1,395
Views
30
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

The Importance of Language in Students' Reasoning About Heat in Thermodynamic Processes

&

References

  • Arnold, M., & Millar, R. (1994). Children's and lay adults’ views about thermal equilibrium. International Journal of Science Education, 16(4), 405–419. doi: 10.1080/0950069940160403
  • Arons, A. B. (1997). Teaching introductory physics. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
  • Baierlein, R. (1994). Entropy and the second law: A pedagogical alternative. American Journal of Physics, 62(1), 15–26. doi: 10.1119/1.17732
  • Bauman, R. P. (1992). Physics that textbook writers usually get wrong: II. Heat and energy. The Physics Teacher, 30(6), 353–356. doi: 10.1119/1.2343574
  • Beall, H. (1994). Probing student misconceptions in thermodynamics with in-class writing. Journal of Chemical Education, 71(12), 1056–1057. doi: 10.1021/ed071p1056
  • Brewe, E. (2011). Energy as a substance like quantity that flows: Theoretical considerations and pedagogical consequences. Physical Review Special TopicsPhysics Education Research, 7(2), 020106. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020106
  • Brookes, D. T. (2006). The role of language in learning physics (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rutgers). The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick.
  • Brookes, D. T., & Etkina, E. (2007). Using conceptual metaphor and functional grammar to explore how language used in physics affects student learning. Physical Review Special TopicsPhysics Education Research, 3(1), 010105. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.010105
  • Brookes, D. T., & Etkina, E. (2009). “Force,” ontology, and language. Physical Review Special TopicsPhysics Education Research, 5(1), 010110. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.5.010110
  • Brookes, D. T., Horton, G. K., Van Heuvelen, A., & Etkina, E. (2005). Concerning scientific discourse about heat. In J. Marx, P. Heron, & S. Franklin (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2004 physics education research conference (Vol. 790, pp. 149–152). Melville, NY: American Institute of Physics.
  • Brown, S. C. (1950). The caloric theory of heat. American Journal of Physics, 18(6), 367–373. doi: 10.1119/1.1932596
  • Chi, M. T. H., & Slotta, J. D. (1993). The ontological coherence of intuitive physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10(2 & 3), 249–260. doi: 10.1080/07370008.1985.9649011
  • Chi, M. T. H., Slotta, J. D., & de Leeuw, N. (1994). From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts. Learning and Instruction, 4(1), 27–43. doi: 10.1016/0959-4752(94)90017-5
  • Cutnell, J. D., & Johnson, K. W. (2001). Physics (5th ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Doige, C. A., & Day, T. (2012). A typology of undergraduate textbook definitions of ‘heat’ across science disciplines. International Journal of Science Education, 34(5), 677–700. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2011.644820
  • Engel Clough, E., & Driver, R. (1985). Secondary students’ conceptions of the conduction of heat: Bringing together scientific and personal views. Physics Education, 20(4), 176–182. doi: 10.1088/0031-9120/20/4/309
  • Erickson, G. L. (1979). Children's conceptions of heat and temperature. Science Education, 63(2), 221–230. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730630210
  • Etkina, E., Gentile, M., & Van Huevelen, A. (2014). College physics. Boston, MA: Pearson.
  • Feynman, R. P., Leighton, R. B., & Sands, M. (1965). The Feynman lectures on physics: Quantum mechanics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Fuchs, H. U. (1987). Thermodynamics: A “misconceived” theory. In J. D. Novak (Ed.), Proceedings of the second international seminar on misconceptions and educational strategies in science and mathematics (Vol. 3, pp. 160–167). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
  • Giancoli, D. C. (2000). Physics for scientists & engineers (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Gupta, A., Elby, A., & Conlin, L. D. (2014). How substance-based ontologies for gravity can be productive: A case study. Physical Review Special TopicsPhysics Education Research, 10(1), 010113. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.010113
  • Gupta, A., Hammer, D., & Redish, E. F. (2010). The case for dynamic models of learners’ ontologies in physics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(3), 285–321. doi: 10.1080/10508406.2010.491751
  • Halliday, D., Resnick, R., & Walker, J. (2003). Fundamentals of physics (6th ed.). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
  • Hammer, D. (2000). Student resources for learning introductory physics. American Journal of Physics, 68(S1), S52–S59. doi: 10.1119/1.19520
  • Harris, W. F. (1981). Heat in undergraduate education, or isn't it time we abandoned the theory of caloric? International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, 9(4), 317–325.
  • Heath, N. E. (1974). Heating. Physics Education, 9(7), 490–491. doi: 10.1088/0031-9120/9/7/117
  • Heath, N. E. (1976). Heating. Physics Education, 11(6), 389–390. doi: 10.1088/0031-9120/11/6/102
  • Helsdon, R. M. (1976). Teaching thermodynamics. Physics Education, 11(4), 261–262. doi: 10.1088/0031-9120/11/4/101
  • Hewson, M. G. (1984). The influence of intellectual environment on conceptions of heat. European Journal of Science Education, 6(3), 245–262. doi: 10.1080/0140528840060306
  • Hobson, A. (1995). Heat is not a noun. The Physics Teacher, 33(9), 325–326.
  • Jasien, P. G., & Oberem, G. E. (2002). Understanding of elementary concepts in heat and temperature among college students and K-12 teachers. Journal of Chemical Education, 79(7), 889–895. doi: 10.1021/ed079p889
  • Jeppsson, F., Haglund, J., Amin, T. G., & Strömdahl, H. (2013). Exploring the use of conceptual metaphors in solving problems on entropy. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22(1), 70–120. doi: 10.1080/10508406.2012.691926
  • Kaper, W. H., & Goedhart, M. J. (2002). ‘Forms of energy’, an intermediary language on the road to thermodynamics? Part II. International Journal of Science Education, 24(2), 119–137. doi: 10.1080/09500690110049123
  • Kesidou, S., & Duit, R. (1993). Students’ conceptions of the second law of thermodynamics—An interpretive study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(1), 85–106. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660300107
  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Leff, H. S. (1995). Entropy and heat along reversible paths for fluids and magnets. American Journal of Physics, 63(9), 814–817. doi: 10.1119/1.17805
  • Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
  • Lemke, J. L. (2004). Teaching all the languages of science: Words, symbols, images, and actions. Presentation given at a conference, Barcelona. Retrieved from http://academic.brooklyn.cuny.edu/education/jlemke/sci-ed.htm
  • Lewis, E. L., & Linn, M. C. (1996). Where is the heat?: A response to David Pushkin. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(3), 335–337.
  • Loverude, M. E., Kautz, C. H., & Heron, P. R. L. (2002). Student understanding of the first law of thermodynamics: Relating work to the adiabatic compression of an ideal gas. American Journal of Physics, 70(2), 137–148. doi: 10.1119/1.1417532
  • Meltzer, D. E. (2004). Investigation of students reasoning regarding heat, work, and the first law of thermodynamics in an introductory calculus-based general physics course. American Journal of Physics, 72(11), 1432–1446. doi: 10.1119/1.1789161
  • Pushkin, D. B. (1996). A comment on the need to use scientific terminology appropriately in conception studies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(2), 223–224.
  • Pushkin, D. B. (1997). Scientific terminology and context: How broad or narrow are our meanings? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(6), 661–668. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199708)34:6<661::AID-TEA8>3.0.CO;2-L
  • Reiner, M., Slotta, J. D., Chi, M. T. H., & Resnick, L. B. (2000). Naive physics reasoning: A commitment to substance-based conceptions. Cognition and Instruction, 18(1), 1–34. doi: 10.1207/S1532690XCI1801_01
  • Romer, R. H. (2001). Heat is not a noun. American Journal of Physics, 69(2), 107–109. doi: 10.1119/1.1341254
  • van Roon, P. H., van Sprang, H. F., & Verdonk, A. H. (1994). ‘Work’ and ‘heat’: On a road towards thermodynamics. International Journal of Science Education, 16(2), 131–144. doi: 10.1080/0950069940160203
  • Rozier, S., & Viennot, L. (1991). Students’ reasonings in thermodynamics. International Journal of Science Education, 13(2), 159–170. doi: 10.1080/0950069910130203
  • Sapir, E. (1957). The status of linguistics as a science. In D. B. Mandelbaum (Ed.), Culture, language and personality (pp. 65–77). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Serway, R. A., & Beichner, R. J. (2000). Physics for scientists and engineers (5th ed., Vol. 1). Orlando, FL: Saunders College Publishing.
  • Slisko, J., & Dykstra, D. I. (1997). The role of scientific terminology in research and teaching: Is something important missing? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(6), 655–660. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199708)34:6<655::AID-TEA7>3.0.CO;2-M
  • Sutton, C. R. (1993). Figuring out a scientific understanding. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(10), 1215–1227. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660301005
  • Tipler, P. A. (1999). Physics for scientists and engineers (4th ed., Vol. 1). New York, NY: W. H. Freeman and Company/Worth Publishers.
  • Tripp, T. B. (1976). The definition of heat. Journal of Chemical Education, 53(12), 782–784. doi: 10.1021/ed053p782
  • Walker, J. S. (2002). Physics. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Warren, J. W. (1972). The teaching of the concept of heat. Physics Education, 7(1), 41–44. doi: 10.1088/0031-9120/7/1/309
  • Whorf, B. L. (1956). The relation of habitual thought and behavior to language. In J. B. Carroll (Ed.), Language, thought, and reality. Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf (pp. 134–159). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Williams, H. T. (1999). Semantics in teaching introductory physics. American Journal of Physics, 67(8), 670–680. doi: 10.1119/1.19351
  • Zemansky, M. W. (1970). The use and misuse of the word “heat” in physics teaching. The Physics Teacher, 8(6), 295–300. doi: 10.1119/1.2351512

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.