Some Challenges in the Empirical Investigation of Conceptual Mappings and Embodied Cognition in Science Education: Commentary on Dreyfus, Gupta and Redish; and Close and Scherr

References

• Cienki, A. (1998). Metaphoric gestures and some of their relations to verbal metaphoric counterparts. In J.-P. Koenig (Ed.), Discourse and cognition: Bridging the gap (pp. 189–205). Stanford, CA: CSLI.
   Google Scholar
• Close, H. G., & Scherr, R. E. (2015). Enacting conceptual metaphor through blending: Learning activities embodying the substance metaphor for energy. International Journal of Science Education. doi:10.1080/09500693.2015.1025307
   Google Scholar
• Cook, A. (2007). Interplay: The method and potential of a cognitive scientific approach to theatre. Theatre Journal, 59(4), 579–594. doi: 10.1353/tj.2008.0015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, B. W., Gupta, A., & Redish, E. F. (2015). Applying conceptual blending to model coordinated use of multiple ontological metaphors. International Journal of Science Education. doi:10.1080/09500693.2015.1025306
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, L. D. (2009). Gestures and conceptual integration in mathematical talk. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70(2), 127–141. doi: 10.1007/s10649-008-9124-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind's hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gentner, D., & Wolff, P. (1997). Alignment in the processing of metaphor. Journal of Memory and Language, 37(3), 331–355. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1997.2527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs Jr, R. W. (Ed.). (2008). The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grady, J. E. (1997). Theories are buildings revisited. Cognitive Linguistics (includes Cognitive Linguistic Bibliography), 8(4), 267–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hrepic, Z., Zollman, D. A., & Rebello, N. S. (2010). Identifying students’ mental models of sound propagation: The role of conceptual blending in understanding conceptual change. Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, 6(2), 020114. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.6.020114
   Google Scholar
• Joy, A., Sherry, J. F., & Deschenes, J. (2009). Conceptual blending in advertising. Journal of business research, 62(1), 39–49. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.11.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980/2003). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Núñez, R. E. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York: Basic books.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, D. (Ed.). (2000). Language and gesture (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, G. L. (1996). On metaphoric representation. Cognition, 60(2), 173–204. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(96)00711-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Núñez, R. (2012). On the science of embodied cognition in the 2010s: Research questions, appropriate reductionism, and testable explanations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21(2), 324–336. doi: 10.1080/10508406.2011.614325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Núñez, R. E., Motz, B. A., & Teuscher, U. (2006). Time after time: The psychological reality of the ego-and time-reference-point distinction in metaphorical construals of time. Metaphor and Symbol, 21(3), 133–146. doi: 10.1207/s15327868ms2103_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Núñez, R. E., & Sweetser, E. (2006). With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science, 30(3), 401–450. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parrill, F., & Sweetser, E. (2004). What we mean by meaning: Conceptual integration in gesture analysis and transcription. Gesture, 4(2), 197–219. doi: 10.1075/gest.4.2.05par
   Google Scholar
• Pascual, E. (2008). Fictive interaction blends in everyday life and courtroom settings. In T. Oakley & A. Hougaard (Eds.), Mental spaces in discourse and interaction (pp. 79–108). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, M. (1998). The literary mind: The origins of thought and language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zandieh, M., Roh, K. H., & Knapp, J. (2014). Conceptual blending: Student reasoning when proving “conditional implies conditional” statements. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 33 (March), 209–229. doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.11.007
   Google Scholar