974
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Comparison of Taiwanese and Canadian Students' Metacognitive Awareness of Science Reading, Text, and Strategies

, , &

References

  • Armbruster, B. B., Anderson, T. H., & Ostertag, J. (1989). Teaching text structure to improve reading and writing. Reading Teacher, 43(2), 130–137.
  • Barton, M. L., & Jordan, D. L. (2001). Teaching reading in science: A supplement to teaching reading in the content areas teacher's manual (2nd ed.). Aurora, CO: McREL.
  • Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  • van den Broek, P., Virtue, S., Everson, M. G., Tzeng, Y., & Sung, Y. C. (2002). Comprehension and memory of science texts: Inferential processes and the construction of a mental representation. In OteroJ.LeónJ. A.GraesserA. C. (Ed.), The psychology of science text comprehension, (pp. 131–154). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Cook, L. K., & Mayer, R. E. (1988). Teaching readers about the structure of scientific text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 448–456. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.80.4.448
  • Elshout-Mohr, M., & Van Daalen-Kapteijns, M. (2002). Situated regulation of scientific text processing. In OteroJ.LeónJ. A.GraesserA. C. (Ed.), The psychology of science text comprehension, (pp. 223–252). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Ford, C. L., & Yore, L. D. (2012). Toward convergence of metacognition, reflection, and critical thinking: Illustrations from natural and social sciences teacher education and classroom practice. In ZoharA.DoriJ. (Ed.), Metacognition in science education: Trends in current research, (pp. 251–271). DordrechtThe Netherlands: Springer.
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Jacobs, J. E., & Paris, S. G. (1987). Children's metacognition about reading: Issues in definition, measurement, and instruction. Educational Psychologist, 22(3/4), 255–278.
  • Jenkins, E. W., & Nelson, N. W. (2005). Important but not for me: Students’ attitude towards secondary school science in England. Research in Science and Technological Education, 23(1), 41–57. doi: 10.1080/02635140500068435
  • Jimenez, V., Puente, A., Alvarado, J. M., & Arrebillaga, L. (2009). Measuring metacognitive strategies using the reading awareness scale ESCOLA. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 7(2), 779–804.
  • Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford.
  • Loman, N. L., & Mayer, R. E. (1983). Signaling techniques that increase the understandability of expository prose. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(3), 402–412. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.75.3.402
  • Mayer, R. E. (1992). Guiding students’ cognitive processing of scientific information in text. In PressleyM.HarrisK. R.GuthrieJ. T. (Ed.), Promoting academic competence and literacy in school, (pp. 242–258). New York: Academic Press.
  • McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analysis. Psychological Methods, 7, 64–82. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.64
  • Midgley, C., Eccles, J. S., & Feldlaufer, H. (1991). Classroom environment and the transition to junior high school. In FraserB. J.WalbergH. J. (Ed.), Educational environments: Antecedents and consequences, (pp. 113–139). London: Pergamon.
  • Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. A. (2002). Assessing students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 249–259. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.249
  • Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87(2), 224–240. doi: 10.1002/sce.10066
  • Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2012). Reading science: How a naive view of reading hinders so much else. In ZoharA.DoriY. J. (Ed.), Metacognition in science education: Trends in current research, (pp. 37–56). DordrechtThe Netherlands: Springer.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2010). PISA 2009 results: Executive summary. Paris Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development: Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/54/12/46643496.pdf
  • Pearson, P. D., Moje, E., & Greenleaf, C. (2010). Literacy and science: Each in service of the other. Science, 328(23), 459–463. doi: 10.1126/science.1182595
  • Pereira-Laird, J. A., & Deane, F. P. (1997). Development and validation of a self-report measure of reading strategy use. Reading Psychology, 18, 185–235. doi: 10.1080/0270271970180301
  • Perez, T. M., Majerus, S., & Poncelet, M. (2011). The contribution of short-term memory for serial order to early reading acquisition: Evidence from a longitudinal study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 111(4), 708–723. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.11.007
  • Roberts, D. A. (2007). Scientific literacy / science literacy. In AbellS. K.LedermanN. G. (Ed.), Handbook of research on science education, (pp. 729–780). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Rukavina, I., & Daneman, M. (1996). Acquiring knowledge about competing scientific theories from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 272–287. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.88.2.272
  • Veenman, M. V. J. (2012). Metacognition in science education: Definitions, constituents, and their intricate relation with cognition. In ZoharA.DoriY. J. (Ed.), Metacognition in science education: Trends and current research, (pp. 21–36). DordrechtThe Netherlands: Springer.
  • Walker, B. J. (2008). Diagnostic teaching of reading techniques for instruction and assessment (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
  • Wang, J.-R., Chen, S.-F., Fang, I., & Chou, C.-T. (2009). Evaluating elementary and secondary school science learning environments in Taiwan. International Journal of Science Education, 31(7), 853–872. doi: 10.1080/09500690701636361
  • Wang, J.-R., Chen, S.-F., Fang, I., & Chou, C.-T. (2012). Development of a test assessing elementary students’ comprehension of science texts. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(4), 955–973. doi: 10.1007/s10763-011-9307-y
  • Wang, T. (2007, November). Understand Chinese culture and learning. Proceedings of the 2006 Australian Association for Research in Education (AARE) conference, Adelaide, Australia.
  • Yore, L. D. (2011, June). Pedagogical content knowledge about science literacy: Elementary, middle, and secondary levels. Keynote address to the Science Education and E-Learning Conference, National Pingtung University of Education, Pingtung, Taiwan.
  • Yore, L. D. (2012). Science Literacy for all—more than a slogan, logo, or rally flag!. In TanK. C. D.KimM.HwangS. (Ed.), Issues and challenges in science education research: Moving forward, (pp. 5–23). DordrechtThe Netherlands: Springer.
  • Yore, L. D., Bisanz, G. L., & Hand, B. M. (2003). Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 689–725. doi: 10.1080/09500690305018
  • Yore, L. D., Craig, M. T., & Maguire, T. O. (1998). Index of science reading awareness: An interactive-constructive model, test verification, and grades 4–8 results. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(1), 27–51. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199801)35:1<27::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-P
  • Yore, L. D., & Treagust, D. F. (2006). Current reality and future possibilities: Language and science literacy-empowering research and informing instruction. International Journal in Science Education, 28, 291–314. doi: 10.1080/09500690500336973
  • Zohar, A., & Dori, Y. J. (2012). Introduction. In ZoharA.DoriY. J. (Ed.), Metacognition in science education: Trends in current research, (pp. 1–19). DordrechtThe Netherlands: Springer.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.