793
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Gender Inequality in Biology Classes in China and Its Effects on Students' Short-Term Outcomes

&

References

  • Alexander, J., Johnson, J., & Kelley, J. (2012). Longitudinal analysis of the relations between opportunities to learn about science and the development of interests related to science. Science Education, 96(5), 763–786.
  • Altermatt, E. R., Jovanovic, J., & Perry, M. (1998). Bias or responsivity? Sex and achievement-level effects on teachers’ classroom questioning practices. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(3), 516–527.
  • Andersson, K., Hussenius, A., & Gustafsson, C. (2009). Gender theory as a tool for analyzing science teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 336–343.
  • Awofala, A. O. A. (2011). Is gender a factor in mathematics performance among Nigerian senior secondary students with varying school organization and location? International Journal of Mathematics Trends and Technology, 2(3), 17–21.
  • Barton, A. C., Tan, E., & Rivet, A. (2008). Creating hybrid spaces for engaging school science among urban middle school girls. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 68–103.
  • Becker, J. R. (1981). Differential treatment of females and males in mathematics classes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 12(1), 40–53.
  • Berekashvili, N. (2012). The role of gender-biased perceptions in teacher–student interaction. Psychology of Language and Communication, 16(1), 39–51.
  • Brotman, J. S., & Moore, F. M. (2008). Girls and science: A review of four themes in the science education literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 971–1002.
  • Campbell, P. F., & Silver, E. A. (1999). Teaching and learning mathematics in poor communities (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 452 288). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  • Chang, S., Yeung, Y., & Cheng, M. H. (2009). Ninth graders’ learning interests, life experiences and attitudes towards science and technology. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18, 447–457.
  • Chen, Y. Q. (2006). Zhongguo chengxiang jumin shouru chaju yanbian de tujing ji yuanyin fenxi [Evolution ways and reason analysis of Chinese city and village residences’ income gap]. Jingji pinglun [Economic Review], 4, 49–53.
  • Cline, R. J., & Puhl, C. A. (1984). Gender, culture, and geography: A comparison of seating arrangements in the United States and Taiwan. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 8, 199–219.
  • De Voe, D. E. (1991). Teacher behavior directed toward individual students in elementary physical education. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 26(1), 9–14.
  • Duckworth, A., & Seligman, M. E. (2006). Self-discipline gives girls the edge: Gender in self-discipline, grades, and achievement test scores. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 198–208.
  • Fernandez, J., & Mateo, M. A. (1992). Student evaluation of university teaching quality: Analysis of a questionnaire for a sample of university students in Spain. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 675–686.
  • Field, A. P. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS: And sex and drugs and rock ‘n’ roll (3rd ed.). London: Sage publications.
  • Francis, B., & Skelton, B. (2011). A feminist analysis of gender and educational achievement. In K. Van den Branden, P. Van Avermaet, & M. Van Houtte (Eds.), Equity and excellence in education: Towards maximal learning opportunities for all students (pp. 96–118). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Glynn, S. M., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Brickman, P. (2009). Science motivation questionnaire: Construct validation with nonscience majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(2), 127–146.
  • Guilford, J. P. (1979). Cognitive psychology with a frame of reference. San Diego, CA: Edits.
  • Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses related to achievement. London: Routledge.
  • Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41, 111–127.
  • Hopkins, T. M. (2004). Gender issues in mathematics achievement in Tennessee: Does rural school locale matter? (PhD dissertation). University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
  • Howley, C. (2002). Research about mathematics achievement in rural circumstance (Working paper, No. 4). Athens: Ohio University, Appalachian Collaborative Centre for the Study of Learning, Assessment and Instruction in Mathematics.
  • Huang, S., & Fraser, B. (2009). Science teachers’ perceptions of the school environment: Gender differences. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 404–420.
  • Konstantopoulos, S., & Li, W. (2012). Are there additional benefits from being in small classes for more than one year? Educational Research and Evaluation, 18(7), 671–685.
  • Lai, F. (2007). Are boys left behind? The evolution of the gender achievement gap in Beijing's middle schools. Economics of Education Review, 29(3), 383–399.
  • Li, H. Z. (2012). Shengwu jiaoxue chengshi he nongcun yao qubie duidai [City and village need to be treated differently in biology teaching]. Kaoshi: JiaoYan Ban [Examinations: Version of Teaching Research], (5), 104–104. doi:http://www.cqvip.com/Read/Read.aspx?id=41978799
  • Li, Q. B. (2012). Gaozhong xuesheng shengwu chengji xingbie chayi de guiyin fenxi ji jiaoxue duice [Factor analysis and teaching strategies for gender differences in high school students biology grades]. Shan Dong Normal University. doi:http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10445–1012340106.htm
  • Lin, J. (2004). Jichu jiaoyu kecheng gaige yu nongcun jiaoshi jiaoyu [Basic education curriculum reform and rural teacher education]. Education Exploration, 4(12), 114–115.
  • Liu, Q., & Zhu, X. (2009). Investigation and analysis on the achievement motivations of 278 senior high school students. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 1(1), 10–15.
  • Marton, A. M. (2006). The cultural politics of curricular reform in China: A case study of geographical education in Shanghai. Journal of Contemporary China, 15(47), 233–254.
  • Miller, J., Puglisi, L., & Perry, J. (2011, September 6–8). What about the girls? Case study of change in a rural school. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association, London.
  • Mitchell, M. (1993). Situational interest: Its multifaceted structure in the secondary mathematics classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 424–436.
  • Organization for Economic Coordination and Development. (2009). Equally prepared for life? How 15-year-old boys and girls perform in school. Retrieved June 30 from http://www.pisa.oecd.org/dataoecd/59/50/42843625.pdf
  • Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543–578.
  • Pajares, F. (2002). Gender and perceived self-efficacy in self-regulated learning. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 116–125.
  • Pajares, F., & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-beliefs and school success: Self-efficacy, self-concept, and school achievement. In R. Riding & S. Rayner (Eds.), Self-perception (pp. 239–266). London: Ablex Publishing.
  • Perry, B., Link, T., Boelter, C., & Leukefeld, C. (2012). Blinded to science: Gender differences in the effects of race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status on academic and science attitudes among sixth graders. Gender and Education, 24(7), 725–743.
  • Rimmele, R. (2002). Videograph. Multimedia-Player zur Kodierung von Videos [Videograph. Multimedia-Player for coding videos]. Kiel: IPN.
  • Rotgans, J. I., Alwis, W. A. M., & Schmidt, H. G. (2008, March). Measuring self-regulation, motivation, and academic achievement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
  • Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2009). Situational interest, task engagement, and achievement in an active-learning environment. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association.
  • Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2011). Situational interest and academic achievement in the active-learning classroom. Learning and Instruction, 21(1), 58–67.
  • Scantlebury, K. (2012). Still part of the conversation: Gender issues in science education. In B. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 499–512). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Scantlebury, K., & Baker, D. (2007). Gender issues in science education research: Remembering where the difference lies. In S. Abell & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 257–286). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Shao, X. J. (2011). Gaozhong nannvsheng jieti nengli de chayi ji duice yanjiu [Differences of biology problem-solving ability between high school boys and girls and countermeasures research]. Nan Jing Normal University. doi:http://www.zhugewenku.com/ZG-29460.html
  • She, H. C., & Fisher, D. (1999, March 28–31). The validation and use of the TCBQ in studying the secondary science classroom and its association with students’ attitudinal and cognitive outcomes in Taiwan. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Boston, MA.
  • She, H. C., & Fisher, D. (2000). The development of a questionnaire to describe science teacher communication behavior in Taiwan and Australia. Science Education, 84(6), 706–726.
  • Skog, B. (2001). Girls’ avoidance of ‘hard’ science subjects-protest or a rational choice? Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 35(3), 201–211.
  • Tang, M., & Neber, H. (2008). Motivation and self-regulated science learning in high-achieving students: Differences related to nation, gender, and grade-level. High Ability Studies, 19(2), 103–116.
  • Tsai, Y. M., Kunter, M., Lüdtke, O., Trautwein, U., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). What makes lessons interesting? The role of situational and individual factors in three school subjects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 460–472.
  • Tsui, M. (2008, August). Gender and mathematics achievement in China and the United States. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association Annual Meeting, Sheraton Boston and the Boston Marriott Copley Place, Boston, MA.
  • Tsui, M., & Rich, L. (2002). The only child and educational opportunity for girls in urban China. Gender and Society, 16(1), 74–92.
  • Tsui, M., Xu, X. Y., & Venator, E. (2011). Gender, stereotype threat and mathematics test scores. Journal of Social Sciences, 7(4), 538–549.
  • Wang, D. (2011). The dilemma of time: Student-centered teaching in the rural classroom in China. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 157–164.
  • Warrall, N., & Tsarna, H. (1987). Teachers’ reported practices towards girls and boys in science and languages. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 57(3), 300–312.
  • Weisgram, E. S., & Bigler, R. S. (2007). Effects of learning about gender discrimination on adolescent girls’ attitudes toward and interest in science. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 262–269.
  • Wienekamp, H., Jansen, W., Fickenfrerichs, H., & Peper, R. (1987). Does unconscious behaviour of teachers cause chemistry lessons to be unpopular with girls? International Journal of Science Education, 9(3), 281–286.
  • Wild, E., Hofer, M., & Pekrun, R. (2001). Psychologie des Lerners. In A. Krapp & B. Weidemann (Eds.), Pädagogische Psychologie [Pedagogical psychology] (pp. 207–270). Weinheim: Beltz Psychologie Verlag Union.
  • Winters, J. J. (2003). An examination of eighth and twelfth grade students’ mathematics achievement in relation to school locale, county location, looping status, SES, grade and class size, and access to upper-level mathematics courses in Tennessee (Doctoral dissertation). The University of Tennessee at Knoxville, Knoxville.
  • Yang, Y., & Yu, J. (2004). Nongcun xinkecheng: wenti yu duice [New curriculum in rural areas: Problems and solutions]. Jiaoyu Fazhan Yanjiu [Educational Development Research], 4(11), 19–21.
  • Yang, Y., Zhang, L., Zeng, J., Pang, X., Lai, F., & Rozelle, S. (2013). Computers and the academic performance of elementary school-aged girls in China's poor communities. Computer & Education, 60, 335–346.
  • Zapata, M., & Gallard, A. (2007). Female science teacher beliefs and attitudes: Implications in relation to gender and pedagogical practice. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3, 43–71.
  • Zhao, L., Lu, Y., Huang, W., & Wang, Q. (2010). Internet inequality: The relationship between high school students’ Internet use in different locations and their Internet self-efficacy. Computers & Education, 55, 1405–1423.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.