References
- Academic Council of Deans of Science (ACDS). (2013). Background: Science threshold learning outcomes. Retrieved from ACDS: http://www.acds.edu.au/tlcentre/centreprojects/current/
- American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (2009). Cultivating biological literacy. In: Vision and change in undergraduate biology: A call to action. Retrieved from AAAS: http://visionandchange.org/files/2011/02/Vision-and-Change-low-res.pdf
- Archer, A., & Hughes, C. (2011). Explicit Instruction: Effective and Efficient Teaching. New York: Guilford Press.
- Australian Government Department of Industry. (2013). Higher education statistics. Retrieved from http://www.innovation.gov.au/highereducation/HigherEducationStatistics/Pages/default.aspx
- Barrie, S., Hughes, C., Smith, C., & Thomson, K. (2009). Key issues to consider in the renewal of learning and teaching experiences to foster Graduate Attributes. Retrieved from http://www.itl.usyd.edu.au/projects/nationalgap/resources/GAPpdfs/NationalGAP_issues_Papers.pdf.
- Bath, D., Smith, C., Stein, S., & Swann, R. (2004). Beyond mapping and embedding graduate attributes: Bringing together quality assurance and action learning to create a validated and living curriculum. Higher Education Research & Development, 23(3), 313–328. doi:10.1080/0729436042000235427
- Besley, J. C., & Tanner, A. H. (2011). What science communication scholars think about training scientists to communicate. Science Communication, 33(2), 239–263. doi:10.1177/1075547010386972
- Biggs, J. B., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education.
- Borrego, M., & Cutler, S. (2010). Constructive alignment of interdisciplinary graduate curriculum in engineering and science: An analysis of successful IGERT proposals. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(4), 355–369. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01068.x
- Bray, B., France, B., & Gilbert, J. K. (2011). Identifying the essential elements of effective science communication: What do the experts say? International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 2(1), 23–41. doi:10.1080/21548455.2011.611627
- Brownell, S. E., Price, J. V., & Steinman, L. (2013a). Science communication to the general public: Why we need to teach undergraduate and graduate students this skill as part of their formal scientific training. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 12(1), E6–E10. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3852879/
- Brownell, S. E., Price, J. V., & Steinman, L. (2013b). A writing-intensive course improves biology undergraduates’ perception and confidence of their abilities to read scientific literature and communicate science. Advances in Physiology Education, 37, 70–79. Retrieved from NCBI: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23471252 doi: 10.1152/advan.00138.2012
- Bubela, T., Nisbet, M. C., Borchelt, R., Brunger, F., Critchley, C., Einsiedel, E., … Caulfield, T. (2009). Science communication reconsidered. Nature and Biotechnology, 27(6), 514–518. doi:10.1038/nbt0609-514
- Candy, C. P., Crebert, R. G., & O'Leary, J. (1994). Developing lifelong learners through undergraduate education. Retrieved from VOCEDplus: http://www.voced.edu.au/content/ngv22704.
- Champagne, A. B., & Klopfer, L. E. (1974). Formative evaluation in science curriculum development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 11(3), 185–203. doi:10.1002/tea.3660110304
- Colthorpe, K., Rowland, S., & Leach, J. (2013). Good practice guide (Science): Threshold learning outcome 4: Communication. Retrieved from ACDS: http://www.acds.edu.au/tlcentre/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Science-Good-Practice-Guide-2013-TLO4.pdf
- Concannon-Gibney, T., & McCarthy, M. J. (2012). The explicit teaching of reading comprehension in science class: A pilot professional development program. Improving Schools, 15(1), 73–88. doi:10.1177/1365480211433726
- Coyne, M. D., Zipoli, R. P., Chard, D. J., Fagella-Luby, M., Ruby, M., Santoro, L. E., & Baker, S. (2009). Direct instruction of comprehension: Instructional examples from intervention research on listening and reading comprehension. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 25(2), 221–245. doi:10.1080/10573560802683697
- Cummings, R. (1998). How should we assess and report student generic attributes? Retrieved from Curtin University: https://ctl.curtin.edu.au/events/conferences/tlf/tlf1998/cummings.html
- Dietz, T. (2013). Bridging values and deliberation to science communication. PNAS, 110, 14081–14087. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1213532110 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1212740110
- Divan, A., & Mason, S. (2015). A programme-wide training framework to facilitate scientific communication skills development amongst biological sciences Masters students. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 1–25. doi:10.1080/0309877X.2014.1000276
- Duffy, G. G. (2009). Explaining reading: A resource for teaching concepts, skills, and strategies (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
- Ecklund, E., James, S., & Lincoln, A. (2012). How academic biologists and physicists view science outreach. PLoS ONE, 7(5), e36240. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0036240
- Ewan, C. (2009). Learning and teaching in Australian Universities: A thematic analysis of cycle 1 AUQA Audits. Retrieved from VOCEDplus: http://hdl.voced.edu.au/10707/238815.
- Fallows, S., & Steven, C. (2000). Building employability skills into the higher education curriculum: A university-wide initiative. Education + Training, 42(2), 75–83. doi:10.1108/00400910010331620
- Freeman, D. (1991). ‘To make the tacit explicit’: Teacher education, emerging discourse, and conceptions of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7(5–6), 439–454. doi:10.1016/0742-051X(91)90040-V
- Good, P. (2005). Permutation, parametric and bootstrap tests of hypotheses. New York, NY: Springer.
- Gray, F. E., Emerson, L., & MacKay, B. (2005). Meeting the demands of the workplace: Science students and written skills. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(4), 425–435. doi:10.1007/s10956-005-8087-y
- Greenwood, M. R. C., & Riordan, D. G. (2001). Civic scientist/civic duty. Science Communication, 23(1), 28–40. doi:10.1177/107554700102300100 doi: 10.1177/1075547001023001003
- Healey, M. (2000). Developing the scholarship of teaching in higher education: A discipline-based approach. Higher Education Research & Development, 19(2), 169–189. doi:10.1080/072943600445637
- Herok, G., Chuck, J., & Millar, T. (2013). Teaching and evaluating graduate attributes in science based disciplines. Creative Education, 4(7), 42–49. Retrieved from http://researchdirect.uws.edu.au/islandora/object/uws:16641. doi: 10.4236/ce.2013.47A2008
- Hodgson, Y., Varsavsky, C., & Matthews, K. E. (2013). Assessment and teaching of science skills: Whole of programme perceptions of graduating students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(5), 515–530. doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.842539
- Huber, R. M. (1992). How professors play the cat guarding the cream. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University Press.
- James, R., & McInnes, C. (2001). Strategically repositioning student assessment: A discussion paper on assessment of student learning. Retrieved from research Gate: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/237342302_STRATEGICALLY_REPOSITIONING_STUDENT_ASSESSMENT_A_discussion_paper_on_the_assessment_of_student_learning_in_universities.
- Jones, S., Yates, B., & Kelder, J. A. (2011). Learning and teaching academic standards project: Science learning and teaching academic standards statement. Retrieved from ABDC: http://www.abdc.edu.au/data/Accounting_LS/Accounting_Learning_Standards_-_February_2011.pdf.
- Knapp, P., & Watkins, M. (2005). Genre, text, grammar: Technologies for teaching and assessing writing. Teaching English as a Second Of Foreign Language, 17(2), 1–3. Retrieved from http://www.tesl-ej.org/pdf/ej66/r2.pdf.
- Knight, P. T. (2001). Complexity and curriculum: A process approach to curriculum-making. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(3), 369–381. doi:10.1080/13562510120061223
- Kuchel, L., Wilson, R., Stevens, S., & Cokley, J. (2014). A documentary video assignment to enhance learning in large first-year science classes. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 22(4), 48–64. Retrieved from http://openjournals.library.usyd.edu.au/index.php/CAL/article/view/7597.
- Kuh, G. D. (2008). Why integration and engagement are essential to effective educational practice in the twenty-first century. Peer Review, 10, 27–28. Retrieved from http://www.aacu.org/publications-research/periodicals/why-integration-and-engagement-are-essential-effective-educational.
- Kuh, G., & Ewell, P. (2010). The state of learning outcomes in the United States. Higher Education Management and Policy, 22(1), 1–20. doi:10.1787/17269822 doi: 10.1787/hemp-22-5ks5dlhqbfr1
- Leshner, A. I. (2003). Public engagement with science. Science, 299(5609), 977. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/213592049?accountid=14723 doi: 10.1126/science.299.5609.977
- McInnis, C., Hartley, R., & Anderson, M. (2000). What did you do with your science degree? A national study of employment outcomes for science degree holders 1990–2000. Retrieved from the University of Melbourne Centre for the Study of Higher Education: https://cshe.unimelb.edu.au/research/disciplines/docs/ScienceR.pdf.
- Mercer-Mapstone, L. D., & Kuchel, L. J. (in press). Core skills for effective science communication: A teaching resource for undergraduate science education International. Journal of Science Education Part B: Communication and Public Engagement.
- Merrill, M. D., Drake, L., Lacy, M. J., Pratt, J., & ID2_Research_Group. (1996). Reclaiming instructional design. Educational Technology, 36(5), 5–7. Retrieved from http://mdavidmerrill.com/Papers/Reclaiming.PDF
- Moni, R. W., Hryciw, D. H., Poronnik, P., & Moni, K. B. (2007). Using explicit teaching to improve how bioscience students write to the lay public. Advances in Physiology Education, 31, 167–75. doi:10.1152/advan.00111.2006
- Morgan, M. K., Clarke, R., Weidmann, M., Laidlaw, J. & Law, A. (2007). How assessment drives learning in neurosurgical higher training. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, 14(4), 349–354. doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2005.12.011
- Ofstad, W. P., & Brunner, L. J. P. (2013). Team-based learning in pharmacy education. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 77(4), 70. doi:10.5688/ajpe77470
- O'Neill, S., Geoghegan, D., & Petersen, S. (2013). Raising the pedagogical bar: Teachers’ co-construction of explicit teaching. Improving Schools, 16(2), 148–158. doi:10.1177/1365480213493709
- Poronnik, P., & Moni, R. W. (2006). The opinion editorial: Teaching physiology outside the box. Advances in Physiology Education, 30(2), 73–82. doi:10.1152/advan.00075.2005
- Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching: The experience of higher education. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
- R Core Team. (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Retrieved from R-Project: http://www.R-project.org/.
- Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge.
- Reutzel, D. R., Child, A., Jones, C. D., & Clark, S. K. (2014). Explicit instruction in core reading programs. The Elementary School Journal, 114(3), 406–430. doi:10.1086/674420
- Ritchhart, R. & Perkins, D. (2008). Making thinking visible. Educational Leadership, 65(5), 57–61. Retrieved from http://www.ronritchhart.com/Papers_files/MTV_ritchhart_perkins.pdf.
- Rosenshine, B. (1986). Synthesis of research on explicit teaching. Educational Leadership, 43(7), 60–69. Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/ASCD/pdf/journals/ed_lead/el_198604_rosenshine.pdf.
- Rosenshine, B. (1997). Advances in research on instruction. In J. W. Lloyd, E. J. Kameanui, & D. Chard (Eds.), Issues in educating students with disabilities (pp. 197–221). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Rowland, S. L. (2012). Biochemistry, molecular biology, and the changing tertiary education landscape in Australia. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 40, 24–28. doi:10.1002/bmb.20577
- Rowland, S. L., & Myatt, P. M. (2014). Getting started in the scholarship of teaching and learning: A ‘how to’ guide for science academics. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 42, 6–14. doi:10.1002/bmb.20748
- Seminar for Statistics (SfS). (2012). Analysis of deviance for generalized linear model fits. Retrieved from: https://stat.ethz.ch/R-manual/R-patched/library/stats/html/anova.glm.html
- Shulman, L. (1988). The dangers of dichotomous thinking in education. In P. Grimmet & G. Erickson (Eds.), Reflection in teacher education (pp. 31–39). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
- Stevens, R. J., Van Meter, P. N., Garner, J., & Warcholak, N. (2008). Reading and integrated literacy strategies (RAILS): An integrated approach to early reading. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 13, 357–380. doi:10.1080/10824660802427611
- Stevens, S. (2013). What communication skills are taught in Australian science degrees and what else do students learn from ‘communication to non-scientists’ tasks? (Unpublished honours thesis). University of Queensland, Brisbane.
- Torgesen, J. K. (2004). Lessons learned from research on interventions for students who have difficulty learning to read. In P. McCardle & V. Chhabra (Eds.), The voice of evidence in reading research (pp. 355–382). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
- Universities Australia. (2014). Student numbers and characteristics. Retrieved from Universities Australia: https://www.universitiesaustralia.edu.au/australias-universities/key-facts-and-data/Student-Numbers---Characteristics#.Ux_aioaQbz0
- Varsavsky, C., Matthews, K. E., & Hodgson, Y. (2013). Perceptions of science graduating students on their learning gains. International Journal of Science Education, 36(6), 929–951. doi:10.1080/09500693.2013.830795
- Venables, W. N., & Ripley, B. D. (2002). Modern applied statistics with S-Plus (4th ed.). New York, NY: Springer.
- Wieman, C., Perkins, K., & Gilbert, S. (2010). Transforming Science Education at Large Research Universities: A Case Study in Progress. Retrieved from http://www.changemag.org/archives/back%20issues/march-april%202010/transforming-science-full.html
- Wilcox, C. (2012). Guest editorial it's time to e-Volve: Taking responsibility for science communication in a digital age. Biology Bulletin, 222(2), 85–87. Retrieved from http://www.biolbull.org/content/222/2/85.full
- Yorke, M., & Knight, P. (2006). Curricula for economic and social gain. Higher Education, 51, 565–588. doi: 10.1007/s10734-004-1704-5
- Zou, B. (2014). Teaching communication for science engagement with non-scientists in tertiary science education: Student, lecturer and employer beliefs (Unpublished honours thesis). University of Queensland, Brisbane.