Applying Conceptual Blending to Model Coordinated Use of Multiple Ontological Metaphors

References

• Amin, T. G. (2009). Conceptual metaphor meets conceptual change. Human Development, 52(3), 165–197. doi: 10.1159/000213891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bache, C. (2005). Constraining conceptual integration theory: Levels of blending and disintegration. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(10), 1615–1635. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2004.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baily, C., & Finkelstein, N. D. (under review). Ontological flexibility and the learning of quantum mechanics. Submitted to Physical Review Special Topics—Physics Education Research. Retrieved from arXiv:1409.8499 [physics.ed-ph]
   Google Scholar
• Beynon, J. (1990). Some myths surrounding energy. Physics Education, 25(6), 314–316. doi: 10.1088/0031-9120/25/6/305
   Google Scholar
• Brewe, E. (2011). Energy as a substancelike quantity that flows: Theoretical considerations and pedagogical consequences. Physical Review Special Topics—Physics Education Research, 7(2), 020106 (14 pp.). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.020106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brookes, D. T. (2006). The role of language in learning physics (PhD dissertation). Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick. Retrieved from http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006PhDT…….238B
   Google Scholar
• Chase, E. A., & Wittmann, M. C. (2013). Evidence of embodied cognition via speech and gesture complementarity. In N. S. Rebello, P. V. Engelhardt, & C. Singh (Eds.), AIP conference proceedings, Philadelphia (Vol. 1513, pp. 94–97). American Institute of Physics. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4789660.
   Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H. (2005). Commonsense conceptions of emergent processes: Why some misconceptions are robust. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 161–199. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls1402_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T., Feltovich, P. J., & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5(2), 121–152. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0502_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H., & Slotta, J. D. (1993). The ontological coherence of intuitive physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10(2–3), 249–260. doi: 10.1080/07370008.1985.9649011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H., Slotta, J. D., & de Leeuw, N. (1994). From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts. Learning and Instruction, 4(1), 27–43. doi: 10.1016/0959-4752(94)90017-5
   Google Scholar
• Church, R. B., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (1986). The mismatch between gesture and speech as an index of transitional knowledge. Cognition, 23(1), 43–71. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(86)90053-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cienki, A., & Müller, C. (2008). Metaphor, gesture, and thought. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 483–502). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• diSessa, A. A. (1993). Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10(2–3), 105–225. doi: 10.1080/07370008.1985.9649008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, B. W., Geller, B. D., Gouvea, J., Sawtelle, V., Turpen, C., & Redish, E. F. (2014). Ontological metaphors for negative energy in an interdisciplinary context. Physical Review Special Topics – Physics Education Research, 10(2), 020108 (11 pp.). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.020108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, B. W., Gouvea, J., Geller, B. D., Sawtelle, V., Turpen, C., & Redish, E. F. (2014). Chemical energy in an introductory physics course for life science students. American Journal of Physics, 82(5), 403–411. doi: 10.1119/1.4870391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, B. W., Sawtelle, V., Turpen, C., Gouvea, J., & Redish, E. F. (2014). Students’ reasoning about “high energy bonds” and ATP: A vision of interdisciplinary education. Physical Review Special Topics – Physics Education Research, 10(1), 010115 (15 pp.). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.010115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, L. D. (2009). Gestures and conceptual integration in mathematical talk. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70(2), 127–141. doi: 10.1007/s10649-008-9124-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fauconnier, G., & Lakoff, G. (2013). On metaphor and blending. Journal of Cognitive Semiotics, 5(1–2), 393–399.
   Google Scholar
• Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind's hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2003). Conceptual blending, form and meaning. Recherches En Communication, 19(19), 57–86.
   Google Scholar
• Forceville, C., & Urios-Aparisi, E. (2009). Multimodal metaphor. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Goldin-Meadow, S. (1999). The role of gesture in communication and thinking. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(11), 419–429. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01397-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). Hearing gesture: How our hands help us think. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldring, H., & Osborne, J. (1994). Students’ difficulties with energy and related concepts. Physics Education, 29(1), 26–32. doi: 10.1088/0031-9120/29/1/006
   Google Scholar
• Grady, J., Oakley, T., & Coulson, S. (1999). Blending and metaphor. In R. W. Gibbs & G. J. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics (pp. 101–124). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, A., & Elby, A. (2011). Beyond epistemological deficits: Dynamic explanations of engineering students' difficulties with mathematical sense-making. International Journal of Science Education, 33(18), 2463–2488. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2010.551551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, A., Elby, A., & Conlin, L. D. (2014). How substance-based ontologies for gravity can be productive: A case study. Physical Review Special Topics—Physics Education Research, 10(1), 010113 (19 pp.). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.010113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, A., Hammer, D., & Redish, E. (2010). The case for dynamic models of learners’ ontologies in physics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(3), 285–321. doi: 10.1080/10508406.2010.491751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammer, D. (1996). More than misconceptions: Multiple perspectives on student knowledge and reasoning, and an appropriate role for education research. American Journal of Physics, 64(10), 1316–1325. doi: 10.1119/1.18376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammer, D., Gupta, A., & Redish, E. F. (2011). On static and dynamic intuitive ontologies. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(1), 163–168. doi: 10.1080/10508406.2011.537977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hougaard, A. (2005). Conceptual disintegration and blending in interactional sequences: A discussion of new phenomena, processes vs. products, and methodology. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(10), 1653–1685. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.01.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeppsson, F., Haglund, J., Amin, T. G., & Strömdahl, H. (2013). Exploring the use of conceptual metaphors in solving problems on entropy. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22(1), 70–120. doi: 10.1080/10508406.2012.691926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, J. E. (1924). On the determination of molecular fields. II. From the equation of state of a gas. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 106(738), 463–477. doi: 10.1098/rspa.1924.0082
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980/2003). Metaphors we live by. London: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lancor, R. (2014). Using metaphor theory to examine conceptions of energy in biology, chemistry, and physics. Science & Education, 23(6), 1245–1267. doi: 10.1007/s11191-012-9535-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, R. A., & McDermott, L. C. (1987). Student understanding of the work-energy and impulse-momentum theorems. American Journal of Physics, 55(9), 811–817. doi: 10.1119/1.14994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machamer, P., Darden, L., & Craver, C. (2000). Thinking about mechanism. Philosophy of Science, 67(1), 1–25. doi: 10.1086/392759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Podolefsky, N., & Finkelstein, N. (2007). Analogical scaffolding and the learning of abstract ideas in physics: An example from electromagnetic waves. Physical Review Special Topics—Physics Education Research, 3(1), 010109 (12 pp.). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.010109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redish, E. F., Bauer, C., Carleton, K. L., Cooke, T. J., Cooper, M., Crouch, C. H., … Zia, R. K. P. (2014). NEXUS/Physics: An interdisciplinary repurposing of physics for biologists. American Journal of Physics, 82(5), 368–377. doi: 10.1119/1.4870386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reif, F. (1995). Millikan Lecture 1994: Understanding and teaching important scientific thought processes. American Journal of Physics, 63(1), 17–32. doi: 10.1119/1.17764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, W. (2000). From gesture to scientific language. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(11), 1683–1714. doi: 10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00115-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, W., & Lawless, D. V. (2002). Scientific investigations, metaphorical gestures, and the emergence of abstract scientific concepts. Learning and Instruction, 12(3), 285–304. doi: 10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00023-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, W., & Welzel, M. (2001). From activity to gestures and scientific language. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(1), 103–136. doi: 10.1002/1098-2736(200101)38:1<103::AID-TEA6>3.0.CO;2-G
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherr, R. E. (2008). Gesture analysis for physics education researchers. Physical Review Special Topics—Physics Education Research, 4(1), 010101 (9 pp.). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherr, R. E., Close, H. G., & McKagan, S. B. (2012). Intuitive ontologies for energy in physics. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1413(1), 343–346. doi:10.1063/1.3680065
   Google Scholar
• Scherr, R. E., Close, H. G., McKagan, S. B., & Vokos, S. (2012). Representing energy. I. Representing a substance ontology for energy. Physical Review Special Topics—Physics Education Research, 8(2), 020114 (11 pp.).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slotta, J. D., & Chi, M. T. H. (2006). Helping students understand challenging topics in science through ontology training. Cognition and Instruction, 24(2), 261–289. doi: 10.1207/s1532690xci2402_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slotta, J. D., Chi, M. T. H., & Joram, E. (1995). Assessing students’ misclassifications of physics concepts: An ontological basis for conceptual change. Cognition and Instruction, 13(3), 373–400. doi: 10.1207/s1532690xci1303_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. P., diSessa, A. A., & Roschelle, J. (1994). Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(2), 115–163. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls0302_1
   Google Scholar
• Stivers, T., & Sidnell, J. (2005). Introduction: Multimodal interaction. Semiotica, 2005(156), 1–20. doi: 10.1515/semi.2005.2005.156.1
   Google Scholar
• Watts, D. M. (1983). Some alternative views of energy. Physics Education, 18(5), 213–217. doi: 10.1088/0031-9120/18/5/307
   Google Scholar
• Wikipedia. (2014). Energy level. Retrieved May 22, 2014, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_level
   Google Scholar
• Wittmann, M. (2010). Using conceptual blending to describe emergent meaning in wave propagation. In K. Gomez, L. Lyons, & J. Radinsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th international conference of the learning sciences – Volume 1 (ICLS ‘10), Chicago (pp. 659–666). International Society of the Learning Sciences. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1854444&CFID=493068450&CFTOKEN=80132093
   Google Scholar