Developing and Validating a Science Notebook Rubric for Fifth-Grade Non-Mainstream Students

References

• Abedi, J., & Lord, C. (2001). The language factor in mathematics tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 14(3), 219–234. doi: 10.1207/S15324818AME1403_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abella, R., Urrutia, J., & Shneyderman, A. (2005). An examination of the validity of English-language achievement test scores in an English language learner population. Bilingual Research Journal, 29, 127–144. doi: 10.1080/15235882.2005.10162827
   Google Scholar
• Achieve, Inc. (2013). Next generation science standards. Achieve, Inc. on behalf of the twenty-six states and partners that collaborated on the Next Generation Science Standards. Retrieved from http://www.nextgenscience.org/next-generation-science-standards.
   Google Scholar
• Amaral, O. M., Garrison, L., & Klentschy, M. (2002). Helping English learners increase achievement through inquiry-based science instruction. Bilingual Research Journal, 26(2), 213–239.
   Google Scholar
• Bacharach, V. R., Baumeister, A. A., & Furr, R. M. (2003). Racial and gender science achievement gaps in secondary education. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 164(1), 115–126. doi: 10.1080/00221320309597507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brantmeier, C., Schueller, J. Wilde, J. A., & Kinginger, C. (2007). Gender equity in foreign and second language learning. In S. S. Klein (Ed.), Handbook for achieving gender equity through education (2nd ed., pp. 305–334). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Burman, D., Bitan, T., & Booth, J. R. (2008). Sex differences in neural processing of language among children. Neuropsychologia, 46(5), 1349–1362. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.12.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calkins, L. (1994). The art of teaching writing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, X. (2009). Students who study science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) in postsecondary education (NCES 2009–161). Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Correll, S. J. (2001). Gender and the career choice process: The role of biased self-assessments. American Journal of Sociology, 106(6), 1691–1730. doi: 10.1086/321299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J., Gleser, G. C., Nanda, H., & Rajaratnam, H. (1972). The dependability of behavioral measurements. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, J. (1981). Empirical and theoretical underpinnings of bilingual education. Journal of Education, 163(1), 16–29.
   Google Scholar
• Fradd, S. H., Lee, O., Sutman, F. X., & Saxton, M. K. (2001). Promoting science literacy with English language learners through instructional materials development: A case study. Bilingual Research Journal, 25(4), 417–439.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2005). Language in the science classroom: Academic social languages as the heart of school-based literacy. In R. Yerrick & W. M. Roth (Eds.), Establishing scientific classroom discourse communities: Multiple voices of teaching and learning research (pp. 19–37). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing science: Literary and discursive power. London, England: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huck, S. W. (2008). Reading statistics and research. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Hudicourt-Barnes, J. (2003). The use of argumentation in Haitian Creole science class-rooms. Harvard Educational Review, 73(1), 73–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keys, C. W., Hand, B., Prain, V., & Collins, S. (1999). Using the science writing heuristic as a tool for learning from laboratory investigations in secondary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(10), 1065–1084. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199912)36:10<1065::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-I
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kieffer, M. J., Lesaux, N., Rivera, M., & Francis, D. J. (2009). Accommodations for English language learners taking large-scale assessments: A meta-analysis on effectiveness and validity. Review of Educational Research, 29(3), 1168–1201. doi: 10.3102/0034654309332490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohlhass, K., Lin, H., & Chu, K. (2010). Disaggregated outcomes of gender, ethnicity, and poverty on fifth grade science performance. Research in Middle Level Education Online, 33(7), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Lara-Alecio, R., Tong, F., Irby, B. J., Guerrero, C., Huerta, M., & Fan, Y. (2012). The effect of an instructional intervention on middle school learnersã science and English reading achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(8), 987–1011.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, O., Deaktor, R. A., Hart, J. E., Cuevas, P., & Enders, C. (2005). An instructional intervention's impact on the science and literacy achievement of culturally and linguistically diverse elementary students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(8), 857–887. doi: 10.1002/tea.20071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, O., Mahotiere, M., Salinas, A., Penfield, R. D., & Maerten-Rivera, J. (2009). Science writing achievement among English language learners: Results of three-year intervention in urban elementary schools. Bilingual Research Journal, 32, 153–167. doi: 10.1080/15235880903170009
   Google Scholar
• Lee, O., Maerten-Rivera, J., Penfield, R. D., LeRoy, K., & Secada, W. G. (2008). Science achievement of English language learners in urban elementary schools: Results of a first-year professional development intervention. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 4(1), 31–52.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, O. L., Lee, H., & Linn, M. C. (2011). Measuring knowledge integration: Validation of four-year assessments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(9), 1079–1107. doi: 10.1002/tea.20441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, S., Kuipers, J., Pyke, C., & Szesze, M. (2005). Examining the effects of a highly rated science curriculum unit on diverse students: Results from a planning grant. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(8), 912–946.
   Google Scholar
• National Assessment of Educational Progress. (2009). The nation's report card: Science 2009. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2010). PISA 2009 results: Executive summary. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/46619703.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2011). Introduction to psychometric theory. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, C. R., Livingston, R. B., & Wilson, V. (2006). Measurement and assessment in education. In A. E. Burvidovs (Ed.), Validity for teachers (pp. 117–140). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Riegle-Crumb, C., Moore, C., & Ramos-Wada, A. (2011). Who wants to have a career in science or math? Exploring adolescents’ future aspirations by gender and race/ethnicity. Science Education, 95(3), 458–476. doi: 10.1002/sce.20431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Li, M., Ayala, C., & Shavelson, R. J. (2004). Evaluating students’ science notebooks as an assessment tool. International Journal of Science Education, 26(12), 1477–1506. doi: 10.1080/0950069042000177299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Li, M., Tsai, S. P., & Schneider, J. (2010). Testing one premise of scientific inquiry in science classrooms: Examining students’ scientific explanations and student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(5), 583–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarcella, R. (2003). Academic English: A conceptual framework. Technical Reports, University of California Linguistic Minority Research Institute, Irvine, CA: University of California. Retrieved from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/6pd082d4.
   Google Scholar
• Texas Education Agency. (2010). Texas education agency 2009–10 state performance report. Retrieved from http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/aeis/2010/state.html
   Google Scholar
• Texas English Language Proficiency Assessment System. (2011). Manual for raters and test administrators grades K-12 (Spring). Austin, TX: Texas Education Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Tong, F., Irby, B. J., Lara-Alecio, R., Guerrero, C., Fan, Y., & Huerta, M. (in press). A randomized study of a literacy integrated science intervention for low SES middle school students: Findings from first year implementation. International Journal of Science Education.
   Google Scholar
• Webb, N. M., Shavelson, R. J., & Haertel, E. H. (2006). Reliability coefficients and generalizability theory. In C. R. Rao & S. Sinharay (Eds.), Handbook of statistics 26: Psychometrics (pp. 81–124). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier B. V.
   Google Scholar
• Yore, L. (2003). Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 689–725.
   Google Scholar