Korean Secondary Students’ Perception of Scientific Literacy as Global Citizens: Using Global Scientific Literacy Questionnaire

References

• Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2001). Embedding nature of science instruction in preservice elementary science courses: Abandoning scientism. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 12(3), 215–233. doi: 10.1023/A:1016720417219
   Google Scholar
• Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82(4), 417–436. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199807)82:4<417::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-E
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aikenhead, G., Orpwood, G., & Fensham, P. (2011). Scientific literacy for a knowledge society. In C. Linder, L. Ostman, D. A. Roberts, P. Wickman, G. Erickson, & A. MacKinnon (Eds.), Promoting scientific literacy: Science education research in transaction (pp. 28–44). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Aikenhead, G. S. (1985). Collective decision making in the social context of science. Science Education, 69(4), 453–475. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730690403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aikenhead, G. S., & Ryan, A. G. (1992). The development of a new instrument: ‘Views on Science-Technology-Society’ (VOSTS). Science Education, 76(5), 477–491. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730760503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1989). Project 2061—Science for all Americans. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (2007). Atlas of science literacy. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Arons, A. B. (1983). Achieving wider scientific literacy. Daedalus, 112(2), 91–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588–606. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkowitz, M. W., & Simmons, P. (2003). Integrating science education and character education. In D. L. Zeidler (Ed.), The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education (pp. 117–138). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Boyes, E., Skamp, K., & Stanistreet, M. (2009). Australian secondary students’ views about global warming: Beliefs about actions, and willingness to act. Research in Science Education, 39, 661–680. doi: 10.1007/s11165-008-9098-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bransford, J., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. Weinert & R. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65–116). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. W. (1997). Towards an understanding of scientific literacy. In W. Graber & C. Bolte (Eds.), Scientific literacy (pp. 37–68). Kiel: Institute for Science Education (IPN).
   Google Scholar
• Choi, K., Lee, H., Shin, N., Kim, S., & Krajcik, J. (2011). Re-conceptualization of scientific literacy in South Korea for the 21st century. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), 670–697. doi: 10.1002/tea.20424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, N. (1994). Metacognition and reading to learn [Online]. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/databases/ERIC_Digests/ed376427.html
   Google Scholar
• DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582–601. doi: 10.1002/1098-2736(200008)37:6<582::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-L
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department for Education and Employment & Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (DfEE/QCA). (1999). Science: The national curriculum for England. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1–19). Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Elmose, S., & Roth, W. M. (2005). Allgemeinbildung: Readiness for living in risk society. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(1), 11–34. doi: 10.1080/0022027041000229413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson, G. L., & Erickson, L. J. (1984). Females and science achievement: Evidence, explanations and implications. Science Education, 68(2), 63–89. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730680202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, G. (2000). Lifelong learning—More than training. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 11(3/4), 265–294.
   Google Scholar
• Floyd, F. J., & Widaman, K. F. (1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 286–299. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, J. K., MacCallum, R. C., & Tait, M. (1986). The application of exploratory factor analysis in applied psychology: A critical review and analysis. Personnel Psychology, 39(2), 291–314. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1986.tb00583.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, B. L. (1978). Development of a test of science-related attitudes. Science Education, 62(4), 509–515. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730620411
   Google Scholar
• Gable, R. K., & Wolf, M. B. (1993). Instrument development in the affective domain: Measuring attitudes and values in corporate and school settings. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glynn, S. M., & Koballa, T. R. (2006). Motivation to learn college science. In J. J. Mintzes & H. L. William (Eds.), Handbook of college science teaching (pp. 25–32). Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: Science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 645–670. doi: 10.1080/09500690305021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1989). LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications. Chicago, IL: SPSS Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kimball, M. E. (1967). Understanding the nature of science: A comparison of scientists and science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 5(2), 110–120. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660050204
   Google Scholar
• Kluwe, R. H., & Friedrichsen, G. (1985). Mechanisms of control and regulation and problem solving. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckman (Eds.), Action control (pp. 203–217). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Laugksch, R. C. (2000). Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science Education, 84(1), 71–94. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200001)84:1<71::AID-SCE6>3.0.CO;2-C
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laugksch, R. C., & Spargo, P. E. (1996). Construction of a paper-and-pencil test of basic scientific literacy based on selected literacy goals recommended by the American Association for the Advancement of Science. Public Understanding of Science, 5(4), 331–359. doi: 10.1088/0963-6625/5/4/003
   Google Scholar
• Leahey, T., & Harris, R. (1997). Learning and cognition. Princeton, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331–359. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660290404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. G., & O'Malley, M. (1990). Students’ perceptions of tentativeness in science: Development, use, and sources of change. Science Education, 74(2), 225–239. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730740207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H., Chang, H., Choi, K., Kim, S., & Zeidler, D. L. (2012). Developing character and values for global citizens: Analysis of pre-service science teachers’ moral reasoning on socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 34(6), 925–953. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2011.625505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M., Sohn, W., & No, U. (2008). The result from PISA 2006(RRE 2008–10). Seoul: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.
   Google Scholar
• Linn, M. C., & Eylon, B. (2006). Science education: Integrating views of learning and instruction. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 511–544). Mahwah, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Linn, M. C., & Hyde, J. S. (1989). Gender, mathematics, and science. Educational Researcher, 18(8), 17–27. doi: 10.3102/0013189X018008017
   Google Scholar
• Lock, R. (1992). Gender and practical skill performance in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(3), 227–241. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660290304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maitland, L. (2000). Ideas in practice: Self-regulation and metacognition in the reading lab. Journal of Developmental Education, 24(2), 26–32.
   Google Scholar
• Manhart, J. J. (1997). Scientific literacy: Factor structure and gender differences (Doctoral thesis). The University of Iowa, Iowa City.
   Google Scholar
• Millar, R. (2007). Twenty first century science: Insights from the design and implementation of a scientific literacy approach in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(13), 1499–1521. doi: 10.1080/09500690600718344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (Eds.). (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. London: King's College London.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J. D. (1998). The measurement of civic scientific literacy. Public Understanding of Science, 7(3), 203–223. doi: 10.1088/0963-6625/7/3/001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, P. H., Blessing, J. S., & Schwartz, S. (2006). Gender differences in high-school students’ views about science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(4), 363–381. doi: 10.1080/09500690500277664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education Science Technology (MEST). (2009). The revised Korea national curriculum standards in 2009. Seoul: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, R. W., & Sutman, F. X. (1970). The development, field test and validation of an inventory of scientific attitudes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 7(2), 85–94. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660070203
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, M. P., & Zeidler, D. L. (2010). Moral-ethical character and science education: Ecojustice ethics through socioscientific issues (SSI). In D. Tippins, M. Mueller, M. van Eijck, & J. Adams (Eds.), Cultural studies and environmentalism: The confluence of ecojustice, place-based (science) education, and indigenous knowledge systems (pp. 105–128). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council (NRC). (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K–8. Committee on science learning, kindergarten through eighth grade. In R. A. Duschl, H. A. Schweingruber, & A. W. Shouse (Eds.). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council (NRC). (2012). A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nietfeld, J. L., Cao, L., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Metacognitive monitoring accuracy and student performance in the postsecondary classroom. The Journal of Experimental Education, 74(1), 7–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2007). PISA 2006 science competencies for tomorrow's world. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Park, B., & Shin, D. (2010). Elementary school high achievers’ gender characteristics of successful and unsuccessful process in problem solving. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 10(2), 173–189.
   Google Scholar
• Park, H., & Noh, M. (2007). Girls` middle school students` understanding of the nature of science and their achievements. Secondary Institute of Education, 55(3), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, D. (2007). Scientific literacy/science literacy. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 729–780). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, I. J. (1987). Girls and boys and practical science. International Journal of Science Education, 9(5), 505–518. doi: 10.1080/0950069870090501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, W. M., & Lee, S. (2004). Science education as/for participation in the community. Science Education, 88(2), 263–291. doi: 10.1002/sce.10113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubba, P. A., & Andersen, H. O. (1978). Development of an instrument to assess secondary school students’ understanding of the nature of scientific knowledge. Science Education, 62(4), 449–458. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730620404
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz, P. O., & Vallejos, R. M. (1999). The role of compassion in moral education. Journal of Moral Education, 28(1), 5–17. doi: 10.1080/030572499103278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamos, M. H. (1995). The myth of scientific literacy. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sinnott, J. D. (1989). Everyday problem solving: Theory and applications. New York, NY: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, G. A., & Williams, D. R. (1999). Ecological education in action: On weaving education, culture, and the environment. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steiger, J. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25(2), 173–180. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, J. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (4th ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, S., Sutherland, L., & Krajcik, J. S. (2009). The big ideas of nanoscale science and engineering. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, R. (2007). Re-imagining science education: Engaging students in science for Australia's future. Camberwell: ACER Press, Australian Council for Educational Research.
   Google Scholar
• Voss, J. F., Lawrence, J. A., & Engle, R. A. (1991). From representation to decision: An analysis of problem solving in international relations. In R. J. Sternberg & P. A. Frensh (Eds.), Complex problem solving (pp. 119–157). Hilldale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. R., & Berenthal, M. W. (2006). Systems for state science assessment. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L., Herman, B. C., Ruzek, M., Linder, A., & Lin, S. (2013). Cross-cultural epistemological orientations to socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(3), 251–283. doi: 10.1002/tea.21077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L., & Nichols, B. H. (2009). Socioscientific issues: Theory and practice. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(2), 49–58. doi: 10.1007/BF03173684
   Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socio-scientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357–377. doi: 10.1002/sce.20048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L., Walker, K. A., & Ackett, W. A. (2002). Tangled up in views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socio-scientific dilemmas. Science Education, 86(3), 343–367. doi: 10.1002/sce.10025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar