Essential Concepts of Nanoscale Science and Technology for High School Students Based on a Delphi Study by the Expert Community

References

• Ambrogi, P., Caselli, M., Montaltic, M., & Venturic, M. (2008). Make sense of nanochemistry and nanotechnology. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 9, 5–10. doi: 10.1039/B801285G
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blonder, R. (2011). The story of nanomaterials in modern technology: An advanced course for chemistry teachers. Journal of Chemical Education, 88, 49–52. doi:10.1021/ed100614f
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blonder, R., & Dinur, M. (2011). Teaching nanotechnology using student-centered pedagogy for increasing students’ continuing motivation. Journal of Nano Education, 3, 51–61. doi: 10.1166/jne.2011.1016
   Google Scholar
• Blonder, R., & Sakhnini, S. (2012). Teaching two basic nanotechnology concepts in secondary school by using a variety of teaching methods. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13, 500–516. doi: 10.1039/C2RP20026K
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blonder, R., & Sakhnini, S. (2015). The making of nanotechnology: Exposing high-school students to behind-the-scenes of nanotechnology by inviting them to a nanotechnology conference. Nanotechnology Reviews, 4(1), 103–116. doi: 10.1515/ntrev-2014-0016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryan, L. A., Magana, A. J., & Sederberg, D. (2015). Published research on pre-college students’ and teachers’ nanoscale science, engineering, and technology learning. Nanotechnology Reviews, 4(1), 7–32. doi:10.1515/ntrev-2014-0029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6, 271–315. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls0603_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran, S. W. (1983). The Delphi method: Formulating and refining group judgements. Journal of the Human Sciences, 2, 111–117.
   Google Scholar
• Custer, R. L., Scarcella, J. A., & Stewart, B. R. (1999). The modified Delphi technique: A rotational modification. Journal of Vocational and Technical Education, 15, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Dalkey, N. C. (1969). An experimental study of group opinion. Futures, 1, 408–426. doi: 10.1016/S0016-3287(69)80025-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalkey, N. C., & Helmer, O. (1963). An experimental application of the Delphi method to use of experts. Management Science, 9, 458–467. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.9.3.458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delbecq, A. L., Van de Ven, A. H., & Gustafson, D. H. (1975). Group techniques for program planning. Glenview, IL: Scott Foreman.
   Google Scholar
• Dori, Y. J., Dangur, V., Avargil, S., & Peskin, U. (2014). Assessing advanced high school and undergraduate students’ thinking skills: The chemistry from the nanoscale to microelectronics module. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(9), 1306–1317. doi:10.1021/ed500007s
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley, E., & Hersam, M. (2006). Assessing the need for nanotechnology education reform in the United States. Nanotechnology Law and Business, 3, 467–484.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Hasson, F., Keeney, S., & McKenna, H. (2000). Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32, 1008–1015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, C. C., & Sandford, A. (2007). The Delphi technique: Making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 12(10), 1–8. Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=12&n=10
   Google Scholar
• Huang, C. Y., Hsu, L. R., & Chen, H. C. (2011). A study on the core concepts of nanotechnology for the elementary school. Journal of National Taichung University: Mathematics, Science & Technology, 25, 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. M. (1996). Essential assessment criteria for physical education teacher education programs: A Delphi study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). West Virginia University, Morgantown.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. G., Blonder, R., Gardner, G. E., Albe, V., Falvo, M., & Chevrier, J. (2013). Nanotechnology and nanoscale science: Educational challenges. International Journal of Science Education, 5, 1490–1512. doi:10.1080/09500693.2013.771828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. G., Gardner, G. E., Falvo, M., & Taylor, A. (2015). Precollege nanotechnology education: A different kind of thinking. Nanotechnology Reviews, 4(1), 117–127. doi:10.1515/ntrev-2014-0014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judd, R. C. (1972). Use of Delphi methods in higher education. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 4, 173–186. doi: 10.1016/0040-1625(72)90013-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laherto, A. (2010). An analysis of the educational significance of nanoscience and nanotechnology in scientific and technological literacy. Science Education International, 21, 160–175.
   Google Scholar
• Lindeman, C. A. (1981). Priorities within the health care system: A Delphi survey. Kansas City, MO: American Nurses’ Association.
   Google Scholar
• Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (1975). Introduction. In H. A. Linstone & M. Turoff (Eds.), The Delphi method: Technique and applications (pp. 3–12). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Ludwig, B. G. (1994). Internationalizing extension: An exploration of the characteristics evident in a state university. Extension system that achieves internationalization (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The Ohio State University, Columbus.
   Google Scholar
• Martino, J. P. (1983). Technological forecasting for decision making. New York, NY: North Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Menaa, B. (2011). The importance of nanotechnology in biomedical sciences. Journal of Biotechnology & Biomaterials, 1, article no. 105e. doi:10.4172/2155-952X.1000105e
   Google Scholar
• Murray, J. W. J., & Hammons, J. O. (1995). Delphi: A versatile methodology for conducting qualitative research. Review of Higher Education, 18, 423–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, W. F., & Jarman, B. O. (1987). Predicting future trends in adult fitness using the Delphi approach. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 58(2), 124–131. doi: 10.1080/02701367.1987.10605436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. A. (2003). What “ideas-about-science” should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 692–720. doi:10.1002/tea.10105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panyala, N., Pena-Mendez, E., & Havel, J. (2009). Gold and nano-gold in medicine: Overview, toxicology and perspectives. Journal of Applied Biomedicine, 7, 75–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parchmann, I., & Komorek, M. (2008). The model of educational reconstruction—a research model for the investigation of students’ and teachers’ conceptual ideas. In B. Ralle & I. Eilks (Eds.), Promoting successful science education—the worth of science education research (pp. 169–181). Aachen: Shaker.
   Google Scholar
• Petros, R., & DiSimone, J. (2010). Strategies in the design of nanoparticles for therapeutic applications. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 9, 615–627. doi: 10.1038/nrd2591
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roco, M. C. (2001). From vision to the implementation of the U.S. national nanotechnology initiative. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 3, 5–11. doi: 10.1023/A:1011429917892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samet, C. (2009). A capstone course in nanotechnology for chemistry majors. Journal of Nano Education, 1, 15–21. doi: 10.1166/jne.2009.010
   Google Scholar
• Skulmoski, J. G., Hartman, T. F., & Krahn, J. (2007). The Delphi method for graduate research. Journal of Information Technology Education, 6, 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, S., Sutherland, L. M., & Krajcik, J. S. (2009). The big ideas of nanoscale science and engineering: A guidebook for secondary teachers. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, R. E., & Judd, L. L. (1989). Delphi method applied to tourism. In S. Witt & L. Moutinho (Eds.), Tourism marketing and management handbook (pp. 180–186). New York, NY: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Toth, E. E., & Jackson, J. K. (2012). Pedagogical challenges for nanotechnology education: Getting science and engineering students to examine societal and ethical issues. International Journal of Engineering Education, 28, 1056–1067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turoff, M., & Hiltz, S. R. (1995). Computer based Delphi processes. In M. Adler & E. Ziglio (Eds.), Gazing into the Oracle: The Delphi method and its application to social policy and public health (pp. 56–88). London: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, H. D. (2007). Nanocomposites: Paving the way to stronger materials. Nature Nanotechnology, 2(12), 742–744. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2007.401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters, K. A., & Bullen, H. A. (2008). Development of a nanomaterials one-week intersession course. Journal of Chemical Education, 85, 1406–1409. doi: 10.1021/ed085p1406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanson, S., Mason, T. O., Hershman, M. C., Drane, D., Light, G., Cormia, R. … Bodner, G. (2009). A rubric for post-secondary degree programs in nanoscience and nanotechnology. International Journal of Engineering Education, 25, 615–627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, S. J., & Jamieson, L. M. (2001). Delivery methodology of the Delphi: A comparison of two approaches. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 19, 42–58.
   Google Scholar