Quantitative Reasoning in Environmental Science: A learning progression

References

• Carlson, M., Jacobs, S., Coe, E., Larsen, S., & Hsu, E. (2002). Applying covariational reasoning while modeling dynamic events: A framework and a study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33, 352–378. doi: 10.2307/4149958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corcoran, T., Mosher, F. A., & Rogat, A. (2009). Learning progressions in science: An evidence-based aproach to reform. Philadelphia, PA: Consortium Policy Research in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Duschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H. A., & Shouse, A. W. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2002). Investigating real data in the classroom: Expanding children's understanding of math and science. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lesh, R., Middleton, J., Caylor, E., & Gupta, S. (2008). A science need: Designing tasks to engage students in modeling complex data. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 68, 113–130. doi: 10.1007/s10649-008-9118-4
   Google Scholar
• Lobato, J., & Siebert, D. (2002). Quantitative reasoning in a reconceived view of transfer. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21, 87–116. doi: 10.1016/S0732-3123(02)00105-0
   Google Scholar
• Louca, L. T., Zacharia, Z. C., & Constantinou, C. P. (2011). In quest of productive modeling-based learning discourse in elementary school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(8), 919–951. doi: 10.1002/tea.20435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madison, B. L., & Steen, L. A. (Eds.). (2003). Quantitative literacy: Why numeracy matters for schools and colleges. Princeton, NJ: Woodrow Wilson Natl Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Mayes, R., Peterson, F., & Bonilla, R. (2012). Quantitative reasoning: In context. In MayesR.HatfieldL. (Ed.), WISDOMe: Quantitative reasoning and mathematical modeling: A driver for STEM integrated education and teaching in context, (pp. 7–38). University of Wyoming.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, K. C., Carlson, M. P., & Oehrtman, M. (2009). The role of quantitative reasoning in solving applied precalculus problems. Conference on research in undergraduate mathematics education (CRUME). Raleigh, NC.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council (NRC) (2001). Grand challenges in environmental sciences. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council (NRC) (2011). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pluta, W. J., Chinn, C. A., & Duncan, R. G. (2011). Learners’ epistemic criteria for good scientific models. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 486–511. doi: 10.1002/tea.20415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2009). Scientific literacy, PISA, and socioscientific discourse: Assessment for progressive aims of science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(8), 909–921.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, C. V., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Kenyon, L., Archer, A., Fortus, D., & Krajcik, J. (2009). Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 632–654. doi: 10.1002/tea.20311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shavelson, R. (2008). Reflections on quantitative reasoning: An assessment perspective. In MadisonB. L.SteenL. A. (Ed.), Calculation vs. context: Quantitative literacy and its implications for teacher education, (pp. 22–47). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C. L., Wisner, M., Anderson, C. W., & Krajcik, J. (2006). Implication of research on children's learning for standards and assessment: A proposed learning progression for matter and the atomic molecular theory. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspective, 4, 1–98.
   Google Scholar
• Steen, L. A. (2001). Mathematics and democracy: The case for quantitative literacy. Princeton, NJ: The Woodrow Wilson National Fellowship Foundation, The National Council on Education and the Disciplines.
   Google Scholar
• Stefani, C., & Tsaparlis, G. (2009). Students’ levels of explanations, models, and misconceptions in basic quantum chemistry: A phenomenographic study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 520–536. doi: 10.1002/tea.20279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, A. R., & Jones, M. G. (2009). Proportional reasoning ability and concepts of scale: Surface area to volume relationships in science. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 1231–1247. doi: 10.1080/09500690802017545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, P. W. (1994). The development of the concept of speed and its relationship to the concepts of rate. In HarelG.ConfreyJ. (Ed.), The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics, (pp. 181–234). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, P. W. (2011). Quantitative reasoning and mathematical modeling. In HatfieldL. L.ChamberlainS.BelbaseS. (Ed.), New perspectives and directions for collaborative research in mathematics education, (pp. 33–57). Laramie, WY: University of Wyoming.
   Google Scholar
• Tretter, T. R., Jones, M. G., Andre, T., Negishi, A., & Minogue, J. (2006). Conceptual boundaries and distances: Students’ and experts’ concepts of the scale of scientific phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(3), 282–319. doi: 10.1002/tea.20123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tretter, T. R., Jones, M. G., & Minogue, J. (2006). Accuracy of scale conceptions in science: Mental maneuverings across many orders of spatial magnitude. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(10), 1061–1085. doi: 10.1002/tea.20155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar