Climate Change and Everyday Life: Repertoires children use to negotiate a socio-scientific issue

References

• Aikenhead, G. (2006). Science education for everyday life. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barab, S. A., & Plucker, J. A. (2002). Smart people or smart contexts? Cognition, ability, and talent development in an age of situated approaches to knowing and knowing. Educational Psychologist, 37, 165–182. doi: 10.1207/S15326985EP3703_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy.
   Google Scholar
• Claxton, G. (2008). What's the point of school? Rediscovering the heart of education. Oxford: Oneworld.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Faria, C., Freire, S., Baptista, M., & Galvão, C. (2014). The construction of a reasoned explanation of a health phenomenon: An analysis of competencies mobilized. International Journal of Science Education. DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2013.783723
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1981). The order of discourse. In R. Young (Ed.), Untying the text. A poststructuralist reader (pp. 52–64). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1982). Afterword. The subject and the power. In H. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault. Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (pp. 208–226). Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. (1996). Introduction: Who needs identity? In S. Hall & P. du Gay (Eds.), Questions of cultural identity (pp. 1–17). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hundal, S., Levin, D. M., & Keselman, A. (2014). Lessons of researcher-teacher co-design of an environmental health afterschool club curriculum. International Journal of Science Education. DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2013.844377
   Google Scholar
• Ideland, M., & Malmberg, C. (2012). Body talk. Student's identity construction while discussing a socio-scientific issue. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 7(2), 279–305. doi: 10.1007/s11422-012-9381-7
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, B. (2005). Barn i konsumtionssamhället. Stockholm: Norstedts.
   Google Scholar
• Kolstø, S. D. (2006). Patterns in students’ argumentation confronted with a risk-focused socio-scientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 28(14), 1689–1716. doi: 10.1080/09500690600560878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., Shaw, V., & Felton, M. (1997). Effects of dyadic interaction on argumentative reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 15(3), 287–315. doi: 10.1207/s1532690xci1503_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, R. (2006). Towards a theoretical framework for teaching controversial socio-scientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 28(10), 1201–1224. doi: 10.1080/09500690600560753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maloney, J., & Simon, S. (2006). Mapping children's discussions of evidence in science to assess collaboration and argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 28(5), 1817–1841. doi: 10.1080/09500690600855419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., Dawes, R., Wegerif, R., & Sams, C. (2004). Reasoning as a scientist: Ways of helping children to use language to learn science. British Educational Research Journal, 30(3), 367–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercer, N., & Littleton, K. (2007). Dialogue and the development of children’s thinking: A sociocultural approach. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• National Health Service. (2012). 5 a day. Author. Retrieved from http://www.nhs.uk/livewell/5aday/Pages/5ADAYhome.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Naylor, S., Keogh, B., & Downing, B. (2007). Argumentation and primary science. Research in Science Education, 37, 17–39. doi: 10.1007/s11165-005-9002-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolan, C. J. (Ed.). (2002). The greenwood encyclopedia of international relationso, vol. 4. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Qvortrup, J. (1987). The sociology of childhood. Barndomsprojektet 2/87. University centre of South Jutland.
   Google Scholar
• Ratcliffe, M., & Grace, M. (2003). Science education for citizenship. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reeve, S., Bricker, L., & Bell, P. (2014). ‘She has to drink blood of the snake': Culture and prior knowledge in science|health education. International Journal of Science Education. DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2013.827817
   Google Scholar
• Roth, W. M. (2014). Personal health – personalized science: A phenomenological approach. International Journal of Science Education.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D. (2009). Situated learning in science education: Socio-scientific issues as contexts for practice. Studies in Science Education, 45(1), 1–42. doi: 10.1080/03057260802681839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2009). Scientific literacy, PISA, and socioscientific discourse: Assessment for progressive aims of science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(8), 909–921. doi: 10.1002/tea.20327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, P. (2008). Talking a way to understanding in science classrooms. In N. Mercer & S. Hodgkinson (Eds.), Exploratory talk in school (pp. 17–36). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, J. (1992). The classroom discussion of science-based social issues presented on television: Knowledge, attitudes and values. International Journal of Science Education, 14(4), 431–444. doi: 10.1080/0950069920140406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wertsch, J. V. (1993). Voices of the mind. A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wesselink, R., Dekker-Groen, A. M., Biemans, H. J. A., & Mulder, M. (2010). Using an instrument to analyse competence-based study programmes: Experiences of teachers in Dutch vocational education and training. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 42(6), 813–829. doi: 10.1080/00220271003759249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeyer, A., & Roth, W.-M. (2013). Post-ecological discourse in the making. Public Understanding of Science, 22(1), 33–48. doi: 10.1177/0963662510394949
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar