2,000
Views
32
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Science Teachers’ Views and Stereotypes of Religion, Scientists and Scientific Research: A call for scientist–science teacher partnerships to promote inquiry-based learning

References

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82(4), 417–436. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199807)82:4<417::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-E
  • Aikenhead, G. S., & Jegede, O. J. (1999). Cross-cultural science education: A cognitive explanation of a cultural phenomenon. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(3), 269–287. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199903)36:3<269::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-T
  • Aikenhead, G. S., & Ryan, A. G. (1992). The development of a new instrument: “Views on science-technology society” (VOSTS). Science Education, 76(5), 477–491. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730760503
  • Akerson, V., Buzzelli, C., & Eastwood, J. (2012). Bridging the gap between preservice early childhood teachers’ cultural values, perceptions of values held by scientists, and the relationships of these values to conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23, 133–157. doi: 10.1007/s10972-011-9244-1
  • Ball-Rokeach, S. J., Rokeach, M., & Grube, J. W. (1984). The great American values test. New York: Free Press.
  • Barab, S., & Hay, K. (2001). Doing science at the elbows of experts: Issues related to the science apprenticeship camp. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(1), 70–102. doi: 10.1002/1098-2736(200101)38:1<70::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-L
  • Bell, J. (1993). Doing your research project. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • Boeije, H. (2002). A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Quality & Quantitym, 36, 391–409. doi: 10.1023/A:1020909529486
  • Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2006). Qualitative research for education: An introductory to theory and methods (5th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Bower, J. (2005). Scientists and science education reform: Myths, methods, and madness. National Academy of Sciences. Retrieved from www.nas.edu/rise/backg2a.htm
  • Brecht, B. (1994). Life of Galileo (J. Willett, Trans., J. Willett & R. Manheim, Eds.). New York: Arcade.
  • Briscoe, C., & Peters, J. (1997). Teacher collaboration across and within schools: Supporting individual change in elementary science teaching. Science Education, 81, 51–65. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199701)81:1<51::AID-SCE3>3.0.CO;2-0
  • Brooke, J. H. (1990). The Galileo affair: Teaching At 17. Physics Education, 25, 197–201. doi: 10.1088/0031-9120/25/4/304
  • Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., Kim, E., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2009). Religiosity as a perceptual filter: Examining processes of opinion formation about nanotechnology. Public Understanding of Science, 18(5), 546–558. doi: 10.1177/0963662507087304
  • Cohen, L., & Manion, L. (1989). Research methods in education. London: Routledge.
  • De Laat, M. (2006). Networked learning. Apeldoorn: Politieacademie.
  • Ecklund, L., & Park, J. (2009). Conflict between religion and science among academic scientists? Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 48(2), 276–292. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5906.2009.01447.x
  • Gaskill, D., Morrison, P., Sanders, F., Forster, E., Edwards, H., McClure, S., & Fleming, R. (2003) University and industry partnerships: Lessons from collaborative research. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 9(6), 347–355. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-172X.2003.00448.x
  • Gouthier, D. (2007). Teachers’ perception of European scientists. Journal of Science Communication, 6(3), 1–10.
  • Gouthier, D., Cannata, I., Castelfranchi, Y., & Manzoli, F. (2006). The perception of science and scientists in the young public. The 9th international conference on public communication of science and technology, Seul.
  • Grosslight, L., Unger, C., Jay, E., & Smith, C. (1991). Understanding models and their use in science: Conceptions of middle and high school students and experts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 799–822. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660280907
  • Harrison, A. (2001). How do teachers and textbook writers model scientific ideas for students? Research in Science Education, 31, 401–435. doi: 10.1023/A:1013120312331
  • Harry, L., Shipman, H., Brickhouse, N., Dagher, Z., & Letts, W. (2011). Changes in student views of religion and science in a college astronomy course. Science Education, 86, 526–547.
  • Hughes, R., Molyneaux, K., & Dixon, P. (2012). The role of scientist mentors on teachers’ perceptions of the community of science during a summer research experience. Research in Science Education, 42, 915–941. doi: 10.1007/s11165-011-9231-8
  • Jane, B., Fleer, M., & Gipps, J. (2007). Changing children's views of science and scientists through school-based teaching. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 8(1), 1–21.
  • Johnston, M., & Thomas, J. M. (1997). Keeping differences in tensions through dialogue. In M. Johnston (Ed.), Contradictions in collaboration: New thinking on school/university partnerships (pp. 9–19). New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Justi, R. (2009). Learning how to model in science classroom: Key teacher's role in supporting the development of students’ modelling skills. Educación Quimica, 20(1), 32–40.
  • Justi, R., & Gilbert, J. K. (2002a). Modelling, teachers’ views on the nature of modelling, and implications for the education of modellers. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 369–387. doi:10.1080/09500690110110142
  • Justi, R., & Gilbert, J. K. (2002b). Science teachers’ knowledge about and attitudes towards the use of models and modelling in learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(12), 1273–1292. doi: 10.1080/09500690210163198
  • Justi, R., & Gilbert, J. K. (2003). Teachers’ views on the nature of models. International Journal of Science Education, 25(11), 1369–1386. doi:10.1080/0950069032000070324
  • Justi, R., & van Driel, J. (2005). The development of science teachers’ knowledge on models and modelling: Promoting, characterizing and understanding the process. International Journal of Science Education, 27(5), 549–573. doi: 10.1080/0950069042000323773
  • Kahle, J. B. (1988). Gender and science education II. In P. Fensham (Ed.), Development and dilemmas in science education (pp. 249–265). Philadelphia, PA: The Falmer Press.
  • Katz, S. (2002). Questions for a millennium: Religion and science from the perspective of a scientist. Zygon, 37(1), 45–54. doi: 10.1111/1467-9744.00410
  • Knowles, J. G. (1992). Models for understanding pre-service and beginning teachers’ biographies: Illustration from case studies. In I. F. Goodson (Ed.), Studying teachers’ lives (pp. 99–152). London: Routledge.
  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Loucks-Horsley, S. L., Love, N., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., & Hewson, P. W. (2003). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
  • Mansour, N. (2008). The experiences and personal religious beliefs of Egyptian science teachers as a framework for understanding the shaping and reshaping of their beliefs and practices about Science-Technology-Society (STS). International Journal of Science Education, 30(12), 1605–1634. doi: 10.1080/09500690701463303
  • Mansour, N. (2011). Egyptian science teachers’ views of science and religion vs. Islamic perspective: Conflicting or complementing? Science Education, 95(2), 281–309. doi: 10.1002/sce.20418
  • Mansour, N. (2013). Modelling the sociocultural contexts of science education: The teachers’ perspective. Research in Science Education, 43, 347–369. doi:10.1007/s11165-011-9269-7
  • McDuffie, T. E., Jr. (2001). Scientists – Geeks & nerds? Dispelling teachers' stereotypes of scientists. Science and Children, 38(8), 16–19.
  • McGillicuddy-De Lisi, A. V., & Subramanian, S. (1996). How do children develop knowledge? Beliefs of Tanzanian and American mother. In S. Harkness & C. M. Super (Eds.), Parents’ cultural belief systems: Their origins, expressions, and consequences (pp. 143–168). New York: The Guiford Press.
  • McGinnis, J. R. (2006). Cultural considerations. In K. Appelton (Ed.), Elementary science teacher education: International perspectives on contemporary issues and practice (pp. 275–298). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Mendonc, P., & Justi, R. (2011). Contributions of the model of modelling diagram to the learning of ionic bonding: Analysis of a case study. Research in Science Education, 41(4), 479–503. doi: 10.1007/s11165-010-9176-3
  • Munby, H., Cunningham, M., & Lock, C. (2000). School science culture: A case study of barriers to developing professional knowledge. Science Education, 84(2), 193–211. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200003)84:2<193::AID-SCE4>3.0.CO;2-K
  • Nelson, T. (2005). Knowledge interactions in teacher–scientist partnerships: Negotiation, consultation, and rejection. Journal of Teacher Education, 56(4), 382–395. doi:10.1177/0022487105279938
  • Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079. doi: 10.1080/0950069032000032199
  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Pearlstein, E. (1990). Science and religion: Conflicting or complementary? Physics Education, 25, 239–240. doi: 10.1088/0031-9120/25/5/102
  • Peker, D., & Dolan, E. (2012). Helping students make meaning of authentic investigations: Findings from a student–teacher–scientist partnership. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 7, 223–244. doi: 10.1007/s11422-012-9385-3
  • Rahm, J., & Charbonneau, P. (1997). Probing stereotypes through students' drawings of scientists. American Journal of Physics, 65(8), 774–778. doi: 10.1119/1.18647
  • Reiss, M. J. (2000). Teaching science in a multicultural, multi-faith society. In J. Sears & P. Sorenson (Eds.), Issues in science teaching (pp. 16–22). London: Routledge Falmer.
  • Rosenthal, D. B. (1993). Images of scientists: A comparison of biology and liberal studies majors. School Science and Mathematics, 93(4), 212–216. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.1993.tb12227.x
  • Sharkawy, A. (2012). Exploring the potential of using stories about diverse scientists and reflective activities to enrich primary students’ images of scientists and scientific work. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 7, 307–340. doi: 10.1007/s11422-012-9386-2
  • Singer, J., Marx, R. W., & Krajcik, J. (2000). Constructing extended inquiry projects: Curriculum materials for science education reform. Educational Psychologist, 35(3), 165–178. doi: 10.1207/S15326985EP3503_3
  • Sjøberg, S. (2000). Science and scientists: The SAS study. Retrieved April 27, 2014, from http://folk.uio.no/sveinsj/SASweb.htm
  • Tal, T., & Kedmi, Y. (2006). Teaching socioscientific issues: Classroom culture and students’ performances. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1, 615–644. doi: 10.1007/s11422-006-9026-9
  • Tanner, K., Chatman, L., & Allen, D. (2003). Approaches to biology teaching and learning: Science teaching and learning across the school–university divide—Cultivating conversations through scientist–teacher partnerships. Cell Biology Education, 2, 195–201. doi: 10.1187/cbe.03-10-0044
  • Vroom, H. M. (1990). Religions and the truth: Philosophical reflections and perspectives. Amsterdam: Rodopi B.V. Editions.
  • Weerakkody, W. (2010). God, science, and the Buddha: Understanding the theory of everything. Lulu.com.
  • Wiebe, D. (1981). Religion and truth: Towards and alternative paradigm for the study of religions. Paris: The Hague.
  • Willcuts, M. (2009). Scientist–teacher partnerships as professional development: An action research study. Richland, WA: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
  • Windschitl, M. (2003). Inquiry projects in science teacher education: What can investigative experiences reveal about teacher thinking and eventual classroom practice? Science Education, 87(1), 112–143. doi: 10.1002/sce.10044
  • Wolcott, H. F. (1994). Transforming qualitative data: Description, analysis, and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Yalvac, B., Tekkaya, C., Cakiroglu, J., & Kahyaoglu, E. (2007). Turkish pre-service science teachers’ views on science-technology-society issues. International Journal of Science Education, 29(3), 331–348. doi: 10.1080/09500690600708667

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.