 175–218. doi: 10.1002/sce.10001
  • Crawford, B. A. (2007). Learning to teach science as inquiry in the rough and tumble of practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(4), 613–642. doi: 10.1002/tea.20157
  • Crawford, B. A. (2012). Moving the essence of inquiry into the classroom: Engaging teachers and students in authentic science. In K. C. D. Tan, & M. Kim (Eds.), Issues and challenges in science education: Moving forward (pp. 25–42). Dordrecht: Springer.
  • DeWitt, J., & Hohenstein, J. (2010a). School trips and classroom lessons: An investigation into teacher-student talk in two settings. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 454–473. doi: 10.1002/tea.20346
  • DeWitt, J., & Hohenstein, J. (2010b). Supporting student learning: A comparison of student discussion in museums and classrooms. Visitor Studies, 13(1), 41–66. doi: 10.1080/10645571003618758
  • Dillon, J. (2009). On scientific literacy and curriculum reform. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(3), 201–213.
  • Dove, J. E., Everett, L. A., & Preece, P. F. W. (1999). Exploring a hydrological concept through children's drawings. International Journal of Science Education, 21(5), 485–497. doi: 10.1080/095006999290534
  • Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287–312. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A
  • Duschl, R. A. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of Research in Education, 28(1), 268–291. doi: 10.3102/0091732X07309371
  • Duschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H. A., & Shouse, A. W. (Eds.). (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  • Ehrlén, K. (2008). Drawings as representations of children's conceptions. International Journal of Science Education, 31(1), 41–57. doi: 10.1080/09500690701630455
  • Finson, K. D. (2002). Drawing a scientist: What we do and do not know after fifty years of drawings. School Science and Mathematics, 102(7), 335–345. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.2002.tb18217.x
  • Flick, L. B., & Lederman, N. G. (2004). In FlickL. B.LedermanN. G. (Ed.), Scientific inquiry and nature of science: Implications for teaching, learning, and teacher education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
  • Gibson, H. L., & Chase, C. (2002). Longitudinal impact of an inquiry-based science program on middle school students’ attitude toward science. Science Education, 86(5), 693–705. doi: 10.1002/sce.10039
  • Gyllenpalm, J., Wickman, P.-O., & Holmgren, S.-O. (2010). Teachers’ language on scientific inquiry: Methods of teaching or methods of inquiry?. International Journal of Science Education, 32(9), 1151–1172. doi: 10.1080/09500690902977457
  • Haney, W., Russell, M., & Bebell, D. (2004). Drawing on education: Using drawings to document schooling and support change. Harvard Educational Review, 74(3), 241–272.
  • Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28–54. doi: 10.1002/sce.10106
  • Khishfe, R., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), 551–578. doi: 10.1002/tea.10036
  • Khishfe, R., & Lederman, N. (2007). Relationship between instructional context and views of nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 29(8), 939–961. doi: 10.1080/09500690601110947
  • Kim, M., Tan, A.-L., & Talaue, F. T. (2013). New vision and challenges in inquiry-based curriculum change in Singapore. International Journal of Science Education, 35(2), 289–311.
  • Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
  • Koren, P., & Bar, V. (2009). Pupils’ image of ‘the scientists’ among two communities in Israel: A comparative study. International Journal of Science Education, 31(18), 2485–2509. doi: 10.1080/09500690802449375
  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., & Foy, P. (2008). TIMSS 2007 international science report: Findings from IEA's trends in international mathematics and science study at the fourth and eighth grades. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Centre.
  • McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. (2012). Supporting grade 5–8 students in constructing explanations in science: The claim, evidence and reasoning framework for talk and writing. New York, NY: Pearson Allyn & Bacon.
  • Meichtry, Y. J. (1992). Influencing student understanding of the nature of science: Data from a case of curriculum development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 389–407. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660290407
  • Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. London: King's College London.
  • Ministry of Education (2008). Primary science syllabus. Singapore: Author.
  • Moss, D. M., Abrams, E. D., & Robb, J. (2001). Examining student conceptions of the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 23(8), 771–790. doi: 10.1080/09500690010016030
  • National Research Council (1996). The National Science Education Standards: Guidelines for moving the vision into practice. Washington, DC: NSTA Press.
  • National Research Council (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  • National Research Council (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  • Newton, L. D., & Newton, D. P. (1998). Primary children's conceptions of science and the scientist: Is the impact of a national curriculum breaking down the stereotype?. International Journal of Science Education, 20(9), 1137–1149. doi: 10.1080/0950069980200909
  • Osborne, J., & Collins, S. (2001). Pupils’ views of the role and value of the science curriculum: A focus-group study. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 441–467. doi: 10.1080/09500690010006518
  • Osborne, J., & Patterson, A. (2012). Authors’ response to “for whom is argument and explanation a necessary distinction? A response to Osborne and Patterson” by Berland and McNeill. Science Education, 96(5), 814–817. doi: 10.1002/sce.21034
  • Palmer, D. H. (1997). Investigating students’ private perceptions of scientists and their work. Research in Science & Technological Education, 15(2), 173–183. doi: 10.1080/0263514970150204
  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Poon, C.-L., Lee, Y.-J., Tan, A.-L., & Lim, S. (2012). Knowing inquiry as practice and theory: Developing a pedagogical framework with elementary school teachers. Research in Science Education, 42(2), 303–327.
  • Rahm, J., Miller, H. C., Hartley, L., & Moore, J. C. (2003). The value of an emergent notion of authenticity: Examples from two student/teacher–scientist partnership programs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(8), 737–756. doi: 10.1002/tea.10109
  • Roberts, L., & Wassersug, R. (2009). Does doing scientific research in high school correlate with students staying in science? A half-century retrospective study. Research in Science Education, 39(2), 251–256. doi: 10.1007/s11165-008-9083-z
  • Roth, W.-M., & Calabrese Barton, A. (2004). Rethinking scientific literacy. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., & Crawford, B. A. (2004). Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: An explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88(4), 610–645. doi: 10.1002/sce.10128
  • Shanahan, M.-C., & Nieswandt, M. (2011). Science student role: Evidence of social structural norms specific to school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(4), 367–395. doi: 10.1002/tea.20406
  • Song, J., & Kim, K.-S. (1999). How Korean students see scientists: The images of the scientist. International Journal of Science Education, 21(9), 957–977. doi: 10.1080/095006999290255
  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: Sage.
  • Talaue, F. T., & Tan, A.-L. (2011). Intention to teach inquiry in primary science: Preliminary summary report. Singapore: National Institute of Education.
  • Tamir, P. (1983). Inquiry and the science teacher. Science Education, 67(5), 657–672. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730670513
  • Tan, A.-L., & Wong, H.-M. (2012). ‘Didn't get expected answer, rectify it.’: Teaching science content in an elementary science classroom using hands-on activities. International Journal of Science Education, 34(2), 197–222.
  • Tucker-Raymond, E., Varelas, M., Pappas, C., Korzh, A., & Wentland, A. (2007). “They probably aren't named Rachel”: Young children's scientist identities as emergent multimodal narratives. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1(3), 559–592. doi: 10.1007/s11422-006-9017-x
  • Varelas, M., Kane, J. M., & Wylie, C. D. (2011). Young African American children's representations of self, science, and school: Making sense of difference. Science Education, 95(5), 824–851. doi: 10.1002/sce.20447
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Weber, S., & Mitchell, C. (1995). ‘That's funny, you don't look like a teacher’: Interrogating images and identity in popular culture. London: The Falmer Press.
  • Zhai, J. (2012). Engaging children in learning ecological science: Two botanic garden educators' pedagogical practices. In K. C. D. Tan & M. Kim (Eds.), Issues and challenges in science education research: Moving forward (pp. 301–315). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.