Development, Evaluation and Use of a Student Experience Survey in Undergraduate Science Laboratories: The Advancing Science by Enhancing Learning in the Laboratory Student Laboratory Learning Experience Survey

References

• Abd-El-Khalick, F., BouJaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N. G., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, …, Tuan, H.-L. (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. Science Education, 88, 397–419. doi:10.1002/sce.10118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albanese, M. A., & Mitchell, S. (1993). Problem-based learning: A review of literature on its outcomes and implementation issues. Academic Medicine, 68, 52–81. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199301000-00012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arons, A. B. (1993). Guiding insight and inquiry in the introductory physics laboratory. Physics Teacher, 31, 278–282. doi: 10.1119/1.2343763
   Google Scholar
• Barrie, S. C., Buntine, M. A., Jamie, I. M., & Kable, S. H. (2001). APCELL: The Australian physical chemistry enhanced laboratory learning project. Australian Journal of Education in Chemistry, 57, 6–12.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, M. S. (1950). Tests of significance in factor analysis. British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 3, 77–85. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1950.tb00285.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, C., Butler, A., & Burke da Silva, K. (2014). Promoting inquiry-based teaching in laboratory courses: Are we meeting the grade? CBE-Life Sciences Education, 13, 444–452. doi:10.1187/cbe.13-12-0245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, S. W. (2000). University practical work: Why do we do it? Education in Chemistry, 37, 49–50.
   Google Scholar
• Bodner, G. M., MacIsaac, D., & White, S. R. (1999). Action research: Overcoming the sports mentality approach to assessment/evaluation. University Chemistry Education, 3, 31–36.
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., Dunn, J., & Hegarty-Hazel, E. (1986). Teaching in laboratories. Guildford: SRHE & NFER-Nelson.
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, R. (2003). Concepts and skills in the biochemistry/molecular biology lab. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 31, 102–105. doi:10.1002/bmb.2003.494031020192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bretz, S. L. (2012). Navigating the landscape of assessment. Journal of Chemical Education, 89(6), 689–691. doi:10.1021/ed3001045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownell, S. E., Kloser, M. J., Fukami, T., & Shavelson, R. (2012). Undergraduate biology lab courses: Comparing the impact of traditionally-based “cookbook” and authentic research-based courses on student lab experiences. Journal of College Science Teaching, 41, 36–45.
   Google Scholar
• Bruck, L. B., Bretz, S. L., & Towns, M. H. (2009). A rubric to guide curriculum development of undergraduate chemistry laboratory: Focus on inquiry. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Buntine, M. A., Kable, S. H., & Metha, G. F. (2004). The emission spectroscopy of C2 produced in a hydrocarbon/oxygen flame: An APCELL experiment. Australian Journal of Education in Chemistry, 63, 21–25.
   Google Scholar
• Cummin, R.H., Green, W.J., & Elliott, C. (2004). “Prompted” inquiry-based learning in the introductory chemistry laboratory. Journal of Chemical Education, 81, 239–241. doi: 10.1021/ed081p239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalkey, N., & Helmer, O. (1963). An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management Science, 9, 458–467. doi:10.1287/mnsc.9.3.458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Carlo, D., Mazzaro, D., & Page, S. (2006). High school students’ perceptions of their laboratory classroom and the copying of laboratory work. Journal of Chemical Education, 83, 1362–1367. doi: 10.1021/ed083p1362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Carlo, D. I., & Bodner, G. M. (2004). Students’ perceptions of academic dishonesty in the chemistry classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 47–64. doi: 10.1002/tea.10124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deters, K. M. (2005). Student opinions regarding inquiry-based labs. Journal of Chemical Education, 82, 1178–1180. doi: 10.1021/ed082p1178
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domin, D. S. (1999). A review of laboratory instruction styles. Journal of Chemical Education, 76, 543. doi:10.1021/ed076p543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dziuban, C. D., & Shirkey, E. C. (1974). When is a correlation matrix appropriate for factor analysis? Psychological Bulletin, 81, 358–361. doi:10.1037/h0036316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fay, M. E., Grove, N. P., Towns, M. H., & Bretz, S. L. (2007). A rubric to characterize inquiry in the undergraduate chemistry laboratory. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8, 212–219. doi: 10.1039/B6RP90031C
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, B., & McRobbie, C. J. (1995). Science laboratory classroom environments at schools and universities: A cross-national study. Educational Research and Evaluation, 1, 289–317. doi: 10.1080/1380361950010401
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, B., McRobbie, C. J., & Giddings, G. J. (1993). Development and cross-national validation of a laboratory classroom instrument for senior high school students. Science Education, 77, 1–24. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730770102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frymier, A. B., & Shulman, G. M. (1995). “What's in it for me?”: Increasing content relevance to enhance students’ motivation. Communication Education, 44, 40–50. doi:10.1080/03634529509378996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanif, M., Sneddon, P., Al-Ahmadi, F., & Reid, N. (2009). The perceptions, views and opinions of university students about physics learning during undergraduate laboratory work. European Journal of Physics, 30, 85–96. doi: 10.1088/0143-0807/30/1/009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasson, F., Keeney, S., & McKenna, H. (2000). Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32, 1008–1015. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.t01-1-01567.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegarty-Hazel, E. (Ed.). (1990). The student laboratory and the science curriculum. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Herrington, D. G., & Nakhleh, M. B. (2003). What defines effective chemistry laboratory instruction? Teaching assistant and student perspectives. Journal of Chemical Education, 80, 1197–1205. doi: 10.1021/ed080p1197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41, 111–127. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidi, S., Renninger, K. A., & Krapp, A. (2004). Interest, a motivational variable that combines affective and cognitive functioning. In D. D. Dai & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development (pp. 89–115). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (1982). The role of the laboratory in science teaching: Neglected aspects of research. Review of Educational Research, 52, 201–217. doi: 10.3102/00346543052002201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88, 28–54. doi: 10.1002/sce.10106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstein, A., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2007). The laboratory in science education: The state of the art. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8, 105–107. doi: 10.1039/B7RP90003A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnstone, A. H. (1997). Chemistry teaching—Science or alchemy? 1996 Brasted lecture. Journal of Chemical Education, 74, 262–268. doi:10.1021/ed074p262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnstone, A. H., & Al-Shuaili, A. (2001). Learning in the laboratory; some thoughts from the literature. University Chemistry Education, 5, 42–51.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, H. F. (1958). The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 23, 187–200. doi:10.1007/BF02289233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, H. F. (1970). A second generation little jiffy. Psychometrika, 35, 401–416. doi: 10.1007/BF02291817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75–86. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krockover, G., Adams, P., Eichinger, D., Nakhleh, M., & Shepardson, D. (2001). Action-based research teams: Collaborating to improve science instruction. Journal of College Science Teaching, 30, 313–317.
   Google Scholar
• Krockover, G. H., Shepardson, D. P., Adams, P. E., Eichinger, D., & Nakhleh, M. (2002). Reforming and assessing undergraduate science instruction using collaborative action-based research teams. School Science and Mathematics, 102, 266–284. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2002.tb17885.x.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarowitz, R., & Tamir, P. (1994). Research on using laboratory instruction in science. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 94–130). New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. W. Y., Lai, Y. C., Yu, H. T. A., & Lin, Y. T. K. (2012). Impact of biology laboratory courses on students’ science performance and views about laboratory courses in general: Innovative measurements and analyses. Journal of Biological Education, 46, 173–179. doi:10.1080/00219266.2011.634017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McWilliam, E. (2004). W(h)ither practitioner research? The Australian Education Researcher, 31, 113–126. doi: 10.1007/BF03249522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, M. J., & Burgess, A. B. (2003). Inquiry-based laboratory course improves students’ ability to design experiments and interpret data. Advances in Physiology Education, 27, 26–33. doi:10.1152/advan.00028.2002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novak, J. D. (1988). Learning science and the science of learning. Studies in Science Education, 15, 77–101. doi:10.1080/03057268808559949
   Google Scholar
• Osbourne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A view of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1049–1079. doi:10.1080/0950069032000032199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, D. H. (2009). Student interest generated during an inquiry skills lesson. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 147–165. doi:10.1002/tea.20263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering, M. (1988). A physical chemist looks at organic chemistry lab. Journal of Chemical Education, 65(2), 143. doi:10.1021/ed065p143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prince, M. J., & Felder, R. M. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95, 123–138. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00884.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Psillos, D., & Niedderer, H. (Eds.). (2002). Teaching and learning in the science laboratory. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, G., Familiari, M., Blansby, T., Young, J., & Burke da Silva, K. (2012). Assessing first year biology student practical skills: Benchmarking across the landscape. In R. Mortimer (Ed.), 15th international first year in higher education (FYHE) conference. Brisbane: QUT Events.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, N., & Shah, I. (2007). The role of laboratory work in university chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8, 172–185. doi: 10.1039/B5RP90026C
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renninger, K. A., & Hidi, S. (2002). Student interest and achievement: Developmental issues raised by a case study. In A. W. J. S. Eccles (Ed.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 173–195). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, J. W., Thomas, S. M., & O'Toole, P. (2009). Tertiary science education in the 21st century. Sydney: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.
   Google Scholar
• Royal Australian Chemical Institute. (2005). The future of chemistry study: Supply and demand of chemists. Melbourne: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., Puig, A., & Trutschel, B. K. (2011). Laboratory instructional practices inventory: A tool for assessing the transformation of undergraduate laboratory instruction. Journal of College Science Teaching, 41, 25–31.
   Google Scholar
• Secker, C. E. V., & Lissitz, R. W. (1999). Estimating the impact of instructional practices on student achievement in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 1110–1126. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199912)36:10<1110::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Settlage, J. (2007). Demythologizing science teacher education: Conquering the false ideal of open inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18, 461–467. doi:10.1007/s10972-007-9060-9
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, M. D., & McShane, K. (2008). A methodological framework for understanding and describing discipline-based scholarship of teaching in higher education through design-based research. Higher Education Research and Development, 27, 257–270. doi: 10.1080/07294360802183812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, M. D., Mills, D., Mendez, A., & Pollard, J. (2005). Learning outcomes and curriculum development in physics: A report on tertiary physics teaching and learning in Australia. Australian Universities Teaching Committee.
   Google Scholar
• Streveler, R. A., Olds, B. M., Miller, R. L., & Nelson, M. A. (2003). Using a Delphi study to identify the most difficult concepts for students to master in thermal and transport science. Proceedings of the annual conference of the American Society for Engineering Education, Nashville, TN.
   Google Scholar
• Stuckey, M., Hofstein, A., Mamlok-Naaman, R., & Eilks, I. (2013). The meaning of ‘relevance’ in science education and its implications for the science curriculum. Studies in Science Education, 49, 1–34. doi: 10.1080/03057267.2013.802463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuss, P., Frechtling, J., Ewing, T., Westat, I., Sladek, M., & McBride, D. (1998). A report on an evaluation of the National Science Foundation's Instrumentation and Laboratory Improvement Program.
   Google Scholar
• Volkmann, M. J., & Abell, S. K. (2003). Seamless assessment. Science and Children, 40, 41–46.
   Google Scholar
• White, R. T. (1996). The link between the laboratory and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 18, 761–774. doi:10.1080/0950069960180703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy—Value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeung, A., Pyke, S. M., Sharma, M. D., Barrie, S. C., Buntine, M. A., Burke da Silva, K. …, Lim, K. F. (2011). The advancing science by enhancing learning in the laboratory (ASELL) project: The first Australian multidisciplinary workshop. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 19, 51–72.
   Google Scholar