Student Moon Observations and Spatial-Scientific Reasoning

References

• Alias, M., Black, T. R., & Gray, D. E. (2002). Effect of instructions on spatial visualisation ability in civil engineering students. International Education Journal, 3(1), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Anson, C. M. (1988). Toward a multidimensional model of writing in the academic disciplines. In D. A. Joliffe (Ed.), Advances in writing research: Writing in academic disciplines (Vol. 2, pp. 1–33). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Applebee, A. N. (1981). Writing in the secondary school: English and the content areas ( NCTE Research Report No. 21). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
   Google Scholar
• Applebee, A. N. (Ed.) (1984). Contexts for learning to write: Studies of secondary school instruction. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, G. P., Bass, K. M., & Glaser, R. (2000). An analysis of notebook writing in elementary science classrooms. (Center for the Study of Evaluation Report 533). Los Angeles, CA: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
   Google Scholar
• Black, A. (2005). Spatial ability and earth science conceptual understanding. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53(4), 402–414.
   Google Scholar
• Chancer, J., & Rester-Zodrow, G. (1997). Moon journals: Writing, art and inquiry through focused nature study. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Comstock, A. B. (1939). Handbook of nature study (24th ed.). Ithaca, NY: Comstock Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Crosland, M. P. (2004). Historical studies in the language of chemistry. Mineola, NY: Courier Dover Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Doris, E. (1991). Doing what scientists do: Children learn to investigate their world. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Duckworth, E. (1996). The having of wonderful ideas and other essays on teaching and learning. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fulwiler, B. R. (2007). Writing in science. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, F. L., Renn, J., & Rheinberger, H. J. (Eds.). (2003). Reworking the bench: Research notebooks in the history of science (Vol. 7). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, V. A. (1988). Thinking on paper: A philosopher's look at writing. In V. A. Howard (Ed.), Varieties of thinking: Essays from Harvard's philosophy of education research center (pp. 84–92). New York, NY: Routledge, Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, N., Ross, H., Lynam, T., Perez, P., & Leitch, A. (2011). Mental models: an interdisciplinary synthesis of theory and methods. Ecology and Society, 16(1), 46. Retrieved from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss1/art46/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linn, M., & Petersen, A. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56, 1479–1498. doi: 10.2307/1130467
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindell, R., & Olsen, J. P. (2002). Developing the lunar phases concept inventory. In S. Franklin, J. Marx, & K. Cummings (Eds.), Physics education research conference proceedings. New York: PERC Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lord, T. R., & Rupert, J. L. (1995). Visual-spatial aptitude in elementary education majors in science and math tracks. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 7(2), 47–58. doi: 10.1007/BF03173735
   Google Scholar
• McMillan, S., & Wilhelm, J. (2007). Students’ stories: Adolescents constructing multiple literacies through nature journaling. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 50(5), 370–377. doi: 10.1598/JAAL.50.5.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Needham, R., & Hill, P. (1987). Teaching strategies for developing understanding in science. Leeds: University of Leeds.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, G. E. (1983). Learning from writing in two content areas: A case study/protocol analysis (Doctoral diss., Stanford University, 1983). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global (Order No. 8314481).
   Google Scholar
• Newman, D., Morrison, D., & Torzs, F. (1993). The conflict between teaching and scientific sense-making: The case of a curriculum on seasonal change. Interactive Learning Environments, 3, 1–16. doi: 10.1080/1049482930030101
   Google Scholar
• Pirnay-Dummer, P., Ifenthaler, D., & Seel, N. M. (2012). Designing model-based learning environments to support mental models for learning. In D. Jonassen & S. Land (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments (pp. 66–94). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Plummer, J., Wasko, K., & Slagle, C. (2011). Children learning to explain daily celestial motion. International Journal of Science Education, 33(14), 1963–1992. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2010.537707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAS, Inc. (2007). All-possible-regressions selection based on PRESS or other statistics (Version 101) [Computer software]. Cary, NC: SAS, Inc. Retrieved from http://support.sas.com/kb/24/986.html
   Google Scholar
• Tighe, M. A. (1991, March). Teaching composition across the curriculum in southeastern Alabama and in Suffolk County, England. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Conference on College Composition and Communication, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Tweney, R. D. (1991). Faraday's notebooks: The active organization of creative science. Physics Education, 26(5), 301–306. doi: 10.1088/0031-9120/26/5/008
   Google Scholar
• Uttal, D. H., Meadow, N. G., Tipton, E., Hand, L. L., Alden, A. R., Warren, C., & Newcombe, N. S. (2013). The malleability of spatial skills: A meta-analysis of training studies. Psychological Bulletin, 139(2), 352–402. doi: 10.1037/a0028446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117(2), 250–270. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilhelm, J. (2009). Gender differences in lunar-related scientific and mathematical understandings. International Journal of Science Education, 31(15), 2105–2122. doi: 10.1080/09500690802483093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilhelm, J., Jackson, C., Sullivan, A., Wilhelm, R. (2013). Examining differences between preteen groups’ spatial-scientific understandings: A quasi-experimental study. The Journal of Educational Research, 106(5), 337–351. doi: 10.1080/00220671.2012.753858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilhelm, J., Sherrod, S., & Walters, K. (2008). Project-based learning environments: Challenging preservice teachers to act in the moment. The Journal of Educational Research, 101(4), 220–233. doi: 10.3200/JOER.101.4.220-233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilhelm, J., Toland, M., Jackson, C., Cole, M., & Wilhelm, R. (2014, March 30–April 2). How instruction, gender, and race affect students’ spatial-scientific learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, NARST – Pittsburgh, PA.
   Google Scholar